This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Pyromk1
Pyromk1

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 Pyromk1
Member since 2004 • 84 Posts

Hello all

Its come to the point where Im thinking of getting a new screen.

Also my flatmate may be moving out some time soon and will be taking his screen with him.

So im thinking of getting a 32" or maybe slightly smaller and buying one screen for both purposes.

It has to be full 1080p (obv) and It would be great to find one with a high refresh rate, but im struggling to find anything that meets all these criteria and doesnt cost a stupid amount.

any reccomendations?

Avatar image for gerygo
GeryGo

12803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#2 GeryGo  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 12803 Posts

27' monitor still counts as PC monitor; http://www.amazon.com/Series-VG278HE-27-Inch-LED-lit-Monitor/dp/B00906HM6K/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1388334108&sr=8-1&keywords=VG278HE

2ms, 144Mhz refresh rate

Avatar image for Arthas045
Arthas045

5800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 Arthas045
Member since 2005 • 5800 Posts

Nice monitor even 3D ready.

Avatar image for Importz2k1
Importz2k1

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Importz2k1
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts

@PredatorRules said:

27' monitor still counts as PC monitor; http://www.amazon.com/Series-VG278HE-27-Inch-LED-lit-Monitor/dp/B00906HM6K/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1388334108&sr=8-1&keywords=VG278HE

2ms, 144Mhz refresh rate

I have that very same monitor in 24in (VG248QE Black 24") and I can confirm that it is awesome!

Avatar image for Arthas045
Arthas045

5800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 Arthas045
Member since 2005 • 5800 Posts

@farrell2k said:

That monitor is too much money. I bought this two weeks ago: http://www.walmart.com/ip/RCA-LED32C45RQD-32-1080p-60Hz-Class-LED-3.1-ultra-slim-HDTV-DVD-Combo/23984218 I can't say enough good things about it.

I don't know man. The link posted above Predator linked a monitor not a TV. The response time will be faster and its also 120HZ+. Also the monitor is 3D ready out of the box, myself I would spend the extra 100 bucks and get the monitor.

The only thing that sucks about getting a monitor and using it for a TV is that you have no remote.

Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts

TVs never look as good as a monitor with a PC. The only disadvantage of a monitor is that the speakers suck, but as modern TVs get thinner and thinner the speakers get worse, so I wouldn't want to use TV speakers anyway.

Avatar image for Cyberdot
Cyberdot

3928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Cyberdot
Member since 2013 • 3928 Posts

Don't get a TV, get a monitor instead. They are much better for gaming because of superior response time.

Avatar image for _SKatEDiRt_
_SKatEDiRt_

3117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 _SKatEDiRt_
Member since 2007 • 3117 Posts

@farrell2k said:

That monitor is too much money. I bought this two weeks ago: http://www.walmart.com/ip/RCA-LED32C45RQD-32-1080p-60Hz-Class-LED-3.1-ultra-slim-HDTV-DVD-Combo/23984218 I can't say enough good things about it.

Well you screwed yourself. the extra dough is well worth it

Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts
@_SKatEDiRt_ said:

@farrell2k said:

That monitor is too much money. I bought this two weeks ago: http://www.walmart.com/ip/RCA-LED32C45RQD-32-1080p-60Hz-Class-LED-3.1-ultra-slim-HDTV-DVD-Combo/23984218 I can't say enough good things about it.

Well you screwed yourself. the extra dough is well worth it

Indeed. A monitor is one of the most important parts of your setup - it's what you view everything through. It's best not to cheap out on it. $250 for a monitor is fine for a budget rig but I'd try to spend more if you use your PC often and have decent hardware.

@Cyberdot said:

Don't get a TV, get a monitor instead. They are much better for gaming because of superior response time.

Some TV's don't actually have all that much input lag, so monitors aren't necessarily better for gaming. Some TV's also have much better picture than what you'd find on an ordinary monitor. Still, if you're looking for a high refresh rate - monitors are the way to go. Cheaper TVs are pretty bad when it comes to input lag. Cheaper monitors - not so much.

Avatar image for Pyromk1
Pyromk1

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 Pyromk1
Member since 2004 • 84 Posts

...so... in essence I cant have my cake and eat it

Its either going to be monitor or TV... dammit!

Avatar image for Arthas045
Arthas045

5800

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12  Edited By Arthas045
Member since 2005 • 5800 Posts

@Pyromk1 said:

...so... in essence I cant have my cake and eat it

Its either going to be monitor or TV... dammit!

I use a monitor for a TV and I have no complaints. Like I said just sucks not having a remote, but its a minor inconvience.

My STB still lets me control the channels and volume through the STB.