Raiders in the front of pursuit for McNabb

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for CleanPlayer
CleanPlayer

9822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#1 CleanPlayer
Member since 2008 • 9822 Posts

Is McNabb the right QB that will solve the Raiders' problems offensively?........I doubt it :lol:

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=5038866

Avatar image for -Halftime-
-Halftime-

10004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 -Halftime-
Member since 2007 • 10004 Posts
The Eagles are making such a terrible mistake by getting rid of McNabb. Reid is the problem. Not McNabb. Reid wouldn't have anything without McNabb and now the organization turns around and spits on the best QB the organization has ever had? And they wonder why they haven't one a Super Bowl. What a terrible organization
Avatar image for Buck_Hotep
Buck_Hotep

10589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#3 Buck_Hotep
Member since 2003 • 10589 Posts

The Eagles are making such a terrible mistake by getting rid of McNabb. Reid is the problem. Not McNabb. Reid wouldn't have anything without McNabb and now the organization turns around and spits on the best QB the organization has ever had? And they wonder why they haven't one a Super Bowl. What a terrible organization-Halftime-

I actually think McNabb has been the problem. McNabb can go hot then cold just as quickly. Also, he's not getting any younger and most likely has started the downward decline. Kevin Kolb did quite well in the games McNabb wasn't able to play due to injuries last season.

Avatar image for -Halftime-
-Halftime-

10004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 -Halftime-
Member since 2007 • 10004 Posts

[QUOTE="-Halftime-"]The Eagles are making such a terrible mistake by getting rid of McNabb. Reid is the problem. Not McNabb. Reid wouldn't have anything without McNabb and now the organization turns around and spits on the best QB the organization has ever had? And they wonder why they haven't one a Super Bowl. What a terrible organizationBuck_Hotep

I actually think McNabb has been the problem. McNabb can go hot then cold just as quickly. Also, he's not getting any younger and most likely has started the downward decline. Kevin Kolb did quite well in the games McNabb wasn't able to play due to injuries last season.

They're going to throw away the best QB in franchise history for a QB that's made 2 starts. 2 ****ing starts. Sorry, but Kevin hasn't proved a god damn thing in this league. In the playoffs last year, McNabb wasn't the problem. Andy Reid refused to run the ball, the offensive line was terrible, and so was the defense. McNabb was far from the problem.
Avatar image for CleanPlayer
CleanPlayer

9822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#5 CleanPlayer
Member since 2008 • 9822 Posts
The Eagles are making such a terrible mistake by getting rid of McNabb. Reid is the problem. Not McNabb. Reid wouldn't have anything without McNabb and now the organization turns around and spits on the best QB the organization has ever had? And they wonder why they haven't one a Super Bowl. What a terrible organization-Halftime-
I agree with you. They are absolutely "loco" like craaaaaaaazy to get rid of McNabb. Both are terrible organizations like there's no way McNabb will actually sign an extension with the Raiders even if he is traded there
Avatar image for flowersjf
flowersjf

2856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 flowersjf
Member since 2008 • 2856 Posts
[QUOTE="Buck_Hotep"]

[QUOTE="-Halftime-"]The Eagles are making such a terrible mistake by getting rid of McNabb. Reid is the problem. Not McNabb. Reid wouldn't have anything without McNabb and now the organization turns around and spits on the best QB the organization has ever had? And they wonder why they haven't one a Super Bowl. What a terrible organization-Halftime-

I actually think McNabb has been the problem. McNabb can go hot then cold just as quickly. Also, he's not getting any younger and most likely has started the downward decline. Kevin Kolb did quite well in the games McNabb wasn't able to play due to injuries last season.

They're going to throw away the best QB in franchise history for a QB that's made 2 starts. 2 ****ing starts. Sorry, but Kevin hasn't proved a god damn thing in this league. In the playoffs last year, McNabb wasn't the problem. Andy Reid refused to run the ball, the offensive line was terrible, and so was the defense. McNabb was far from the problem.

I love you -Halftime- lol. I'm a die-hard Minnesota Vikings fan and I like the Eagles too but if they let go of McNabb they will never smell a Super Bowl let alone a NFC Championship game for a very long time. You took the words right out of my mouth.
Avatar image for HurricaneHugo
HurricaneHugo

40807

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 HurricaneHugo
Member since 2002 • 40807 Posts
McNabb had a good year last year....not sure why the Eagles want to get rid of him so bad...
Avatar image for NetYankEagle
NetYankEagle

11090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 NetYankEagle
Member since 2007 • 11090 Posts
Mcnabb gets blamed for what he does in the playoff but when you have to throw the ball 80 times a game your bound to make mistakes. The eagles Have Mike Bell and Lesean Mccoy i doubt Reid will run more then 5 times a game this season. I mean i would like to see what Kolb does as a starter for more then just 2 games but all Mcnabb needs is that #1 guy he needs a TO again. Instead of trading Mcnabb they should try to get Marshall. a Marshall/Jackson/Maclin Combo is what Mcnabb has been looking for and needing since he came into this league
Avatar image for monkeytoes61
monkeytoes61

8399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

#9 monkeytoes61
Member since 2005 • 8399 Posts
Good, get out of Philly, McNabb. Those fans don't deserve you.
Avatar image for LoseEagles1245
LoseEagles1245

1115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 LoseEagles1245
Member since 2007 • 1115 Posts
This is the way I look at it. McNabb is still a good QB. He could at least get the Eagles to the playoffs. But I highly doubt he can get the to the Super Bowl if he has to face teams like the Saints, Cowboys, and Vikings. The Eagles defense also isn't good enough right now to carry the team either. So why not trade McNabb while he still has value. They could have two Top 42 picks and three in the Top 60. With these picks they could potentially get good defensive starters. If McNabb stayed this year I think is kind of risky. At the end of the season he'll be a free agent. The Eagles will not resign him. So basically they're letting there best player go away for no compensation. This draft is stacked and they could find some good talent. Even if they did resign him, he's injury prone, if he has a season ending injury it would be really bad for his value. So his trade value would slip from a 1st-2nd round pick to a 5,6, 7th rounder. Kolb has been waiting for three years, so he knows the offense and is ready to start. The Eagles may not make the playoffs the first year with Kolb, but thats ok. He'll gain starting experience and the rookies from the draft will start to produce to. So they can make a run in 2011.
Avatar image for fastr
fastr

2100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 fastr
Member since 2010 • 2100 Posts
This is the way I look at it. McNabb is still a good QB. He could at least get the Eagles to the playoffs. But I highly doubt he can get the to the Super Bowl if he has to face teams like the Saints, Cowboys, and Vikings. The Eagles defense also isn't good enough right now to carry the team either. So why not trade McNabb while he still has value. They could have two Top 42 picks and three in the Top 60. With these picks they could potentially get good defensive starters. If McNabb stayed this year I think is kind of risky. At the end of the season he'll be a free agent. The Eagles will not resign him. So basically they're letting there best player go away for no compensation. This draft is stacked and they could find some good talent. Even if they did resign him, he's injury prone, if he has a season ending injury it would be really bad for his value. So his trade value would slip from a 1st-2nd round pick to a 5,6, 7th rounder. Kolb has been waiting for three years, so he knows the offense and is ready to start. The Eagles may not make the playoffs the first year with Kolb, but thats ok. He'll gain starting experience and the rookies from the draft will start to produce to. So they can make a run in 2011.LoseEagles1245
You beat me too it, first off, Mcnabb is overrated. He's just not that good, and the Eagles really don't have a chance of winning the superbowl next year, and he only has a year left. Trading him now is a smart move. Like loseeagle said, they may not make the playoffs this year because of it, but it seems they're entering more of a rebuilding mode right now, doesn't letting westbrook go make more sense now? You really should be asking what the Raiders are thinking, they're not gonna go anywhere with him in a year, and he won't resign, so whats the point? they need those picks alot more then they need a 1 year overrated QB. Then again we're use to seeing the raiders do stupid things. Only problem with this is forget using vincent jackson again this year for Fantasy Football.. damnit
Avatar image for MarcusAntonius
MarcusAntonius

15667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 MarcusAntonius
Member since 2004 • 15667 Posts

McNabb would be a terrible fit for the Raiders. Seven step drops for a beat-up 34 year old QB behind a garbage offensive line and throwing to very green receivers, not going to work.

Avatar image for feryl06
feryl06

4955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 feryl06
Member since 2006 • 4955 Posts

In a passing league, after P.Manning, Brady, Brees, Rivers, who's the next best QBs out there. McNabb is one of the most underated and under appreciated QBs. He's been booed since he got drafted and the Eageles failed to surround him with players. They're starting now, but it's too late and now they want to get rid of him as if he's the problem? He won't go to the Raiders---he's got the final say doesn' t he?

Avatar image for MURDA_B
MURDA_B

2879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 MURDA_B
Member since 2008 • 2879 Posts

even if they get mcnabb that still wont make them a better team offensively he's way past his prime......and i dont get why all philly sports team trade away all their good players or let them go.

Avatar image for fastr
fastr

2100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 fastr
Member since 2010 • 2100 Posts

In a passing league, after P.Manning, Brady, Brees, Rivers, who's the next best QBs out there. McNabb is one of the most underated and under appreciated QBs. He's been booed since he got drafted and the Eageles failed to surround him with players. They're starting now, but it's too late and now they want to get rid of him as if he's the problem? He won't go to the Raiders---he's got the final say doesn' t he?

feryl06
Add to your four Aaron Rodgers, Big Ben, and even Bret Favre as QBs definitely better then McNabb. Also consider you could argue that Tony Romo and Kurt Warner are better. There are probably some others too, but can't think of them all, so he's about a mid level Qb.. but for the raiders he's replacing possible the worst qb int he league, so still a step up for them but for one season where they have no chance of winning. I don't believe he has a no trade clause, he's stuck going where ever they say, at least I haven't heard any reports mention it, I know he ASKED to be sent to a winning team if he is traded.
Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#16 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

Just retire McNabb and go out on a high note, relatively speaking. Go to the Raiders and by the end of December you and Jeff Garcia are gonna be drinking buddies.

Avatar image for feryl06
feryl06

4955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 feryl06
Member since 2006 • 4955 Posts
I'd debate Rodgers since he hasn't taken his team deep into the playoffs... Favre is great, but at this stage of the game, I'd take McNabb over Favre. Minnesota would do the same, but they know Favre is coming back and entertaining any ideas of getting McNabb would only hurt Favre's ego---something Minnesota doesn't want to get into. Warner, yes, but he's retired so you can't count him. Big Ben is also better than McNabb. So overall, McNabb is top 10---that's not even close to 'mid level QB'. Again, he's under rated. I don't understand why people can't appreciate what he's done for Philly.
[QUOTE="feryl06"]

In a passing league, after P.Manning, Brady, Brees, Rivers, who's the next best QBs out there. McNabb is one of the most underated and under appreciated QBs. He's been booed since he got drafted and the Eageles failed to surround him with players. They're starting now, but it's too late and now they want to get rid of him as if he's the problem? He won't go to the Raiders---he's got the final say doesn' t he?

fastr
Add to your four Aaron Rodgers, Big Ben, and even Bret Favre as QBs definitely better then McNabb. Also consider you could argue that Tony Romo and Kurt Warner are better. There are probably some others too, but can't think of them all, so he's about a mid level Qb.. but for the raiders he's replacing possible the worst qb int he league, so still a step up for them but for one season where they have no chance of winning. I don't believe he has a no trade clause, he's stuck going where ever they say, at least I haven't heard any reports mention it, I know he ASKED to be sent to a winning team if he is traded.

Avatar image for feryl06
feryl06

4955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 feryl06
Member since 2006 • 4955 Posts
I think he's made it public he won't sign an extension with a team that he doesn't want to get traded to. So if the Raiders want a one year QB and trade some high draft picks, then the Raiders are dumber than we thought.
[QUOTE="feryl06"]

In a passing league, after P.Manning, Brady, Brees, Rivers, who's the next best QBs out there. McNabb is one of the most underated and under appreciated QBs. He's been booed since he got drafted and the Eageles failed to surround him with players. They're starting now, but it's too late and now they want to get rid of him as if he's the problem? He won't go to the Raiders---he's got the final say doesn' t he?

fastr
Add to your four Aaron Rodgers, Big Ben, and even Bret Favre as QBs definitely better then McNabb. Also consider you could argue that Tony Romo and Kurt Warner are better. There are probably some others too, but can't think of them all, so he's about a mid level Qb.. but for the raiders he's replacing possible the worst qb int he league, so still a step up for them but for one season where they have no chance of winning. I don't believe he has a no trade clause, he's stuck going where ever they say, at least I haven't heard any reports mention it, I know he ASKED to be sent to a winning team if he is traded.

Avatar image for fastr
fastr

2100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 fastr
Member since 2010 • 2100 Posts
[QUOTE="feryl06"]I'd debate Rodgers since he hasn't taken his team deep into the playoffs... Favre is great, but at this stage of the game, I'd take McNabb over Favre. Minnesota would do the same, but they know Favre is coming back and entertaining any ideas of getting McNabb would only hurt Favre's ego---something Minnesota doesn't want to get into. Warner, yes, but he's retired so you can't count him. Big Ben is also better than McNabb. So overall, McNabb is top 10---that's not even close to 'mid level QB'. Again, he's under rated. I don't understand why people can't appreciate what he's done for Philly.
[QUOTE="feryl06"]

In a passing league, after P.Manning, Brady, Brees, Rivers, who's the next best QBs out there. McNabb is one of the most underated and under appreciated QBs. He's been booed since he got drafted and the Eageles failed to surround him with players. They're starting now, but it's too late and now they want to get rid of him as if he's the problem? He won't go to the Raiders---he's got the final say doesn' t he?

fastr
Add to your four Aaron Rodgers, Big Ben, and even Bret Favre as QBs definitely better then McNabb. Also consider you could argue that Tony Romo and Kurt Warner are better. There are probably some others too, but can't think of them all, so he's about a mid level Qb.. but for the raiders he's replacing possible the worst qb int he league, so still a step up for them but for one season where they have no chance of winning. I don't believe he has a no trade clause, he's stuck going where ever they say, at least I haven't heard any reports mention it, I know he ASKED to be sent to a winning team if he is traded.

Rodgers is hands down a better QB then McNabb, no doubt in my mind, and he's still early in his career. He may be top 10, but he's out of the conversation of the better Qbs in the league, and he may be a little better then some mid range guys, but he's still in that mid range. It's just a large group of QBS that happen to be mid level.
Avatar image for jiggaloj
jiggaloj

4345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#20 jiggaloj
Member since 2006 • 4345 Posts

If McNabb does leave, Kolb will be a huge sleeper for fantasy football. Speaking of which, I saw replica McNabb jerseys at a Macy's in Philly for $10.

Avatar image for Cuddlebearz
Cuddlebearz

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Cuddlebearz
Member since 2009 • 25 Posts

Nah we dont need um we got Jamarcus Russell hahahahahahahhaha

Avatar image for M_1_A_M_I
M_1_A_M_I

938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#22 M_1_A_M_I
Member since 2010 • 938 Posts
[QUOTE="-Halftime-"][QUOTE="Buck_Hotep"]

The Eagles are making such a terrible mistake by getting rid of McNabb. Reid is the problem. Not McNabb. Reid wouldn't have anything without McNabb and now the organization turns around and spits on the best QB the organization has ever had? And they wonder why they haven't one a Super Bowl. What a terrible organization-Halftime-

I actually think McNabb has been the problem. McNabb can go hot then cold just as quickly. Also, he's not getting any younger and most likely has started the downward decline. Kevin Kolb did quite well in the games McNabb wasn't able to play due to injuries last season.

They're going to throw away the best QB in franchise history for a QB that's made 2 starts. 2 ****ing starts. Sorry, but Kevin hasn't proved a god damn thing in this league. In the playoffs last year, McNabb wasn't the problem. Andy Reid refused to run the ball, the offensive line was terrible, and so was the defense. McNabb was far from the problem.

I agree with what your saying about kolb 2 games doesn't prove someone can start like when ryan leaf played in his first game he was amazing, the next game he was terrible. Plus the eagles suffering from injuries on the o line last year, and their run game was far from dominant, 22nd in the league in rush yards... Plus their defense only ranked 12th in the league. But their pass offense was 10th in the nfl.
Avatar image for CADMAN_3
CADMAN_3

1189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#23 CADMAN_3
Member since 2003 • 1189 Posts

So "if" McNabb goes do they start Vick or Kolb? I really would hate to see McNabb go to another team and just finish on a low note. I think Andy has just gotten softer in his years and really hasn't done much with the team or the play book. He's not taking chance's like he did before. IE onside kicks for the opening kick off. Fake field goal attempts. Using 3 running backs. When he did the trick plays once in awhile they won games.

Avatar image for QuistisTrepe_
QuistisTrepe_

4121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 QuistisTrepe_
Member since 2010 • 4121 Posts
[QUOTE="fastr"] Rodgers is hands down a better QB then McNabb, no doubt in my mind, and he's still early in his career.

Perhaps he ought to win a playoff game first to better solidify such a strident proclamation.
Avatar image for fastr
fastr

2100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 fastr
Member since 2010 • 2100 Posts
[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"][QUOTE="fastr"] Rodgers is hands down a better QB then McNabb, no doubt in my mind, and he's still early in his career.

Perhaps he ought to win a playoff game first to better solidify such a strident proclamation.

Nah, really, he's better, no question. I actually watch games, and can say I truely believe that from watching them perform. He hasn't won a playoff game yet, alot of that is because of the team around him.
Avatar image for QuistisTrepe_
QuistisTrepe_

4121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 QuistisTrepe_
Member since 2010 • 4121 Posts
[QUOTE="fastr"][QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"][QUOTE="fastr"] Rodgers is hands down a better QB then McNabb, no doubt in my mind, and he's still early in his career.

Perhaps he ought to win a playoff game first to better solidify such a strident proclamation.

Nah, really, he's better, no question. I actually watch games, and can say I truely believe that from watching them perform. He hasn't won a playoff game yet, alot of that is because of the team around him.

So you assert that I don't watch the games:? Um, ok. As far as the "team around him" bit, you make me honestly question whether you do watch the games or not. I've seen Donovan McNabb play in five NFC title games and a SB with only one Pro Bowl receiver in his entire career. If Aaron Rodgers can make it to the NFC conference championship game with starting wideouts like Todd Pinkston and James Thrash, then I'll be impressed with him.
Avatar image for fastr
fastr

2100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 fastr
Member since 2010 • 2100 Posts
Give him time, he's played a full what, two years? From the first couple times I saw him take the team, when Favre came out for injury, he showed huge potential. Now he's one of the best starting QB's in the league, look at his stats. Sure greenbay started off good last night, then they tanked, his offensive line just can't stop the rush, that would hurt any QB
Avatar image for The-Apostle
The-Apostle

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#30 The-Apostle
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts
What happened to Vick? Why wouldn't he start?
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

50604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 50604 Posts

So "if" McNabb goes do they start Vick or Kolb? I really would hate to see McNabb go to another team and just finish on a low note. I think Andy has just gotten softer in his years and really hasn't done much with the team or the play book. He's not taking chance's like he did before. IE onside kicks for the opening kick off. Fake field goal attempts. Using 3 running backs. When he did the trick plays once in awhile they won games.

CADMAN_3
Kolb, it's a no-brainer. And McNabb has told Philly he doesn't want to be traded to the Raiders, although he doesn't have a no trade clause.
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

50604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 50604 Posts
What happened to Vick? Why wouldn't he start?Apostle92627
No, he is average at best.
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

50604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 50604 Posts

[QUOTE="fastr"][QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"] Perhaps he ought to win a playoff game first to better solidify such a strident proclamation.QuistisTrepe_
Nah, really, he's better, no question. I actually watch games, and can say I truely believe that from watching them perform. He hasn't won a playoff game yet, alot of that is because of the team around him.

So you assert that I don't watch the games:? Um, ok. As far as the "team around him" bit, you make me honestly question whether you do watch the games or not. I've seen Donovan McNabb play in five NFC title games and a SB with only one Pro Bowl receiver in his entire career. If Aaron Rodgers can make it to the NFC conference championship game with starting wideouts like Todd Pinkston and James Thrash, then I'll be impressed with him.

What about his O-line and running game? Or the Eagles defense over the years?

Avatar image for QuistisTrepe_
QuistisTrepe_

4121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 QuistisTrepe_
Member since 2010 • 4121 Posts

[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"][QUOTE="fastr"] Nah, really, he's better, no question. I actually watch games, and can say I truely believe that from watching them perform. He hasn't won a playoff game yet, alot of that is because of the team around him. Chutebox

So you assert that I don't watch the games:? Um, ok. As far as the "team around him" bit, you make me honestly question whether you do watch the games or not. I've seen Donovan McNabb play in five NFC title games and a SB with only one Pro Bowl receiver in his entire career. If Aaron Rodgers can make it to the NFC conference championship game with starting wideouts like Todd Pinkston and James Thrash, then I'll be impressed with him.

What about his O-line and running game? Or the Eagles defense over the years?

Yeah, what about them?
Avatar image for -Halftime-
-Halftime-

10004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 -Halftime-
Member since 2007 • 10004 Posts

[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"][QUOTE="fastr"] Nah, really, he's better, no question. I actually watch games, and can say I truely believe that from watching them perform. He hasn't won a playoff game yet, alot of that is because of the team around him. Chutebox

So you assert that I don't watch the games:? Um, ok. As far as the "team around him" bit, you make me honestly question whether you do watch the games or not. I've seen Donovan McNabb play in five NFC title games and a SB with only one Pro Bowl receiver in his entire career. If Aaron Rodgers can make it to the NFC conference championship game with starting wideouts like Todd Pinkston and James Thrash, then I'll be impressed with him.

What about his O-line and running game? Or the Eagles defense over the years?

Running game? :lol: Andy Reid's fat ass hasn't run the ball since the Duce Staley/Buckhalter/Westbrook days in like 2003. The eagles with a running game:lol:
Avatar image for fastr
fastr

2100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 fastr
Member since 2010 • 2100 Posts
so, i'm not gonna put all the numbers in here, but I think Rodgers literally is better then McNabb in EVERY stat, he's more accurate, more yards per cetch, more TDs, Less interceptions, hell of a lot more completions, higher avg QB rating (actually, he's number ONE for the whole league) The only stat that Rodgers looks bad for is sacks, he's actually tied with Big Ben for 50, most in the league. Which goes to my point that his O-line can't stop the rush, and he doesn't have the kind of running game that McNabb has had behind him for years now, he has grant sure, but thats not as good as McNabb has had behind him. So with less of an offense around him, he puts up better stats.. Sooo any reason why anyone would consider McNabb better?
Avatar image for -Halftime-
-Halftime-

10004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#37 -Halftime-
Member since 2007 • 10004 Posts
so, i'm not gonna put all the numbers in here, but I think Rodgers literally is better then McNabb in EVERY stat, he's more accurate, more yards per cetch, more TDs, Less interceptions, hell of a lot more completions, higher avg QB rating (actually, he's number ONE for the whole league) The only stat that Rodgers looks bad for is sacks, he's actually tied with Big Ben for 50, most in the league. Which goes to my point that his O-line can't stop the rush, and he doesn't have the kind of running game that McNabb has had behind him for years now, he has grant sure, but thats not as good as McNabb has had behind him. So with less of an offense around him, he puts up better stats.. Sooo any reason why anyone would consider McNabb better?fastr
The Eagles have had one of the worst running games in the NFL for the past 5 years.... Get the hell out of here with that BS. McNabb has no run game.
Avatar image for fastr
fastr

2100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 fastr
Member since 2010 • 2100 Posts
Really? what kinda BS is that, they have had Westbrook, he's such a dynamic player, weather he's running the ball or catching it, he was someone you had to worry about coming out of the back field, of course.. westbrook really slowed down this past year, he's really starting to show ware, so that has significantly hurt their running game. For the 2009 season, Greenbay did actually have more yards total, by about 200, pretty darn close tho. 2008 season, Greenbay had about 100 more. 2007 season, eagles had about 400 more yards. 2006 season, eagles had about 300 more yards. So yeah, even if they had one of the worst running games in the nfl for the past 5 years, Greenbays has been worse. Guess what the turn around was for the 09 and 08 season? They had a better QB throwing the ball, openning up some space!
Avatar image for QuistisTrepe_
QuistisTrepe_

4121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 QuistisTrepe_
Member since 2010 • 4121 Posts
Sooo any reason why anyone would consider McNabb better?fastr
Those reasons have already been stated, next?
Avatar image for fastr
fastr

2100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 fastr
Member since 2010 • 2100 Posts
and yet no reason has been stated for why McNabb is better, and no one has disputed those reasons, so why are you asking me for next? McNabb has never broke 4k yards in a season, Rodgers has done it in both his.. shrugs, theres your next, :P
Avatar image for QuistisTrepe_
QuistisTrepe_

4121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 QuistisTrepe_
Member since 2010 • 4121 Posts
and yet no reason has been stated for why McNabb is better, and no one has disputed those reasons, so why are you asking me for next? McNabb has never broke 4k yards in a season, Rodgers has done it in both his.. shrugs, theres your next, :P fastr
Two full seasons of Rodgers and you're convinced that he's better than McNabb? I'm starting to honestly believe that this is an April Fool's put-on.
Avatar image for fastr
fastr

2100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 fastr
Member since 2010 • 2100 Posts
[QUOTE="fastr"]and yet no reason has been stated for why McNabb is better, and no one has disputed those reasons, so why are you asking me for next? McNabb has never broke 4k yards in a season, Rodgers has done it in both his.. shrugs, theres your next, :P QuistisTrepe_
Two full seasons of Rodgers and you're convinced that he's better than McNabb? I'm starting to honestly believe that this is an April Fool's put-on.

and again.. any reason he isn't? nope, you can't say one reason? whos putting the april fools prank on, he's clearly better.
Avatar image for -Halftime-
-Halftime-

10004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#43 -Halftime-
Member since 2007 • 10004 Posts
[QUOTE="fastr"]and yet no reason has been stated for why McNabb is better, and no one has disputed those reasons, so why are you asking me for next? McNabb has never broke 4k yards in a season, Rodgers has done it in both his.. shrugs, theres your next, :P QuistisTrepe_
I'm starting to honestly believe that this is an April Fool's put-on.

Mos def.
Avatar image for feryl06
feryl06

4955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 feryl06
Member since 2006 • 4955 Posts
So based off stats alone, you must think Rodgers is better than Tom Brady? Greenbay is a pure passing team, of course he'll put up crazy numbers like that---it's the winning part that matters the most. It helps when you're facing Detroit twice a year. I'll give Rodgers a few more years and see where his team goes until I can say he's better than McNabb. Rodgers gets sacked a lot cause he holds on to the ball too long as well, that and his o-line isn't great.
[QUOTE="QuistisTrepe_"][QUOTE="fastr"]and yet no reason has been stated for why McNabb is better, and no one has disputed those reasons, so why are you asking me for next? McNabb has never broke 4k yards in a season, Rodgers has done it in both his.. shrugs, theres your next, :P fastr
Two full seasons of Rodgers and you're convinced that he's better than McNabb? I'm starting to honestly believe that this is an April Fool's put-on.

and again.. any reason he isn't? nope, you can't say one reason? whos putting the april fools prank on, he's clearly better.

Avatar image for fastr
fastr

2100

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 fastr
Member since 2010 • 2100 Posts
No, i'm using stats to prove to you, I know he's better from watching them both play. Don't forget, it's not hard to be better then McNabb, he's extremely overrated by people like you.
Avatar image for -Halftime-
-Halftime-

10004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#46 -Halftime-
Member since 2007 • 10004 Posts
No, i'm using stats to prove to you, I know he's better from watching them both play. Don't forget, it's not hard to be better then McNabb, he's extremely overrated by people like you. fastr
Yeah, a player with over 200 TD passes, playoff success, and the best TD to INT ration in history is sure overrated.
Avatar image for feryl06
feryl06

4955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#47 feryl06
Member since 2006 • 4955 Posts
He's probably one of those people who booed McNabb when he got drafted. That and he's got Rodgers on his fantasy draft. :)
[QUOTE="fastr"]No, i'm using stats to prove to you, I know he's better from watching them both play. Don't forget, it's not hard to be better then McNabb, he's extremely overrated by people like you. -Halftime-
Yeah, a player with over 200 TD passes, playoff success, and the best TD to INT ration in history is sure overrated.