This topic is locked from further discussion.
Did anyone notice this? In this review and this review, that not having trophies is listed as "bad" Is this kind of weird? It should be mentioned but not docked for it. Thoughts?Chaos_Bladez
Funny thing is they are both about singing, maybe players want to be rewarded on crap vocals.
There's no confirmation that it was even docked. It's not like reviewers assume the game is perfect and work from there.siLVURcrossYeah you are right. It probably wasn't "docked" points. Bad choice of words on my part, but still it shouldn't be "bad."
Has anyone noticed how Gamespot will mark down a Ps3 game that is a cross-platform title and "may have" slightly less AA. But when a game comes out with noticeably better graphics than it's 360 counterpart, that score will be the same. Example, Bioshock, and Eternal Sonata, It is just so ridiculous it's funny, Gamespot gives no respect to the ps3. So if they are now giving bad reviews for games not giving out trophies, that is on par with the sites attitude. TUNEwon
That my friend is not welcome on these boards nor in this thread.
I don't thnk they're bad now.
But it should be mandatory for future releases after a certain date. To give developers time to add them into the games,as most of the games that will go out next year, '09, are and were in production this year or even last year, before trophies made their way to the PS3.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment