I would rather have really nice graphics at a lower resolution that a higher resolution, where graphics were sacrificed to get to that resolution. If they can run in 1080p with what they got then GREAT! but I dont want them to take things out to make it 1080p.
Why have it 1080p when you cant see the high res textures because they were down-graded to get to 1080p?? doesnt make sense.
brandeni
Who says the graphics will be sacrificed? Does liar have worse graphics than the other upcoming titles?
Look at Oblivion, because it runs in 720p the devs are using processing power on compensating for the resolution not being able to show the details of the objects unless they are up close.
And 1080p games need much less AA to remove "jaggies" and it allows for much cleaner polygon edges.
Sure you got an opinion but what did you actually base it on?
Yes they may not be able to have the same amount of polygons, textures and effects but the question is how much less and how does it compare to the many things gained from the higher resolution is the real question to be asked.
It's the very same with frame rate, how does 60fps compare with 30fps where the latter needs to compensate with motion blur on objects but there's only blur on the defined objects while 60fps got natural motion blur on all objects and allows for higher control precision.
We could also just run all games in 480p at 23.973fps, just think of all the polygons, textures and effects we could throw in.
Log in to comment