@MethodManFTW said:
I could understand this wrong, but no games on consoles run at over 60fps so getting a tv for gaming with over 60hz is relatively pointless, right?
I like my 120hz monitor with my pc because i can actually play games at 120fps.
Hertz is different than frames per second in that you have a game that in order to run at over that many frames needs a higher refresh rate. But a higher native refresh is going to help with motion blur and ghosting because the screen is just blinking that many more times and faster natively and capable of that. Refresh is just how many times the screen can blink. 60hz and if the tv has a slower processor is going to ghost more. I could be imagining all of this but having a 120hz native panel I can notice the difference. It just runs faster and is more stable to me. IT's the interpolation and motion processing that you can turn on that does nothing except insert frames and mess up the picture in video games. A lot of these tvs are 120 clear motion but still have a 60hz panel. Other ones the panel is actually 120hz. I could be wrong because it's all an algorithm anyways but i'm guessing the panel and hardware is different in some of these and actually blink at 120hz natively. It's like 720p vs 1080p. There is only so much the human eye can notice. hertz is even slighter than resolution but speed of processing is just as important as resolution. Neither is perfect. Picture quality and build also has something to do with it. Maybe it's just me but Panasonic and sony TV's seem to have the best build quality and best native pictures. It's preference though. Samsung I didn't like for some reason. The tint was off.
60hz I could actually see the screen blinking in certain scenarios. 120hz not so much. There is still some blur but its blinking twice as fast so you can't see it. The picture also doesn't seem to lose it's quality as often. It's just seems to be more stable of a quality picture. Maybe it's just the brand. I have no idea. My old Panasonic lcd 720p 60hz tv had very little motion blur but it was also a 32 inch tv. Vs a 40 inch Samsung 60hz it actually looked better in spots. This 120hz Panasonic is like my old tv but bigger and better resolution. limited motion blur. It's nice.
All this motion interpolation stuff like clear motion and trumotion and stuff like that is just software and processor driven stuff that just adds frames and messes up the picture. If you have a processor doing that it's takes processing power to do it. If you have a weak processor faking a refresh it's not going to be good. The native refresh rate is different. I have the motion stuff set to low for tv and off for games and im getting a stable picture with this tv. I think the native refresh rate is noticeable regardless. IT's very slight but the tv just seems to run faster.
I could be totally wrong and it could all be software driven and just companies lying about it in ways which wouldn't surprise me. It's no different than hard drives and storage algorithms. I don't know the inner workings of these TV's so much. Just know technology in general and have a degree in it. I think the panel on some of these, some of the circuitry is native 120hz though. If it says 120hz plus clearmotion or whatever, that is the native panel plus the software algorithm.
A 120 hertz panel is still going to be faster even if a game is running at 30-60 fps or whatever because it's just blinking that much faster and you aren't going to get the ghosting effect so much. It's still there but it's better. It's not like a plasma or crt which are totally different and their hertz are much higher as far as its refreshing but it's better.
Log in to comment