Nuclear Union gameplay STALKER reborn?

gameplay trailer right here, I hope the graphics look better than what was shown since they seemed to brag a lot about it in the tech review

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3-9oklWUls&feature=youtu.be

The video is based on a very early technical demo of the game that is even not at pre-alpha stage and by far does not represent the final quality of game. All textures, animations and battles system are work in progress. We were eager to show the video so that you can have the idea where the development is heading.

hmm.. looked pretty terrible to me. Nothing like STALKER.

RIP Stalker 2 :(

It's as if the Gamebryo Engine went backwards in time.. this would be it.. but worst. Other than the graphics, the game looks interesting. It slightly reminds me of Stalker.

The game is still early in development and the engine they're using is an engine originally built for RTS but rebuilt and modified so it can work with third person games. They still have a lot of time to polish the game so lets cross our fingers it looks and plays better. I mean they bragged about DX11 and all that, they better have it!

Stop complaining about the graphics, it's built on the Men of War engine ffs, so it already look pretty amazing as it is.

Just hope they can take advantage of this fact and include some RTS scale huge battles, that would be so wicked.

Doesn't really remind me of STALKER but it could be interesting. Graphics look pretty bad though.Toxic-Seahorse

Since when did graphics of this caliber become "really bad"? It actually looked technically better than any game in the STALKER series which received much praise for it's graphical achievements. The actual surrounding, trees, grass, buildings, etc looked better than STALKER and looked quite nice to me. However, much like STALKER from what I could tell about the character models is that they were the ones that were terrible graphically. Aside from that it looks quite nice. I don't like the fact that it's third person(I think). Also the blood looked stupid.

Doesn't really remind me of STALKER but it could be interesting. Graphics look pretty bad though.Toxic-Seahorse

Since I double posted thought I'd share how much better the game looks than STALKER it's self. Btw, I LOVE STALKER games, and thought the graphics were great with mods, with the exception of some aspects of the game. Anyway, here are some screenshots of the game showing how great it looks.

[QUOTE="Toxic-Seahorse"]Doesn't really remind me of STALKER but it could be interesting. Graphics look pretty bad though.SystemsGO

Since I double posted thought I'd share how much better the game looks than STALKER it's self. Btw, I LOVE STALKER games, and thought the graphics were great with mods, with the exception of some aspects of the game. Anyway, here are some screenshots of the game showing how great it looks.

I agree Call of Pripyat looked awesome without mods, but with them it looks even better. I was only comparing it with STALKER like everyone else in general, and making the point it looks better than STALKER. Aside from that, you never elaborated before I posted my reply. You vaguely said "The graphics look pretty bad though", the graphics look great for a recent game, especially compared to games like SKYRIM(sucks without mods, big time). It's not just overly saturated with bloom and HDR to make you think it looks better than it actually does. Not to mention the game isn't out yet, and there are probably some enhancements still to be made overall. As it stands I would play it and think the graphics are great from what I've seen thus far.

I agree Call of Pripyat looked awesome without mods, but with them it looks even better. I was only comparing it with STALKER like everyone else in general, and making the point it looks better than STALKER. Aside from that, you never elaborated before I posted my reply. You vaguely said "The graphics look pretty bad though", the graphics look great for a recent game, especially compared to games like SKYRIM(sucks without mods, big time). It's not just overly saturated with bloom and HDR to make you think it looks better than it actually does. Not to mention the game isn't out yet, and there are probably some enhancements still to be made overall. As it stands I would play it and think the graphics are great from what I've seen thus far.

SystemsGO

Even if its to show "development," I have no idea why you'd release something that clunky. What kind of response do they expect to get from that? It looks terrible. biggest_loser

I don't think enough was shown to even formulate this type of opinion. It showed some slow-motion kills, and a guy walking around. Was that really enough to give you a definitive "clunky" gameplay opinion? There wasn't much actual walking around and shooting going on to have that sortve response. Surely once more gets released we'll be able to accurately determine whether or not it's going to be clunky.

Some real gameplay would be nice. A few walking around views of the world and real-time kills would give us a better perspective on what is clunky and what isn't. From what I can tell the game looked nice so far. I say keep it up and don't let the negative Gamespot comrades discourage any future development.

Noodle you need to stop trying to hype this game so much. Chances are it won't be all that great

[QUOTE="biggest_loser"]Even if its to show "development," I have no idea why you'd release something that clunky. What kind of response do they expect to get from that? It looks terrible. SystemsGO

I don't think enough was shown to even formulate this type of opinion. It showed some slow-motion kills, and a guy walking around. Was that really enough to give you a definitive "clunky" gameplay opinion?

Yes, it looked bad.