This topic is locked from further discussion.
- Member Since: March 2, 2003
- Posts: 6330
LEDs simply don't have the picture quality of a plasma. Unless you have a really bright room, I would get a plasma. If your room is bright and there is little you can do to change that -- I recommend a matte LED (NOT GLOSSY, these reflect as much as a plasma)
I recommend that you increase your budget (and size, honestly a 32" is microscopic these days) to a good 42" plasma like the Panasonic UT50.
- Member Since: November 17, 2012
- Posts: 148
Well, technically, once OLEDs have sorted their problems with degrading diodes, they should trump plasmas.. but until then.. plasmas are still the king of displays as they have been since 2006.
How about OLED's? Wonder if they trump plasma. Ain't no way a backlit LED tv should be called LED imo. LED based LCD tv is more like it. OLED is the beast i'm waiting for.
Another thing is that OLED suffers from burn-in too, just like a plasma.
- Member Since: November 18, 2012
- Posts: 25
- Member Since: July 12, 2011
- Posts: 1437
^ ignore this post. Dumb ass troll always posts this kind of stuff. As if black levels, colour accuracy, gamma tracking, colour luminance, video processing, input lag etc is all the same...
just buy any 1080p TV. There is no difference besides the size as the price goes up. Unless you like useless features like wireless.jakes456