I'm raging about Rage

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for TCheetor
TCheetor

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 TCheetor
Member since 2005 • 37 Posts

Glad I just spent 60 bucks on Rage for PC since everything in game looks like **** What a crap year for PC graphics (Witcher 2 aside). God they need to release new consoles so our PC games stop getting raped. What two new games this year did we have that were supposed to blow us away and set a new standard? Crysis 2 and Rage, both on new "next-gen" engine, and both looked like **** At least we got the patches for Crysis 2, but think what could have been had it been developed for PC like the first one. I don't really even blame the developers (although they could have done more with these textures in Rage for us PC gamers), they want to sell games and the consoles are the best way of doing that. I'm constantly seeing idiots posting crap like "I don't want new consoles, games look almost photorealistic now." What a load of nonsense! I want what they're smoking! I never get on forums and fuss about this stuff but I'm really fed up here. Jeez!

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#2 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts

Rage's issues aren't just with the graphics.

Avatar image for couly
couly

6279

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#3 couly
Member since 2004 • 6279 Posts
My patience is also wearing thin, and now they say no new xbox for 2 years! we need more witchers.
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#4 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts
You make this thread when BF3 is coming out in two days?
Avatar image for slabber44
slabber44

985

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 slabber44
Member since 2004 • 985 Posts
You make this thread when BF3 is coming out in two days?GeneralShowzer
And you know as well General, there will be people raging about BF3 for one reason or another. Always someone not satisfied with something.
Avatar image for TCheetor
TCheetor

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 TCheetor
Member since 2005 • 37 Posts

You make this thread when BF3 is coming out in two days?GeneralShowzer

What's your point? My argument will be no less valid after BF3 is released.

Avatar image for mep69
mep69

1926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 mep69
Member since 2008 • 1926 Posts
don't tell me you just went out and bought Rage, if it was a preorder fair enough. But no one has an excuse now because it sucks and everyone should know.
Avatar image for GeneralShowzer
GeneralShowzer

11598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#8 GeneralShowzer
Member since 2010 • 11598 Posts

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]You make this thread when BF3 is coming out in two days?TCheetor

What's your point? My argument will be no less valid after BF3 is released.

What do you mean what's my point?

There you have it, BF3, a graphical powerhouse running on a next gen engine,buy it and get your graphics fix.

Rage was never meant to push PC graphics anyway, it was always a console focused project and id was very clear about this from the start.

Shogun II and Crysis 2 also looked amazing and were very advanced graphics wise.

Avatar image for deactivated-60f7582dcaa79
deactivated-60f7582dcaa79

510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 deactivated-60f7582dcaa79
Member since 2004 • 510 Posts

I agree even though Shogun 2 didn't stick for me like M:TW2 did (12 hours played versus 300+ hours played). The graphics were great even on the campaign map.... Obviously not photo realistic there but the battles were really incredible looking.

Avatar image for TCheetor
TCheetor

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 TCheetor
Member since 2005 • 37 Posts

don't tell me you just went out and bought Rage, if it was a preorder fair enough. But no one has an excuse now because it sucks and everyone should know.mep69

I traded in a bunch of games I did't want and Rage was the only theing currently out the semi-interested me. :( I've already got BF3 and Skyrim on preorder so this was pretty much it.

Avatar image for TCheetor
TCheetor

37

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 TCheetor
Member since 2005 • 37 Posts

[QUOTE="TCheetor"]

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]You make this thread when BF3 is coming out in two days?GeneralShowzer

What's your point? My argument will be no less valid after BF3 is released.

What do you mean what's my point?

There you have it, BF3, a graphical powerhouse running on a next gen engine,buy it and get your graphics fix.

Rage was never meant to push PC graphics anyway, it was always a console focused project and id was very clear about this from the start.

Shogun II and Crysis 2 also looked amazing and were very advanced graphics wise.

I have no doubt that BF3 will look good, but we'll see if there's really that much difference between the PC and console versions. Furthermore, even if it's utterly amazing, that doesn't change the fact that console limitations are holding back the industry in general, which was my initial point. As for Rage, it doesn't need to "push PC graphics" it just needs to not have ugly blurry crappy looking textures. Metro 2033 was on XBOX 360 and PC but the PC version didn't look like crap.

Avatar image for mep69
mep69

1926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 mep69
Member since 2008 • 1926 Posts
[QUOTE="TCheetor"]

[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"]

[QUOTE="TCheetor"]

What's your point? My argument will be no less valid after BF3 is released.

What do you mean what's my point?

There you have it, BF3, a graphical powerhouse running on a next gen engine,buy it and get your graphics fix.

Rage was never meant to push PC graphics anyway, it was always a console focused project and id was very clear about this from the start.

Shogun II and Crysis 2 also looked amazing and were very advanced graphics wise.

I have no doubt that BF3 will look good, but we'll see if there's really that much difference between the PC and console versions. Furthermore, even if it's utterly amazing, that doesn't change the fact that console limitations are holding back the industry in general, which was my initial point. As for Rage, it doesn't need to "push PC graphics" it just needs to not have ugly blurry crappy looking textures. Metro 2033 was on XBOX 360 and PC but the PC version didn't look like crap.

ID is just tring to cover themselves, ofcourse they could have made the pc version better. they just couldn't be bothered