This topic is locked from further discussion.
pc gamers do u like this more than baldurs gate an dragon age inquisition? hows it measuring up?
Better than Baldur's Gate 1, less interesting than Baldur's Gate 2 (primarily due to characters), and significantly superior than Dragon Age Inquisition from a RPG perspective.
Is the cosplay thing this guy's schtick now? I don't watch his videos often (didn't watch this one) or rather hardly ever; think i watched 2 many years ago and both were like almost an hour and he said everything he needed to in like 5 mins and spent the rest of the time repeating shit mostly and occasionally wearing crappy costumes. I do recall some anger here and there... why is he mad?
The guy bought an Alienware
And complains about spending $300 on a Wii U.
I thought his Wii U was donated to him by a fan. Or maybe I'm mistaken.
I thought his Wii U was donated to him by a fan. Or maybe I'm mistaken.
In his last Nintendo rant video he bitched about spending "nearly $1000" on Nintendo stuff... and only because he doesn't want to share his revenue stream with the copyright holder who is taking the time to enforce their copyright.
I thought his Wii U was donated to him by a fan. Or maybe I'm mistaken.
In his last Nintendo rant video he bitched about spending "nearly $1000" on Nintendo stuff... and only because he doesn't want to share his revenue stream with the copyright holder who is taking the time to enforce their copyright.
Huh... I find it interesting because, apparently in his first video he talks about how some fans donated money for him to get one and then in his second video he makes it sound like he bought it with his own money or something. :P
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=18&v=koX-Ny6zHdM First minute he mentions the donations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cz09W2Z6OOU And around the 1:50 mark he mentions buying the console.
Though I may not agree with him all the time, I can't deny his reviews are somewhat entertaining and at times, informative, though SW usually keeps me up to date and he usually restates what I hear here mostly.
I thought his Wii U was donated to him by a fan. Or maybe I'm mistaken.
In his last Nintendo rant video he bitched about spending "nearly $1000" on Nintendo stuff... and only because he doesn't want to share his revenue stream with the copyright holder who is taking the time to enforce their copyright.
Huh... I find it interesting because, apparently in his first video he talks about how some fans donated money for him to get one and then in his second video he makes it sound like he bought it with his own money or something. :P
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=18&v=koX-Ny6zHdM First minute he mentions the donations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cz09W2Z6OOU And around the 1:50 mark he mentions buying the console.
Though I may not agree with him all the time, I can't deny his reviews are somewhat entertaining and at times, informative, though SW usually keeps me up to date and he usually restates what I hear here mostly.
LOL so that son of a bitch didn't even buy it, his fans paid for it and he has the nerve to act like it was money out of his pocket, what a piece of crap...
I thought his Wii U was donated to him by a fan. Or maybe I'm mistaken.
In his last Nintendo rant video he bitched about spending "nearly $1000" on Nintendo stuff... and only because he doesn't want to share his revenue stream with the copyright holder who is taking the time to enforce their copyright.
Fair use. Reviewers, even ones on this site, do the exact same thing and there has never been a problem until Nintendo starts taking these down. Also, lets not forget the advertising that this would bring for Nintendo (you know that thing they almost never do for their games?). Its really just them being overzealous. The only times they should jump on these people is when they upload ROMs or things like the tech demo with ripped assets they recently C&Ded.
For the less inclined.....the purpose of his rant regarding the money spent on the system, accessories and games....was the fact that he showed interest and support for Nintendo and when he tried to share his fun times.....Nintendo said "**** you".
I'm not surprised Nintendo fanboys are on his case....if this were EA or Ubisoft....it would be a different story.
Do I think he should have known beforehand that it would be taken down? Yes.
Do I think he has a point? Yes.
I'm not sure why it's so difficult to see that.
Fair use. Reviewers, even ones on this site, do the exact same thing and there has never been a problem until Nintendo starts taking these down. Also, lets not forget the advertising that this would bring for Nintendo (you know that thing they almost never do for their games?). Its really just them being overzealous. The only times they should jump on these people is when they upload ROMs or things like the tech demo with ripped assets they recently C&Ded.
Who gives a ****? It's Nintendo's choice to enforce their copyright and fair use doesn't cover playing an entire way through a game.
Plenty of other Youtubers share their revenue with Nintendo as they requested, and they don't get DMCA'd.
Fair use. Reviewers, even ones on this site, do the exact same thing and there has never been a problem until Nintendo starts taking these down. Also, lets not forget the advertising that this would bring for Nintendo (you know that thing they almost never do for their games?). Its really just them being overzealous. The only times they should jump on these people is when they upload ROMs or things like the tech demo with ripped assets they recently C&Ded.
Who gives a ****? It's Nintendo's choice to
Sounds like those idiots who used to defend EA's scumbag moves.
Oh look at your avatar, ugh. Nintendo Drones.
Stopped the review when he said there was a lot of reading.
I wish I enjoyed reading in games, but I just don't. Too bad...this game looked pretty good.
Fair use. Reviewers, even ones on this site, do the exact same thing and there has never been a problem until Nintendo starts taking these down. Also, lets not forget the advertising that this would bring for Nintendo (you know that thing they almost never do for their games?). Its really just them being overzealous. The only times they should jump on these people is when they upload ROMs or things like the tech demo with ripped assets they recently C&Ded.
Who gives a ****? It's Nintendo's choice to enforce their copyright and fair use doesn't cover playing an entire way through a game.
Plenty of other Youtubers share their revenue with Nintendo as they requested, and they don't get DMCA'd.
I do, otherwise I wouldn't be posting. Why does it matter if they play through the game? Watching someone play 3D World isn't going to stop them from buying it, because you know people buy Nintendo games for gameplay? In fact it is going to have the opposite effect, they are going to see stuff like Shadow-Play Alley and want to try it out for themselves. That advertising will moves units for them, something they don't seem to understand. THAT is their cut.
This program Nintendo has on youtube is a fucking joke. The split is bigger then most partners take with Youtube personalities. If they do both, then they get an even smaller split, making it harder for them to survive on as a full time job. If you feel that Nintendo is entitled to that, lets ignore that then. All videos have to be approved by them and have a 3 day wait. Think about that for a second. You are never going to get videos up the day of release or when the embargo goes up, where the biggest revenue for some content creators come from, because of that screening process. And if the Youtuber decides to post a negative review, what is to stop Nintendo from simply censoring it?
I do, otherwise I wouldn't be posting. Why does it matter if they play through the game? Watching someone play 3D World isn't going to stop them from buying it, because you know people buy Nintendo games for gameplay? In fact it is going to have the opposite effect, they are going to see stuff like Shadow-Play Alley and want to try it out for themselves. That advertising will moves units for them, something they don't seem to understand. THAT is their cut.
This program Nintendo has on youtube is a fucking joke. The split is bigger then most partners take with Youtube personalities. If they do both, then they get an even smaller split, making it harder for them to survive on as a full time job. If you feel that Nintendo is entitled to that, lets ignore that then. All videos have to be approved by them and have a 3 day wait. Think about that for a second. You are never going to get videos up the day of release or when the embargo goes up, where the biggest revenue for some content creators come from, because of that screening process. And if the Youtuber decides to post a negative review, what is to stop Nintendo from simply censoring it?
Joke or not, it's their decision as a company, and bitching and moaning about not being able to get 100% revenue from a "let's play" is just childish. Nintendo chooses to enforce their copyright. Tough shit.
For the less inclined.....the purpose of his rant regarding the money spent on the system, accessories and games....was the fact that he showed interest and support for Nintendo and when he tried to share his fun times.....Nintendo said "**** you".
I'm not surprised Nintendo fanboys are on his case....if this were EA or Ubisoft....it would be a different story.
Do I think he should have known beforehand that it would be taken down? Yes.
Do I think he has a point? Yes.
I'm not sure why it's so difficult to see that.
If it had been Sony or Microsoft the fanboys of the respective companies would be on his case, I don't understand why everyone talks about the Nintendo fans like that as if they were the only ones that do that. Thats why theyre fanboys.
The reason people are on his case including non Nintendo fans are because he was very well aware of everything beforehand and still acts surprised. He had a video removed and still decided to put another one just to bitch. If he decided to spend money on a system he knew he wasnt going to cover because of the YouTube program he didn't want to participate in, then its his own damn fault.
Nintendo never said "**** you" they just wanted him to follow the guidelines, Joe is the one that said "**** you"
Are Nintendo policies ridiculous? Absolutely. Do they have a right? Yes. Is Joe being an idiot for clicks? Absolutely.
I'm not sure why it's so difficult to see that.
Sounds like those idiots who used to defend EA's scumbag moves.
Oh look at your avatar, ugh. Nintendo Drones.
*yawn*
Countering an argument based on a person's avatar is such a fallacy.
He could easily go to Twitch if he doesn't like how Nintendo demands part of his revenue. But he won't, because he's a greedy dick who thinks he's entitled to use copyrighted material to make money.
Youtubers are really lucky Nintendo is the only one enforcing their copyright claims.
Stopped the review when he said there was a lot of reading.
I wish I enjoyed reading in games, but I just don't. Too bad...this game looked pretty good.
To be fair, reading sucks with most games because the writing sucks in most games. Not the case here at all. You may actually enjoy it. Beyond that, you can just choose what to read and what to skip on. I don't sit there and read every single book I pick up in this game, but it's cool that the stuff is there for those who do wish to know every detail of the world and lore.
I do, otherwise I wouldn't be posting. Why does it matter if they play through the game? Watching someone play 3D World isn't going to stop them from buying it, because you know people buy Nintendo games for gameplay? In fact it is going to have the opposite effect, they are going to see stuff like Shadow-Play Alley and want to try it out for themselves. That advertising will moves units for them, something they don't seem to understand. THAT is their cut.
This program Nintendo has on youtube is a fucking joke. The split is bigger then most partners take with Youtube personalities. If they do both, then they get an even smaller split, making it harder for them to survive on as a full time job. If you feel that Nintendo is entitled to that, lets ignore that then. All videos have to be approved by them and have a 3 day wait. Think about that for a second. You are never going to get videos up the day of release or when the embargo goes up, where the biggest revenue for some content creators come from, because of that screening process. And if the Youtuber decides to post a negative review, what is to stop Nintendo from simply censoring it?
Joke or not, it's their decision as a company, and bitching and moaning about not being able to get 100% revenue from a "let's play" is just childish. Nintendo chooses to enforce their copyright. Tough shit.
And those decisions have done them a world of good right? Oh wait, it has alienated a bunch of people who would have otherwise made content for them (Total Biscuit is another example off the top of my head). Their head being up their ass is largely what caused them to lose so much market share when they were in a position to keep dominance. If a company who makes games I happen to like a lot and want to succeed fucks up I'm going to keep on calling them on it until they turn the sinking ship around.
Apparently I'm the childish one because I don't blindly accept whatever bullshit they do. Come on dude, I remember you being a great poster on the PC boards back in the day, stop the fanboy shit.
@Kaze_no_Mirai: B/c as I said...if this were a neutral company (not Sony/MS/Nintendo) the Nintendo fanboys would be all over it. And yes...thats why they are fanboys....but it seems any Nintendo fan...is a fanboy...backing them up on whatever. Who the **** cares if they're in the right....thats not the point.
Theres more than one outcome for manipulation. Did AJ do this for the views? Probably. He ALSO could have done this b/c he hates that Nintendo has the type of shit relationship with ppl who want to share Nintendo games on youtube.
I get thats why their called faboys.....and thats exactly why I said what I said. This isn't cows coming to Sony's rescue over a thread about some dude getting phished for $600 and everyone screaming "SONY SUCKS!!" only to find out theres more to the story.
This isn't the X1 only being able to do 900p in many games regardless of having one of the best looking console games of this gen.
It's about Nintendo's youtube outlook and sheep doing the exact opposite of what would be done if it were a neutral company.
@ConanTheStoner: I'd feel like I was missing out on something if I didn't read....maybe not everything but at least a lot of it. I did listen to the rest of the review and from what I gather a lot of the lore and whatnot is reading but some or all (?) of the main quest missions are voice acted. For a game that supposedly has a bunch of shit in it....I wouldn't want to miss out on half the stuff.
I do, otherwise I wouldn't be posting. Why does it matter if they play through the game? Watching someone play 3D World isn't going to stop them from buying it, because you know people buy Nintendo games for gameplay? In fact it is going to have the opposite effect, they are going to see stuff like Shadow-Play Alley and want to try it out for themselves. That advertising will moves units for them, something they don't seem to understand. THAT is their cut.
This program Nintendo has on youtube is a fucking joke. The split is bigger then most partners take with Youtube personalities. If they do both, then they get an even smaller split, making it harder for them to survive on as a full time job. If you feel that Nintendo is entitled to that, lets ignore that then. All videos have to be approved by them and have a 3 day wait. Think about that for a second. You are never going to get videos up the day of release or when the embargo goes up, where the biggest revenue for some content creators come from, because of that screening process. And if the Youtuber decides to post a negative review, what is to stop Nintendo from simply censoring it?
Joke or not, it's their decision as a company, and bitching and moaning about not being able to get 100% revenue from a "let's play" is just childish. Nintendo chooses to enforce their copyright. Tough shit..
Just rolling over and accepting stupid policies is dumb. He has a right to express his thoughts on this matter, and most people fully agree with him. Not sure if you're aware, but youtube is a legit career. I don't see how its childish to complain about not getting 100% revenue from Nintendo games. It simply encourages youtubers to not cover Nintendo's games, and that's a big loss for everyone involved. Nintendo's stance is just going to dig them a bigger hole. Wii U is a complete failure, and Nintendo needs all the positive coverage it can get for the system.
The guy bought an Alienware
And complains about spending $300 on a Wii U.
The Wii U wouldn't cost $300 if they just shipped it with the standard Pro Controller instead of that stupid iPad.
After Joe's childish rant over Nintendo's policies, I've stopped keeping up with his videos.
He was kinda okay before in my eyes,but after that cry fest it kinda made me dislike him.
@mr_huggles_dog: You didn't seem to understand. The point I made about fanboys is everyone talking about how typical it is of Nintendo fans to defend the company as if their fanboyism is above that. When they all do that. I don't see why you bring up 900p or the other phishing victim. All fanboys will defend their beloved company of any stupidity. No exceptions. I guarantee you if this had been Microsoft or Sony they'd have their fanboys on their nuts doing damage control and yes, sheep would most likely criticize. My point is Joe and other people talking about "typical sheep" blindly defending the company acting like they're the only ones like that.
Who the **** cares if they have the right? A lot of people. Nintendo and YouTube for example. I do think what they ask for is stupid. I applaud YouTubers for taking a stand in what they believe. But Joe us pretending to be a white knight standing up to big bad Nintendo. When hes just as bad as their policies. The fact that he acted surprised is proof, had he wanted to make a statement he'd had done that. Not upload a video purposefully to play the victim card.
I do, otherwise I wouldn't be posting. Why does it matter if they play through the game? Watching someone play 3D World isn't going to stop them from buying it, because you know people buy Nintendo games for gameplay? In fact it is going to have the opposite effect, they are going to see stuff like Shadow-Play Alley and want to try it out for themselves. That advertising will moves units for them, something they don't seem to understand. THAT is their cut.
This program Nintendo has on youtube is a fucking joke. The split is bigger then most partners take with Youtube personalities. If they do both, then they get an even smaller split, making it harder for them to survive on as a full time job. If you feel that Nintendo is entitled to that, lets ignore that then. All videos have to be approved by them and have a 3 day wait. Think about that for a second. You are never going to get videos up the day of release or when the embargo goes up, where the biggest revenue for some content creators come from, because of that screening process. And if the Youtuber decides to post a negative review, what is to stop Nintendo from simply censoring it?
Joke or not, it's their decision as a company, and bitching and moaning about not being able to get 100% revenue from a "let's play" is just childish. Nintendo chooses to enforce their copyright. Tough shit..
Just rolling over and accepting stupid policies is dumb. He has a right to express his thoughts on this matter, and most people fully agree with him. Not sure if you're aware, but youtube is a legit career. I don't see how its childish to complain about not getting 100% revenue from Nintendo games. It simply encourages youtubers to not cover Nintendo's games, and that's a big loss for everyone involved. Nintendo's stance is just going to dig them a bigger hole. Wii U is a complete failure, and Nintendo needs all the positive coverage it can get for the system.
No but its childish for go "im doing no videos cause I gatta share money. Even though you guys bought the stuff for me so I can soly do nintendo content" heres an idea joe do a non profit video for your fans that supported you or if you want do a vlog and still get paid for it. I think he said something about nintendo strangling creativity which is 100% incorrect. Now if he said nintendo is strangling my nintendo related income then that would be honest. End of the day other youtubers will cover nintendo stuff so all hes doing is hurting his fans not nintendo. Did he forget why he got into this review stuff or was it really all about the money. Also he knew this would happen again and yet still did it and went to complain. I do not pity this guy one bit.
@mr_huggles_dog:
I do think what they ask for is stupid.
Thats the only point I was making.
To not outright back Nintendo even though the policies are stupid.
I'm not quite sure what the purpose of this post was after reading all the comments. Are we suppose to respond to PoE? Critiquing Angry Joe himself? Critiquing Angry Joe's review of PoE? Or Angry Joe's Nintendo rant video? Whatever the case, I guess I'll answer all of the above.
AJ's PoE review: Great review that assess many aspects of the game and fully presents what to expect from this game.
AJ himself: Not much of a fan. He kind of seems like a douche.
PoE: Seems like a pretty damn good game that I should buy one of these days once I get my medical bills payed off.
AJ on Nintendo: Everyone needs to calm the f down. Nintendo owns their IP. They can do whatever the hell they want. (haven't watch his video but I'm assuming that this video was a response for Nintendo vs fans using their IPs)
@mr_huggles_dog: And the point that I was trying to make is that Joe is just playing the victim even he knew everything beforehand. And that you and many others talk about Nintendo fans defending the company as if they're the only ones that do that, with the pretext that if it had beem EA or someone else it wouldn't happen. When it's obvious that Sony or MS fans would do the same.
I never once argued that Nintendo's policies are brilliant or okay. And I made that clear since the beginning, i only argued those two things you said.
@Kaze_no_Mirai:
You're saying fanboys will be fanboys.
I'm saying fanboys of any of them would be acting different if it were a neutral company like Ubisoft or EA.
There are sheep who still don't agree with what Nintendo did in this case....and there are cows and lems that don't agree with everything their respective favorite company's do. The fanboys ppl are calling out are just that....the fanboys.
That was a great review and I didn't expect him to review it. I hope positive word of a mouth will boost sales because I want to see this become a franchise. I disagree about the story though. So far from what I've played, it's really good and writing is easily one of the best in video games. It's one of the biggest reasons why I can't stop playing the game.
Writing here is much better than Divinity: Original Sin but I found loot and combat more interesting in Original Sin. It was a game that took old school formulas and executed them in a new way. Would've been nice if Joe reviewed that game because it would've convinced more people to buy that game.
Started playing it and its kicking my arse big time. I have to rest frequently in readrics castle and I think I took up on his quest way too early.(I wanna quit my job to play this game. :'( )
Stopped the review when he said there was a lot of reading.
I wish I enjoyed reading in games, but I just don't. Too bad...this game looked pretty good.
To be fair, reading sucks with most games because the writing sucks in most games. Not the case here at all. You may actually enjoy it. Beyond that, you can just choose what to read and what to skip on. I don't sit there and read every single book I pick up in this game, but it's cool that the stuff is there for those who do wish to know every detail of the world and lore.
Agreed. I suck at reading but after starting the game, the first thing I noticed was the writing, that doesn't suck like most other games. I only read things related to main story and the ones that feel interesting and so far I haven't missed anything important. I did the same with Original Sin but writing is a lot better here. I don't think anyone sucks when it comes to reading, more than I do. That's something.
The review was spot-on by Joe once again but I'll play Pillars of Eternity late this year, got too many things to do. I'm looking forward if he's doing MKX review.
After Joe's childish rant over Nintendo's policies, I've stopped keeping up with his videos.
Come on now Fox, AJ games review shouldn't be overlooked depending on what type of game your looking for when Joe spots something is wrong, it's worth looking before buying a game. AJ is most of the times, my last top when I'm ready to buy a game once I got all the data I need.
Another highly detailed, well put together review by AngryJoe. Some people hate on him(mostly just butthurt sheep) but nobody can deny his review standards are pretty damn high. He's better than most professional review critics and adds immense amounts of entertainment value to his videos.
Another highly detailed, well put together review by AngryJoe. Some people hate on him(mostly just butthurt sheep) but nobody can deny his review standards are pretty damn high. He's better than most professional review critics and adds immense amounts of entertainment value to his videos.
Indeed. Him and TB is when i usually go for reviews though i dont really like AJ other videos but his reviews are good and informative
For the less inclined.....the purpose of his rant regarding the money spent on the system, accessories and games....was the fact that he showed interest and support for Nintendo and when he tried to share his fun times.....Nintendo said "**** you".
I'm not surprised Nintendo fanboys are on his case....if this were EA or Ubisoft....it would be a different story.
Do I think he should have known beforehand that it would be taken down? Yes.
Do I think he has a point? Yes.
I'm not sure why it's so difficult to see that.
I agree with this.
Also it's the dumbest type of copyright to enforce.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment