B..b..but 60 FPS doesn't matter! - Halo MC Collection

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for ghostwarrior786
ghostwarrior786

5811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 ghostwarrior786
Member since 2005 • 5811 Posts

i really cant tell the difference between 30/60fps even when playing a game, halo reach feels just as smooth as titanfall on x1 to me. personally dont give a shit about 60fps

Avatar image for b4x
B4X

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#52  Edited By B4X
Member since 2014 • 5660 Posts

@ghostwarrior786 said:

i really cant tell the difference between 30/60fps even when playing a game, halo reach feels just as smooth as titanfall on x1 to me. personally dont give a shit about 60fps

Great prediction and net code. Can go a long way.

How are you enjoying the X1... Did they sort your problem out?

Avatar image for deadline-zero0
DEadliNE-Zero0

6607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#53  Edited By DEadliNE-Zero0
Member since 2014 • 6607 Posts

@ghostwarrior786 said:

i really cant tell the difference between 30/60fps even when playing a game, halo reach feels just as smooth as titanfall on x1 to me. personally dont give a shit about 60fps

Nice joke m8

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54  Edited By silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts

@b4x said:

@silversix_ said:

@Motokid6 said:

@silversix_: Because I really, really enjoyed it and I'd like to play it again. The new graphics are just a cherry on top. Can't wait... MCC is my system seller.

In other words you're spending whatever this costs for NOSTALGIA purposes only.

I was going to give up vag.. due to nostalgia I couldn't bring myself to do it.

it couldn't be nostalgic because you weren't seeing any at young age so your point is irrelevant as always

Avatar image for ghostwarrior786
ghostwarrior786

5811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#55 ghostwarrior786
Member since 2005 • 5811 Posts

@b4x said:

@ghostwarrior786 said:

i really cant tell the difference between 30/60fps even when playing a game, halo reach feels just as smooth as titanfall on x1 to me. personally dont give a shit about 60fps

Great prediction and net code. Can go a long way.

How are you enjoying the X1... Did they sort your problem out?

honestly not had that much spare time yet because im applying for jobs and stuff but i bought titanfall and enjoying that. bf4 is complete and utter shit, nfs rivals is ok i guess. i rang up ms cs and they recommended i power cycle the console and that sorted the problem out

@deadline-zero0 said:

@ghostwarrior786 said:

i really cant tell the difference between 30/60fps even when playing a game, halo reach feels just as smooth as titanfall on x1 to me. personally dont give a shit about 60fps

Nice joke m8

#no jokes

Avatar image for b4x
B4X

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#56  Edited By B4X
Member since 2014 • 5660 Posts

@silversix_ said:

@b4x said:

@silversix_ said:

@Motokid6 said:

@silversix_: Because I really, really enjoyed it and I'd like to play it again. The new graphics are just a cherry on top. Can't wait... MCC is my system seller.

In other words you're spending whatever this costs for NOSTALGIA purposes only.

I was going to give up vag.. due to nostalgia I couldn't bring myself to do it.

it couldn't be nostalgic because you weren't seeing any at young age so your point is irrelevant as always

I'm 42.... I was seeing it at a young age my friend... :p

Why do you think old guys buy antique cars they had as a young man... and fix them up?

Why do people listen to old music?

Why do people watch old movies?

Think about the point you're trying to make. Just saying.

I do enjoy blanket statements. Continue.

Avatar image for StormyJoe
StormyJoe

7806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 StormyJoe
Member since 2011 • 7806 Posts

@Wasdie: I think it matters in FPS and in racing games. RPGs? Not so much.

Avatar image for StormyJoe
StormyJoe

7806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 StormyJoe
Member since 2011 • 7806 Posts

@silversix_ said:

@Motokid6 said:

@silversix_: Because I really, really enjoyed it and I'd like to play it again. The new graphics are just a cherry on top. Can't wait... MCC is my system seller.

In other words you're spending whatever this costs for NOSTALGIA purposes only.

Halo games are awesome. All of them in this collection are AAA. Don't be a hater.

Avatar image for b4x
B4X

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#59  Edited By B4X
Member since 2014 • 5660 Posts

@ghostwarrior786:

No FH2? Yeah the hard reset and power cable go a long way. I do mine every 3-4 days. Also don't leave all the apps running.

WTF would they not give a setting to QUIT an app when you close it, I have zero clue.... I know why.... for speed, but they should give an option in the settings for every app to either Keep Open or Quit on exit .. The way it's set up now is dumb.

Avatar image for donalbane
donalbane

16383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#60 donalbane
Member since 2003 • 16383 Posts

@mikhail said:

How can anyone see the game if it's above 30 fps? Everyone knows the human eye is designed for 24-30 cinematic fps.

0/10, would not buy.

You feel it. It's a more responsive feedback loop.

Avatar image for deadline-zero0
DEadliNE-Zero0

6607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#61  Edited By DEadliNE-Zero0
Member since 2014 • 6607 Posts

@ghostwarrior786 said:
@deadline-zero0 said:

@ghostwarrior786 said:

i really cant tell the difference between 30/60fps even when playing a game, halo reach feels just as smooth as titanfall on x1 to me. personally dont give a shit about 60fps

Nice joke m8

#no jokes

You honestly can't tell the difference between 30 and 60? Even after watching the IGN video? Nice joke m8

Avatar image for ghostwarrior786
ghostwarrior786

5811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#62 ghostwarrior786
Member since 2005 • 5811 Posts

@b4x said:

@ghostwarrior786:

No FH2? Yeah the hard reset and power cable go a long way. I do mine every 3-4 days. Also don't leave all the apps running.

WTF would they not give a setting to QUIT an app when you close it, I have zero clue.... I know why for speed, but they should give an option in the setting for every app to either Keep open or quit on exit .. The way it's set up now is dumb.

gona get fh2 later when i have more time on my hands.

Avatar image for ghostwarrior786
ghostwarrior786

5811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 ghostwarrior786
Member since 2005 • 5811 Posts

@deadline-zero0 said:

@ghostwarrior786 said:
@deadline-zero0 said:

@ghostwarrior786 said:

i really cant tell the difference between 30/60fps even when playing a game, halo reach feels just as smooth as titanfall on x1 to me. personally dont give a shit about 60fps

Nice joke m8

#no jokes

You honestly can't tell the difference between 30 and 60? Even after watching the IGN video? Nice joke m8

ign player is so crap even people who can tell a difference wouldnt be able to. and no im not joking, if i increase the cursor sensitivity in halo reach to maximum it feels fast and fluid like titanfall/team fortress, i cant tell the difference at all

Avatar image for b4x
B4X

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#64  Edited By B4X
Member since 2014 • 5660 Posts

@ghostwarrior786 said:

@deadline-zero0 said:

@ghostwarrior786 said:
@deadline-zero0 said:

@ghostwarrior786 said:

i really cant tell the difference between 30/60fps even when playing a game, halo reach feels just as smooth as titanfall on x1 to me. personally dont give a shit about 60fps

Nice joke m8

#no jokes

You honestly can't tell the difference between 30 and 60? Even after watching the IGN video? Nice joke m8

ign player is so crap even people who can tell a difference wouldnt be able to. and no im not joking, if i increase the cursor sensitivity in halo reach to maximum it feels fast and fluid like titanfall/team fortress, i cant tell the difference at all

Wouldn't you have to play it at 60 fps also to make that call :P

I bought FH2... All the other games I'm waiting on the buy 2 get 1 free sales. We have in America every year.

Avatar image for CrownKingArthur
CrownKingArthur

5262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 CrownKingArthur
Member since 2013 • 5262 Posts
@ghostwarrior786 said:

im not joking

Avatar image for draign
Draign

1824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#66 Draign
Member since 2013 • 1824 Posts

@silversix_ said:

@b4x said:

@silversix_ said:

@Motokid6 said:

@silversix_: Because I really, really enjoyed it and I'd like to play it again. The new graphics are just a cherry on top. Can't wait... MCC is my system seller.

In other words you're spending whatever this costs for NOSTALGIA purposes only.

I was going to give up vag.. due to nostalgia I couldn't bring myself to do it.

it couldn't be nostalgic because you weren't seeing any at young age so your point is irrelevant as always

I didnt play Halo 4. Im glad I didnt so I can enjoy this collection with no hesitation. Sucks that you have nothing to be excited about.

Avatar image for bldgirsh
BldgIrsh

3044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 5

#67 BldgIrsh
Member since 2014 • 3044 Posts

@CrownKingArthur: Oh god my sides!!!! Hahaha.

Avatar image for softwaregeek
SoftwareGeek

573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#69 SoftwareGeek
Member since 2014 • 573 Posts

Halo is the best series of games of all time. That is all.

Avatar image for Ross_the_Boss6
Ross_the_Boss6

4056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70  Edited By Ross_the_Boss6
Member since 2009 • 4056 Posts

It's too bad the CE multiplayer didn't get the same treatment the campaign did. Still looks nice though.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#71  Edited By delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

@silversix_ said:

Other than Halo 2's multiplayer i can't believe people are exited to play what they've played hundreds of times before.

theres a ton of people in this very thread alone that are really stoked to play this.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#72 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
@Suppaman100 said:

Well...can't polish a turd.

Halo was and is nothing more than a mediocre bro shooter.

oh look , a cow damage controlling in a Halo thread, theres a suprise*rolls eyes*

i am so Glad the Majority of the gaming world disagrees with you.

Cows always seem to have a meltdown over Halo, tis funny to watch.

Halo, AAA franchise that sells a Ton more than anything exclusive to the playstation.

Avatar image for WitIsWisdom
WitIsWisdom

9530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#73 WitIsWisdom
Member since 2007 • 9530 Posts

Frame rates on shooters does matter. For those who only play occasionally they would not notice, but for people like me that can detect an ounce of lag or slow down... it makes all the difference in the world. Funny how I am not a hermit since that matters to me... the reason is mostly because where I live the internet speed is too slow to make a difference, and lag sinks it's ugly fangs in regardless. I have always predominantly been a console gamer, but I do play on every console and PC. If I ever get a killer internet speed things like this will be MUCH more important to me. 60 fps should be what consoles strive for on shooters... gameplay over a thin layer of shine. I will likely buy this. Hopefully by the time I either move to an area with higher speeds, or they bring higher speeds to my area 60fps will be the industry standard. If not, then I will be stuck between a rock and a hard place, because I want to play on my big screen and with a controller without being at a disadvantage. I guess you can't have your cake and eat it too.. :(

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#74 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

@delta3074: well you know many ere hate it when you like something they don't. The funny thing is you would think they would be the low level trolls that do it. However, it's usually the people who have been here as long as you or me.

Avatar image for Alucard_Prime
Alucard_Prime

10107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#75 Alucard_Prime
Member since 2008 • 10107 Posts

Of course it matters but this is just a case of some incredible games becoming even better and more polished. They were amazing then, and various improvements will make them amazing again today. But when they were first released, the fact that they were not running at 60 fps was certainly not a deal breaker then, I think that's what's a lot of people refer to when they downplay the 60 fps thing..yes it is important, but lets not lose interest in a game just because of it.

Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#76 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

@Wasdie said:

IGN just posted a first look at Halo Combat Anniversary in the Halo Master Chief collection on the Xbox One at 1080p60. As a fan of Halo who has probably played the game over 20 times through, this footage makes me extremely excited.

This is what Halo CE looks like with the Combat Anniversary HD graphics upgrade and at 1080p60.

Those who have played Halo for years can instantly see how much more fluid the combat is and how much better the game looks to play overall. It makes such a difference in the feel of a game. Action feels quicker, aiming is easier and more precise, and the whole game feels even more polished than ever.

The jump to 1080p60 for the Halo series is huge and extremely appreciated. Too bad they couldn't get Halo 2 Combat Anniversary at 1080p60 and had to settle for sub 1080 to keep that 60fps. Oh well, Halo 1, 3, and 4 are all 1080p60.

The only reason Halo 2 Anniversary is sub 1080P is because they kept the switch from the older Xbox 360 graphics to the new HD graphics. If they had removed that switch, they could have easily ran it at the regular native 1080P. So it wasn't that they couldn't do it, they chosed not to so that feature could be there for all 4 games.

Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#77 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts
@Suppaman100 said:
Well...can't polish a turd.

Halo was and is nothing more than a mediocre bro shooter.

Weird, Metacritic says you're the turd. lol!!

http://www.metacritic.com/search/all/Halo/results

Avatar image for jsmoke03
jsmoke03

13717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#78 jsmoke03
Member since 2004 • 13717 Posts

i thought this wasnt going to run in 1080p?

Avatar image for Bruin1986
Bruin1986

1629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Bruin1986
Member since 2007 • 1629 Posts

@Suppaman100 said:

Well...can't polish a turd.

Halo was and is nothing more than a mediocre bro shooter.

As opposed to sophisticated, aficionado videogames.

Halo 2 is one of the best competitive FPS games in history, other than Quake and CS.

If your sense of self-worth is derived from the perceived "complexity and nuance" of videogames...you've got bigger issues.

Avatar image for Bruin1986
Bruin1986

1629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 Bruin1986
Member since 2007 • 1629 Posts

@silversix_ said:

@Motokid6 said:

@silversix_: Because I really, really enjoyed it and I'd like to play it again. The new graphics are just a cherry on top. Can't wait... MCC is my system seller.

In other words you're spending whatever this costs for NOSTALGIA purposes only.

It's not "nostalgia" if it is better than anything that has released in the subsequent decade...

What "advancement" in the FPS genre has improved on Halo's winning formula since then?

Sprint? Perks? Load-outs?

All have served only to decrease skill cap and competitive advantage of skilled players.

Avatar image for noahproa
NoahProa

70

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#81 NoahProa
Member since 2014 • 70 Posts

@mems_1224 said:

man that looks sexy. the old graphics hold up surprisingly well.

Fanboy still posting

Avatar image for cantloginnow
cantloginnow

381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#82  Edited By cantloginnow
Member since 2013 • 381 Posts

Well,while everyone bitches about fps and resolution Im just gonna say I cant wait for the MCC.Its my favorite franchise and Halo CE is the greatest game Ive played.Bungie was great with all the games but come on 343,do what Bungie couldnt and bring me back to installation 04.

Avatar image for SuddenlyTragic
SuddenlyTragic

976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 SuddenlyTragic
Member since 2005 • 976 Posts

@silversix_ said:

@Motokid6 said:

@silversix_: Because I really, really enjoyed it and I'd like to play it again. The new graphics are just a cherry on top. Can't wait... MCC is my system seller.

In other words you're spending whatever this costs for NOSTALGIA purposes only.

Absolutely can't wait for that nostalgia. People like nostalgia, why are you considering that negative? Four of the best first person shooters EVER in their entirety, redone with better graphics in 60FPS at 1080p. Uhhh what sounds bad about that?

Avatar image for b4x
B4X

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#84 B4X
Member since 2014 • 5660 Posts

Halo MCC 400 achievements 4000 points.

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#85 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

@deadline-zero0 said:

@ghostwarrior786 said:
@deadline-zero0 said:

@ghostwarrior786 said:

i really cant tell the difference between 30/60fps even when playing a game, halo reach feels just as smooth as titanfall on x1 to me. personally dont give a shit about 60fps

Nice joke m8

#no jokes

You honestly can't tell the difference between 30 and 60? Even after watching the IGN video? Nice joke m8

seriously, 30fps in certain genres might as well give me a seizure

https://gfycat.com/FeistyWavyAcaciara

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

Lag affects play more.

Avatar image for timster20
timster20

399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#87 timster20
Member since 2014 • 399 Posts

@Bruin1986 said:

@silversix_ said:

@Motokid6 said:

@silversix_: Because I really, really enjoyed it and I'd like to play it again. The new graphics are just a cherry on top. Can't wait... MCC is my system seller.

In other words you're spending whatever this costs for NOSTALGIA purposes only.

It's not "nostalgia" if it is better than anything that has released in the subsequent decade...

What "advancement" in the FPS genre has improved on Halo's winning formula since then?

Sprint? Perks? Load-outs?

All have served only to decrease skill cap and competitive advantage of skilled players.

Sprint, perks and loadouts decrease skill cap? How?

Avatar image for RVCA823
RVCA823

2839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#88  Edited By RVCA823
Member since 2006 • 2839 Posts

I might buy an Xbox One just for this collection. Halo 2 multiplayer is unmatched on consoles.

Avatar image for Gaming-Planet
Gaming-Planet

21064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#89 Gaming-Planet
Member since 2008 • 21064 Posts

If only it was on PC.

I hate the feeling of the Xbox One controller.

Avatar image for Bruin1986
Bruin1986

1629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Bruin1986
Member since 2007 • 1629 Posts

@timster20 said:

@Bruin1986 said:

@silversix_ said:

@Motokid6 said:

@silversix_: Because I really, really enjoyed it and I'd like to play it again. The new graphics are just a cherry on top. Can't wait... MCC is my system seller.

In other words you're spending whatever this costs for NOSTALGIA purposes only.

It's not "nostalgia" if it is better than anything that has released in the subsequent decade...

What "advancement" in the FPS genre has improved on Halo's winning formula since then?

Sprint? Perks? Load-outs?

All have served only to decrease skill cap and competitive advantage of skilled players.

Sprint, perks and loadouts decrease skill cap? How?

Any competitive FPS gamer from the 90s or early 2000s will tell you the same thing.

Competitive gameplay is at its best when the primary deciding factor on who wins an engagement is player skill (positioning, map knowledge, weapon control, and technical skill, ie aiming and character movement)

Sprint makes it a very viable option for a player who is losing an engagement to simply run away, hide, wait for his recharging health (another bad addition), and then come back to try to win the next engagement. Bad. You want the best option to be for the player to try to actually win the firefight with superior aiming, movement, etc.

Perks frankly shouldn't need explanation. If I die because I got shot by a bloody AC-130 gunship which I have almost 0 chance of harming or fighting back against...that simply destroys competitive gaming. Every kill should be because I was "out skilled" by the other player. Not because some other player got lucky with a few consecutive kills and then is rewarded with an automatic "I win" unlock for the next 15 seconds.

Load-outs differentiate players base abilities. Bad. It works fairly well in large, strategic games like Battlefield, but these aren't skill based arena shooters. A fundamental pillar of competitive FPSs is that every player is exactly the same at spawn. The only difference between players is skill. Part of this skill is knowledge of the map and where strategic areas/power weapons spawn. I should die because the other player fought that last engagement better than I did. Not because he spawned with a weapon that is far more effective at the range we happened to first engage in a firefight at (I spawned with a sub-machine gun and he spawned with a scoped assault rifle).

This attempt to reduce the skill cap has been prevalent across all genres of games, especially large budget titles, for the past decade. Developers want their titles to be "accessible", meaning they don't intimidate any potential buyers in hopes of increasing sales. The FPS genre is just one in which this shift has been exceedingly obvious. Unreal Tournament 2004 to UT III is one egregious example.

Avatar image for timster20
timster20

399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#91  Edited By timster20
Member since 2014 • 399 Posts

@Bruin1986 said:

@timster20 said:

@Bruin1986 said:

It's not "nostalgia" if it is better than anything that has released in the subsequent decade...

What "advancement" in the FPS genre has improved on Halo's winning formula since then?

Sprint? Perks? Load-outs?

All have served only to decrease skill cap and competitive advantage of skilled players.

Sprint, perks and loadouts decrease skill cap? How?

Any competitive FPS gamer from the 90s or early 2000s will tell you the same thing.

Competitive gameplay is at its best when the primary deciding factor on who wins an engagement is player skill (positioning, map knowledge, weapon control, and technical skill, ie aiming and character movement)

Sprint makes it a very viable option for a player who is losing an engagement to simply run away, hide, wait for his recharging health (another bad addition), and then come back to try to win the next engagement. Bad. You want the best option to be for the player to try to actually win the firefight with superior aiming, movement, etc.

Perks frankly shouldn't need explanation. If I die because I got shot by a bloody AC-130 gunship which I have almost 0 chance of harming or fighting back against...that simply destroys competitive gaming. Every kill should be because I was "out skilled" by the other player. Not because some other player got lucky with a few consecutive kills and then is rewarded with an automatic "I win" unlock for the next 15 seconds.

Load-outs differentiate players base abilities. Bad. It works fairly well in large, strategic games like Battlefield, but these aren't skill based arena shooters. A fundamental pillar of competitive FPSs is that every player is exactly the same at spawn. The only difference between players is skill. Part of this skill is knowledge of the map and where strategic areas/power weapons spawn. I should die because the other player fought that last engagement better than I did. Not because he spawned with a weapon that is far more effective at the range we happened to first engage in a firefight at (I spawned with a sub-machine gun and he spawned with a scoped assault rifle).

This attempt to reduce the skill cap has been prevalent across all genres of games, especially large budget titles, for the past decade. Developers want their titles to be "accessible", meaning they don't intimidate any potential buyers in hopes of increasing sales. The FPS genre is just one in which this shift has been exceedingly obvious. Unreal Tournament 2004 to UT III is one egregious example.

Both players can sprint though. You're speaking as if only the losing player has sprinting ability.

AC 130 is a killstreak, not a perk and players don't just randomly get access to it. You need to play very well to get it, I think it's either 9 or 11 kills without dying to get it. It's a power up that's not all that different from quad damage in Quake.

Load outs are the one thing that is noob friendly but I wouldn't use your scenario. What if in Quake I spawn near the shotgun, enemy spawns near the railgun and we spot each other from afar? Not much different from your loadouts are bad scenario. Load outs make a game easier because it allows the player to spawn with their fav weapon and they don't have to learn how to use any other weapon to do well. Map knowledge is still very important even in games with loadouts though.

Now that Quake Live has loadouts you never have to bother with those weapons you had the most trouble with, although in ffa I still see the same players winning just like they used to.

UT 3 was an attempt to get back to UT's roots. There was a huge outcry when UT2k3 came out with it's jump dodging, wall running and focus on hitscan.

Avatar image for sukraj
sukraj

27859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#92 sukraj
Member since 2008 • 27859 Posts

I don't care if its running at 30fps or 60fps I'm still getting the collection.

Avatar image for GrenadeLauncher
GrenadeLauncher

6843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 GrenadeLauncher
Member since 2004 • 6843 Posts

Should bloody well hope it's 60fps considering it's a series of ports.

Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd

12449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94  Edited By deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
Member since 2012 • 12449 Posts

60 FPS and 1080p is soooooo last decade. silly peasants not having 1440p at 144fps.

On a more serious note... I don't miss Halo at all... that slow gunplay.... easy reticule sizes... and slow overall movement... amplified in 60 FPS just reminds me how "Baby's first arena shooter" Halo actually was.

Avatar image for SecretPolice
SecretPolice

44025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 SecretPolice
Member since 2007 • 44025 Posts

@jsmoke03 said:

i thought this wasnt going to run in 1080p?

That's only Halo 2 b/c it's running duel engines simultaneously so you can switch back & forth on the fly from original Xbox version to this new remade HD version plus there's some destructible environments now that can be used to damage the enemies. The new Halo 2 is what I'm looking forward to the most in MCC... .. by far.

Avatar image for Lionheart08
Lionheart08

15814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#98  Edited By Lionheart08
Member since 2005 • 15814 Posts

Nice. Wish Reach was included as well though.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#99  Edited By Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

@Lionheart08 said:

Nice. Wish Reach was included as well though.

I hope they do both ODST and Reach as expansion packs or DLC or a separate release.

Avatar image for Bruin1986
Bruin1986

1629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 Bruin1986
Member since 2007 • 1629 Posts

@timster20 said:

@Bruin1986 said:

@timster20 said:

@Bruin1986 said:

It's not "nostalgia" if it is better than anything that has released in the subsequent decade...

What "advancement" in the FPS genre has improved on Halo's winning formula since then?

Sprint? Perks? Load-outs?

All have served only to decrease skill cap and competitive advantage of skilled players.

Sprint, perks and loadouts decrease skill cap? How?

Any competitive FPS gamer from the 90s or early 2000s will tell you the same thing.

Competitive gameplay is at its best when the primary deciding factor on who wins an engagement is player skill (positioning, map knowledge, weapon control, and technical skill, ie aiming and character movement)

Sprint makes it a very viable option for a player who is losing an engagement to simply run away, hide, wait for his recharging health (another bad addition), and then come back to try to win the next engagement. Bad. You want the best option to be for the player to try to actually win the firefight with superior aiming, movement, etc.

Perks frankly shouldn't need explanation. If I die because I got shot by a bloody AC-130 gunship which I have almost 0 chance of harming or fighting back against...that simply destroys competitive gaming. Every kill should be because I was "out skilled" by the other player. Not because some other player got lucky with a few consecutive kills and then is rewarded with an automatic "I win" unlock for the next 15 seconds.

Load-outs differentiate players base abilities. Bad. It works fairly well in large, strategic games like Battlefield, but these aren't skill based arena shooters. A fundamental pillar of competitive FPSs is that every player is exactly the same at spawn. The only difference between players is skill. Part of this skill is knowledge of the map and where strategic areas/power weapons spawn. I should die because the other player fought that last engagement better than I did. Not because he spawned with a weapon that is far more effective at the range we happened to first engage in a firefight at (I spawned with a sub-machine gun and he spawned with a scoped assault rifle).

This attempt to reduce the skill cap has been prevalent across all genres of games, especially large budget titles, for the past decade. Developers want their titles to be "accessible", meaning they don't intimidate any potential buyers in hopes of increasing sales. The FPS genre is just one in which this shift has been exceedingly obvious. Unreal Tournament 2004 to UT III is one egregious example.

Both players can sprint though. You're speaking as if only the losing player has sprinting ability.

AC 130 is a killstreak, not a perk and players don't just randomly get access to it. You need to play very well to get it, I think it's either 9 or 11 kills without dying to get it. It's a power up that's not all that different from quad damage in Quake.

Load outs are the one thing that is noob friendly but I wouldn't use your scenario. What if in Quake I spawn near the shotgun, enemy spawns near the railgun and we spot each other from afar? Not much different from your loadouts are bad scenario. Load outs make a game easier because it allows the player to spawn with their fav weapon and they don't have to learn how to use any other weapon to do well. Map knowledge is still very important even in games with loadouts though.

Now that Quake Live has loadouts you never have to bother with those weapons you had the most trouble with, although in ffa I still see the same players winning just like they used to.

UT 3 was an attempt to get back to UT's roots. There was a huge outcry when UT2k3 came out with it's jump dodging, wall running and focus on hitscan.

Yes, and in medium to long range engagements, by the time the attacker has managed to sprint behind the cover that the fleeing person hid behind, his/her health and managed to regenerate half-way (or completely), thus negating the advantage initially given to the attacker for getting "the jump" on the other player and winning the initial engagement.

I guess killstreaks would be a better term, my apologies. I just checked out some of these killstreaks for the newest "hot" fps Call of Duty: Ghosts. At 5 kills, you get a guard dog that automatically attacks people for you. At 7 kills, you get a "Trinity Rocket" missile I win button. At 9 kills, you get a bloody Hind helicopter that automatically attacks all enemies.

NONE of these help to create a game conducive to skill based, competitive FPS games. In Halo 2, the "killstreak" you got for killing 10 enemies in a row was...the ability to position yourself in a strategically advantageous location and the ability to set up control, with your teammates, of areas in which power weapons spawn.

Developers has systematically made games with lower skill caps in order to appeal to larger audiences. Since development costs have skyrocketed, this is a logical step for them. Hell, even Gamespot, hardly a "hardcore" gaming forum, has been complaining about this for years. The FPS genre is just one of the most noticeable.