Sup.Com. system req's 4 anyone like me who didnt know.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for runejedi
runejedi

406

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 runejedi
Member since 2006 • 406 Posts
   
  • Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2, Windows Vista
  • 1.8 GHz processor
  • 512 MB RAM
  • 8GB available hard drive space
  • 128MB video RAM or greater
  • Video card must support geometry instancing
  • December 2006 release of DirectX 9.0c

Recommended

  • Windows Vista (for DirectX 10)
  • 3.0 GHz Intel or equivalent AMD processor or better (A dual-core processor is greatly recommended for acceptable performance.)
  • 2GB RAM
  • 8GB available hard drive space
  • 256 MB Video RAM, with DirectX 9 Vertex Shader/Pixel Shader 2.0 support (Nvidia 6800 or better)
  • Internet connection with Cable/DSL speeds[2]

Supreme Commander is designed to take advantage of the special features in Windows Vista and DirectX 10. All capabilities of the game, including the dual-monitor support, are still supported in the DirectX 9 version, although the DirectX 10 version might have improved graphical features.[3]

Avatar image for -Karayan-
-Karayan-

6713

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 -Karayan-
Member since 2006 • 6713 Posts
Maybe we should just make a sticky referring to http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/referrer/srtest
Avatar image for zeeinc
zeeinc

163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 zeeinc
Member since 2004 • 163 Posts
Maybe we should just make a sticky referring to http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/referrer/srtest-Karayan-
Agreed.
Avatar image for GenTom
GenTom

5945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

#4 GenTom
Member since 2005 • 5945 Posts
It currently isn't DX 10, i have a 8800 GTX, Windows Vista and until the new drivers come out it can't be, also, i don't think the game ships as DX10 but rather they intend to patch it within a few weeks
Avatar image for damz
damz

2112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 damz
Member since 2003 • 2112 Posts
my pc is way below recomended specs and the game runs perfectly on high settings, i dnt see how so many people are having problems with performance, the only time it has run slowly on my pc was an 8 man ffa an nukes started going off
Avatar image for BeyondItAll
BeyondItAll

1739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 BeyondItAll
Member since 2006 • 1739 Posts
my pc is way below recomended specs and the game runs perfectly on high settings, i dnt see how so many people are having problems with performance, the only time it has run slowly on my pc was an 8 man ffa an nukes started going offdamz
I'm really not sure what to make of about 1/3rd of the people with lesser rigs making comments like yours damz, it's odd people like you reporting fantastic results, others dreaded results....I guess it lies somewhere in the middle...
Avatar image for SilentSwirl
SilentSwirl

69

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 SilentSwirl
Member since 2006 • 69 Posts

I tried the SupCom demo and it didn't run all that great... infact it looked ugly.

P4 HT 3.2 Ghz, 1Gb RAM, 7600GT