Well guys I'm a really big FPS fan but I'm looking into the RTS genre and well I think I've narrowed the choices down to the following:
Warcraft 3 Battlechest
Company of Heroes
World in Conflict
Now I'm really having trouble deciding! Out of these, I've only played WC3 (and that was the demo). So far from what I've heard, here are the pros/cons to each:
Warcraft 3 Battlechest Pros:
I have some friends that play it
It seems to still have a really good amount of players on Battle.net
It has a Map Editor kit
My friend said it takes both strategy and tactics, not really luck
Story and setting
Warcraft 3 Battlechest Cons:
You don't control that many units
It's an older game so who knows when WC4 is coming
Many people have been playing since it's original release and will know all the little tricks and nuances
COH Pros:
Cool WW2 setting
Seems to take strategy and tactics to win
Graphics seem good
Destructible environments
COH Cons:
I can't really think of any haha
But again, this is from what I've heard
WiC Pros:
Newest RTS out there I think
Beautiful graphics
Story and setting
Destructible environments (?)
Seems like a different take on the RTS genre
WiC Cons:
I've been hearing that it doesn't really take a lot of skill i.e. not much strategy or tactics
I've heard that the single-player doesn't have much replayability
I want a game that has a lot of replayability but is also very skill based. Like, when you win you feel a sense of accomplishment knowing that you actually out-played or or out-thought your opponent(s) by using better strategies/tactics. Not winning becuz luck plays a huge factor in the game. So lol basically I guess I want a very strategic/tactical game.
What do you guys think?
Log in to comment