right now ive choosen the amd athlon 64 fx-55 san diego 2.6Ghz socket 939 i plan on using the system for games mostly and to write a paper or something every now and then. i went with the asus a8n sli deluxe motherboard as well
right now ive choosen the amd athlon 64 fx-55 san diego 2.6Ghz socket 939 i plan on using the system for games mostly and to write a paper or something every now and then. i went with the asus a8n sli deluxe motherboard as well
it would run all the games at high settings at 800 x 600 res. DUDE THATS LIKE HIGH DEF. Im going to save up my 500 dollars to buy that. total PWNAGE in games man. all running at 5 FPS. !!!1!! lol.. im out guys, l8er
E6600 is a way better value if you OC it you'll get performance on par/better than the FX62 for a fraction of the price but as you've already gone with a 939 mobo that doesn't matter
[QUOTE="Generalkill8888"][QUOTE="macpop"]lol yea i remembered the dell thing, and the error messages he got while sayin i cant crash it :lol: classic macpop
Yeah, I want to watch that again, Man that guy was computer smart. just like u huh :lol: jp jp YAY Well that was me like 3 years ago.
[QUOTE="XboxUnderground"]E6600 is a way better value if you OC it you'll get performance on par/better than the FX62 for a fraction of the price but as you've already gone with a 939 mobo that doesn't matter Even the E6300 is good and highly overclockable.
[QUOTE="Cyborg-21"][QUOTE="XboxUnderground"]E6600 is a way better value if you OC it you'll get performance on par/better than the FX62 for a fraction of the price but as you've already gone with a 939 mobo that doesn't matter Even the E6300 is good and highly overclockable. the problem with the E6300 is it's lack of l2 cache
[QUOTE="XboxUnderground"][QUOTE="Cyborg-21"][QUOTE="XboxUnderground"]E6600 is a way better value if you OC it you'll get performance on par/better than the FX62 for a fraction of the price but as you've already gone with a 939 mobo that doesn't matter Even the E6300 is good and highly overclockable. the problem with the E6300 is it's lack of l2 cache which is y theres a new e6300 comin with 4mb cache i think
Log in to comment