Question about Dragon Age Inquisition requirements.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for toddx77
toddx77

3395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#1 toddx77
Member since 2008 • 3395 Posts

My lap top has a nvidia geforce gtx 660m graphics card and I see that for recommended requirements list a geforce gtx 660. Is there a major difference between the two or does mine have an "m" because it is in a lap top?

Avatar image for gerygo
GeryGo

12803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By GeryGo  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 12803 Posts

@toddx77 said:

My lap top has a nvidia geforce gtx 660m graphics card and I see that for recommended requirements list a geforce gtx 660. Is there a major difference between the two or does mine have an "m" because it is in a lap top?

There's is a difference between mobile GPUs and standart ones, I haven't checked it for sure but it should be like 20-10% difference.

But for your question you'd be good to go, since I see it can run all modern games on low above 60fps and on medium settins above 30fps. (http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GTX-660M.71859.0.html)

Avatar image for toddx77
toddx77

3395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#3 toddx77
Member since 2008 • 3395 Posts

that is good to hear. thanks for your help.

Avatar image for Coseniath
Coseniath

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By Coseniath
Member since 2004 • 3183 Posts

Wait wait.

GTX660m is a very weak GPU compared to GTX660.

In order to understand, GTX660m equals to GTX550ti.

Now what does this mean? GTX660 has more than double performance than GTX660m.

But the resolution can save you.

What's your resolution?

Avatar image for gerygo
GeryGo

12803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By GeryGo  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 12803 Posts

@Coseniath said:

Wait wait.

GTX660m is a very weak GPU compared to GTX660.

In order to understand, GTX660m equals to GTX550ti.

Now what does this mean? GTX660 has more than double performance than GTX660m.

But the resolution can save you.

What's your resolution?

Not sure if passmark results or actual gaming performance, because I got the same double "performance" on GPU boss.

Avatar image for Coseniath
Coseniath

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By Coseniath
Member since 2004 • 3183 Posts
@PredatorRules said:

Not sure if passmark results or actual gaming performance, because I got the same double "performance" on GPU boss.

Pred, what are you talking about?

You know that passmark and GPU boss sux A LOT.

GTX660m = GK107 with 386 cores @ 835 MHz with 128 Bit @ 4000 MHz GDDR5 (64GB/s).

GTX660 = GK106 with 960 cores @ 980MHz with 192 Bit @ 6000 MHz GDDR5 (144.2GB/s).

Now how can these GPUs have the same performance???

These sites (passmark and GPU boss) need to be shutdown, they are terribly misleading.

Avatar image for gerygo
GeryGo

12803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#7 GeryGo  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 12803 Posts

@Coseniath said:
@PredatorRules said:

Not sure if passmark results or actual gaming performance, because I got the same double "performance" on GPU boss.

Pred, what are you talking about?

You know that passmark and GPU boss sux A LOT.

GTX660m = GK107 with 386 cores @ 835 MHz with 128 Bit @ 4000 MHz GDDR5 (64GB/s).

GTX660 = GK106 with 960 cores @ 980MHz with 192 Bit @ 6000 MHz GDDR5 (144.2GB/s).

Now how can these GPUs have the same performance???

These sites (passmark and GPU boss) need to be shutdown, they are terribly misleading.

I know but from notebookcheck the performance of the 660M is quite accurate and possibly match the same 660 performance

Avatar image for deactivated-5a9b3f32ef4e9
deactivated-5a9b3f32ef4e9

7779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By deactivated-5a9b3f32ef4e9
Member since 2009 • 7779 Posts

660m is no way near a 660. 680m is equal to a 660.

660m is equal to a 550ti as has been mentioned.

Avatar image for Coseniath
Coseniath

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By Coseniath
Member since 2004 • 3183 Posts
@PredatorRules said:

I know but from notebookcheck the performance of the 660M is quite accurate and possibly match the same 660 performance

Notebookcheck is very accurate. But it confirms my words :P.

As you can see GTX660m is a little slower than GTX550ti.

Avatar image for gerygo
GeryGo

12803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#10 GeryGo  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 12803 Posts

@Coseniath said:
@PredatorRules said:

I know but from notebookcheck the performance of the 660M is quite accurate and possibly match the same 660 performance

Notebookcheck is very accurate. But it confirms my words :P.

As you can see GTX660m is a little slower than GTX550ti.

Do not know about that, but anyway he should be fine, there's no need going above 720p on a laptop

Avatar image for Coseniath
Coseniath

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11  Edited By Coseniath
Member since 2004 • 3183 Posts
@PredatorRules said:

@Coseniath said:
@PredatorRules said:

I know but from notebookcheck the performance of the 660M is quite accurate and possibly match the same 660 performance

Notebookcheck is very accurate. But it confirms my words :P.

As you can see GTX660m is a little slower than GTX550ti.

Do not know about that, but anyway he should be fine, there's no need going above 720p on a laptop

? This is from notebookcheck in the right of the page, you didn't read the link you posted before?

And I really hope he has 720p, cause most laptops with GTX660M had 1600x900 or 1920x1080.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12  Edited By 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23829 Posts

GTX 660m is no where near a desktop GTX 660, GTX 660m is half as strong as a GTX 680m , and 680m is still slightly slower then a GTX 660.

Avatar image for gerygo
GeryGo

12803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#13 GeryGo  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 12803 Posts

@Coseniath said:
@PredatorRules said:

@Coseniath said:
@PredatorRules said:

I know but from notebookcheck the performance of the 660M is quite accurate and possibly match the same 660 performance

Notebookcheck is very accurate. But it confirms my words :P.

As you can see GTX660m is a little slower than GTX550ti.

Do not know about that, but anyway he should be fine, there's no need going above 720p on a laptop

? This is from notebookcheck in the right of the page, you didn't read the link you posted before?

And I really hope he has 720p, cause most laptops with GTX660M had 1600x900 or 1920x1080.

I didn't read it but was more into fps benchmarks on some modern games and heavy duty games such as Battlefield 4, Metro etc, the 660M running them perfectly fine so I don't think Dragon Age will require more than that, unless it comes as a crappy port.

Avatar image for Coseniath
Coseniath

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14  Edited By Coseniath
Member since 2004 • 3183 Posts
@PredatorRules said:

I didn't read it but was more into fps benchmarks on some modern games and heavy duty games such as Battlefield 4, Metro etc, the 660M running them perfectly fine so I don't think Dragon Age will require more than that, unless it comes as a crappy port.

It doesn't look like a port :D.

I was reading an article before and I am thinking of posting this in our forums too.

I Played 3 Hours of Dragon Age: Inquisition and It's Awesome

This is from techspot and he clearly says:

Inquisition was built from the ground up on all five launch platforms; that’s to say, the PC version is not a port. A BioWare employee informed me that the team was producing up to 16 builds of the game per day, ensuring it was optimized on PC along the way. While the Frostbite engine does scale well allowing those with lower-end systems to play, if you want to crank it all the way to achieve a stunning level of fidelity, you’ll need a top-end single GPU

And he also states:

Compared to the PS4 version on the other side of the room, the PC version looked superior.

Ok, that's it. I think gamespot mambers would like to hear an opinion form someone that played it on PC. I am going to post it.

Avatar image for gerygo
GeryGo

12803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#15 GeryGo  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 12803 Posts

@Coseniath said:
@PredatorRules said:

I didn't read it but was more into fps benchmarks on some modern games and heavy duty games such as Battlefield 4, Metro etc, the 660M running them perfectly fine so I don't think Dragon Age will require more than that, unless it comes as a crappy port.

It doesn't look like a port :D.

I was reading an article before and I am thinking of posting this in our forums too.

I Played 3 Hours of Dragon Age: Inquisition and It's Awesome

This is from techspot and he clearly says:

Inquisition was built from the ground up on all five launch platforms; that’s to say, the PC version is not a port. A BioWare employee informed me that the team was producing up to 16 builds of the game per day, ensuring it was optimized on PC along the way. While the Frostbite engine does scale well allowing those with lower-end systems to play, if you want to crank it all the way to achieve a stunning level of fidelity, you’ll need a top-end single GPU

And he also states:

Compared to the PS4 version on the other side of the room, the PC version looked superior.

Ok, that's it. I think gamespot mambers would like to hear an opinion form someone that played it on PC. I am going to post it.

Dunno about that, we'll have to see, I saw a gameplay once with all that dragon fighting and it seemed to me like a clear port, maybe they were playing on a console - maybe it was just a controller plugged in.

Avatar image for toddx77
toddx77

3395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#16 toddx77
Member since 2008 • 3395 Posts

So I am good to play it on my laptop with my 660m then? I don't want to buy it and be screwed until I can build my desk top lol.

Avatar image for Realmjumper
Realmjumper

840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#17 Realmjumper
Member since 2007 • 840 Posts

I suggest get it on console, the game is going to be intensive. Also its only windows 7 or higher only.

Console is safe bet.

Avatar image for toddx77
toddx77

3395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#18 toddx77
Member since 2008 • 3395 Posts

I hate playing RPG's on console, especially ones like that.

Avatar image for gerygo
GeryGo

12803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#19 GeryGo  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 12803 Posts

@toddx77 said:

So I am good to play it on my laptop with my 660m then? I don't want to buy it and be screwed until I can build my desk top lol.

You've seen yourself what modern games you can run and at what frame rates, from my speculations the worst case scenario you'd be playing it on low settings in case of crappy port.

Avatar image for toddx77
toddx77

3395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#20 toddx77
Member since 2008 • 3395 Posts

@PredatorRules said:

@toddx77 said:

So I am good to play it on my laptop with my 660m then? I don't want to buy it and be screwed until I can build my desk top lol.

You've seen yourself what modern games you can run and at what frame rates, from my speculations the worst case scenario you'd be playing it on low settings in case of crappy port.

Well the most recent game I have on my lap top is Titanfall and it works fine. Is that a good sign?

Avatar image for gerygo
GeryGo

12803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#21 GeryGo  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 12803 Posts

@toddx77 said:

@PredatorRules said:

@toddx77 said:

So I am good to play it on my laptop with my 660m then? I don't want to buy it and be screwed until I can build my desk top lol.

You've seen yourself what modern games you can run and at what frame rates, from my speculations the worst case scenario you'd be playing it on low settings in case of crappy port.

Well the most recent game I have on my lap top is Titanfall and it works fine. Is that a good sign?

Titanfall is not a demanding game, Far Cry, Crysis and Metro on the other hand are demanding games and they should work fine on your laptop as well.

Avatar image for toddx77
toddx77

3395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#22  Edited By toddx77
Member since 2008 • 3395 Posts

@PredatorRules: Far Cry 3 and the Original Crisis both work fine on my lap top. I have Crisis 2 but haven't played it yet. So if Far Cry 3 works on my lap top Dragon Age Inquisition work?

Avatar image for gerygo
GeryGo

12803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#23 GeryGo  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 12803 Posts

@toddx77 said:

@PredatorRules: Far Cry 3 and the Original Crisis both work fine on my lap top. I have Crisis 2 but haven't played it yet. So if Far Cry 3 works on my lap top Dragon Age Inquisition work?

Yes.

Avatar image for toddx77
toddx77

3395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#24 toddx77
Member since 2008 • 3395 Posts

Awesome that is great to hear :)

Avatar image for RossRichard
RossRichard

3738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 RossRichard
Member since 2007 • 3738 Posts

You should be fine. If you notice choppy gameplay, just turn down some settings.