Should I upgrade from 2500k to 6700k?

Avatar image for SPBoss
SPBoss

3746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 SPBoss
Member since 2009 • 3746 Posts

Hey Guys..

I currently have an i5 2500k at 5ghz and I'm wondering if changing to a 6700k would increase performance in games. Judging by a few benchmark comparisons the stock 2500k is about 20% slower (rough estimate) than the 6700k.

I'm just thinking has my overclock narrowed this gap enough for me not to bother changing cpu or would it be worth it?

Avatar image for gerygo
GeryGo

12809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#2 GeryGo  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 12809 Posts

You should ask yourself why didn't you upgrade to 4690K already? :P

My point if you didn't concider upgrading into 4690K you shouldn't look at 6700K since the difference between the previous CPU isn't upgrade at all unless you aim for lower temps.

Avatar image for bulby_g
bulby_g

1861

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By bulby_g
Member since 2005 • 1861 Posts

No, I wouldn't bother. Save your money as you aren't going to be improving game performance by anything noticeable. If it's for heavy processing work outside of games then an upgrade could be worthwhile but look at doing an X99 build instead.

Avatar image for TrooperManaic
TrooperManaic

3863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 TrooperManaic
Member since 2004 • 3863 Posts

Whoa why do you need to upgrade? I have the same exact processor at that OC and it rocks everything I throw at it.

Avatar image for SPBoss
SPBoss

3746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 SPBoss
Member since 2009 • 3746 Posts

My temps are pretty good they never go above 60c at 5ghz and my room is rather warm.

I guess there's no point upgrading.. you guys saved me from impulse buying something that would have been a waste of money lol. Thanks for that :P

I am planning to sli two 980 ti's so I hope it won't bottleneck me in the future :)

Avatar image for gerygo
GeryGo

12809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#6 GeryGo  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 12809 Posts

@SPBoss said:

My temps are pretty good they never go above 60c at 5ghz and my room is rather warm.

I guess there's no point upgrading.. you guys saved me from impulse buying something that would have been a waste of money lol. Thanks for that :P

I am planning to sli two 980 ti's so I hope it won't bottleneck me in the future :)

It won't bottleneck trust me =)

Unless there's a huge leap keep that CPU till it dies.

Avatar image for TrooperManaic
TrooperManaic

3863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 TrooperManaic
Member since 2004 • 3863 Posts

Yeah its unfortunate but nothing in the foreseeable future is going to bottleneck that CPU. With DirectX 12 its making even older CPUs last longer by directing more calls to the GPU. Looks like the ole LGA 1155 is here to stay a few years longer.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

@TrooperManaic said:

Yeah its unfortunate but nothing in the foreseeable future is going to bottleneck that CPU. With DirectX 12 its making even older CPUs last longer by directing more calls to the GPU. Looks like the ole LGA 1155 is here to stay a few years longer.

Not sure how that is unfortunate.. It means you can continue using a cpu released back in early 2011 and not be forced to spend upwards to $400+ for the new cpu, motherboard and memory.. I5 2500k and 2600k are the biggest bang for your buck cpu's ever made for sure..

Avatar image for Coseniath
Coseniath

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 Coseniath
Member since 2004 • 3183 Posts

Even if its 30% slower, what's the point?

You have a sandybridge i5 2500K clocked at 5GHz.

There is no game that a 2500K@5GHz will bottleneck it.

@PredatorRules said:

It won't bottleneck trust me =)

Unless there's a huge leap keep that CPU till it dies.

+1.

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127525

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127525 Posts

At 5GHz you can keep it a while longer. To be honest I think only real upgrade for you is going to X99 or wait for Skylake-E.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11  Edited By deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

@Coseniath said:

Even if its 30% slower, what's the point?

You have a sandybridge i5 2500K clocked at 5GHz.

There is no game that a 2500K@5GHz will bottleneck it.

@PredatorRules said:

It won't bottleneck trust me =)

Unless there's a huge leap keep that CPU till it dies.

+1.

No way is it that much slower.. .. A i5 2500k at 4.4 to 4.5ghz out does a stock speed I5 4690k.. Even when the 4690k is overclocked, we are talking about a tops of 5% difference in performance in real world game tests at best.. Add into the fact that the Skylake so far have been looking to be awful overclockers from what I have seen people have only been able to push their chips to around 400 or 500mhz tops..

Avatar image for Truth_Hurts_U
Truth_Hurts_U

9703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#12  Edited By Truth_Hurts_U
Member since 2006 • 9703 Posts

The best thing about Skylake is the lower frame times.

Loading Video...

If you play a lot of games and have been noticing stuttering or hitching... Skylake is the way to go.

Avatar image for Coseniath
Coseniath

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 Coseniath
Member since 2004 • 3183 Posts

@sSubZerOo: I said "even if"... :P

@Truth_Hurts_U: Wow! Dat min framerates!

Avatar image for sm0ke
Sm0ke

13

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Sm0ke
Member since 2015 • 13 Posts

@SPBoss: You know the best way to answer your question? When the day comes and your computer is chugging along when you want to do something on it then that's when you should upgrade. If you don't currently have that problem with your games or applications then you have no need for an upgrade.

Consider upgrades when you find the need for it because you're not getting the performance you desire from what you need your PC to do.

Avatar image for jj-josh
jj-josh

266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#15 jj-josh
Member since 2014 • 266 Posts
@SPBoss said:

Hey Guys..

I currently have an i5 2500k at 5ghz and I'm wondering if changing to a 6700k would increase performance in games. Judging by a few benchmark comparisons the stock 2500k is about 20% slower (rough estimate) than the 6700k.

I'm just thinking has my overclock narrowed this gap enough for me not to bother changing cpu or would it be worth it?

I have a 2500k and it works great. Save your money my man the 2500k is still killing games now.

Avatar image for BassMan
BassMan

17859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 226

User Lists: 0

#16  Edited By BassMan
Member since 2002 • 17859 Posts

@Truth_Hurts_U: Good call on the frame-times. Frame-times are crucial to a good experience. You can have high fps, but if the frame-times are inconsistent, it will feel like shit. I may upgrade to Skylake-E because of this. I will see how DX12 factors into all of this when the games start rolling out.

Avatar image for joseph_mach
joseph_mach

3898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 joseph_mach
Member since 2003 • 3898 Posts

@jj-josh said:
@SPBoss said:

Hey Guys..

I currently have an i5 2500k at 5ghz and I'm wondering if changing to a 6700k would increase performance in games. Judging by a few benchmark comparisons the stock 2500k is about 20% slower (rough estimate) than the 6700k.

I'm just thinking has my overclock narrowed this gap enough for me not to bother changing cpu or would it be worth it?

I have a 2500k and it works great. Save your money my man the 2500k is still killing games now.

Yeah, mine is still running strong in my rig too. I was just about to pull the trigger and move to SkyLake, but after everyone's opinions that I should wait...I'm glad I did. I'm going to give DX12 some time to develop and see how much it extends the life of my 2500k. I'm running games just fine atm and I think once I got over the feeling of wanting to upgrade because SkyLake was so new...holding out for another generation (SkyLake-E or even Cannonlake) is going to be worth it in the long run.

Avatar image for Gambler_3
Gambler_3

7736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -4

User Lists: 0

#18 Gambler_3
Member since 2009 • 7736 Posts

@sSubZerOo: I think the Q6600 certainly gives the 2500k a run for its money in terms of being the best bang for buck CPU of all time.