Will you buy the Oculus Rift? *POLL*

  • 54 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#1 Posted by 4-Legged-Shark (1031 posts) -

With Valve discussing virtual reality in March (likely invloving the Oculus Rift), not to mention all of the "Best of CES" Awards it has won at this year's show, I have become very optimistic toward the likelihood of the Oculus Rift being a success. What are your thoughts? Will you buy one? **EDIT** added a poll. 

#2 Posted by Mozuckint (799 posts) -

When the consumer version is released definitely. Day 1 if possible depending on price.

#3 Posted by GamingVengeance (1854 posts) -
yes
#4 Posted by Masenkoe (4888 posts) -

I really want to try it. If it is as good as people have said then yes definitely.

#5 Posted by Tixylixx (376 posts) -
If it is under £100. Wont pay any more for a fad. Could get a nice monitor for £150 that has much more use.
#6 Posted by k2theswiss (16599 posts) -
i would really have to test it before buying it... IDK
#7 Posted by DanielDust (15402 posts) -
[QUOTE="Tixylixx"]If it is under £100. Wont pay any more for a fad. Could get a nice monitor for £150 that has much more use.

It's 300$ and not a chance, it's the cool thing now, after it gets released everyone will forget it exists, just like the 3D mouse that even Valve advertised.
#8 Posted by DJ_Headshot (6281 posts) -

Depends on the level of support it manages to reach in games after being out a while. If its around the level of 3D support in ps3 games that's not enough for me if its closer to how many titles can be played in 3D on pc then sure but to get there will take time assuming it ever gets there.

#9 Posted by Will47 (6826 posts) -
[QUOTE="Tixylixx"]If it is under £100. Wont pay any more for a fad. Could get a nice monitor for £150 that has much more use.

Yeah it seems kinda fad-ish to me. Would love to try one, not sure how much I would drop on it though.
#10 Posted by Tixylixx (376 posts) -
Like the whole 120hrz 3D monitor thing, in reality they're often worse than 60hrz ones because you need a lower latency which often they have an even worse latency giving massive ghosting. So not only is active 3D **** you cannot view it in the day or you see flashing and gives you eye strain, however the monitor is actually worse as the make cut backs to hit the 120hrz for the same price.
#11 Posted by pelvist (4942 posts) -

Yes, but i wont pay any more than £200 for it.

#12 Posted by Riadon2 (1609 posts) -

Day. Fvcking. One.

Imagine playing Mirror's Edge with it.

#13 Posted by lawlessx (46854 posts) -

If the price is right..day one

#14 Posted by Stream_Beta (352 posts) -

Much like everyone else said, if it is the correct price. If it doesn't hit the correct price then it'll be just like the 3DS was, over-priced for what you are getting. I can see them selling a lot of copies if it is around ~$100.

#15 Posted by _VenomX (1614 posts) -

Depends on the games.

#16 Posted by guynamedbilly (12967 posts) -
Not likely. 3D makes me dizzy and if I was going to go that far, I'd want a more fully featured VR with holograms. It's kind of like buying a jetpack that can only fly ten feet off the ground to me. Sure it's cool, but it's expensive and is still not nearly as good as the real thing. Still, if I somehow find it super cheap somewhere, I may get one.
#17 Posted by Basinboy (11274 posts) -

Of the technologies being introduced to gaming, Oculus Rift is the only one I am optimistic toward. As long as it's not too expensive, I will certainly consider a purchase if the support is good.

#18 Posted by _VenomX (1614 posts) -

Of the technologies being introduced to gaming, Oculus Rift is the only one I am optimistic toward. As long as it's not too expensive, I will certainly consider a purchase if the support is good.

Basinboy

Valve is supporting it :)

Just did some research and I can't wait til I get my hands on one of these machine.

#19 Posted by k2theswiss (16599 posts) -

just watch a cool video of people reactions. It made me want to try it more

http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkain/2013/01/18/some-early-reactions-to-the-oculus-rift-virtual-reality-headset/

did learn it connect to your pc and not standalone. So sure keep price down

#20 Posted by KABCOOL (1147 posts) -

It looks pretty damn cool, but definitely not for $300. Maybe later when the price goes down.

#21 Posted by k2theswiss (16599 posts) -

It looks pretty damn cool, but definitely not for $300. Maybe later when the price goes down.

KABCOOL
agreed specially since it's basically a screen with senors. hopefully that $300 is just for development cost
#22 Posted by nutcrackr (12724 posts) -
Short answer, no Never really followed it when they had the kickstarter, watched the video now and it didn't convince me
#23 Posted by SAGE_OF_FIRE (15589 posts) -
Yes.
#24 Posted by airshocker (30374 posts) -

$300 isn't chump change. But to support something like this? I think I'd be willing to part with it.

#25 Posted by BattleSpectre (6395 posts) -

Sounds like a Zelda game or something lol..

Anyways for $300? HELL NO!

#26 Posted by DJ_Headshot (6281 posts) -

Day. Fvcking. One.

Imagine playing Mirror's Edge with it.

Riadon2
They would have to patch it for extra support to really get the full effect If the game lacks probably coded head tracking support your not getting the full effect the oculus rift can offer. It should still offer a 3D display that fills up your vision with just the game world assuming you can convert any regular 3D games to stereo-topic 3D on the oculus rift without needing support in game for the 3D to work on it.
#27 Posted by G-Lord (2134 posts) -

I'm waiting for the consumer model.

#28 Posted by Wasdie (50267 posts) -

Day one if I can.

I'm really excited for it. ArmA 2 + the Oculus Rift = simulation bliss.

Any military or flight sim really. Oh god, I cannot WAIT!

#29 Posted by k2theswiss (16599 posts) -

Day one if I can.

I'm really excited for it. ArmA 2 + the Oculus Rift = simulation bliss.

Any military or flight sim really. Oh god, I cannot WAIT!

Wasdie
umm don't the game need be updated for it? Not sure
#30 Posted by Baranga (14217 posts) -

Technically all games can be hacked to work with it through custom drivers and injectors. The leading project right now is the Vireio Perception driver.

Not likely. 3D makes me dizzy guynamedbilly

The Rift won't make you any dizzier than real life does.

#31 Posted by trastamad03 (4859 posts) -
It does look interesting, so maybe.
#32 Posted by 4-Legged-Shark (1031 posts) -

They have said repeatedly in interviews that with the Oculus Rift, "Seeing is believing," (they have also admitted how corny that sounds) So I hope they get some big supporters who will help them get demo kiosks in places like Best Buy. I think that will be the key to selling these things.

#33 Posted by Wasdie (50267 posts) -

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Day one if I can.

I'm really excited for it. ArmA 2 + the Oculus Rift = simulation bliss.

Any military or flight sim really. Oh god, I cannot WAIT!

k2theswiss

umm don't the game need be updated for it? Not sure

Kind of.

ArmA 2 already supports TrackIR, which the Oculus Rift pretty much is. I bet it will work pretty seamlessly.

#34 Posted by k2theswiss (16599 posts) -

[QUOTE="k2theswiss"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Day one if I can.

I'm really excited for it. ArmA 2 + the Oculus Rift = simulation bliss.

Any military or flight sim really. Oh god, I cannot WAIT!

Wasdie

umm don't the game need be updated for it? Not sure

Kind of.

ArmA 2 already supports TrackIR, which the Oculus Rift pretty much is. I bet it will work pretty seamlessly.

interesting.
#35 Posted by NamelessPlayer (7729 posts) -
If the Oculus Rift can be made to work with any 3D game, and the head-tracking supports the TrackIR API, then I'm definitely buying one as soon as I can afford it! Combat flight simulators would be awesome with a HMD like that. I also kind of missed the one time I got to play Quake with a Forte VFX-1 helmet back in the late 1990s. Obviously, the technology wasn't as advanced back then, and even MORE expensive. (We're talking "four figures" expensive!)
#36 Posted by JohnF111 (14099 posts) -
Would like to try it, but not buy it.
#37 Posted by chrisrooR (9027 posts) -

When the consumer version is released definitely. Day 1 if possible depending on price.

Mozuckint
This.
#38 Posted by TheFatPerson (1842 posts) -

How are third person games going to work on that thing?

#39 Posted by with_teeth26 (6227 posts) -

Imagine playing Amnesia with that thing.

It looks interesting but I'd only think about getting it if most first-person games supported it.

#40 Posted by Rougehunter (5873 posts) -

Imagine playing Amnesia with that thing.

It looks interesting but I'd only think about getting it if most first-person games supported it.

with_teeth26

The nightmares would never end

#41 Posted by ravenguard90 (3064 posts) -

I was excited about it up to the point where he mentioned the refresh rate of the screens is 30ms. That's really high, considering the majority of TN, and even some IPS, monitors run significantly lower than that.

If they resolve that response time issue though, I am definitely all for it.

#42 Posted by trastamad03 (4859 posts) -
What we'll look like when playing with Occulus Rift: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJo12Hz_BVI
#43 Posted by ZombieKiller7 (6255 posts) -

Nah I'm not into VR.

3D makes me dizzy.

#44 Posted by Baranga (14217 posts) -

From the CEO's CV:

Led the product team at Gaikai, the innovative GPU cloud company that's transforming the way video games are distributed. (acquired by Sony)

Former co-founder and CEO of Scaleform, the #1 user interface (UI) technology provider in the video game market. (acquired by Autodesk)

Do you notice a pattern?

I was excited about it up to the point where he mentioned the refresh rate of the screens is 30ms. That's really high, considering the majority of TN, and even some IPS, monitors run significantly lower than that.

If they resolve that response time issue though, I am definitely all for it.

ravenguard90

The screen was already improved. It will keep getting better.

#45 Posted by 4-Legged-Shark (1031 posts) -

^yes and their goal for the consumer version is a full 1080p screen in the headset. Granted you may still see some pixelation, but I'm sure it will look phenomenal.

#46 Posted by 4-Legged-Shark (1031 posts) -

Added a poll. This is a bump, I won't lie. 

#47 Posted by Evenios (1140 posts) -

pre-ordered a Dev Kit..  it will be cool i think but for the rest of you id hold off a bit they said ooh well have 500 units a day ooh we'll start shipping in April for pre-orders

 

nope and the sad thing is they have yet offically confermed the delay to the public.  the website still says "may shipping" I think they are biting off a bit more then they can chew most of their news updates are worded for PR and less honest, open timely feedback to their members for example they NEVER said at all that Unity Pro might be required to use Unity with the rift however yesterday they release this very "nice" PR worded "news" saying oh wow yeah Dev Kit owners will get 4 months of Unity Pro FREE! then you read further into the article and it says oops, Unity Pro is REQUIRED to use Unity on the Rift....well gee thanks for waiting till now to tELL US

and Palmer stating that "its not about PR" thats a joke.  They have been overhyping this thing for months and the problem is they reed to scale back on the hype train. get the dev kits out the door first giive it time for devs to come up with cool stuff  work on somehow finding ways to produce them faster so that devs can get them faster.


Its going to be a cool device i think but i am not sure if it will end up being a "must have" for gamers if a) they cant work on getting production faster and b) get more game support. and i find it odd tha Carmack one of the orignal people on board with the Rift and said Doom 3 is the first Oculus ready game....suddenly at the last minute oops sorry Doom 3 BFG wont be ready and theres no word at all if it will be ready for the Rift anytime soon a bit odd dont you think given how excited he seem to be and the fact he said at E3 last year "i think i have the best virtual reality demo the world has ever seen" - Carmack.

If you have the money sure go ahead pre-order a kit but your going to be waiting for a while. otherwise id take a wait- and see approach. honestly with all the news about it and he more or less have shared whats in the device itself i woudnt be suprised if other companys come up soon to develop something else like it at not a high cost

honestly a company like Nvidia might be better suited for it anyways Oculus only has 20 people i think and i think they really are biting off more then they can chew, a company like Nvidia would have much more resources to intigrate it into a lot more games and have much faster production instead of having to wait 4 months for them to churn out 14,000 units.

We shall see.

#48 Posted by ShimmerMan (4453 posts) -

Stereoscopic 3D is the equivilent of reading a book with pop-up art. I think it's a gimmick, this Occulus Rift may be the best gimmick of the lot but It's still a gimmick.

#49 Posted by jer_1 (7451 posts) -

My lord this would be the perfect tool for Arma3. I will definitely get one if the price is decent upon release, if it's not I'll wait until I can get it at a fair price. Looks pretty damn awesome!

 

Stereoscopic 3D is the equivilent of reading a book with pop-up art. I think it's a gimmick, this Occulus Rift may be the best gimmick of the lot but It's still a gimmick.

ShimmerMan

What it will do is separate your head from your gun, which is EXACTLY what you need to be able to do in a game like arma, keep your head on a swivel.

#50 Posted by SentientMind (359 posts) -

For everyone that said no, you might want to read this. It will change your mind. Just imagine Amnesia, Mirrors Edge, and BF3 with this thing

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/CES-2013-Oculus-Rift-VR-Goggles-Epic-Citadel,20561.html