Are they making it better for the ps3 ? orwhat?!! Do you guys know anything about this delay on the ps3?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="JustWiicredible"]Probably because the Ps3 is so hard to develop for. It better land before Xmas or i'm turning my 360 back on.gsf
if it actually will turn on
I'm on my third. No Lol. Lost alot of money due to 'red rings of death' syndrome
[QUOTE="gsf"][QUOTE="JustWiicredible"]Probably because the Ps3 is so hard to develop for. It better land before Xmas or i'm turning my 360 back on.JustWiicredible
if it actually will turn on
I'm on my third. No Lol. Lost alot of money due to 'red rings of death' syndrome
Comments like this keep scarring me from getting a 360.
[QUOTE="JustWiicredible"][QUOTE="gsf"][QUOTE="JustWiicredible"]Probably because the Ps3 is so hard to develop for. It better land before Xmas or i'm turning my 360 back on.OmegaOrtega
if it actually will turn on
I'm on my third. No Lol. Lost alot of money due to 'red rings of death' syndrome
Comments like this keep scarring me from getting a 360.
Wish i had some alienware instead of this oversized calculater, then i could play Crysis aswell.
[QUOTE="JustWiicredible"][QUOTE="gsf"][QUOTE="JustWiicredible"]Probably because the Ps3 is so hard to develop for. It better land before Xmas or i'm turning my 360 back on.OmegaOrtega
if it actually will turn on
I'm on my third. No Lol. Lost alot of money due to 'red rings of death' syndrome
Comments like this keep scarring me from getting a 360.
Dont let them. The 360 is a great machine. Although im on my third. But then again the ps3 is a great machine aswell.[QUOTE="PMatt722"][QUOTE="unasyn"][QUOTE="virriador"]Are they making it better for the ps3 ?
airg6
Yes.
lol just like skate, madden, and fear hmm i guess owned :)
How are they better for the ps3. Explain. Especially madden.Their not, They made the mistake "so they say" of trying to make them better. Which is a lame excuse for 30fps. Im sure they wont make that mistake twice. Or when they do figure out how the machine works. Only then will they press any fancy buttons lol.
[QUOTE="airg6"][QUOTE="PMatt722"][QUOTE="unasyn"][QUOTE="virriador"]Are they making it better for the ps3 ?
truenextgen
Yes.
lol just like skate, madden, and fear hmm i guess owned :)
How are they better for the ps3. Explain. Especially madden.Their not, They made the mistake "so they say" of trying to make them better. Which is a lame excuse for 30fps. Im sure they wont make that mistake twice. Or when they do figure out how the machine works. Only then will they press any fancy buttons lol.
I agree. Ea has had more time to dovelop for the 360. But in a couple of years im sure the ps3 will have much better graphics,features and gameplay.Valve is not doing the PS3 version for some reason. i guess it's because they usually work with DirectX so they outsourced it to EA. Hope they do a good job but judging from the track record all you can do is hope for the best.Deihmos
Ughh. So their kinda just coping and pasting it, "in basic terms," And with EA, That don't sound to good. Im sure others could get that thing as smooth as ice, but EA?
Welp,, looks like COD and Haze "as far as FPSers"next month, and for the holidays :)
You almost have to think at this rate, EA is gonna look so bad in a few years. But than again after 08, and PS3 standards fly up. Watch them make a spectacular looking Madden next. It will almost have to be a must do for them, after a Killzone and MGS 4 are shown on the system.
[QUOTE="OmegaOrtega"][QUOTE="JustWiicredible"][QUOTE="gsf"][QUOTE="JustWiicredible"]Probably because the Ps3 is so hard to develop for. It better land before Xmas or i'm turning my 360 back on.airg6
if it actually will turn on
I'm on my third. No Lol. Lost alot of money due to 'red rings of death' syndrome
Comments like this keep scarring me from getting a 360.
Dont let them. The 360 is a great machine. Although im on my third. But then again the ps3 is a great machine aswell.Dude you just said you on on your 3rd 360. You added to me not wanting one lol.
I'll just wait.
[QUOTE="OmegaOrtega"][QUOTE="JustWiicredible"][QUOTE="gsf"][QUOTE="JustWiicredible"]Probably because the Ps3 is so hard to develop for. It better land before Xmas or i'm turning my 360 back on.airg6
if it actually will turn on
I'm on my third. No Lol. Lost alot of money due to 'red rings of death' syndrome
Comments like this keep scarring me from getting a 360.
Dont let them. The 360 is a great machine. Although im on my third. But then again the ps3 is a great machine aswell.Not to turn this into SW, but 360 is a peice of **** machine with good games lol.
I'm waiting on the ps3 version to pick this game up.
Because Gabe Newell is a knob. He bashed the PS3 a while back. He likes the 360 more because it's practically a PC, which is the only platform he cares about. The port is being left to EA, so you can expect dramatically different results from the PS3 version. 9.5 for the PC and 360, and even if the port is a 9.0 game, take away another .5 just because it's PS3, and you have an 8.5. If they don't stoop that low, they will just take away several of the medals, specifically in the graphics department. Just watch. excelR83
The Swedish magazine Gamereactor have got the PS3 version and they wrote that its just as good as the 360 version. So no, you wrong.
[QUOTE="JustWiicredible"][QUOTE="gsf"][QUOTE="JustWiicredible"]Probably because the Ps3 is so hard to develop for. It better land before Xmas or i'm turning my 360 back on.OmegaOrtega
if it actually will turn on
I'm on my third. No Lol. Lost alot of money due to 'red rings of death' syndrome
Comments like this keep scarring me from getting a 360.
30% of all 360's. But you can get a new one for free anyway. So it's not like it matters. People just over exaggerate the problem.
If you can afford a 360, I would advise you to get it. Afterall you can experience excellent games like GeoW, Bioshock etc.
For me the games I buy for my 360 is the one that are not on PS3. As for the multiplatform games + PS3 exclusives, that is what my PS3 is for.
[QUOTE="excelR83"]Because Gabe Newell is a knob. He bashed the PS3 a while back. He likes the 360 more because it's practically a PC, which is the only platform he cares about. The port is being left to EA, so you can expect dramatically different results from the PS3 version. 9.5 for the PC and 360, and even if the port is a 9.0 game, take away another .5 just because it's PS3, and you have an 8.5. If they don't stoop that low, they will just take away several of the medals, specifically in the graphics department. Just watch. BajenVaNamnet
The Swedish magazine Gamereactor have got the PS3 version and they wrote that its just as good as the 360 version. So no, you wrong.
No, they are wrong, or you are. If at this point in time, there was a PS3 version that was just as good as the 360 version, then the damned game would be out at the same time. There is no way there is a 2 month delay just because. There are obviously issues that need resolving and whether EA can get the job done or not is yet to be seen, but Gamereactor is a complete POS magazine if they are claiming that they have a finished build of the PS3 version 2 or 3 months (depending on when the issue went to press) ahead of it's release, and are claiming it's identical to the 360 version, but yet it's delayed 2 months.
Because Gabe Newell is a knob. He bashed the PS3 a while back. He likes the 360 more because it's practically a PC, which is the only platform he cares about. The port is being left to EA, so you can expect dramatically different results from the PS3 version. 9.5 for the PC and 360, and even if the port is a 9.0 game, take away another .5 just because it's PS3, and you have an 8.5. If they don't stoop that low, they will just take away several of the medals, specifically in the graphics department. Just watch. excelR83
I agree. The PS3 version will get dumbed down and gamespot will end up giving something much lower than the other platforms.
Because the technology in a PS3 is much higher thus harder. To put it simple. And if you see what EA does with vary new high tech stuff as of late, their not real good with it. Its like trying to drive a jet, when you only been riding a bike. :P Chances are if you only know how to ride a bike, you fly a jet into the ground. At least the first few trys.truenextgen
high on what, and i thought that you flewjets not drive them.
[QUOTE="excelR83"]Because Gabe Newell is a knob. He bashed the PS3 a while back. He likes the 360 more because it's practically a PC, which is the only platform he cares about. The port is being left to EA, so you can expect dramatically different results from the PS3 version. 9.5 for the PC and 360, and even if the port is a 9.0 game, take away another .5 just because it's PS3, and you have an 8.5. If they don't stoop that low, they will just take away several of the medals, specifically in the graphics department. Just watch. donmohsin
I agree. The PS3 version will get dumbed down and gamespot will end up giving something much lower than the other platforms.
your right, not like it hasnt happened before, the PS3 just cant run games as smoothly as the 360 can, and this game will show its true colors
[QUOTE="PMatt722"][QUOTE="unasyn"][QUOTE="virriador"]Are they making it better for the ps3 ?
airg6
Yes.
lol just like skate, madden, and fear hmm i guess owned :)
How are they better for the ps3. Explain. Especially madden.Don't you know what sarcasm is? -_-
Its because gabe let ea handle the ps3 port like a shamefull fat basterd that he is.he is crying because of how hard the ps3 is to dev for.....let him go play with nuaghty dogG10mgs4Naughty Dog would be considered a second-party developer for Sony (since they pretty much exclusively dev for the PlayStation), where VALVe (and EA) in this case, would be purely a third-party developer. Naughty Dog would have had more time with the PS3 hardware and getting to learn its ins and outs before trying to make a game for it, therefore are able to know tricks that some (or most) third-party devs won't. How else can you explain that the only two games for the PS2 capable of HD resolutions (1080i) came from Polyphony Digital, which spent more than four years working with the PS2 hardware to make it possible?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment