WiMP now streams music files in HD quality

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11293 Posts

Website

 

Premium WiMP membership will allow you to stream their entire library of songs (millions) in 24 bit 192khz audio quality.

 

"We store everything we get from the record companies as FLAC. This is still an PCM file like WAV, but it uses an algorithm to losslessly compress and decompress the audio file. Think of it as a . zip-file for audio. It saves up to 50-60% of file size with zero degradation of the sound quality."


Great news and a step further in the right direction for streaming and digital audio all together. Checkmate, Spotify. 

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#2 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11785 Posts

192?  Not many people will actually be able to fully enjoy it.

If they have an option for 96, I think it would be fantastic.

Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11293 Posts

192?  Not many people will actually be able to fully enjoy it.

If they have an option for 96, I think it would be fantastic.

Lach0121
Obviously they will support 24 bit 96khz too. And it doesn't cost much to get a 24/192 DAC :) (of course they do get very expensive if high end)
Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts

I think the kind of people into 192/24 are not the kinda people that stream music.

Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11293 Posts

I think the kind of people into 192/24 are not the kinda people that stream music.

kraken2109
And why don't they stream music? Because previously we've only had 16 bitAAC/MP3 256-320kbps streaming. Now we have 24/192 FLAC/WAV files ;)
Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11785

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#6 Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11785 Posts

[QUOTE="Lach0121"]

192?  Not many people will actually be able to fully enjoy it.

If they have an option for 96, I think it would be fantastic.

Mozelleple112

Obviously they will support 24 bit 96khz too. And it doesn't cost much to get a 24/192 DAC :) (of course they do get very expensive if high end)

Good news!

As far as the 192k... I am doing a home studio with the capability of doing 96k (with sort of specific routing features, and minimal cost considering).  I did finally find one fitting all of that with 96k, but adding 192k to that makes it impossible at a low cost point with a single unit. 

That being said, as 192k is becoming more available, and wider used than before, also means that gear "geared" towards it should also become cheaper overtime. I just don't feel now is the time for me to go that route, not quite.

Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts
[QUOTE="kraken2109"]

I think the kind of people into 192/24 are not the kinda people that stream music.

Mozelleple112
And why don't they stream music? Because previously we've only had 16 bitAAC/MP3 256-320kbps streaming. Now we have 24/192 FLAC/WAV files ;)

That's gonna be totally viable for people with poor internet XD
Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#8 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11293 Posts
[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"][QUOTE="kraken2109"]

I think the kind of people into 192/24 are not the kinda people that stream music.

kraken2109
And why don't they stream music? Because previously we've only had 16 bitAAC/MP3 256-320kbps streaming. Now we have 24/192 FLAC/WAV files ;)

That's gonna be totally viable for people with poor internet XD

Wait.. People still have poor internet in 2013? But if you care about audio quality (i.e. can afford expensive sound gear) I'm sure your internet is superb.
Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts
[QUOTE="Mozelleple112"][QUOTE="kraken2109"][QUOTE="Mozelleple112"] And why don't they stream music? Because previously we've only had 16 bitAAC/MP3 256-320kbps streaming. Now we have 24/192 FLAC/WAV files ;)

That's gonna be totally viable for people with poor internet XD

Wait.. People still have poor internet in 2013? But if you care about audio quality (i.e. can afford expensive sound gear) I'm sure your internet is superb.

A lot of people into audio seem to be old fashioned in many ways, like the people who still listen to records. It will be interesting to see how this streaming service goes.
Avatar image for Riadon2
Riadon2

1598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Riadon2
Member since 2011 • 1598 Posts

There is no audible difference between 32 bit/192 khz and 16 bit/44100 khz (I have a 32 bit DAC).  The people who rip all of their albums to 24/32 bit 192 khz are the same people buying cables worth thousands of dollars and insisting that there is some huge difference.  There is an audible difference between FLAC and 320 kbps in most music.  However, you aren't going to hear it with a gaming headset or something of that nature.

That said, I'm looking forward to being able to convenientally stream high quality FLAC files.

Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts

There is no audible difference between 32 bit/192 khz and 16 bit/44100 khz (I have a 32 bit DAC).  The people who rip all of their albums to 24/32 bit 192 khz are the same people buying cables worth thousands of dollars and insisting that there is some huge difference.  There is an audible difference between FLAC and 320 kbps in most music.  However, you aren't going to hear it with a gaming headset or something of that nature.

That said, I'm looking forward to being able to convenientally stream high quality FLAC files.

Riadon2
I agree that high sample rates aren't really necessary, but going from 16bit to 24bit can help in some situations to lower the noise floor with sensitive equipment.
Avatar image for agpickle
agpickle

3293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 agpickle
Member since 2006 • 3293 Posts

Only available in 5 countries though...

Avatar image for Riadon2
Riadon2

1598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Riadon2
Member since 2011 • 1598 Posts

[QUOTE="Riadon2"]

There is no audible difference between 32 bit/192 khz and 16 bit/44100 khz (I have a 32 bit DAC).  The people who rip all of their albums to 24/32 bit 192 khz are the same people buying cables worth thousands of dollars and insisting that there is some huge difference.  There is an audible difference between FLAC and 320 kbps in most music.  However, you aren't going to hear it with a gaming headset or something of that nature.

That said, I'm looking forward to being able to convenientally stream high quality FLAC files.

kraken2109

I agree that high sample rates aren't really necessary, but going from 16bit to 24bit can help in some situations to lower the noise floor with sensitive equipment.

The only benefit to 24/32 bit audio is the ability to freely adjust software volume further if you do not have an external amp.

Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts

[QUOTE="kraken2109"][QUOTE="Riadon2"]

There is no audible difference between 32 bit/192 khz and 16 bit/44100 khz (I have a 32 bit DAC).  The people who rip all of their albums to 24/32 bit 192 khz are the same people buying cables worth thousands of dollars and insisting that there is some huge difference.  There is an audible difference between FLAC and 320 kbps in most music.  However, you aren't going to hear it with a gaming headset or something of that nature.

That said, I'm looking forward to being able to convenientally stream high quality FLAC files.

Riadon2

I agree that high sample rates aren't really necessary, but going from 16bit to 24bit can help in some situations to lower the noise floor with sensitive equipment.

The only benefit to 24/32 bit audio is the ability to freely adjust software volume further if you do not have an external amp.

Useful if you have an amp that has crosstalk at low levels and sensitive headphones
Avatar image for andyboiii
andyboiii

13628

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 andyboiii
Member since 2006 • 13628 Posts
really hope this hits the United States soon! there's no other streaming music app I've heard that can stream that high quality audio