New Medal of Honor Trailer

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Remmib
Remmib

2250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Remmib
Member since 2010 • 2250 Posts

Here.

October 15th.

Gave me goose bumps...Can't wait.

Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

Reminds me a lot of World in Conflict. Now I hope it has a story at least half as good as that game's, which was even better with the expansion.

Avatar image for SF_KiLLaMaN
SF_KiLLaMaN

6446

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 SF_KiLLaMaN
Member since 2007 • 6446 Posts
Need a gameplay video.
Avatar image for -Origin-
-Origin-

1816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#4 -Origin-
Member since 2007 • 1816 Posts

Yeah, after that helicopter got shot down towards the end of the trailer, i was like BOOYAH!!! AWESOME!!!

Avatar image for arto1223
arto1223

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 arto1223
Member since 2005 • 4412 Posts

Looks good. The fact that DICE is making the multiplayer is enought for me to get excited, but if the rest of the game is good, then that's just dandy...

Avatar image for mhofever
mhofever

3960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 52

User Lists: 0

#6 mhofever
Member since 2008 • 3960 Posts
Finally, Medal Of Honor gets a total makeover with a modern warfare style. Looks really good so far. Knowing the developers behind the game, I think it'll be very good indeed.
Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts

Looks good. The fact that DICE is making the multiplayer is enought for me to get excited, but if the rest of the game is good, then that's just dandy...

arto1223
I had no idea DICE was making the multiplayer component...Sweet!
Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

Need a gameplay video. SF_KiLLaMaN

Because out of context gameplay is so much more representative than this kind of video.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#9 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Pointless trailer..... really.
Avatar image for Lord_DoDo56
Lord_DoDo56

960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#10 Lord_DoDo56
Member since 2005 • 960 Posts
Pointless trailer..... really.dakan45
I don't think it was meant to be awe inspiring but meant to point out that there will be a back story for the protagonist. But I gotta say this looks way better than MW2's trailer did.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#11 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
[QUOTE="Lord_DoDo56"] But I gotta say this looks way better than MW2's trailer did.

WHAT? :shock: NOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! :P Well depends on what you going for, i much prefered the mw2 trailer that showed diffirent battlefields and alot of action than this trailer. But then again judging by moh pacific assault that had a great story focused around the main character. I got to say that if this is what its going for, then ok. But the previous trailer pointed out it was a mw2 ripoff. If its diffirent then thats fine, but i still found this trailer to be pretty simplistic without showing anything to get me excited for.
Avatar image for the_mitch28
the_mitch28

4684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 the_mitch28
Member since 2005 • 4684 Posts

Looks good. The fact that DICE is making the multiplayer is enought for me to get excited, but if the rest of the game is good, then that's just dandy...

arto1223

That's actually got me worried considering it's supposed to take on Call of Duty directly. It needs to be a fast paced shooter not slow and tactical like the BF series. That and Dice just makes guns weird... they sit weird on the screen and aren't fun to use.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#14 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="arto1223"]

Looks good. The fact that DICE is making the multiplayer is enought for me to get excited, but if the rest of the game is good, then that's just dandy...

the_mitch28

That's actually got me worried considering it's supposed to take on Call of Duty directly. It needs to be a fast paced shooter not slow and tactical like the BF series. That and Dice just makes guns weird... they sit weird on the screen and aren't fun to use.

The exact same concern here. Making a moh game with vehicles seems kinda out of place to me.
Avatar image for Remmib
Remmib

2250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Remmib
Member since 2010 • 2250 Posts

[QUOTE="arto1223"]

Looks good. The fact that DICE is making the multiplayer is enought for me to get excited, but if the rest of the game is good, then that's just dandy...

the_mitch28

That's actually got me worried considering it's supposed to take on Call of Duty directly. It needs to be a fast paced shooter not slow and tactical like the BF series. That and Dice just makes guns weird... they sit weird on the screen and aren't fun to use.

The fact that DICE is making the multiplayer is kind of worrisome. Their guns are always very weak and peashooter-like. Also, their netcode for their games has always been a bit crappy with hit detection and what not.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#16 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
That is true, but how diffirent the mp will be from mp regarding the guns thingy? I just dont think they can completly change the way guns work because they make the mp, i mean what are they going to do.......(installs the last update) Ahhhh i see it now, yeah you are right to worry, they can change the guns anytime ;)
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#17 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

[QUOTE="arto1223"]

Looks good. The fact that DICE is making the multiplayer is enought for me to get excited, but if the rest of the game is good, then that's just dandy...

the_mitch28

That's actually got me worried considering it's supposed to take on Call of Duty directly. It needs to be a fast paced shooter not slow and tactical like the BF series. That and Dice just makes guns weird... they sit weird on the screen and aren't fun to use.

DICE is an amazing company, their multiplayer games are always leaps and bounds over the other military shooters.
Avatar image for alexlmt
alexlmt

418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 alexlmt
Member since 2006 • 418 Posts

Honestly, I don't really care about this game's multiplayer. I just want a good and long single player campaign.

Avatar image for mhofever
mhofever

3960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 52

User Lists: 0

#19 mhofever
Member since 2008 • 3960 Posts

Honestly, I don't really care about this game's multiplayer. I just want a good and long single player campaign.

alexlmt

Yes, to be honest, I haven't played an awesome long single player campaign since....since Allied Assault I guess!

Avatar image for adv_tr00per
adv_tr00per

2605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 adv_tr00per
Member since 2006 • 2605 Posts

This is gonna be good.

Avatar image for the_mitch28
the_mitch28

4684

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 the_mitch28
Member since 2005 • 4684 Posts

[QUOTE="the_mitch28"]

[QUOTE="arto1223"]

Looks good. The fact that DICE is making the multiplayer is enought for me to get excited, but if the rest of the game is good, then that's just dandy...

millerlight89

That's actually got me worried considering it's supposed to take on Call of Duty directly. It needs to be a fast paced shooter not slow and tactical like the BF series. That and Dice just makes guns weird... they sit weird on the screen and aren't fun to use.

DICE is an amazing company, their multiplayer games are always leaps and bounds over the other military shooters.

hahaha I'm sorry but no.

I like the CoD series a hell of a lot more than the Battlefield series simply because I like fast paced shooters with satisfying guns... something that the BF series doesn't offer.

If this game is supposed to be a substitute for CoD then it needs to have a similar pace something which DICE hasn't done and their recent slow sluggish BC2 isn't confidence inspiring either.

Oh and DICE's multiplayer shooters being leaps and bounds above everything else? Well that's just not true at all.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#22 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
^I agree with the post above, thats why i bought bad company 2 mainly for the singleplayer, after a while i was bored with the mp. I never liked a bad company game, not even bf heroes.
Avatar image for gashoe13
gashoe13

511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#23 gashoe13
Member since 2007 • 511 Posts

Looks sorta like a Modern Warfare 2 on steroids.

If it's longer than 10 hours, I'll grab it. Otherwise, I'll just stick to Modern Warfare 1 and 2.

Oh, but if they change the cover of the game to something better, I'll get it anyways.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#24 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

Looks sorta like a Modern Warfare 2 on steroids.

If it's longer than 10 hours, I'll grab it. Otherwise, I'll just stick to Modern Warfare 1 and 2.

Oh, but if they change the cover of the game to something better, I'll get it anyways.

gashoe13
A non sandbox fps nowadays being more than 10 hours? No way.
Avatar image for Remmib
Remmib

2250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Remmib
Member since 2010 • 2250 Posts

hahaha I'm sorry but no.

I like the CoD series a hell of a lot more than the Battlefield series simply because I like fast paced shooters with satisfying guns... something that the BF series doesn't offer.

If this game is supposed to be a substitute for CoD then it needs to have a similar pace something which DICE hasn't done and their recent slow sluggish BC2 isn't confidence inspiring either.

Oh and DICE's multiplayer shooters being leaps and bounds above everything else? Well that's just not true at all.

the_mitch28

CoD does indeed have satisfying guns, BF series never really did due to the crappy net code DICE always had.

I just hope this is a bit slower paced than the CoD games.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#26 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
I have to say i agree totally with the avoce user. If you make cod guns but less accurate at long range and add a slower paced gameplay than cod without cheap perks, it could become a great mp experiance without vehicles.
Avatar image for venjhammet
venjhammet

127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 venjhammet
Member since 2009 • 127 Posts

Looks like they finally made a modern combat game, bye to world war 2 setting

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#28 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

Looks like they finally made a modern combat game, bye to world war 2 setting

venjhammet
Amen to that, i was waiting for years till they drop the ww2 setting.