@plageus900 said:
@k--m--k: So what is your reasoning for hating homosexuals?
No one said anything about hate,. hate is such a strong word. more of passive disapproval I would say.
@always_explicit said:
Im interested to see where this universal rule of whats natural and what isnt is located.
I do sometimes ask myself the same question, what makes something natural and unnatural, and I guess society does, right?
I am just a product of my own society that judges homosexuality as unnatural.
@Teenaged said:
Um yeah, why the doubt. Might I add that its actually paraben-free as well?
[spoiler]In all seriousness, I dont give a **** if its "natural", "innate", "immutable" or whatever. Homosexuality is harmless so... deal with it. If you cant, go cry on your priest's shoulder.[/spoiler]
I guess it depends on how you measure something to be harmless or not, maybe for you it isnt
but what about the homosexuals themselves?
"the male body is not designed to be penetrated during sexual intercourse. The lining of the anus is much thinner than the vagina and tears very easily. The lining of the anus, compared to the lining of the vagina, is also designed for nutrients to pass through it - where a healthy vagina will stop sperm entering any part of the body except the reproductive system the anus will allow semen (and any disease it carries) into the blood stream"
source : http://aflame.blog.co.uk/2010/07/08/blinded-by-science-1-all-in-the-mind-is-homosexuality-a-psychiatric-condition-pt-8936688/
"Even if the condom doesn't break, anal intercourse is very risky because it can cause tissue in the rectum to tear and bleed. These tears allow disease germs to pass more easily from one partner to the other"
Source : http://www.fda.gov/forconsumers/byaudience/forpatientadvocates/hivandaidsactivities/ucm126372.htm#strong
I guess it no difference when male and female have anal sex, but again it doesnt mean it is harmless.
Also I am not Christain, therefore, I have no priest to cry on his shoulder.
Log in to comment