Benchmark Thread - How do you rank against other GS users?

#1 Posted by darksusperia (6911 posts) -

Welcome to the Benchmark Thread. Here you can see where your machine ranks against other gamespot users. This is similiar to the
thread in the Custom Build PC union board but seems to have died off and here gets more traffic, so lets find out how you stack
up.

1. Download 3DMark 1.1.0 Basic from here:

http://www.guru3d.com/files_details/3dmark_download.html

pick the mirror closest to you, its around 1GB download.

1b. Download Catzilla 1.0 from here:

http://www.catzilla.com/download 

2. Make sure VirtuMVP is disabled if you have it enabled.

3. Click Run all button for 3dmark. Run the 720p test for Catzilla.

4. post the result link*.

*If your cpu/gpu specs do not record/display properly then a shot from cpu-z/gpu-z is required for fair comparisons. (MSI afterburner can be used to get GPU clocks if necessary)
EG:
[spoiler]
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/622208

My cpu didnt record properly for whatever reason, its at stock anyway (OC disabled). I believe I have mobo problems, just like my
ram says 1333 instead of 1600.

[/spoiler]

5. You can come back at any time and update your score if its better then your existing. You may have tweaked your OC's, RAM
timings, whatever, if its better then post away.

** Fire strike scores will be kept in the leaderboard, and updated below along with the main result link / specs for quick
comparisons.

*** Cloud Gate leaderboard is for older hardware(DX10). If you have a DX11 card you can either be one or both, this is up to you.

**** Ice Storm leaderboard is only for tablets and phones. I will not accept PC scores for this. 

#2 Edited by darksusperia (6911 posts) -

Entries will be stored in the following format Score - Username - link - quickspecs: cpu(oc) - GPU - ram

EG:

4074 - darksusperia: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/688973 - 3770K(4.5) - GTX 570(780) - 2133 RAM

1. 24830 - AdamK47 - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/1767679 - 4960X(4.5) - 4x TITAN - 2333 RAM

2. 18696 - Faustarp - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/509036 - 3930K(5) - 2x TITAN(1215|1176) - 1600 RAM

3. 17348 - Klunt_Bumskrint - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/1517305 - 3770K(4.7) - 2x GTX 780(1319|1319) - 1600 RAM

15961 - mdraven - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/978967 - 3930K(4.2?) - 2x 780 - 1333 RAM

15785 - Alienware_fan - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1272531 - 3770K(4.5) - 3x 7970(1100) - 1600 RAM

13940 - GameFan1983 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1522972 - 3970X(4.2) - 2x GT690 - 1333 RAM

13560 - _Matt_ - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1088563 - 3930K(4.1) - 2x GTX 780 - 2133 RAM

12242 - Nightz2k - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/451225 - 2500K(5.1) - 2x 7950(1200) - 1600 RAM

12198 - Klunt_Bumskrint(defunct) - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/661578? - 3770K(4.7) - 2x GTX 680(1267) - 1600 RAM

11834 - Postmortem123 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2471262 - 4770K(4.3) - GTX 780 Ti(1276) - 1333 RAM

11159 -mike4realz - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/442961 - 2600K(4.6) - GTX 690(1163) - 2133 RAM

11140 - Faustarp(single card) - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/508551- 3930K(5) - TITAN(1215) - 1600 RAM

10892 - Grey_Eyed_Elf - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1868804 - 4670K(4.2) - GTX 780Ti(1141) - 1333 RAM

10809 - Klunt_Bumskrint - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/942956 - 3770K(4.7) - GTX 780(1320) - 1600 RAM

10542 - punk2k6x - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1487002 - FX 8350(4.5) - 7990(1100) - 1600 RAM

10138 - C_rule - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1699724 - 3570K (4.4) - 2x GTX 670(1163|1241) - 1600 RAM

10004 - DevilMightCry - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/628315 - 3770K(4.6) - GTX 780(1202) - 1866 RAM

9674 - CreasianDevaili - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/867258 - 4670K(4.4) - GTX 780(1280) - 1600 RAM

9468 - PernicioEnigma - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/845875 - 3930K(4.7) - GTX 780(1123) - 1333 RAM

9367 - Clyde46 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1864603 - 2600K - GTX 780 Ti - 1333 RAM

9336 - GoldenElementXL - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1012654 - 3770K(4.2) - GTX 690 - 2133 RAM

9293 - darksusperia - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/744589? - 3770K(4.5) - GTX 780(1137) - 2133 RAM

9121 - Krisroe_213 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/741854 - 3570K(4.4) - GTX 780(1030) - 1600 RAM

8278 - Blaznwiipspman1 - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/454319 - 3770K(4.2) - 7970(1225) - 1600 RAM

7955 - Nightz2k(single card) - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/457715 - 2500K(5.1) - 7950(1230) - 1600 RAM

7861 - The_Animator420 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2477792 - 3770K(4.7) - GTX 680(1290) - 1333 RAM

7841 - 2ndWonder - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1826706 - Phenom II X4 965(3.8) - 2x 7870(1050) - 1333 RAM

7453 - Horgen123 - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/1280477 - 3570K (4.3) - GTX 680 (1320) - 1600RAM

7440 - Khan8671 - NO LINK ONLINE RESULT PIC VERIFY - ???? - 7970Ghz - ????

7230 - quikdash6 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1076505 - 3570K(4.2) - GTX 770(1241) - 1600 RAM

7206 - Postmortem123 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/651404 - 2500K(4.4) - GTX 680(1241) - 1333 RAM

7203 - Klunt_Bumskrint - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/815133 - 3770K(4.5) - GTX 680(1228) - 1600 RAM

7080 - PredatorRules - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2179789 - 4670 - R9 280X - 1333 RAM

7027 - pawq -http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/626490 - 3570K(4.3) - 7970(1100) - 1600 RAM

6933 - ankor77 - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/526054 - 4770K - 7970 - 1600 RAM

6912 - nutshell163 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/859941 - Phenom II X6 1090T(3.6) - 7970(1200) - 1333 RAM

6761 - CptJSparrow - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/969848 - FX 8350(4.5) - 7970 - 1600 RAM

6586 - 404FredNotFound - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1522541 - 3570K(4.6) - GTX 670(1280) - 2133 RAM

6516 - consoletroll - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/517902 - 3570K(4.2) - GTX 670(1110) - 1866 RAM

6442 - lostrib - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/640912 - 3570K (4.2) - GTX 670(1228) - 1600 RAM

6333 - homeboylizard - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/666096 - i5 2310 - 7950(1195) - 1333 RAM

6315 - hartsickdiscipl - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/853364 - 3570K(4.5) - GTX 760(1220) - 1600 RAM

6289 - Elann2008 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/627039 - 2500K(4.4) - GTX 670(1200) - 1333 RAM

6056 - Jd1680a - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/875852 - i5 2500 - GTX 680 - 1333 RAM

5856 - Bpoole - http://www.3dmark.com/fs/443592. - 2500K(4.3) - 2x 6950(840) - 2133 RAM

5478 - Kraken2109 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1628269 - Phenom II X4 955(3.5) - GTX 670(1124) - 800 RAM

5469 - Marvi_l - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/901399 - i7 920 - GTX 760 - 1333 RAM

5377 - Cyberdot - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/629284 - 3470 - GTX 670 - 1600 RAM

5237 - neatfeatguy - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/631642 - Phenom II X4 940(3.6) - 2x GTX 570 - 800 RAM

5185 - sensfanVone - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/905550 - 4770 - GTX 670 - 1600 RAM

5091 - ferrari2001 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2148247 - FX-6300- GTX 760 - 1600 RAM

4991 - insane_metalist - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1826933 - FX 8120(4) - GTX 760 - 1333 RAM

4914 - Weird_jerk - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1800995 - Phenom II X4 1055T(3.9) - GTX 660(1202) - 1600 RAM

4510 - soolkiki - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/723896 - 3570K(4) - 7850(1.0) - 1600 RAM

4455- Gambler_3 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/624133 - Q8400(3.2) - 7850(1050) - 1333 RAM

4321 - gamerman1011 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/624349 - 3350P - GTX 660 - 1333 RAM

3250 - EliteM0nk3y - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/651375 - Phenom II X4 955 - GTX 560 Ti(900) - 1333 RAM

2943 - jun_aka_pekto - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/818785 - FX 8350(4.4) - GTX 560 Ti - 1600 RAM

2656 - nightz2k(wife) - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/820715 - i5 2500K(3.8) - GTX 460(850) - 1600 RAM

1. 40625 - AdamK47 - http://www.3dmark.com/cg/790354 - 4960X(4.5) - 3x TITAN(1020|1032|1058) - 2333 RAM

2. 35204 - GameFan1983 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1522972 - 3970X(4.2) - 2x GTX690 - 1333 RAM

3. 33651 - _Matt_ - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1088563 - 3930K(4.1) - 2x GTX 780 - 2133 RAM

32898 - mdraven - http://www.3dmark.com/cg/878844 - 3930K(4.2?) - 2x 780 - 1333 RAM

32509 - PernicioEnigma - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/845875 - 3930K(4.7) - GTX 780 - 1333 RAM

31468 - Alienware_fan - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1272531 - 3770K(4.5) - 3x 7970(1100) - 1600 RAM

30404 - acanofcoke - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/641813? - 3770K(4.5) - 2x GTX 680(1254) - 1600 RAM

27089 - darksusperia - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/698409 - 3770(4.5) - GTX 780(1084) - 2133 RAM

25487 - GoldenElementXL - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1012654 - 3770K(4.2) - GTX 690 - 2133 RAM

25452 - The_Animator23 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2478005 - 3770K - GTX 680(1280) - 1333 RAM

24787 - Nightz2k - http://www.3dmark.com/cg/429221 - 2500K(5.0) - 2x 7950(1200) - 1600 RAM

22839 - punk2k6x - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1487002 - 8350(4.5) - 7990(1100) - 1600 RAM

22052 - Clyde46 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1864603 - 2600K - GTX 780 Ti - 1333 RAM

21954 - Blaznwiipspman1 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/644660 - 3770K - 7970(1060) - 1600 RAM

21869 - Grey_Eyed_Elf - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1868804 - 4670K(4.2) - GTX 780Ti(1141) - 1333 RAM

21834 - C_rule - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1699724 - 3570K (4.4) - 2x GTX 670(1163|1241) - 1600 RAM

21507 - ankor77 - http://www.3dmark.com/cg/494938 - 4770K - 7970 - 1600 RAM

21326 - punk2k6x - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1383009 - 8350 - 7990 - 1600 RAM

21131 - CreasianDevaili - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1204235 - 4670K(4.4) - GTX 780(1100) - 1600 RAM

21127 - Krisroe_213 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/741854 - 3570K(4.4) - GTX 780(1030) - 1600 RAM

21077 - The_Animator23 - http://www.3dmark.com/cg/544636 - 3770K - GTX 680 - 1333 RAM

20357 - CptJSparrow - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/969848 - FX 8350(4.5) - 7970- 1600 RAM

20158 - sensfanVone - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/905550 - 4770 - GTX 670 - 1600 RAM

19574 - 404FredNotFound - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1522541 - 3570K(4.6) - GTX 670(1280) - 2133 RAM

19350 - hartsickdiscipl - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/853364 - 3570K(4.5) - GTX 760(1220) - 1600 RAM

19152 - quikdash6 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1076505 - 3570K(4.2) - GTX 770(1241) - 1600 RAM

18744 - lostrib - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/640912 - 3570K (4.2) - GTX 670(1228) - 1600 RAM

18653 - BPoole - http://www.3dmark.com/cg/422389 2500K(4.3) - 2x 6950(840) - 2133 RAM

18559 - Elann2008 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/627039 - 2500K(4.4) - GTX 670(1200) - 1333 RAM

18104 - pawq -http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/626490 - 3570K(4.3) - 7970(1100) - 1600 RAM

17031 - PredatorRules - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2179789 - 4670 - R9 280X - 1333 RAM

16928 - nutshell163 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/859941 - Phenom II X6 1090T(3.6) - 7970(1200) - 1333 RAM

16267 - Wierd_Jerk - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/805258 - Phenom II X4 1055T(3.8) - GTX 660(1202) - 1600 RAM

15671 - insane_metalist - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1826933 - FX 8120(4) - GTX 760 - 1333 RAM

15655 - soolkiki - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/723896 - 3570K(4) - 7850(1.0) - 1600 RAM

15436 - Marvi_l - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/901399 - i7 920 - GTX 760 - 1333 RAM

15162 - jun_aka_pekto - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/824310 - FX 8350(4.5) - GTX 560 Ti - 1600 RAM

14771 - Jd1680a - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/875852 - i5 2500 - GTX 680 - 1333 RAM

14580 - 2ndWonder - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1826706 - Phenom II X4 965(3.8) - 2x 7870(1050) - 1333 RAM

13158 - ferrari2001 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/2148247 - FX-6300 - GTX 760 - 1600 RAM

13122 - gamerman1011 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/624349 - 3350P - GTX 660 - 1333 RAM

12884 - neatfeatguy - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/631642 - Phenom II X4 940(3.6) - 2x GTX 570 - 800 RAM

12437 - Kraken2109 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1628269 - Phenom II X4 955(3.5) - GTX 670(1124) - 800 RAM

12067- Gambler_3 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/624133 - Q8400(3.2) - 7850(1050) - 1333 RAM

11439 - homeboylizard - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/655162 - i5 2310 - 7950(1180) - 1333 RAM

10594 - EliteM0nk3y - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/651375 - Phenom II X4 955 - GTX 560 Ti(900) - 1333 RAM

10587 - Horgen123 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/623527 - 3570K (4.2) - GTX 680 (1175) - 1600RAM

9661 - Cyberdot - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/629284 - 3470 - GTX 670 - 1600 RAM

8306 - Kraken2109 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/629833 - Phenom II X4 955(3.5) - GTX 275 - 800 RAM

4740 - nightz2k(wife) - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/631056 - Athlon 64 x2 5600+ - GTX 460 - 667 RAM

4630 - Klunt_Bumskrint(son) - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/650549 - Athlon 64 x2 6400+ - GTX 280 - 800 RAM

1. 16136 - Kraken2109 - Nexus 5

2. 13893 - mike4realz - iPhone 5s

3. 12052 - C_Rule - Xperia ZR

11853 - Grey_Eyed_Elf - HTC one

11536 - hartsickdiscipl - Samsung Galaxy S4

10156 - ferrari2001 - HTC one

3548 - EliteM0nk3y - Nexus 7

1987 - Klunt_Bumskrint - Samsung Galaxy Note

1666 - darksusperia - Samsung Galaxy Note

#3 Posted by darksusperia (6911 posts) -



1. 23253 - acanofcoke - http://www.catzilla.com/pl/showresult?lp=81230 - 3770K(4.7) - GTX 780(1320) - 1600 RAM.

2. 19450 - C_Rule - http://www.catzilla.com/pl/showresult?lp=81622 - 3570K(4.4) - GTX 670 SLI - 1600 RAM

3. 16583 - The_Animator420 - http://www.catzilla.com/showresult?lp=89422 - 3770K(4.7) - GTX 680(1274) - 1333 RAM

16568 - Grey_Eyed_Elf - http://www.catzilla.com/showresult?lp=87072 - 2500K(4.5) - GTX 680(1110) - 1333 RAM

16391 - horgen123 - http://www.catzilla.com/pl/showresult?lp=83313 - 3570K(4.6) - GTX 680(1202) - 1600 RAM

14654 - C-Rule - http://www.catzilla.com/pl/showresult?lp=81640 - 3570K(4.4) - GTX 670 - 1600 RAM

#4 Posted by hartsickdiscipl (14787 posts) -

I will post mine once this version of 3dmark is downloaded and installed.  This is definitely a more scientific way of measuring e-peen than just comparing specs.  

#5 Posted by soolkiki (1765 posts) -

There's no way I'd be able to beat even half of the people on here, but I will post for the heck of it! :)

#6 Posted by C_Rule (9741 posts) -

Score

Bit modest compared to scores that will be rolling in soon enough.

CPU is at 4.4. GPU is reported at 915MHz, but it's at 1150MHz boost.



GPUz for OC:
sv.png

#7 Posted by FaustArp (1038 posts) -

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/326343

#8 Posted by C_Rule (9741 posts) -

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/326343

FaustArp

I had a total of 10 minutes at the top.

Feels good man.:cool:

 

 

 

 

#9 Posted by darksusperia (6911 posts) -

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/326343

FaustArp
GPUz of your GPU clocks? or afterburner whichever is easiest to get.
#10 Posted by FaustArp (1038 posts) -

[QUOTE="FaustArp"]

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/326343

darksusperia

GPUz of your GPU clocks? or afterburner whichever is easiest to get.

GPU-Z reads my clocks wrong, dunno why.  Here's my Precision OSD though:

#11 Posted by C_Rule (9741 posts) -

[QUOTE="darksusperia"][QUOTE="FaustArp"]

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/326343

FaustArp

GPUz of your GPU clocks? or afterburner whichever is easiest to get.

GPU-Z reads my clocks wrong, dunno why.  Here's my Precision OSD though:

Does it report them correctly on the sensors tab? GPUz tells me my boost is 1115, but the actual boost is 1150.
#12 Posted by FaustArp (1038 posts) -

[QUOTE="FaustArp"]

[QUOTE="darksusperia"] GPUz of your GPU clocks? or afterburner whichever is easiest to get.C_Rule

GPU-Z reads my clocks wrong, dunno why.  Here's my Precision OSD though:

Does it report them correctly on the sensors tab? GPUz tells me my boost is 1115, but the actual boost is 1150.

Yeah, sensors tab seems to get it correct.

#13 Posted by hartsickdiscipl (14787 posts) -

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/622498

My first runthrough.  It's reporting my RAM at DDR3-1333 speed, although it's running at 1600mhz.  Confirmed with CPU-Z.  

#14 Posted by darksusperia (6911 posts) -

[QUOTE="darksusperia"][QUOTE="FaustArp"]

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/326343

FaustArp

GPUz of your GPU clocks? or afterburner whichever is easiest to get.

GPU-Z reads my clocks wrong, dunno why.  Here's my Precision OSD though:

1163 or 1169? sorry to be a pain, it just for comparisons so people can see easily.
#15 Posted by FaustArp (1038 posts) -

[QUOTE="FaustArp"]

[QUOTE="darksusperia"] GPUz of your GPU clocks? or afterburner whichever is easiest to get.darksusperia

GPU-Z reads my clocks wrong, dunno why.  Here's my Precision OSD though:

1163 or 1169? sorry to be a pain, it just for comparisons so people can see easily.

1163.

#16 Posted by darksusperia (6911 posts) -

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/622498

My first runthrough.  It's reporting my RAM at DDR3-1333 speed, although it's running at 1600mhz.  Confirmed with CPU-Z.  

hartsickdiscipl
added. CPUz screeny for RAM please. - Usual standard bench rules.
#18 Posted by BPoole96 (22801 posts) -

5593 BPoole96 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/622578 GPU: 2x 6950 810/1250 CPU: i5 2500k 4.2Ghz RAM: 8GB 2133Mhz

My GPU have been having this weird problem where they won't stay overclocked. I just use the slider in CCC which allows me to go up to 840/1325 but it never stays. Also, my RAM is 2133Mhz but the benchmark only recorded 1600.

#19 Posted by darksusperia (6911 posts) -

5593 BPoole96 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/622578 GPU: 2x 6950 810/1250 CPU: i5 2500k 4.2Ghz RAM: 8GB 2133Mhz

My GPU have been having this weird problem where they won't stay overclocked. I just use the slider in CCC which allows me to go up to 840/1325 but it never stays. Also, my RAM is 2133Mhz but the benchmark only recorded 1600.

BPoole96
updated, cpuz for ram would be nice, just to confirm. you're in 3rd for now. I put your clock as 810, afterburner/precision shot of clocks at 840?
#20 Posted by BPoole96 (22801 posts) -

[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

5593 BPoole96 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/622578 GPU: 2x 6950 810/1250 CPU: i5 2500k 4.2Ghz RAM: 8GB 2133Mhz

My GPU have been having this weird problem where they won't stay overclocked. I just use the slider in CCC which allows me to go up to 840/1325 but it never stays. Also, my RAM is 2133Mhz but the benchmark only recorded 1600.

darksusperia

updated, cpuz for ram would be nice, just to confirm. you're in 3rd for now. I put your clock as 810, afterburner/precision shot of clocks at 840?

Sure thing:

[spoiler] pffCmIK.jpg [/spoiler]

For the test, my GPU speeds were at 810/1250. I have been having this problem with Catalyst Control Center when I click apply it just reverts my clocks back to 810/1250. I haven't had any look as far as solutions go.

#21 Posted by darksusperia (6911 posts) -

[QUOTE="darksusperia"][QUOTE="BPoole96"]

5593 BPoole96 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/622578 GPU: 2x 6950 810/1250 CPU: i5 2500k 4.2Ghz RAM: 8GB 2133Mhz

My GPU have been having this weird problem where they won't stay overclocked. I just use the slider in CCC which allows me to go up to 840/1325 but it never stays. Also, my RAM is 2133Mhz but the benchmark only recorded 1600.

BPoole96

updated, cpuz for ram would be nice, just to confirm. you're in 3rd for now. I put your clock as 810, afterburner/precision shot of clocks at 840?

Sure thing:

[spoiler] pffCmIK.jpg [/spoiler]

For the test, my GPU speeds were at 810/1250. I have been having this problem with Catalyst Control Center when I click apply it just reverts my clocks back to 810/1250. I haven't had any look as far as solutions go.

Awesome!
#22 Posted by Horgen (110134 posts) -
6412 - Horgen123 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/623367 - 3570K (4.2) - GTX 680 (1137) - 1600RAM Updated score: 6797 - Horgen123 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/623527 - 3570K (4.2) - GTX 680 (1175) - 1600 RAM. I know it says 667 on the RAM speed. CPU-Z reports this
#23 Posted by nightz2k (456 posts) -

Maybe I'll try higher overclocks sometime, but this isn't too bad for what I got.

CPU: i5 2500k@5.0GHz, GPU: 2x HD7950 @ 1200/1650 Memory: 8GB (2x4GB)@1600MHz stock

Firestrike score: 11176 - Link for proof

Says Graphics Driver not approved, most likely because I'm using 13.5beta2 drivers. I always try to use the latest possible.

Screenshots of CPU-Z and Afterburner:

 

..

#24 Posted by darksusperia (6911 posts) -
6412 - Horgen123 - http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/623367 - 3570K (4.2) - GTX 680 (1137) - 1600RAMhorgen123
updated
#25 Posted by darksusperia (6911 posts) -
[QUOTE="nightz2k"]

Maybe I'll try higher overclocks sometime, but this isn't too bad for what I got.

CPU: i5 2500k@5.0GHz, GPU: 2x HD7950 @ 1200/1650 Memory: 8GB (2x4GB)@1600MHz stock

Firestrike score: 11176 - Link for proof

Says Graphics Driver not approved, most likely because I'm using 13.5beta2 drivers. I always try to use the latest possible.

Screenshots of CPU-Z and Afterburner:

 

[spoiler] .. [/spoiler]

updated. nice score, blazing 7950's!
#26 Posted by Horgen (110134 posts) -
I'm glad to see that I beat C-Rule and his 670. Though I bet if he OC more he will beat me =/ (I'll do the same though:P )
#27 Posted by darksusperia (6911 posts) -
that's the idea Horgen. I think hes tapped out though
#28 Posted by C_Rule (9741 posts) -
Yeah, I'm out of the race, fellas. My poor little 670 refuses to OC any further. :( I've considered flashing a custom BIOS, but it wouldn't benefit me outside of benchmark scores. Maybe I'll steal a couple Titans just so I can beat you. :twisted:
#29 Posted by Horgen (110134 posts) -
[QUOTE="C_Rule"]Yeah, I'm out of the race, fellas. My poor little 670 refuses to OC any further. :( I've considered flashing a custom BIOS, but it wouldn't benefit me outside of benchmark scores. Maybe I'll steal a couple Titans just so I can beat you. :twisted:

Damn you if you do that :x
that's the idea Horgen. I think hes tapped out thoughdarksusperia
Well he got his 670 far.
#30 Posted by AdamK47 (1066 posts) -

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/621995

Intel Core i7 3960X @ 4.5GHz
ASRock X79 Extreme11 @ 36 x 125MHz
32GB G.SKILL Ripjaws Z @ 2333 DDR
Three Nvidia GTX Titans in 3-Way SLI
256GB Vertex 4 SSD
Eight 512GB Vertex 4s in RAID-0 (4096GB)
4TB Deskstar 7K4000 HDD
Pioneer BDR-206 BD-RW
Cooler Master HAF-X case
Thermaltake Water 2.0 Extreme cooler
Corsair AX1200 power supply
Razer BlackWidow Ultimate keyboard
CST LaserTRAC 2545W trackball
DoubleSight DS-307W monitor
Shure SRH1440 headphones
Windows 7 Ultimate x64

+78 core (13MHz x 6) and +100 on the memory for each GPU. No voltage adjustments. At load, the boost settles to 1019MHz for GPU1, 1032MHz for GPU2, and 1058MHz for GPU3.

320.00 drivers with everything set to default.

#31 Posted by Horgen (110134 posts) -
You passed 20 000 on FireStrike :shock:
#32 Posted by C_Rule (9741 posts) -
What's up with the other two benches, scores are all over the place for everyone who has posted.
#33 Posted by darksusperia (6911 posts) -

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/621995

Intel Core i7 3960X @ 4.5GHz
ASRock X79 Extreme11 @ 36 x 125MHz
32GB G.SKILL Ripjaws Z @ 2333 DDR
Three Nvidia GTX Titans in 3-Way SLI
256GB Vertex 4 SSD
Eight 512GB Vertex 4s in RAID-0 (4096GB)
4TB Deskstar 7K4000 HDD
Pioneer BDR-206 BD-RW
Cooler Master HAF-X case
Thermaltake Water 2.0 Extreme cooler
Corsair AX1200 power supply
Razer BlackWidow Ultimate keyboard
CST LaserTRAC 2545W trackball
DoubleSight DS-307W monitor
Shure SRH1440 headphones
Windows 7 Ultimate x64

+78 core (13MHz x 6) and +100 on the memory for each GPU. No voltage adjustments. At load, the boost settles to 1019MHz for GPU1, 1032MHz for GPU2, and 1058MHz for GPU3.

320.00 drivers with everything set to default.

AdamK47
GPUz/afterburner/precision your boost clocks if you can please
#34 Posted by Horgen (110134 posts) -
What's up with the other two benches, scores are all over the place for everyone who has posted.C_Rule
I get a 60fps cap on those. I bet that affects it.
#35 Posted by C_Rule (9741 posts) -
[QUOTE="C_Rule"]What's up with the other two benches, scores are all over the place for everyone who has posted.horgen123
I get a 60fps cap on those. I bet that affects it.

Ah, strange. Was wondering why I had the highest score for Ice Storm, despite having far from the best PC. Guess it's broken.
#36 Posted by darksusperia (6911 posts) -
[QUOTE="C_Rule"]What's up with the other two benches, scores are all over the place for everyone who has posted.horgen123
I get a 60fps cap on those. I bet that affects it.

different drivers possibly. could also be too much power for the bench, renders faster then it can show maybe seeing as its a mobile and notebook bench. not sure to be honest
#37 Posted by Gambler_3 (7565 posts) -

935266_10152759253355316_1997105738_n.jp

248086_10152759253320316_323399547_n.jpg

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/624133

#38 Posted by darksusperia (6911 posts) -
Added
#39 Posted by C_Rule (9741 posts) -
Upgrading to 320.00 brought a small improvement.
#41 Posted by Horgen (110134 posts) -
Upgrading to 320.00 brought a small improvement.C_Rule
Same driver that I used. Not that much of a difference... Less than 100 points on firestrike.
#42 Posted by gamerman1011 (73 posts) -

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/624349

#44 Posted by Elann2008 (32991 posts) -

Seriously, you guys are getting me hooked on this benchmarking stuff. Now, I want to do some upgrades lol.. all for e-peen. :-P Normally, I would never post benchmarks let alone run any benchmark tests.

Edit:  Patiently waiting for MITU's benchmarks. xD

#45 Posted by nightz2k (456 posts) -

Yeah, I might try to up my score, but 3DMark is a bit more stressing than some other benchmarks I've run so it may not make it through. I know I'll lose my 3rd place spot soon enough when other beefier systems start showing up.

Enjoying my spot while I can. :P

#46 Posted by Elann2008 (32991 posts) -

Yeah, I might try to up my score, but 3DMark is a bit more stressing than some other benchmarks I've run so it may not make it through. I know I'll lose my 3rd place spot soon enough when other beefier systems start showing up.

Enjoying my spot while I can. :P

nightz2k
I want to see where Mitu stands next to you with his 670 sli. xD
#47 Posted by Horgen (110134 posts) -

Seriously, you guys are getting me hooked on this benchmarking stuff. Now, I want to do some upgrades lol.. all for e-peen. :-P Normally, I would never post benchmarks let alone run any benchmark tests.

Edit:  Patiently waiting for MITU's benchmarks. xD

Elann2008
His should be good. Dunno what he got his 2500K running at, but 670 (stock) SLI should really give him a good score.
#48 Posted by Elann2008 (32991 posts) -
[QUOTE="Elann2008"]

Seriously, you guys are getting me hooked on this benchmarking stuff. Now, I want to do some upgrades lol.. all for e-peen. :-P Normally, I would never post benchmarks let alone run any benchmark tests.

Edit:  Patiently waiting for MITU's benchmarks. xD

horgen123
His should be good. Dunno what he got his 2500K running at, but 670 (stock) SLI should really give him a good score.

Mmhm. I just gotta find a way to beat C_Rule without doing any upgrade. Don't think it's possible though. I blame my motherboard, and a bit of my CPU. xD
#49 Posted by Horgen (110134 posts) -
[QUOTE="Elann2008"] Mmhm. I just gotta find a way to beat C_Rule without doing any upgrade. Don't think it's possible though. I blame my motherboard, and a bit of my CPU. xD

Liquid cooling. That way you can perhaps OC further... A lot more!
#50 Posted by Postmortem123 (7693 posts) -

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/438706

Should put my 4.8Ghz OC back on and re-test, but I'm too lazy.