e6300 Conroe or E4300 Allendale?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Axecident
Axecident

1778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#1 Axecident
Member since 2006 • 1778 Posts
Well the mobo am gettings say Conroe ready in big letters, so my thoughts are it will maybe work better on my mobo.
Now the reason I listed e4300 cuv everyone say its the best OC cuv it works with low cheap ram and has higher MP.
The ram I will be using is pc3200 so I think thats consider low.Note I don't think am going to OC very high.
So which cpu is a better choice for me?
Avatar image for r3351925
r3351925

1728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 r3351925
Member since 2006 • 1728 Posts
I think that u shold get the conroe anyway, its really good if ur not ocing far, if u wanna go far get the e4300.
Avatar image for kato_
kato_

1423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 kato_
Member since 2006 • 1423 Posts
Well the mobo am gettings say Conroe ready in big letters, so my thoughts are it will maybe work better on my mobo.
Now the reason I listed e4300 cuv everyone say its the best OC cuv it works with low cheap ram and has higher MP.
The ram I will be using is pc3200 so I think thats consider low.Note I don't think am going to OC very high.
So which cpu is a better choice for me?
Axecident

E4300 regardless of what you want to do. The E4300 has a higher multiplier which means you wont have to buy an expensive ram. The E6300 only has a multiplier of 7 which means u'll need a more expensive ram.

Reaching 3.20GHz using either the E4300 or E6300 was quite easy and I believe most of these Core 2 Duo processors will at least reach this frequency. That said, we were able to push our E6300 to 3.50GHz and the E4300 to 3.47GHz. While both processors achieved similar frequencies they used very different settings to achieve them, nevertheless real-world performance was much the same. The advantages of the E4300 other than being slightly cheaper, is that the FSB (front side bus) does not need to be nearly as high to achieve the overclock. The advantage of this is that the DDR2 memory frequency can be lowered below 800MHz whereas the E6300 is forced to run DDR2-1000 memory. - Techspot

E4300 DDR2-800MHZ - cheap
E6300 DDR2-1000MHZ - really expensive
Avatar image for cronomagical
cronomagical

119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 cronomagical
Member since 2003 • 119 Posts
It kinda depends on the chipset of your mobo. If your running p965 or 975 hen I'd recommend e6300 better driver support. If you've got a 650i of higher e4300 because its cheaper and has a higher OC ceiling
Avatar image for Axecident
Axecident

1778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#5 Axecident
Member since 2006 • 1778 Posts
[QUOTE="Axecident"]Well the mobo am gettings say Conroe ready in big letters, so my thoughts are it will maybe work better on my mobo.
Now the reason I listed e4300 cuv everyone say its the best OC cuv it works with low cheap ram and has higher MP.
The ram I will be using is pc3200 so I think thats consider low.Note I don't think am going to OC very high.
So which cpu is a better choice for me?
kato_

E4300 regardless of what you want to do. The E4300 has a higher multiplier which means you wont have to buy an expensive ram. The E6300 only has a multiplier of 7 which means u'll need a more expensive ram.

Reaching 3.20GHz using either the E4300 or E6300 was quite easy and I believe most of these Core 2 Duo processors will at least reach this frequency. That said, we were able to push our E6300 to 3.50GHz and the E4300 to 3.47GHz. While both processors achieved similar frequencies they used very different settings to achieve them, nevertheless real-world performance was much the same. The advantages of the E4300 other than being slightly cheaper, is that the FSB (front side bus) does not need to be nearly as high to achieve the overclock. The advantage of this is that the DDR2 memory frequency can be lowered below 800MHz whereas the E6300 is forced to run DDR2-1000 memory. - Techspot

E4300 DDR2-800MHZ - cheap
E6300 DDR2-1000MHZ - really expensive

And Should i buy the zalma hsf or just stay with the stock cooler?
Avatar image for Jiggly_Wiggly
Jiggly_Wiggly

1912

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Jiggly_Wiggly
Member since 2006 • 1912 Posts
[QUOTE="kato_"][QUOTE="Axecident"]Well the mobo am gettings say Conroe ready in big letters, so my thoughts are it will maybe work better on my mobo.
Now the reason I listed e4300 cuv everyone say its the best OC cuv it works with low cheap ram and has higher MP.
The ram I will be using is pc3200 so I think thats consider low.Note I don't think am going to OC very high.
So which cpu is a better choice for me?
Axecident

E4300 regardless of what you want to do. The E4300 has a higher multiplier which means you wont have to buy an expensive ram. The E6300 only has a multiplier of 7 which means u'll need a more expensive ram.

Reaching 3.20GHz using either the E4300 or E6300 was quite easy and I believe most of these Core 2 Duo processors will at least reach this frequency. That said, we were able to push our E6300 to 3.50GHz and the E4300 to 3.47GHz. While both processors achieved similar frequencies they used very different settings to achieve them, nevertheless real-world performance was much the same. The advantages of the E4300 other than being slightly cheaper, is that the FSB (front side bus) does not need to be nearly as high to achieve the overclock. The advantage of this is that the DDR2 memory frequency can be lowered below 800MHz whereas the E6300 is forced to run DDR2-1000 memory. - Techspot

E4300 DDR2-800MHZ - cheap
E6300 DDR2-1000MHZ - really expensive

And Should i buy the zalma hsf or just stay with the stock cooler?

Zalman are nice tuniq tower 120 is one of the best the thermaltright 120 ultra is the best air cooler. I have the zalman 9700 its quite nice If you are going to OC alot a newer cooler will help greatly. I'm at 3.4 ghz on my qx6700 with the zalman 9700.
Avatar image for Axecident
Axecident

1778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#7 Axecident
Member since 2006 • 1778 Posts
Ok let me make this easy which is better for this mobo?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?item=N82E16813157092
Avatar image for cronomagical
cronomagical

119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 cronomagical
Member since 2003 • 119 Posts
e6300
Avatar image for Axecident
Axecident

1778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#9 Axecident
Member since 2006 • 1778 Posts
[QUOTE="Axecident"][QUOTE="kato_"][QUOTE="Axecident"]Well the mobo am gettings say Conroe ready in big letters, so my thoughts are it will maybe work better on my mobo.
Now the reason I listed e4300 cuv everyone say its the best OC cuv it works with low cheap ram and has higher MP.
The ram I will be using is pc3200 so I think thats consider low.Note I don't think am going to OC very high.
So which cpu is a better choice for me?
Jiggly_Wiggly

E4300 regardless of what you want to do. The E4300 has a higher multiplier which means you wont have to buy an expensive ram. The E6300 only has a multiplier of 7 which means u'll need a more expensive ram.

Reaching 3.20GHz using either the E4300 or E6300 was quite easy and I believe most of these Core 2 Duo processors will at least reach this frequency. That said, we were able to push our E6300 to 3.50GHz and the E4300 to 3.47GHz. While both processors achieved similar frequencies they used very different settings to achieve them, nevertheless real-world performance was much the same. The advantages of the E4300 other than being slightly cheaper, is that the FSB (front side bus) does not need to be nearly as high to achieve the overclock. The advantage of this is that the DDR2 memory frequency can be lowered below 800MHz whereas the E6300 is forced to run DDR2-1000 memory. - Techspot

E4300 DDR2-800MHZ - cheap
E6300 DDR2-1000MHZ - really expensive

And Should i buy the zalma hsf or just stay with the stock cooler?

Zalman are nice tuniq tower 120 is one of the best the thermaltright 120 ultra is the best air cooler. I have the zalman 9700 its quite nice If you are going to OC alot a newer cooler will help greatly. I'm at 3.4 ghz on my qx6700 with the zalman 9700.


nah lol thats too big . I was thikning something small and cheap like this?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16835118003
Avatar image for Axecident
Axecident

1778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#10 Axecident
Member since 2006 • 1778 Posts
e6300cronomagical
why?
Avatar image for kato_
kato_

1423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 kato_
Member since 2006 • 1423 Posts
[QUOTE="kato_"][QUOTE="Axecident"]Well the mobo am gettings say Conroe ready in big letters, so my thoughts are it will maybe work better on my mobo.
Now the reason I listed e4300 cuv everyone say its the best OC cuv it works with low cheap ram and has higher MP.
The ram I will be using is pc3200 so I think thats consider low.Note I don't think am going to OC very high.
So which cpu is a better choice for me?
Axecident

E4300 regardless of what you want to do. The E4300 has a higher multiplier which means you wont have to buy an expensive ram. The E6300 only has a multiplier of 7 which means u'll need a more expensive ram.

Reaching 3.20GHz using either the E4300 or E6300 was quite easy and I believe most of these Core 2 Duo processors will at least reach this frequency. That said, we were able to push our E6300 to 3.50GHz and the E4300 to 3.47GHz. While both processors achieved similar frequencies they used very different settings to achieve them, nevertheless real-world performance was much the same. The advantages of the E4300 other than being slightly cheaper, is that the FSB (front side bus) does not need to be nearly as high to achieve the overclock. The advantage of this is that the DDR2 memory frequency can be lowered below 800MHz whereas the E6300 is forced to run DDR2-1000 memory. - Techspot

E4300 DDR2-800MHZ - cheap
E6300 DDR2-1000MHZ - really expensive

And Should i buy the zalma hsf or just stay with the stock cooler?

you'll definitely need to buy an aftermarket cooling if ur going to overclock the processor. I am not exactly sure how far you can pull off with stock cooling but i suggest you buy an aftermarket one. A good one would be around $30 but i am not exactly sure what brand. My friend is helping me overclock mine because i dont know know how to overclock CPUs. The E4300 is great espicially clocked @ 3.47GHZ. Just look at how much better it does than the E6700. So if u get the E4300 and overclock it to 3.47GHZ you'll bisically have an E6800 Allendale or something lol
Avatar image for Axecident
Axecident

1778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#12 Axecident
Member since 2006 • 1778 Posts
[QUOTE="Axecident"][QUOTE="kato_"][QUOTE="Axecident"]Well the mobo am gettings say Conroe ready in big letters, so my thoughts are it will maybe work better on my mobo.
Now the reason I listed e4300 cuv everyone say its the best OC cuv it works with low cheap ram and has higher MP.
The ram I will be using is pc3200 so I think thats consider low.Note I don't think am going to OC very high.
So which cpu is a better choice for me?
kato_

E4300 regardless of what you want to do. The E4300 has a higher multiplier which means you wont have to buy an expensive ram. The E6300 only has a multiplier of 7 which means u'll need a more expensive ram.

Reaching 3.20GHz using either the E4300 or E6300 was quite easy and I believe most of these Core 2 Duo processors will at least reach this frequency. That said, we were able to push our E6300 to 3.50GHz and the E4300 to 3.47GHz. While both processors achieved similar frequencies they used very different settings to achieve them, nevertheless real-world performance was much the same. The advantages of the E4300 other than being slightly cheaper, is that the FSB (front side bus) does not need to be nearly as high to achieve the overclock. The advantage of this is that the DDR2 memory frequency can be lowered below 800MHz whereas the E6300 is forced to run DDR2-1000 memory. - Techspot

E4300 DDR2-800MHZ - cheap
E6300 DDR2-1000MHZ - really expensive

And Should i buy the zalma hsf or just stay with the stock cooler?

you'll definitely need to buy an aftermarket cooling if ur going to overclock the processor. I am not exactly sure how far you can pull off with stock cooling but i suggest you buy an aftermarket one. A good one would be around $30 but i am not exactly sure what brand. My friend is helping me overclock mine because i dont know know how to overclock CPUs. The E4300 is great espicially clocked @ 3.47GHZ. Just look at how much better it does than the E6700. So if u get the E4300 and overclock it to 3.47GHZ you'll bisically have an E6800 Allendale or something lol

yea but look at my mobo which is better for it?
Avatar image for Nonam3gamer
Nonam3gamer

880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#13 Nonam3gamer
Member since 2005 • 880 Posts
Bottom Line

If you intend to overclock to 3.2 ghz or less go for the e6300
If you intend to go over that get the E4300

But you may want to wait until the E6320 comes out that has twice the cache.

Edit: I just read over you're post again and I think that you're planning to using the 2 gigs of PC3200 DDR ram from your sempron computer This will not work. Core 2 mobos require DDR2 memory.

Avatar image for kato_
kato_

1423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 kato_
Member since 2006 • 1423 Posts
[QUOTE="kato_"][QUOTE="Axecident"][QUOTE="kato_"][QUOTE="Axecident"]Well the mobo am gettings say Conroe ready in big letters, so my thoughts are it will maybe work better on my mobo.
Now the reason I listed e4300 cuv everyone say its the best OC cuv it works with low cheap ram and has higher MP.
The ram I will be using is pc3200 so I think thats consider low.Note I don't think am going to OC very high.
So which cpu is a better choice for me?
Axecident

E4300 regardless of what you want to do. The E4300 has a higher multiplier which means you wont have to buy an expensive ram. The E6300 only has a multiplier of 7 which means u'll need a more expensive ram.

Reaching 3.20GHz using either the E4300 or E6300 was quite easy and I believe most of these Core 2 Duo processors will at least reach this frequency. That said, we were able to push our E6300 to 3.50GHz and the E4300 to 3.47GHz. While both processors achieved similar frequencies they used very different settings to achieve them, nevertheless real-world performance was much the same. The advantages of the E4300 other than being slightly cheaper, is that the FSB (front side bus) does not need to be nearly as high to achieve the overclock. The advantage of this is that the DDR2 memory frequency can be lowered below 800MHz whereas the E6300 is forced to run DDR2-1000 memory. - Techspot

E4300 DDR2-800MHZ - cheap
E6300 DDR2-1000MHZ - really expensive

And Should i buy the zalma hsf or just stay with the stock cooler?

you'll definitely need to buy an aftermarket cooling if ur going to overclock the processor. I am not exactly sure how far you can pull off with stock cooling but i suggest you buy an aftermarket one. A good one would be around $30 but i am not exactly sure what brand. My friend is helping me overclock mine because i dont know know how to overclock CPUs. The E4300 is great espicially clocked @ 3.47GHZ. Just look at how much better it does than the E6700. So if u get the E4300 and overclock it to 3.47GHZ you'll bisically have an E6800 Allendale or something lol

yea but look at my mobo which is better for it?

Asus P5N-E Sli 650i = perfect for the E4300 and loves it espcially when clocked at 3.47GHZ or the Asus 680i Sli = good with the processor but i suggest getting this motherboard only if ur getting an E6600 or higher processor.
Avatar image for Axecident
Axecident

1778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#15 Axecident
Member since 2006 • 1778 Posts
[QUOTE="Axecident"][QUOTE="kato_"][QUOTE="Axecident"][QUOTE="kato_"][QUOTE="Axecident"]Well the mobo am gettings say Conroe ready in big letters, so my thoughts are it will maybe work better on my mobo.
Now the reason I listed e4300 cuv everyone say its the best OC cuv it works with low cheap ram and has higher MP.
The ram I will be using is pc3200 so I think thats consider low.Note I don't think am going to OC very high.
So which cpu is a better choice for me?
kato_

E4300 regardless of what you want to do. The E4300 has a higher multiplier which means you wont have to buy an expensive ram. The E6300 only has a multiplier of 7 which means u'll need a more expensive ram.

Reaching 3.20GHz using either the E4300 or E6300 was quite easy and I believe most of these Core 2 Duo processors will at least reach this frequency. That said, we were able to push our E6300 to 3.50GHz and the E4300 to 3.47GHz. While both processors achieved similar frequencies they used very different settings to achieve them, nevertheless real-world performance was much the same. The advantages of the E4300 other than being slightly cheaper, is that the FSB (front side bus) does not need to be nearly as high to achieve the overclock. The advantage of this is that the DDR2 memory frequency can be lowered below 800MHz whereas the E6300 is forced to run DDR2-1000 memory. - Techspot

E4300 DDR2-800MHZ - cheap
E6300 DDR2-1000MHZ - really expensive

And Should i buy the zalma hsf or just stay with the stock cooler?

you'll definitely need to buy an aftermarket cooling if ur going to overclock the processor. I am not exactly sure how far you can pull off with stock cooling but i suggest you buy an aftermarket one. A good one would be around $30 but i am not exactly sure what brand. My friend is helping me overclock mine because i dont know know how to overclock CPUs. The E4300 is great espicially clocked @ 3.47GHZ. Just look at how much better it does than the E6700. So if u get the E4300 and overclock it to 3.47GHZ you'll bisically have an E6800 Allendale or something lol

yea but look at my mobo which is better for it?

Asus P5N-E Sli 650i = perfect for the E4300 and loves it espcially when clocked at 3.47GHZ or the Asus 680i Sli = good with the processor but i suggest getting this motherboard only if ur getting an E6600 or higher processor.

no dude am sticking with agp mobos for now for price reason.
Avatar image for jjjhsmith
jjjhsmith

799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 jjjhsmith
Member since 2003 • 799 Posts
[QUOTE="kato_"][QUOTE="Axecident"][QUOTE="kato_"][QUOTE="Axecident"][QUOTE="kato_"][QUOTE="Axecident"]Well the mobo am gettings say Conroe ready in big letters, so my thoughts are it will maybe work better on my mobo.
Now the reason I listed e4300 cuv everyone say its the best OC cuv it works with low cheap ram and has higher MP.
The ram I will be using is pc3200 so I think thats consider low.Note I don't think am going to OC very high.
So which cpu is a better choice for me?
Axecident

E4300 regardless of what you want to do. The E4300 has a higher multiplier which means you wont have to buy an expensive ram. The E6300 only has a multiplier of 7 which means u'll need a more expensive ram.

Reaching 3.20GHz using either the E4300 or E6300 was quite easy and I believe most of these Core 2 Duo processors will at least reach this frequency. That said, we were able to push our E6300 to 3.50GHz and the E4300 to 3.47GHz. While both processors achieved similar frequencies they used very different settings to achieve them, nevertheless real-world performance was much the same. The advantages of the E4300 other than being slightly cheaper, is that the FSB (front side bus) does not need to be nearly as high to achieve the overclock. The advantage of this is that the DDR2 memory frequency can be lowered below 800MHz whereas the E6300 is forced to run DDR2-1000 memory. - Techspot

E4300 DDR2-800MHZ - cheap
E6300 DDR2-1000MHZ - really expensive

And Should i buy the zalma hsf or just stay with the stock cooler?

you'll definitely need to buy an aftermarket cooling if ur going to overclock the processor. I am not exactly sure how far you can pull off with stock cooling but i suggest you buy an aftermarket one. A good one would be around $30 but i am not exactly sure what brand. My friend is helping me overclock mine because i dont know know how to overclock CPUs. The E4300 is great espicially clocked @ 3.47GHZ. Just look at how much better it does than the E6700. So if u get the E4300 and overclock it to 3.47GHZ you'll bisically have an E6800 Allendale or something lol

yea but look at my mobo which is better for it?

Asus P5N-E Sli 650i = perfect for the E4300 and loves it espcially when clocked at 3.47GHZ or the Asus 680i Sli = good with the processor but i suggest getting this motherboard only if ur getting an E6600 or higher processor.

no dude am sticking with agp mobos for now for price reason.

You wont find a AGP mobo out there with support for a core 2 duo. Face it, if you are planning on getting a Conroe or Allendale chip, a new motherboard and new ram are in your future, unless maybe one of those weird ASRock motherboards has support for DDR and C2D

-EDIT- Lol speak of devil, I decided to research mobos some more and it IS a weird ASRock board that can do all that.  Those hybrid boards are nuts.  I doubt you will be able to overclock very high with them, but I guess it is kinda nice to be able to save so many old components.
Avatar image for BeavermanA
BeavermanA

2652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 BeavermanA
Member since 2003 • 2652 Posts
That is exactly what he's getting. I find it funny no one has noticed that the board can't possibly reach 3ghz on a E6300 and can barely make it with a E4300 with a 340 FSB cap. Get the E4300, at least you theoretically have a chance at 3ghz, although it's extremely doubtful. I've seen on some other boards the mobo averages about 300 FSB, so that's 2.7 ghz on an E4300.
Avatar image for Axecident
Axecident

1778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 Axecident
Member since 2006 • 1778 Posts
That is exactly what he's getting. I find it funny no one has noticed that the board can't possibly reach 3ghz on a E6300 and can barely make it with a E4300 with a 340 FSB cap. Get the E4300, at least you theoretically have a chance at 3ghz, although it's extremely doubtful. I've seen on some other boards the mobo averages about 300 FSB, so that's 2.7 ghz on an E4300. BeavermanA
Thanks man I had a feeling it was not going to be able to OC that much. Cuz the mobo I have right now is even worst only can go up 50 mhz and I had to set it back to 20 mhz.lol Guess I get the e4300 just hope the ram will be able to keep up.
Avatar image for Axecident
Axecident

1778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#19 Axecident
Member since 2006 • 1778 Posts
[QUOTE="BeavermanA"]That is exactly what he's getting. I find it funny no one has noticed that the board can't possibly reach 3ghz on a E6300 and can barely make it with a E4300 with a 340 FSB cap. Get the E4300, at least you theoretically have a chance at 3ghz, although it's extremely doubtful. I've seen on some other boards the mobo averages about 300 FSB, so that's 2.7 ghz on an E4300. Axecident
Thanks man I had a feeling it was not going to be able to OC that much. Cuz the mobo I have right now is even worst only can go up 50 mhz and I had to set it back to 20 mhz.lol Guess I get the e4300 just hope the ram will be able to keep up.

Avatar image for 9mmSpliff
9mmSpliff

21751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 9mmSpliff
Member since 2005 • 21751 Posts
I would do the E4300. It does 3.2Ghz on stock volts and cooler. If I was to go Intel Core 2 Duo, that would be my choice.
Avatar image for Axecident
Axecident

1778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#21 Axecident
Member since 2006 • 1778 Posts
I would do the E4300. It does 3.2Ghz on stock volts and cooler. If I was to go Intel Core 2 Duo, that would be my choice. 9mmSpliff
ty
Avatar image for AARONRULZ1
AARONRULZ1

6273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#22 AARONRULZ1
Member since 2006 • 6273 Posts
E4300 Allendale because it can reach a 100% OC (3600MHz!) with a tuniq tower 120 and a gigabyte DS3 and IF you're lucky,you can probably get a 120% OC (3960MHz!!!!!)
Avatar image for GamingMonkeyPC
GamingMonkeyPC

3576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#23 GamingMonkeyPC
Member since 2005 • 3576 Posts
The only choice for you is the e4300, if you're going to be picking up those VIA chipset motherboards (the one that uses PC3200 memories). Expect to only be able to raise the FSB up to 300 or below MHz.
Avatar image for Wesker776
Wesker776

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Wesker776
Member since 2005 • 7004 Posts
If I were you, and if that's a socket 939 processor in your sig, I would stick with AMD. Get a S939 Operon or 5000+. :/
Avatar image for Axecident
Axecident

1778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#25 Axecident
Member since 2006 • 1778 Posts
[QUOTE="Wesker776"]If I were you, and if that's a socket 939 processor in your sig, I would stick with AMD. Get a S939 Operon or 5000+. :/

lol no just no.....
Avatar image for AARONRULZ1
AARONRULZ1

6273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#26 AARONRULZ1
Member since 2006 • 6273 Posts
[QUOTE="Axecident"][QUOTE="Wesker776"]If I were you, and if that's a socket 939 processor in your sig, I would stick with AMD. Get a S939 Operon or 5000+. :/

lol no just no.....

Why not?
Avatar image for Axecident
Axecident

1778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#27 Axecident
Member since 2006 • 1778 Posts
[QUOTE="AARONRULZ1"][QUOTE="Axecident"][QUOTE="Wesker776"]If I were you, and if that's a socket 939 processor in your sig, I would stick with AMD. Get a S939 Operon or 5000+. :/

lol no just no.....

Why not?

Dude I already have a nice amd mobo setup. I just wish I know more about hardware early I would have went into intel. So am trying to clean up my mistakes.
Avatar image for r3351925
r3351925

1728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 r3351925
Member since 2006 • 1728 Posts
[QUOTE="Axecident"][QUOTE="AARONRULZ1"][QUOTE="Axecident"][QUOTE="Wesker776"]If I were you, and if that's a socket 939 processor in your sig, I would stick with AMD. Get a S939 Operon or 5000+. :/

lol no just no.....

Why not?

Dude I already have a nice amd mobo setup. I just wish I know more about hardware early I would have went into intel. So am trying to clean up my mistakes.

man u look like a smart guy 2 me. core2duo's r the best.
Avatar image for Axecident
Axecident

1778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#29 Axecident
Member since 2006 • 1778 Posts
[QUOTE="r3351925"][QUOTE="Axecident"][QUOTE="AARONRULZ1"][QUOTE="Axecident"][QUOTE="Wesker776"]If I were you, and if that's a socket 939 processor in your sig, I would stick with AMD. Get a S939 Operon or 5000+. :/

lol no just no.....

Why not?

Dude I already have a nice amd mobo setup. I just wish I know more about hardware early I would have went into intel. So am trying to clean up my mistakes.

man u look like a smart guy 2 me. core2duo's r the best.

I just wish I came to these broads a bit early I would have a uber pc with 680i mobo 8800 cards and all that good stuff.Too late now that I wasted so much money on outdated stuff. But still runs fast for my gaming needs.