Benchmark Thread - How do you rank against other GS users?

#-49 Posted by Horgen (110009 posts) -
#-48 Posted by Postmortem123 (7613 posts) -

I can get it up another 50Mhz, but I start to see flickers. It's benchmark stable but I prefer having it completely stable.

#-47 Posted by blaznwiipspman1 (6028 posts) -
#-46 Posted by Horgen (110009 posts) -

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/624894

 

didnt oc anything, but daamn that took forever 

blaznwiipspman1
That is impressive. Especially with GPU core at 300, mem at 150 and CPU at 0. :P
#-45 Posted by Gambler_3 (7548 posts) -

Seriously, you guys are getting me hooked on this benchmarking stuff. Now, I want to do some upgrades lol.. all for e-peen. :-P Normally, I would never post benchmarks let alone run any benchmark tests.

Edit:  Patiently waiting for MITU's benchmarks. xD

Elann2008

lol same here I dont usually bother with any of these synthetic benchmarks but for some reason I liked this thread and wanted to post. :P

#-44 Posted by hartsickdiscipl (14787 posts) -

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/622498

My first runthrough.  It's reporting my RAM at DDR3-1333 speed, although it's running at 1600mhz.  Confirmed with CPU-Z.  

darksusperia

added. CPUz screeny for RAM please. - Usual standard bench rules.

 

cpuzclockshot_zps01b88613.jpg~original

#-43 Posted by quikdash6 (412 posts) -
#-42 Posted by kraken2109 (12964 posts) -

Don't think there's much point me taking part :(

#-41 Posted by Elann2008 (32953 posts) -

Update!  Scored better second time.  I didn't make any changes either. :-)

2yl5qgp.png

zwnqq1.png

#-40 Posted by Elann2008 (32953 posts) -
[QUOTE="horgen123"][QUOTE="Elann2008"] Mmhm. I just gotta find a way to beat C_Rule without doing any upgrade. Don't think it's possible though. I blame my motherboard, and a bit of my CPU. xD

Liquid cooling. That way you can perhaps OC further... A lot more!

Lol. I still have some headroom left. I'm going to OC it just for fun later tonight.
#-39 Posted by Klunt_Bumskrint (3516 posts) -

Best I could do tonight

Capture-19.png

 

I tried to break 12000, but couldn't manage it, I will try again when I can be bothered.

GPU Clocks @ 1254

Mem @ +510 offset ( 3515MHz )

 

 

 

#-38 Posted by FaustArp (1038 posts) -

GPU Clocks @ 1254

acanofcoke

Nice!  I'm guessing that's with modded BIOS?

#-37 Posted by Klunt_Bumskrint (3516 posts) -

[QUOTE="acanofcoke"]

GPU Clocks @ 1254

FaustArp

Nice!  I'm guessing that's with modded BIOS?

Yup :D
#-36 Posted by blaznwiipspman1 (6028 posts) -

Best I could do tonight

Capture-19.png

 

I tried to break 12000, but couldn't manage it, I will try again when I can be bothered.

GPU Clocks @ 1254

Mem @ +510 offset ( 3515MHz )

 

 

 

acanofcoke

 

guess my suspicions were correct...the oc'd 7950's CF'd scored better on the gpu portion than the oc'd 680's.  This thread is about get reallll ugly real soon.

#-35 Posted by Klunt_Bumskrint (3516 posts) -
The new 3dMark does really seem to love AMD for some reason, I feel a bit gimped. Things are more even on Unigine
#-34 Posted by gamerman1011 (73 posts) -
#-33 Posted by blaznwiipspman1 (6028 posts) -

The new 3dMark does really seem to love AMD for some reason, I feel a bit gimped. Things are more even on Unigineacanofcoke

 

AMD doesn't have the money to pay off devs like nvidia does.  The 7000 series just oc's like monsters, thats all.  Anyways I want to see someone with an AMD fx-8350/8320 do the benchmark test to see the physics score.

#-31 Posted by mitu123 (153911 posts) -

 

Edit:  Patiently waiting for MITU's benchmarks. xD

Elann2008

If I can get the damn thing to open that is!

#-30 Posted by Postmortem123 (7613 posts) -

[QUOTE="Elann2008"]

 

Edit:  Patiently waiting for MITU's benchmarks. xD

mitu123

If I can get the damn thing to open that is!

It doesn't open?

#-29 Posted by kitty (114460 posts) -

Don't think there's much point me taking part :(

kraken2109
Same. :(
#-28 Posted by darksusperia (6898 posts) -
Ive updated the leaderboard with everyone that has posted while I was sleeping. If you have an updated score, can you make a new post and not edit your existing otherwise I may not catch it :)
[QUOTE="kraken2109"]

Don't think there's much point me taking part :(

2ndWonder
Same. :(

You should still give it a run and get your scores up there. Its all for fun.
#-27 Posted by mitu123 (153911 posts) -

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Elann2008"]

 

Edit:  Patiently waiting for MITU's benchmarks. xD

Postmortem123

If I can get the damn thing to open that is!

It doesn't open?

Nope, tried running as administrator and still nothing happens.
#-26 Posted by darksusperia (6898 posts) -
[QUOTE="Postmortem123"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"]If I can get the damn thing to open that is!

mitu123

It doesn't open?

Nope, tried running as administrator and still nothing happens.

disable UAC?
#-25 Posted by kitty (114460 posts) -
[QUOTE="darksusperia"]Ive updated the leaderboard with everyone that has posted while I was sleeping. If you have an updated score, can you make a new post and not edit your existing otherwise I may not catch it :)
[QUOTE="kraken2109"]

Don't think there's much point me taking part :(

2ndWonder
Same. :(

You should still give it a run and get your scores up there. Its all for fun.

I'll wait a month or so then do it. :P I plan on upgrading my gpu then if my money allows it.
#-24 Posted by pawq4 (476 posts) -
#-23 Posted by darksusperia (6898 posts) -
[QUOTE="2ndWonder"][QUOTE="darksusperia"]Ive updated the leaderboard with everyone that has posted while I was sleeping. If you have an updated score, can you make a new post and not edit your existing otherwise I may not catch it :) [QUOTE="2ndWonder"] You should still give it a run and get your scores up there. Its all for fun.

I'll wait a month or so then do it. :P I plan on upgrading my gpu then if my money allows it.

You can come back at any time and update your score ;)

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/626490

 

Overclocking does help my scores a lot.

Dat coil whine during ice strike though :shock:

pawq4
added to the leaderboard.
#-22 Posted by AdamK47 (1054 posts) -

[QUOTE="AdamK47"]

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/621995

Intel Core i7 3960X @ 4.5GHz
ASRock X79 Extreme11 @ 36 x 125MHz
32GB G.SKILL Ripjaws Z @ 2333 DDR
Three Nvidia GTX Titans in 3-Way SLI
256GB Vertex 4 SSD
Eight 512GB Vertex 4s in RAID-0 (4096GB)
4TB Deskstar 7K4000 HDD
Pioneer BDR-206 BD-RW
Cooler Master HAF-X case
Thermaltake Water 2.0 Extreme cooler
Corsair AX1200 power supply
Razer BlackWidow Ultimate keyboard
CST LaserTRAC 2545W trackball
DoubleSight DS-307W monitor
Shure SRH1440 headphones
Windows 7 Ultimate x64

+78 core (13MHz x 6) and +100 on the memory for each GPU. No voltage adjustments. At load, the boost settles to 1019MHz for GPU1, 1032MHz for GPU2, and 1058MHz for GPU3.

320.00 drivers with everything set to default.

darksusperia

GPUz/afterburner/precision your boost clocks if you can please

Clocks_05-08-13.png

#-21 Posted by mitu123 (153911 posts) -
[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="Postmortem123"]

It doesn't open?

darksusperia
Nope, tried running as administrator and still nothing happens.

disable UAC?

I always have it disabled.
#-19 Posted by Elann2008 (32953 posts) -
[QUOTE="darksusperia"][QUOTE="mitu123"]Nope, tried running as administrator and still nothing happens.mitu123
disable UAC?

I always have it disabled.

Your rig is too powerful Mitu.
#-18 Posted by nightz2k (456 posts) -

3DMark is tough to get through at 5.2GHz, so I backed down, but the GPU's overclocked (100MHz) higher made it through.

CPU: i5 2500k@5.0GHz, GPU: 2x HD7950 @ 1200/1750 Memory: 8GB (2x4GB)@1600MHz stock

Firestrike score: 11256 Link for proof

Just a slight improvement.

#-17 Posted by darksusperia (6898 posts) -
updated.
#-16 Posted by Elann2008 (32953 posts) -

3DMark is tough to get through at 5.2GHz, so I backed down, but the GPU's overclocked (100MHz) higher made it through.

CPU: i5 2500k@5.0GHz, GPU: 2x HD7950 @ 1200/1750 Memory: 8GB (2x4GB)@1600MHz stock

Firestrike score: 11256 Link for proof

Just a slight improvement.

nightz2k

Nice man! Is there a reason why I scored a 166915 for Ice Storm, when your setup is obviously superior when compared to mine? Just curious.  I'm guessing it's broken?

My graphics score only:  297319   

#-15 Posted by darksusperia (6898 posts) -

[QUOTE="nightz2k"]

3DMark is tough to get through at 5.2GHz, so I backed down, but the GPU's overclocked (100MHz) higher made it through.

CPU: i5 2500k@5.0GHz, GPU: 2x HD7950 @ 1200/1750 Memory: 8GB (2x4GB)@1600MHz stock

Firestrike score: 11256 Link for proof

Just a slight improvement.

Elann2008

Nice man! Is there a reason why I scored a 166915 for Ice Storm, when your setup is obviously superior when compared to mine? Just curious.  I'm guessing it's broken?

I think its how they are weighting the average frame consistancy (or inconsistancy) that may be throwing out the scores there, seeing as its designed for phones/tablets and our pc's run it at rediculous framerates (in some cases 600fps+). It throws it out. Thats why we're only using fire strike here.
#-14 Posted by Elann2008 (32953 posts) -
[QUOTE="Elann2008"]

[QUOTE="nightz2k"]

3DMark is tough to get through at 5.2GHz, so I backed down, but the GPU's overclocked (100MHz) higher made it through.

CPU: i5 2500k@5.0GHz, GPU: 2x HD7950 @ 1200/1750 Memory: 8GB (2x4GB)@1600MHz stock

Firestrike score: 11256 Link for proof

Just a slight improvement.

darksusperia

Nice man! Is there a reason why I scored a 166915 for Ice Storm, when your setup is obviously superior when compared to mine? Just curious.  I'm guessing it's broken?

I think its how they are weighting the average frame consistancy (or inconsistancy) that may be throwing out the scores there, seeing as its designed for phones/tablets and our pc's run it at rediculous framerates (in some cases 600fps+). It throws it out. Thats why we're only using fire strike here.

Gotcha. Makes sense. Thanks man! Btw, very fun thread.
#-12 Posted by Elann2008 (32953 posts) -
I wanna see some AMD FX-8350 users post some benchmarks!
#-11 Posted by nightz2k (456 posts) -

Yeah, I wasn't sure on that either, probably overkill for that test. lol.

That's probably going to be my personal best results, such a long benchmark. I hate when it crashes while I'm on the last part, waste of time and effort. =/

EDIT: Curious see some AMD 8-core action too. :cool:

#-10 Posted by darksusperia (6898 posts) -
[QUOTE="Elann2008"][QUOTE="darksusperia"][QUOTE="Elann2008"] Gotcha. Makes sense. Thanks man! Btw, very fun thread.

Thanks! :)
I wanna see some AMD FX-8350 users post some benchmarks!Elann2008
Id love to see an similiarly spec'd machine to say a PS4 (no I dont want to start SW in this thread, just think it would be another good comparison point) [QUOTE="nightz2k"]Yeah, I wasn't sure on that either, probably overkill for that test. lol. That's probably going to be my personal best results, such a long benchmark. I hate when it crashes while I'm on the last part, waste of time and effort. =/

Yes, that sucks. You could always get the "Advanced' version, then you could just run fire strike instead of them all.
#-9 Posted by nightz2k (456 posts) -

Yes, that sucks. You could always get the "Advanced' version, then you could just run fire strike instead of them all.darksusperia

Thought about it, but even for a low cost, I'd just rather buy game(s) on sale on Steam instead. I'm always waiting to see what's on sale next. :P

#-8 Posted by Elann2008 (32953 posts) -

Damn it. Overclocked my GPU a bit more and it was stable in testing.. but crashes after the fire strike demo when gathering results.. son of a.. lol xD

#-7 Posted by darksusperia (6898 posts) -

Damn it. Overclocked my GPU a bit more and it was stable in testing.. but crashes after the fire strike demo when gathering results.. son of a.. lol xD

Elann2008
More volts!
#-6 Posted by FaustArp (1038 posts) -

[QUOTE="Elann2008"]

Damn it. Overclocked my GPU a bit more and it was stable in testing.. but crashes after the fire strike demo when gathering results.. son of a.. lol xD

darksusperia

More volts!

He has a 670, he'll need to mod his BIOS to get more volts.

Having said that, I do get good results when I run a modded BIOS, and look at acanofcoke's post earlier in this thread...his 680s are running @~1250 on his new BIOS.  :)

#-5 Posted by Elann2008 (32953 posts) -

New score..

Something must have gone wrong the first time, but it went through perfectly this time without up'ing the voltage.

It doesn't show it there, but my core clock is 1201 MHz

#-4 Posted by darksusperia (6898 posts) -

New score..

Something must have gone wrong the first time, but it went through perfectly this time without up'ing the voltage.

It doesn't show it there, but my core clock is 1201 MHz

Elann2008
you know I want a pic of afterburner/gpuz with your clocks.
#-3 Posted by Elann2008 (32953 posts) -

[QUOTE="Elann2008"]

New score..

Something must have gone wrong the first time, but it went through perfectly this time without up'ing the voltage.

It doesn't show it there, but my core clock is 1201 MHz

darksusperia

you know I want a pic of afterburner/gpuz with your clocks.

t0j8ec.png

#-2 Posted by Elann2008 (32953 posts) -
#-1 Posted by darksusperia (6898 posts) -
#0 Posted by BPoole96 (22784 posts) -

Got my cards back at 840/1325 and upped my CPU by .1 Mhz. That improved my score by about 200.

5802 BPoole96 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/627427 2x 2GB 6950 840/1325 | 2500k@4.3Ghz | 8GB @ 2133Mhz