Battlefield 4 on PS4 is pretty shaweet

  • 116 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
#1 Posted by SolidGame_basic (16060 posts) -

dem next gen graphics, looks even better than I expected. 10X better than last gen versions. anyone else very pleased? (aside from the launch problems)

#2 Posted by kinectthedots (1507 posts) -

looks last gen compared to "PC"

#3 Edited by Blabadon (25219 posts) -

I wanna see a direct comparison of new gen Battlefield to last gens in real life.

#4 Posted by silversix_ (13639 posts) -

BF4 on ps4 doesn't look next gen at all actually. Sure there's a big difference between ps4 and last gen but who the F cares how it looks on 8y old systems? of course a console released in 2013 surpasses it. Now if BF4 looked like Infamous and ran a proper 1080p then i'd be very impressed.

#5 Posted by SolidGame_basic (16060 posts) -

BF4 on ps4 doesn't look next gen at all actually. Sure there's a big difference between ps4 and last gen but who the F cares how it looks on 8y old systems? of course a console released in 2013 surpasses it. Now if BF4 looked like Infamous and ran a proper 1080p then i'd be very impressed.

lets see what infamous looks like with 64 player multiplayer

#6 Posted by silversix_ (13639 posts) -

@silversix_ said:

BF4 on ps4 doesn't look next gen at all actually. Sure there's a big difference between ps4 and last gen but who the F cares how it looks on 8y old systems? of course a console released in 2013 surpasses it. Now if BF4 looked like Infamous and ran a proper 1080p then i'd be very impressed.

lets see what infamous looks like with 64 player multiplayer

that's why i said i'd be VERY impressed. infamous is also an open world game and BF4 isn't. Burning fire and particle effects are super low rez in BF4/ps4 while they're stellar in Infamous.

#7 Posted by mems_1224 (45785 posts) -

lol 900p 30fps

#8 Posted by silversix_ (13639 posts) -

lol 900p 30fps

Bish calm yo tits its 60fps

#9 Posted by Jankarcop (8827 posts) -

lmao multiplats on consoles

#10 Posted by mems_1224 (45785 posts) -

@mems_1224 said:

lol 900p 30fps

Bish calm yo tits its 60fps

lol not it isn't. not on ps4.

#11 Posted by freedomfreak (38242 posts) -

lol not it isn't. not on ps4.

It is.

#12 Posted by Cranler (7773 posts) -

@silversix_ said:

@mems_1224 said:

lol 900p 30fps

Bish calm yo tits its 60fps

lol not it isn't. not on ps4.

Find something better to troll about. BF 4 being 60fps on ps4/xone is common knowledge here.

#13 Posted by m3dude1 (828 posts) -

bf4 looks like piss on all platforms, even PC. adding AA to a piss looking game doesnt make it not look like piss.

#14 Posted by Dire_Weasel (15882 posts) -

@silversix_ said:

@mems_1224 said:

lol 900p 30fps

Bish calm yo tits its 60fps

lol not it isn't. not on ps4.

Battlefield is 900p, 60fps on the Playstation 4. It looks pretty good, actually.

#15 Edited by GTSaiyanjin2 (5695 posts) -

BF4 does actually look very good... best way I can describe would be the game has a very clean image, with smooth frame rate. Which is odd considering the game is 900p. I still give the edge to Killzone in the graphics department, but BF4 is the better game.

#16 Posted by m3dude1 (828 posts) -

the very act of shooting people is completely broken and random in bf4 but yep, its the better game.

#17 Posted by mems_1224 (45785 posts) -

@mems_1224 said:

lol not it isn't. not on ps4.

It is.

if it is, my bad. i just remember that digital foundry article saying that both consoles were mostly between 40-50fps.

#18 Posted by silversix_ (13639 posts) -

@silversix_ said:

@mems_1224 said:

lol 900p 30fps

Bish calm yo tits its 60fps

lol not it isn't. not on ps4.

I heard CoD Ghosts is also 30fps but im not sure, would mems_1224 be kind and confirm it for me?

#19 Edited by freedomfreak (38242 posts) -

if it is, my bad. i just remember that digital foundry article saying that both consoles were mostly between 40-50fps.

Could very well be. The singleplayer was a smooth 60. Don't know about the multiplayer.

#20 Posted by GotNugz (638 posts) -

@mems_1224: so how did you get 30? Caught with your pants down.

#21 Posted by mems_1224 (45785 posts) -

@mems_1224 said:

if it is, my bad. i just remember that digital foundry article saying that both consoles were mostly between 40-50fps.

Could very well be. The singleplayer was a smooth 60. Don't know about the multiplayer.

lol well i was talking about multiplayer. only lunatics play battlefield's single player :P

#22 Posted by kingjazziephiz (2371 posts) -

Its good. Not a fan of the new maps though

#23 Posted by Kaze_no_Mirai (10893 posts) -

The game annoyed me when I was trying to complete the single player ( I know, BF games are meant to be multiplayer, but I like completing the campaigns). It crashed on me five or six times while doing it. And it was that annoying glitch that corrupted your save.

The game itself looks ok. I don't think it's anything amazing.

#24 Posted by Vatusus (4229 posts) -

lol 900p 30fps

Its actually 60fps fyi

#25 Posted by Cranler (7773 posts) -

@mems_1224 said:

if it is, my bad. i just remember that digital foundry article saying that both consoles were mostly between 40-50fps.

Could very well be. The singleplayer was a smooth 60. Don't know about the multiplayer.

Mp is 60 also.

#26 Posted by xhawk27 (7082 posts) -

Too bad it never works right.

#27 Edited by m3dude1 (828 posts) -

@Vatusus said:

@mems_1224 said:

lol 900p 30fps

Its actually 60fps fyi

bf4 MP on ps4 is 900p w/ no deferred AA, all settings excluding terrain decoration/effects quality/mesh quality/shadow quality on ultra(the first is custom setting probly close to the low setting on pc, the latter 3 are very near to the high setting on pc). fps avg is 47 to 48 factoring in the more demanding scenarios. other than lack of AA, it looks very similar to the pc version. effects quality on ultra in pc version does provide a solid improvement when looking at vegetation through smoke, but effects quality on ultra is also performance destroyer on even the fastest single gpu money can buy.

#28 Edited by Midnightshade29 (5233 posts) -

looks last gen compared to "PC"

not really. I have bf3 on pc and bf4 on ps4 and they both look great. I actually perfer the new gens battlefields on ps4 more. (Although i loved bf2 on pc back in the day).

#29 Posted by Midnightshade29 (5233 posts) -

The game annoyed me when I was trying to complete the single player ( I know, BF games are meant to be multiplayer, but I like completing the campaigns). It crashed on me five or six times while doing it. And it was that annoying glitch that corrupted your save.

The game itself looks ok. I don't think it's anything amazing.

I didn't get the game until X-mas (got killzone and AC at launch) so all those issues were ironed out and I never had any issue at all with bf4 on ps4.

#30 Posted by Kaze_no_Mirai (10893 posts) -

@Midnightshade29: well you're lucky and I believe you. I've been very unlucky with it. I've tried it as recently as January and still got my file corrupted.

#31 Posted by NFJSupreme (5025 posts) -

It's the best looking console version but I play at 1080p on ultra settings at true 60fps not the average of 40 something that ps4 gets so no I wasn't really impressed. But if all you know are consoles it doesn't matter. You will be amazed and the differences probably won't be that noticeable to you if at all.

#32 Posted by Rage010101 (5470 posts) -

Your OP doesnt even have enough material to make this a decent discussion me thinks. Also, no 900p lol

#33 Edited by NFJSupreme (5025 posts) -

@Cranler: mp does not average anything close to 60fps it's in the 40s throughout. If you want claim "60fps" you gotta average at least 57. Ps4 averages in the 40s from what I saw. Maybe possibly but it really 50 but no where near 60fps. But again most console gamers don't even know the difference. It could be locked at 30fps and most people here wouldn't know if they weren't told. Not because they are blind but because they aren't used to 60fps and don't really know what it feels like.

#34 Posted by Sharp-Shooter89 (112 posts) -

i love how back in BF3 days, console peasants would say LOL barely a difference because they are watching youtube video's, now that they can see a ps4 version compared to a ps3 version in real life they actually see a difference... hmm its almost like youtube compresses video or something... its too bad most peasants have never seen an actual gaming computer with maxed out settings in real life, they just watch video comparisons and say, "barely a noticeable difference" like titanfall LOL

#35 Posted by lostrib (31694 posts) -

i love how back in BF3 days, console peasants would say LOL barely a difference because they are watching youtube video's, now that they can see a ps4 version compared to a ps3 version in real life they actually see a difference... hmm its almost like youtube compresses video or something... its too bad most peasants have never seen an actual gaming computer with maxed out settings in real life, they just watch video comparisons and say, "barely a noticeable difference" like titanfall LOL

herp derp master race

#36 Posted by Cranler (7773 posts) -

@Cranler: mp does not average anything close to 60fps it's in the 40s throughout. If you want claim "60fps" you gotta average at least 57. Ps4 averages in the 40s from what I saw. Maybe possibly but it really 50 but no where near 60fps. But again most console gamers don't even know the difference. It could be locked at 30fps and most people here wouldn't know if they weren't told. Not because they are blind but because they aren't used to 60fps and don't really know what it feels like.

Well you can't get a proper average when the fps is capped. Every pc benchmark is with framerate uncapped.

Watch this vid and you see there are many sections where the fps is at 60 and if the framerate weren't capped then obviously it would exceed 60 fps and end up with an average of about 60. Plus this vid is from around the launch, there may have been performance improvements since then.

#37 Posted by lostrib (31694 posts) -

@Cranler said:

@NFJSupreme said:

@Cranler: mp does not average anything close to 60fps it's in the 40s throughout. If you want claim "60fps" you gotta average at least 57. Ps4 averages in the 40s from what I saw. Maybe possibly but it really 50 but no where near 60fps. But again most console gamers don't even know the difference. It could be locked at 30fps and most people here wouldn't know if they weren't told. Not because they are blind but because they aren't used to 60fps and don't really know what it feels like.

Well you can't get a proper average when the fps is capped. Every pc benchmark is with framerate uncapped.

Watch this vid and you see there are many sections where the fps is at 60 and if the framerate weren't capped then obviously it would exceed 60 fps and end up with an average of about 60. Plus this vid is from around the launch, there may have been performance improvements since then.

...so your average is based on something you can't know

#38 Posted by I_can_haz (6481 posts) -

Yea it looks pretty good especially in Single Player.

#39 Posted by SummerParadise (160 posts) -

PS4 VERSION:

PC VERSION:

#40 Posted by lostrib (31694 posts) -
#41 Edited by I_can_haz (6481 posts) -

@summerparadise said:

PS4 VERSION:

PC VERSION:

MP vs SP?

Are you fucking serious? You do realize the second screen is from BF3 not BF4 right? Something tells me you've never touched BF3 or BF4.

#42 Posted by DA1M0Z (32 posts) -

The PS4 community automatically makes it better than PC.

PC BF4 community is pretty much dead...

#43 Posted by Cranler (7773 posts) -

@lostrib said:

@Cranler said:

@NFJSupreme said:

@Cranler: mp does not average anything close to 60fps it's in the 40s throughout. If you want claim "60fps" you gotta average at least 57. Ps4 averages in the 40s from what I saw. Maybe possibly but it really 50 but no where near 60fps. But again most console gamers don't even know the difference. It could be locked at 30fps and most people here wouldn't know if they weren't told. Not because they are blind but because they aren't used to 60fps and don't really know what it feels like.

Well you can't get a proper average when the fps is capped. Every pc benchmark is with framerate uncapped.

Watch this vid and you see there are many sections where the fps is at 60 and if the framerate weren't capped then obviously it would exceed 60 fps and end up with an average of about 60. Plus this vid is from around the launch, there may have been performance improvements since then.

...so your average is based on something you can't know

You must be new to gaming or never seen or done a benchmark. A 60 fps average will typically consist of a fluctuation from roughly 40-80 fps.

You really think an uncapped framerate would have as small a fluctuation as 60-44? Link some benches to prove it.

See here for an example of how the fps fluctuates http://www.bf4blog.com/battlefield-4-retail-gpu-cpu-benchmarks/

#44 Edited by Cranler (7773 posts) -

@DA1M0Z said:

The PS4 community automatically makes it better than PC.

PC BF4 community is pretty much dead...

Lol there's 23,000 people playing pc version right now. http://bf4stats.com/

#45 Edited by PAL360 (26575 posts) -

It's one of the best looking 8th gen games, so far! Also the jump to 60fps and 64 players was very welcomed.

#46 Posted by ReadingRainbow4 (12832 posts) -
#47 Posted by ShoTTyMcNaDeS (1876 posts) -

BF4 is a great looking game on PS4 for sure. The problem with it is that it is not noob friendly! Anyone who starts playing now better just accept getting turned inside out for about 30 levels. You start with crap guns and crap gear in this game. You have no chance against a guy that has had the game since launch. BF4 is far too gear dependant!!

#48 Posted by stationplay_4 (442 posts) -

it looked so good that it gave me ptsd.

#49 Posted by WallofTruth (1087 posts) -

looks last gen compared to "PC"

No it doesn't, the PC version looks a bit better but not by much.

#50 Edited by WallofTruth (1087 posts) -

@DA1M0Z said:

The PS4 community automatically makes it better than PC.

PC BF4 community is pretty much dead...

Cool, a new alt, ban dodging much? and right now 30428 players are online on the PC version, more than on Xbox One, Xbox 360 and PS3 and only a 3k players less than the PS4 version, wow, dat dead PC version.