GTX 680 worth getting?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for auronvscloud
auronvscloud

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 auronvscloud
Member since 2008 • 36 Posts

Is it worth getting at the moment? And how many years do you think it'll still be good for?

Avatar image for V4LENT1NE
V4LENT1NE

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 V4LENT1NE
Member since 2006 • 12901 Posts
I would just go for an OC 670 instead if you have your heart set on Nvidia, 680 isnt worth the price tag at the moment.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#3 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

The Radeon 7950, 7970 and the GTX 670 are the cards to consider in the high-end. The GTX 680 isn't practical for the price IMO.

Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10310

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10310 Posts

The Radeon 7950, 7970 and the GTX 670 are the cards to consider in the high-end. The GTX 680 isn't practical for the price IMO.

hartsickdiscipl

This.

Also future proofing is ridiculous. There is no way to know when something will become obsolete or at least not pass a certain standard.

Avatar image for II-Siamak-II
II-Siamak-II

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 II-Siamak-II
Member since 2012 • 480 Posts

This is the card I have and Love it, solid, stay icy cold, never hear the card even in most intense gaming seassions:

http://www.amazon.com/ASUS-Series-Graphics-Card-GTX670-DC2-4GD5/dp/B0094CWZ8U/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1354075655&sr=8-1&keywords=Asus+GTX+670+4gb

Avatar image for jakes456
jakes456

1398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 jakes456
Member since 2011 • 1398 Posts

680 sucks. anyone who wastes money on this card is clueless.

the 660 ti also sucks big time.

The only nvidia card worth getting is the 670 at the right price.

Otherwise 7850, 7870, 7950, 7970 are all better for the price.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23829 Posts

680 sucks. anyone who wastes money on this card is clueless.

the 660 ti also sucks big time.

The only nvidia card worth getting is the 670 at the right price.

Otherwise 7850, 7870, 7950, 7970 are all better for the price.

jakes456
lol, GTX 660ti is just a shade slower then a 7950 in performance so how does it suck? besides your trolling.....
Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16539 Posts

The 7970 is faster and $100 cheaper. The reason its cheaper is probably becayse amd is prepping the 8000 series due out in a fewm months.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23829 Posts

The 7970 is faster and $100 cheaper. The reason its cheaper is probably becayse amd is prepping the 8000 series due out in a fewm months.

blaznwiipspman1

Calm down there, and no a normal 7970 is not overall faster then the 680. And about the price, its not because of the upcoming gpu line its because AMD has to provide a cheaper alternative to the GTX 670 and GTX 680 or they wouldn't be able to sell their gpu's as well.

Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16539 Posts

[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

The 7970 is faster and $100 cheaper. The reason its cheaper is probably becayse amd is prepping the 8000 series due out in a fewm months.

04dcarraher

Calm down there, and no a normal 7970 is not overall faster then the 680. And about the price, its not because of the upcoming gpu line its because AMD has to provide a cheaper alternative to the GTX 670 and GTX 680 or they wouldn't be able to sell their gpu's as well.

The ghz 7970 is ocd 75 mhz from a stock 7970 which isnt a huge amout for a card that regularly ocs to 1150-1200 mhz on air. Also the 7000 seriea were released late december 2011 and amd usually releases new series once every 12-14 months. Im gueasing the 8000 series release around february the latest.

Avatar image for deactivated-579f651eab962
deactivated-579f651eab962

5404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 deactivated-579f651eab962
Member since 2003 • 5404 Posts
[QUOTE="jakes456"]

680 sucks. anyone who wastes money on this card is clueless .

the 660 ti also sucks big time.

The only nvidia card worth getting is the 670 at the right price.

Otherwise 7850, 7870, 7950, 7970 are all better for the price.

680 sucks, lol. Sure it does.
Avatar image for robertoenrique
robertoenrique

1191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 robertoenrique
Member since 2004 • 1191 Posts
If you can afford it comfortably, then go for it.
Avatar image for 5SI-GonePostal
5SI-GonePostal

391

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 5SI-GonePostal
Member since 2004 • 391 Posts

Isnt a bad card - just overpriced vs 670/7970 (as others have said)

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23829 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

The 7970 is faster and $100 cheaper. The reason its cheaper is probably becayse amd is prepping the 8000 series due out in a fewm months.

blaznwiipspman1

Calm down there, and no a normal 7970 is not overall faster then the 680. And about the price, its not because of the upcoming gpu line its because AMD has to provide a cheaper alternative to the GTX 670 and GTX 680 or they wouldn't be able to sell their gpu's as well.

The ghz 7970 is ocd 75 mhz from a stock 7970 which isnt a huge amout for a card that regularly ocs to 1150-1200 mhz on air. Also the 7000 seriea were released late december 2011 and amd usually releases new series once every 12-14 months. Im gueasing the 8000 series release around february the latest.

Problem is that a 75-100 mhz increase is a 7.5 to 10% overclock which allows the ghz 7970 to be on average 5% faster then gtx 680 with 12.11 drivers, Before those drivers GTX 680 was 5-6% faster on average and then a GTX 670 was only 3% on average slower then ghz 7970. Companies dont drop prices on cards before they even announce a new gpu series, the reason prices drop is because of competition.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#15 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

680 sucks. anyone who wastes money on this card is clueless.

the 660 ti also sucks big time.

The only nvidia card worth getting is the 670 at the right price.

Otherwise 7850, 7870, 7950, 7970 are all better for the price.

jakes456

You're definitely holding on to your "most useless poster" award for another week.

Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#16 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts
I have been debating whether to drop 900 bucks on a pair of SLI 680's. I am well aware of the small gap between the 670 and 680, but I am very weird and don't want to spend 600-700 on inferior cards even if the difference in performance is so small. My current 480's max everything out but the heat and noise has begun to annoy me more than usual. Also the temps have gotten even more ridiculous lately. 109 Celsius with 100% fan speed while gaming. The temps were originally in the low 90's when I first bought them, but two years of heavy use has taken its toll. II would probably use one of the 480's for dedicated Physx.
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23829 Posts

I have been debating whether to drop 900 bucks on a pair of SLI 680's. I am well aware of the small gap between the 670 and 680, but I am very weird and don't want to spend 600-700 on inferior cards even if the difference in performance is so small. My current 480's max everything out but the heat and noise has begun to annoy me more than usual. Also the temps have gotten even more ridiculous lately. 109 Celsius with 100% fan speed while gaming. The temps were originally in the low 90's when I first bought them, but two years of heavy use has taken its toll. II would probably use one of the 480's for dedicated Physx. Fizzman

You may need to apply a freash coat of thermal paste but getting aftermarket coolers and your problem with heat will be solved.

Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16539 Posts

I have been debating whether to drop 900 bucks on a pair of SLI 680's. I am well aware of the small gap between the 670 and 680, but I am very weird and don't want to spend 600-700 on inferior cards even if the difference in performance is so small. My current 480's max everything out but the heat and noise has begun to annoy me more than usual. Also the temps have gotten even more ridiculous lately. 109 Celsius with 100% fan speed while gaming. The temps were originally in the low 90's when I first bought them, but two years of heavy use has taken its toll. II would probably use one of the 480's for dedicated Physx. Fizzman

both the 670 and the 680 are inferior to the 7970, but I wouldn't recommend going crossfire with radeon cards yet. Their drivers aren't that great in that area. A single 7970 is about as powerful as a 590, as can be seen from benchmarks and a 590 is about as powerful as both your 480s in SLI. Alternatively you could go with a 680 gtx after selling both 480s. The 680 is also pretty close performance wise to a 590 gtx, and you could SLI it later for more performance, while using much less power than your 480s.

perfrel_1920.gif

Avatar image for Truth_Hurts_U
Truth_Hurts_U

9703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#19 Truth_Hurts_U
Member since 2006 • 9703 Posts

Well you get the extra cores and that's good for a few extra frames in physics titles and shader heavy games.

Avatar image for Elann2008
Elann2008

33028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#20 Elann2008
Member since 2007 • 33028 Posts
[QUOTE="jakes456"]

680 sucks. anyone who wastes money on this card is clueless.

the 660 ti also sucks big time.

The only nvidia card worth getting is the 670 at the right price.

Otherwise 7850, 7870, 7950, 7970 are all better for the price.

04dcarraher
lol, GTX 660ti is just a shade slower then a 7950 in performance so how does it suck? besides your trolling.....

Agreed. GTX 660ti is one heck of a card, especially for the price. Slightly better than GTX 580 in some games and the price is less than $300. GTX 580 was $500...
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

Is it worth getting at the moment? And how many years do you think it'll still be good for?

auronvscloud

680 doesn't support full DirectX11.1. NVIDIA kitbashing Microsoft's APIs again.

NVIDIA kitbash DirectX10.1 with custom DX10.0 with NVIDIA extensions http://www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2008/10/22/nvidia-gpus-support-dx10-1-features-in-far-cry-2/1

explained Vincent Greco, Worldwide Production Technical Coordinator at Ubisoft. "This feature was enabled by either using DX10.1 or using a DX10.0 extension supported by Nvidia DirectX 10 GPUs."

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="jakes456"]

680 sucks. anyone who wastes money on this card is clueless.

the 660 ti also sucks big time.

The only nvidia card worth getting is the 670 at the right price.

Otherwise 7850, 7870, 7950, 7970 are all better for the price.

Elann2008
lol, GTX 660ti is just a shade slower then a 7950 in performance so how does it suck? besides your trolling.....

Agreed. GTX 660ti is one heck of a card, especially for the price. Slightly better than GTX 580 in some games and the price is less than $300. GTX 580 was $500...

Oh man. That makes me sad :(
Avatar image for V4LENT1NE
V4LENT1NE

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 V4LENT1NE
Member since 2006 • 12901 Posts

[QUOTE="auronvscloud"]

Is it worth getting at the moment? And how many years do you think it'll still be good for?

ronvalencia

680 doesn't support full DirectX11.1. NVIDIA kitbashing Microsoft's APIs again.

NVIDIA kitbash DirectX10.1 with custom DX10.0 with NVIDIA extensions http://www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2008/10/22/nvidia-gpus-support-dx10-1-features-in-far-cry-2/1

explained Vincent Greco, Worldwide Production Technical Coordinator at Ubisoft. "This feature was enabled by either using DX10.1 or using a DX10.0 extension supported by Nvidia DirectX 10 GPUs."

Yeah because DX10.1 was a huge hit:roll: How come you dont bring up Nvidias stuff like PhysX?

Avatar image for Guovssohas
Guovssohas

330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Guovssohas
Member since 2010 • 330 Posts
No. It's a waste imo. If you want Nvidia get the 670.
Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16539 Posts

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

[QUOTE="auronvscloud"]

Is it worth getting at the moment? And how many years do you think it'll still be good for?

V4LENT1NE

680 doesn't support full DirectX11.1. NVIDIA kitbashing Microsoft's APIs again.

NVIDIA kitbash DirectX10.1 with custom DX10.0 with NVIDIA extensions http://www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2008/10/22/nvidia-gpus-support-dx10-1-features-in-far-cry-2/1

explained Vincent Greco, Worldwide Production Technical Coordinator at Ubisoft. "This feature was enabled by either using DX10.1 or using a DX10.0 extension supported by Nvidia DirectX 10 GPUs."

Yeah because DX10.1 was a huge hit:roll: How come you dont bring up Nvidias stuff like PhysX?

I believe I heard before that alot of features in dx11 were actually supposed to come out in dx10 like tessellation but was delayed to the whining of nvidia. Also the only way the 660ti could be considered a "superb" card is for power consumption. Everything else the 7950 takes a dump on the 660ti. This is even accounting for the fact that the 7950 stock clock is almost 100 mhz lower than the 660ti

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23829 Posts

[QUOTE="V4LENT1NE"]

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

680 doesn't support full DirectX11.1. NVIDIA kitbashing Microsoft's APIs again.

NVIDIA kitbash DirectX10.1 with custom DX10.0 with NVIDIA extensions http://www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2008/10/22/nvidia-gpus-support-dx10-1-features-in-far-cry-2/1

explained Vincent Greco, Worldwide Production Technical Coordinator at Ubisoft. "This feature was enabled by either using DX10.1 or using a DX10.0 extension supported by Nvidia DirectX 10 GPUs."

blaznwiipspman1

Yeah because DX10.1 was a huge hit:roll: How come you dont bring up Nvidias stuff like PhysX?

I believe I heard before that alot of features in dx11 were actually supposed to come out in dx10 like tessellation but was delayed to the whining of nvidia. Also the only way the 660ti could be considered a "superb" card is for power consumption. Everything else the 7950 takes a dump on the 660ti. This is even accounting for the fact that the 7950 stock clock is almost 100 mhz lower than the 660ti

Typical bias post from you....
Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16539

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16539 Posts

[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

[QUOTE="V4LENT1NE"]

Yeah because DX10.1 was a huge hit:roll: How come you dont bring up Nvidias stuff like PhysX?

04dcarraher

I believe I heard before that alot of features in dx11 were actually supposed to come out in dx10 like tessellation but was delayed to the whining of nvidia. Also the only way the 660ti could be considered a "superb" card is for power consumption. Everything else the 7950 takes a dump on the 660ti. This is even accounting for the fact that the 7950 stock clock is almost 100 mhz lower than the 660ti

Typical bias post from you....

yes and you would make a fox news reporter blush

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23829 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

I believe I heard before that alot of features in dx11 were actually supposed to come out in dx10 like tessellation but was delayed to the whining of nvidia. Also the only way the 660ti could be considered a "superb" card is for power consumption. Everything else the 7950 takes a dump on the 660ti. This is even accounting for the fact that the 7950 stock clock is almost 100 mhz lower than the 660ti

blaznwiipspman1

Typical bias post from you....

yes and you would make a fox news reporter blush

You do that nearly every time you post half truths praising AMD gpu's. GTX 660ti at 1080 is only on average 1-2% slower then 7950 even with 12.11 drivers , without those drivers GTX 660ti was about 5% faster on average. So 7950 taking a dump on 660ti is false. Driver updates and overclocking goes both ways so even when their OC'ed at the same ratios the performance differences are no different from stock.

Avatar image for V4LENT1NE
V4LENT1NE

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 V4LENT1NE
Member since 2006 • 12901 Posts
[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

[QUOTE="V4LENT1NE"]

Yeah because DX10.1 was a huge hit:roll: How come you dont bring up Nvidias stuff like PhysX?

04dcarraher

I believe I heard before that alot of features in dx11 were actually supposed to come out in dx10 like tessellation but was delayed to the whining of nvidia. Also the only way the 660ti could be considered a "superb" card is for power consumption. Everything else the 7950 takes a dump on the 660ti. This is even accounting for the fact that the 7950 stock clock is almost 100 mhz lower than the 660ti

Typical bias post from you....

He has been like that for a loonnnggg time :P
Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

[QUOTE="auronvscloud"]

Is it worth getting at the moment? And how many years do you think it'll still be good for?

V4LENT1NE

680 doesn't support full DirectX11.1. NVIDIA kitbashing Microsoft's APIs again.

NVIDIA kitbash DirectX10.1 with custom DX10.0 with NVIDIA extensions http://www.bit-tech.net/news/hardware/2008/10/22/nvidia-gpus-support-dx10-1-features-in-far-cry-2/1

explained Vincent Greco, Worldwide Production Technical Coordinator at Ubisoft. "This feature was enabled by either using DX10.1 or using a DX10.0 extension supported by Nvidia DirectX 10 GPUs."

Yeah because DX10.1 was a huge hit:roll: How come you dont bring up Nvidias stuff like PhysX?

If DX10.1 wasn't a huge hit, how come NVIDIA kitbashed Microsoft's DX10.1 standand with thier own DX10.1 like APIs?


PS; NVIDIA's pattern of kitbashing standards are also being applied in Google's Andriod platform.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] Typical bias post from you.... 04dcarraher

yes and you would make a fox news reporter blush

You do that nearly every time you post half truths praising AMD gpu's. GTX 660ti at 1080 is only on average 1-2% slower then 7950 even with 12.11 drivers , without those drivers GTX 660ti was about 5% faster on average. So 7950 taking a dump on 660ti is false. Driver updates and overclocking goes both ways so even when their OC'ed at the same ratios the performance differences are no different from stock.

660 Ti didn't win where performance was needed e.g. remove 1280x800 resolution and light weight Blizzard games from the benchmarking mix.