Haswell-E CPU Reviews: Core i7-5960X, i7-5930K and i7-5820K

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Coseniath
Coseniath

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Coseniath
Member since 2004 • 3183 Posts

Haswell-E has been officially launched:

Here is a list of reviews:

Anandtech

Guru3D

Hardware Canucks

Hardware Heaven

HiTech Legion

PC Perspective

Tweak Town

The Tech Report

Bit-tech

Tom's Hardware

Vortez

HardOCP

HotHardware

Legit Reviews

Avatar image for deactivated-579f651eab962
deactivated-579f651eab962

5404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 deactivated-579f651eab962
Member since 2003 • 5404 Posts

The 5820k is a bargain at £300. I'll be picking up the 5930k though.

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11790 Posts

@klunt_bumskrint:

Curious, why is this the case? Are you planning on multi-gpu? Or am I missing something?

Just want to make sure I am not missing anything between the 5930k, and the 5820k. I understand the only real difference between them is 2mhz (base clock) and 1mhz (turbo clock) and the lower PCI lanes on the 5820k. However, for someone like myself who is only planning on a single card solution (as to keep noise/heat down, and just overall more stable setup) the 5820k would be the best choice, right? Especially if these are supposed to overclock well?

Avatar image for ShepardCommandr
ShepardCommandr

4939

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 ShepardCommandr
Member since 2013 • 4939 Posts

If intel keeps this up i won't have to upgrade my cpu for another 10 years.

Avatar image for Coseniath
Coseniath

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By Coseniath
Member since 2004 • 3183 Posts

The i7 5820K is great. Since it doesn't cost much more than i7 4790K its a great deal.

The problem is DDR4. paying for 16GB around $250 :S...

Avatar image for Lach0121
Lach0121

11790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By Lach0121
Member since 2007 • 11790 Posts

@Coseniath:

True, but I have already decided I am gonna wait for Cyber weekend to get my RAM (DDR4) and most parts, unless I can find them on a decent sale before hand. Which I don't expect really to happen. I also don't expect to save much Cyber Weekend as this is all new hardware. However, anything I can save will be helpful as I have to build 2 of these rigs.

Avatar image for commander
commander

16217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#7 commander
Member since 2010 • 16217 Posts

I'm not picking up those extreme cpu's again, some games just run worse and you have to start tweaking.

A fast mainstream cpu is all you need in this day and age

Avatar image for GamingVengeance
GamingVengeance

1874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 GamingVengeance
Member since 2012 • 1874 Posts

ordered the 5930k, just waiting for a couple 980s now!

Avatar image for deactivated-579f651eab962
deactivated-579f651eab962

5404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By deactivated-579f651eab962
Member since 2003 • 5404 Posts

@Lach0121 said:

Curious, why is this the case? Are you planning on multi-gpu? Or am I missing something?

Just want to make sure I am not missing anything between the 5930k, and the 5820k. I understand the only real difference between them is 2mhz (base clock) and 1mhz (turbo clock) and the lower PCI lanes on the 5820k. However, for someone like myself who is only planning on a single card solution (as to keep noise/heat down, and just overall more stable setup) the 5820k would be the best choice, right? Especially if these are supposed to overclock well?

The PCI lanes.

I have 2 GPU's now it would be nice to run at 16/16. I might be trowing in another 780 in which case 8/8/8 is better than 8/8/4

Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

Too expensive for me.

You have to factor in the much more expensive RAM and motherboards.

Avatar image for horgen
horgen

127525

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 horgen  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 127525 Posts

@Chatch09 said:

This has been my new dilemma lol. I already have my case and a few other parts but Im still not sure if I want to go X99 over Z97, for me the X99 combo (5820k, MSI X99S Gaming 7 and 32GB Ripjaws DDR4 2400) is only $250 more than Z97 (4790k, Maximus VII Hero, 32GB Trident X DDR3 2400). One thing I am concerned about though is power consumption lol, 140W TDP and running 3+ GPUs....

If you plan to run 3+ GPU I would go for 5930K or higher.

Avatar image for Kjranu
Kjranu

1802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#14  Edited By Kjranu
Member since 2012 • 1802 Posts

The prices are outrageous. This is a great example of when you have zero competition, prices go through the roof. AMD needs to step it up.

Avatar image for insane_metalist
insane_metalist

7797

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#15 insane_metalist
Member since 2006 • 7797 Posts

@Kjranu said:

The prices are outrageous. This is a great example of when you have zero competition, prices go through the roof. AMD needs to step it up.

Actually these are pretty normal prices for 2011 socket.