For the first time since CoD4... CoD looks really cool

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for MEOWWW123
MEOWWW123

870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 MEOWWW123
Member since 2008 • 870 Posts

Im actually enticed by this trailer. This CoD actually looks like it might be a bit different for once.

Avatar image for egger7577
egger7577

721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 egger7577
Member since 2004 • 721 Posts

Different yes, same graphics engine since 2007, also yes.

Avatar image for Toxic-Seahorse
Toxic-Seahorse

5074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Toxic-Seahorse
Member since 2012 • 5074 Posts

Im actually enticed by this trailer. This CoD actually looks like it might be a bit different for once.

MEOWWW123
You really think that? It'll be the same old CoD just with a different skin over it.
Avatar image for Phoenix534
Phoenix534

17774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Phoenix534
Member since 2008 • 17774 Posts

[QUOTE="MEOWWW123"]

Im actually enticed by this trailer. This CoD actually looks like it might be a bit different for once.

Toxic-Seahorse

You really think that? It'll be the same old CoD just with a different skin over it.

I wasn't aware that previous Call of Duty games had branching storylines and RTS sequences.

Avatar image for dangamit
dangamit

664

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 dangamit
Member since 2010 • 664 Posts
Sheeple will eat anything Activision throws at them. I learned my lesson when I paid $60 for BO, only to play it for 22 hours and 44 minutes. Thankfully it was the only CoD that I paid for since CoD1.
Avatar image for NintendoGamer3
NintendoGamer3

2848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 NintendoGamer3
Member since 2008 • 2848 Posts
Really? The trailer confirmed myself NOT to get it. Looks like Halo meets CoD. Just look at GameSpot's home page, the soldier looks like an ODST.. Looks horrible.
Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#7 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

[QUOTE="Toxic-Seahorse"][QUOTE="MEOWWW123"]

Im actually enticed by this trailer. This CoD actually looks like it might be a bit different for once.

Phoenix534

You really think that? It'll be the same old CoD just with a different skin over it.

I wasn't aware that previous Call of Duty games had branching storylines and RTS sequences.

I also forgot when older Call of Duty games let you ride horses or fly a VTOL.

Avatar image for Calvin079
Calvin079

16406

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#8 Calvin079
Member since 2008 • 16406 Posts

[QUOTE="MEOWWW123"]

Im actually enticed by this trailer. This CoD actually looks like it might be a bit different for once.

Toxic-Seahorse

You really think that? It'll be the same old CoD just with a different skin over it.

yep. saem old same old. move along, nothing to see.

Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

BLOPSII makes it really easy to see who bltches about COD without even knowing anything about it.

Different yes, same graphics engine since 2007, also yes.

egger7577

Since 2003.

Or 1999 if you count the first game using it lol

Avatar image for GameFan1983
GameFan1983

2189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 GameFan1983
Member since 2004 • 2189 Posts

when it comes to marketing trailer, activison the best in the industry. None of the BO1, MW1-3 looked less impressive, until you start playing it.

Avatar image for Zubinen
Zubinen

2555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 Zubinen
Member since 2011 • 2555 Posts

BLOPSII makes it really easy to see who bltches about COD without even knowing anything about it.

Baranga
But it's so edgy bro, bro. Wait the bros are complaining about COD now? It really is the end of the world :lol:
Avatar image for slabber44
slabber44

985

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 slabber44
Member since 2004 • 985 Posts
Will the never-ending series of CoD, MW, and BF ever end? NOPE! Not as long as people keep buying them by the 100's of thousands. I finally stopped at CoD 2, BF2, and MW4. As many as they have released in each series, I can't see where they can possibly add anything new gameplay wise. So to expect something groundbreaking from any of these is somewhat naive.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#13 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

Different yes, same graphics engine since 2007, also yes.

egger7577

Same graphics engine since 2003. Not improved all that much since 2005.

Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#14 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

Will the never-ending series of CoD, MW, and BF ever end? NOPE! Not as long as people keep buying them by the 100's of thousands. I finally stopped at CoD 2, BF2, and MW4. As many as they have released in each series, I can't see where they can possibly add anything new gameplay wise. So to expect something groundbreaking from any of these is somewhat naive. slabber44

It's funny because Bad Company 2 and now BLOPSII add something new gameplay wise.

If you count zombies and campaign coop - WaW was pretty damn innovative back in 2008. And BLOPS was the pinnacle of RPG elements in a multiplayer shooter.

Avatar image for DevilMightCry
DevilMightCry

3554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#15 DevilMightCry
Member since 2007 • 3554 Posts

[QUOTE="slabber44"]Will the never-ending series of CoD, MW, and BF ever end? NOPE! Not as long as people keep buying them by the 100's of thousands. I finally stopped at CoD 2, BF2, and MW4. As many as they have released in each series, I can't see where they can possibly add anything new gameplay wise. So to expect something groundbreaking from any of these is somewhat naive. Baranga

It's funny because Bad Company 2 and now BLOPSII add something new gameplay wise.

If you count zombies and campaign coop - WaW was pretty damn innovative back in 2008. And BLOPS was the pinnacle of RPG elements in a multiplayer shooter.

WaW featured like a decent version of COD2 gameplay with both small and large maps, and some tanks, great FULL co-op with 4 players and... Zombies.
Avatar image for slabber44
slabber44

985

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 slabber44
Member since 2004 • 985 Posts
[QUOTE="Baranga"]

[QUOTE="slabber44"]Will the never-ending series of CoD, MW, and BF ever end? NOPE! Not as long as people keep buying them by the 100's of thousands. I finally stopped at CoD 2, BF2, and MW4. As many as they have released in each series, I can't see where they can possibly add anything new gameplay wise. So to expect something groundbreaking from any of these is somewhat naive. DevilMightCry

It's funny because Bad Company 2 and now BLOPSII add something new gameplay wise.

If you count zombies and campaign coop - WaW was pretty damn innovative back in 2008. And BLOPS was the pinnacle of RPG elements in a multiplayer shooter.

WaW featured like a decent version of COD2 gameplay with both small and large maps, and some tanks, great FULL co-op with 4 players and... Zombies.

Your right about the co-op in WaW (played my friends game). The zombies was alot like L4D survival mode, with different features. As for BLOPS and Bad Co. 2 can't comment cause I never played it so you might be right there also. So what is it that they could possibly add to make people want to buy it? The basic gunplay hasn't changed much. Still need to shoot people multiple times for them to die often, guns that should have a limited range can shoot halfway across the map. Those two things always irritated me.
Avatar image for cfstar
cfstar

1979

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 cfstar
Member since 2009 • 1979 Posts

I Think that has to do with the fact that it doesn't look like CoD.

Avatar image for -CheeseEater-
-CheeseEater-

5258

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 -CheeseEater-
Member since 2007 • 5258 Posts
Unless this game has the same levels of functionality as CoD4/CoD2, I will not be touching it with a 10 foot barge poll.
Avatar image for True_Sounds
True_Sounds

2915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#19 True_Sounds
Member since 2009 • 2915 Posts

I thought the mechs and stuff make the game look terrible.. And I woulda used CGI for the trailer instead of gameplay, with THOSE graphics.

Avatar image for theragu40
theragu40

3332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#20 theragu40
Member since 2005 • 3332 Posts
Meh. Activision is Tony Hawking the COD series big time. I give them one or two more iterations before the series falls into oblivion and they find some other burgeoning franchise to destroy.
Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts

Im actually enticed by this trailer. This CoD actually looks like it might be a bit different for once.

MEOWWW123
It's the same crap but with robots thrown in. It's going to be generic garbage just like the past few entries in the series.
Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts

Different yes, same graphics engine since 2007, also yes.

egger7577
Same graphics engine since 1999.
Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

rofl they put 4 legs in a tank and make "futuristic" military uniforms instead of "modern" time uniforms and people go "OMGADZ its a new cod"

well i guess its understandable, there has been so little change over every cod that this may seem the ultimate change for some people, i will wait and laugh when it comes out and its the same engine with same mechanics in different uniform.

Avatar image for jakes456
jakes456

1398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 jakes456
Member since 2011 • 1398 Posts

The only good Call of Duty is #2. The game isn't even worth talking about :P

Avatar image for Englando_IV
Englando_IV

4334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Englando_IV
Member since 2008 • 4334 Posts
Meh. Activision is Tony Hawking the COD series big time. I give them one or two more iterations before the series falls into oblivion and they find some other burgeoning franchise to destroy.theragu40
It's true, it's absurd how much they milk it. But what's more absurd is that the sales keep increasing.
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#26 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

Different yes, same graphics engine since 2007, also yes.

egger7577

You mean since 1999?

EDIT: O wait some1 beat me

Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#27 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

[QUOTE="theragu40"]Meh. Activision is Tony Hawking the COD series big time. I give them one or two more iterations before the series falls into oblivion and they find some other burgeoning franchise to destroy.Englando_IV
It's true, it's absurd how much they milk it. But what's more absurd is that the sales keep increasing.

Well for one, its not the same deal. Not exactly.

Tony Hawk games were all made by one developer, which inevitably led to games decreasing in quality as time went on and more time and money was necessary to make quality titles. Sort of the same tale for Guitar Hero, except it relied on expensive peripherals, at one point had like 5 other GH games out in one year, and ended up being just like Rock Band, not to mention the lack of flexibility they had in messing with the formula.

CoD has a lot more going for it, especially when you consider how they can make radical changes like CoD4 or, well, BO2 and still call it CoD.

Avatar image for Zubinen
Zubinen

2555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 Zubinen
Member since 2011 • 2555 Posts

CoD has a lot more going for it, especially when you consider how they can make radical changes like CoD4 or, well, BO2 and still call it CoD.

SPYDER0416
That's because Treyarch fails at making MP as well as IW did prior to the post-MWF2 release firings. I will admit, all the fluffy stuff like gun cosmetics, wager mode, dive to prone, combat training, etc. were neat but I don't trust them to make the core MP enjoyable, I mean just look at their random hate for snipers. In BF3 sniping at any range is enjoyable, and yet somehow in a COD game it isn't? Well at least the art direction isn't as moody/depressing looking as in previous Treyarch titles :lol: Compare this from MWF3 for example: http://image.gamespotcdn.net/gamespot/images/2011/244/995751_20110903_640screen003.jpg With this from BO1 for example: http://image.gamespotcdn.net/gamespot/images/2010/312/reviews/960187_20101109_640screen013.jpg
Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#29 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
I don't feel the same way but that's an awesome feeling I would imagine. COD4 was the last, and best Modern Warfare COD game.
Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#30 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts

I think that it'll bring nothing interesting or new to CoD and it'll just be a reskinning of the rest of the games. There's just no creativity from them. Nothing that makes me think "wow I really want to try that out".

Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#31 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

[QUOTE="SPYDER0416"]

CoD has a lot more going for it, especially when you consider how they can make radical changes like CoD4 or, well, BO2 and still call it CoD.

Zubinen

That's because Treyarch fails at making MP as well as IW did prior to the post-MWF2 release firings. I will admit, all the fluffy stuff like gun cosmetics, wager mode, dive to prone, combat training, etc. were neat but I don't trust them to make the core MP enjoyable, I mean just look at their random hate for snipers. In BF3 sniping at any range is enjoyable, and yet somehow in a COD game it isn't? Well at least the art direction isn't as moody/depressing looking as in previous Treyarch titles :lol: Compare this from MWF3 for example: http://image.gamespotcdn.net/gamespot/images/2011/244/995751_20110903_640screen003.jpg With this from BO1 for example: http://image.gamespotcdn.net/gamespot/images/2010/312/reviews/960187_20101109_640screen013.jpg

Personally I think after MW2 and the IW split, Treyarch is the company responsible for the better CoD games. They aren't busy doing sidework like before with WaW and 3 (which made them less then stellar), and they seem the most interested in fleshing out unique ideas or concepts. IW just has a "if it aint broke, don't fix it mentality" and all they do is add and polish what they had before instead of innovating.

Black Ops was fun and a step in the right direction. The gun customization was maybe a bit TOO cartoony (smily face dot sights?), and the polish isn't nearly on the level of IW titles in terms of smooth performance, graphics and hit boxes, but I think that's really the only thing holding them back when they try to innovate and make the series fresh and unique again.

I'm not saying they revolutionized Call of Duty yet like CoD4 did or anything, but so far its looking like it just based on what we can expect from single player. Really the only thing holding it back is the tech, and hopefully the game looks better when it releases.

Avatar image for gunmaster55555
gunmaster55555

712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 gunmaster55555
Member since 2009 • 712 Posts
I don't feel the same way but that's an awesome feeling I would imagine. COD4 was the last, and best Modern Warfare COD game.Elann2008
Yup lol. COD 4 was the last good one, bought 5 and haven't touched the series since.
Avatar image for SKaREO
SKaREO

3161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 SKaREO
Member since 2006 • 3161 Posts
I stopped playing at CoD4. The game is poorly balanced, poorly designed, and attracts n00bs with an IQ under 100.
Avatar image for JKnaperek
JKnaperek

2023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 JKnaperek
Member since 2006 • 2023 Posts
lol, these comments are so petty.
Avatar image for SteverXIII
SteverXIII

3795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 SteverXIII
Member since 2010 • 3795 Posts
Anyone else sick of the "COD sucks" circlejerk?
Avatar image for Loegi
Loegi

1692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Loegi
Member since 2009 • 1692 Posts
Looks interesting. They haven't said much about the multiplayer yet though, only that it's "going to push boundaries". I'm keeping my eye out for this one.
Avatar image for Silicel1
Silicel1

2342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#38 Silicel1
Member since 2005 • 2342 Posts
Ummmm...nope?! How about BO in a medieval setting.
Avatar image for Zubinen
Zubinen

2555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 Zubinen
Member since 2011 • 2555 Posts
Anyone else sick of the "COD sucks" circlejerk?SteverXIII
It's the PC games board on a generic gaming site, what exactly would you expect? Although I find it funny that the scrubs mention COD4 which wasn't worth playing until mods were available for it. COD 2 was there before the franchise took consolitis to the knee with a bunch of BS added to the game to grab a huge demographic of otherwise non gamers, COD 6 gave good players the opportunity to dominate the enemy team and nuke nubs, COD4 didn't have good qualities of either game with a spawn system worse than both.
Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

I fail to understand how people can looove Call of Duty 4, but somehow not enjoy Modern Warfare 2 at all.

Avatar image for supras989
supras989

1558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41 supras989
Member since 2006 • 1558 Posts

[QUOTE="Phoenix534"]

[QUOTE="Toxic-Seahorse"] You really think that? It'll be the same old CoD just with a different skin over it. SPYDER0416

I wasn't aware that previous Call of Duty games had branching storylines and RTS sequences.

I also forgot when older Call of Duty games let you ride horses or fly a VTOL.

Come on think about it, those sequences are only going to be short to break up gun scenes, will probably mostly be on-rail with a small amount of freedom, every COD game has something like it, whether it be flying a Helicopter, being the gunner on a car or bike, operating a predator drone, an AC130, driving a tank etc etc, each COD has some sort of section like that, it really won't be anything new and won't eat up much of the actual campaign time.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#42 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

I'll keep my eye on it. It *could* be fun. We'll see.

After MW3 though, I'm never getting a CoD on anything but the PC again. They may be built for the consoles but they are a lot more fun on the PC.

Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#43 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

I fail to understand how people can looove Call of Duty 4, but somehow not enjoy Modern Warfare 2 at all.

JangoWuzHere

I don't really like COD4 but MW2 is the most frustrating multiplayer experience ever.

There is no balance, the sky is full of threats, the interface and sound design are a mess and the only map I was able to learn is Afghan.

You know there's something terribly wrong when you can noobtube Flag A from the spawning point until you get a nuke and win the game.

Avatar image for Nick3306
Nick3306

3429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Nick3306
Member since 2007 • 3429 Posts

I fail to understand how people can looove Call of Duty 4, but somehow not enjoy Modern Warfare 2 at all.

JangoWuzHere
MW2 was a train wreck. It was as if they decided to not balance the game. Akibmo g18's, riot shields, shotguns as secondary weapons, 1 hit kill throwing knives. Just one terrible feature after another. Not to mention the tactical nuke made no sense. If I am playing demolition and i need to destroy the crates, if they call in tactical nuke why do they win the game? The crates would have gotten destroyed so technically I should win the game. It is just one bad oversight after another.