Why WOULDNT anyone vote for Ron Paul?

I just don't see why you would vote for anyone else?

No foreign war,ending the federal reserve and lowering taxes theseare all good things that America needs and Ron Paul stands for!Yet he still hasn't won a state to date.

Its not like the other candidates are much better,Romneys a dick and Gingrich is in it for the money.

So what do you think of Ron Paul OT?

.

This country is ****

He was my choice from the get go, but you know the internet doesn't have much say in the final decision.

This is more or less why

http://www.reddit.com/r/socialism/comments/opg40/in_a_ron_paul_america_there_would_be_no/c3j2k70

This is more or less why

http://www.reddit.com/r/socialism/comments/opg40/in_a_ron_paul_america_there_would_be_no/c3j2k70

Guybrush_3

He's old.

This is more or less why

http://www.reddit.com/r/socialism/comments/opg40/in_a_ron_paul_america_there_would_be_no/c3j2k70

Guybrush_3

Through some personal things I'd rather not get into, I don't trust anything I see on reddit anymore. Half of the political stuff you see is based off of rumor, created by someone who hates whoever they are bashing (and on the internet, hate is eternal), and sometimes just outright lies. Getting your reasons for hating politicians off that site is just as good as getting it from quickmeme.

i'm not in a position to respond to this thread but maybe because what he says isn't practical?

[QUOTE="Guybrush_3"]

This is more or less why

http://www.reddit.com/r/socialism/comments/opg40/in_a_ron_paul_america_there_would_be_no/c3j2k70

WiiCubeM1

Through some personal things I'd rather not get into, I don't trust anything I see on reddit anymore. Half of the political stuff you see is based off of rumor, created by someone who hates whoever they are bashing (and on the internet, hate is eternal), and sometimes just outright lies. Getting your reasons for hating politicians off that site is just as good as getting it from quickmeme.

Click the links and read them. Most of it is bills he's introduced, stuff he's blogged, and wikipedia.

[QUOTE="WiiCubeM1"]

[QUOTE="Guybrush_3"]

This is more or less why

http://www.reddit.com/r/socialism/comments/opg40/in_a_ron_paul_america_there_would_be_no/c3j2k70

Guybrush_3

Through some personal things I'd rather not get into, I don't trust anything I see on reddit anymore. Half of the political stuff you see is based off of rumor, created by someone who hates whoever they are bashing (and on the internet, hate is eternal), and sometimes just outright lies. Getting your reasons for hating politicians off that site is just as good as getting it from quickmeme.

Click the links and read them. Most of it is bills he's introduced, stuff he's blogged, and wikipedia.

I did, but I'd still say only about half of that is actually valid.

[QUOTE="Guybrush_3"]

[QUOTE="WiiCubeM1"]

Through some personal things I'd rather not get into, I don't trust anything I see on reddit anymore. Half of the political stuff you see is based off of rumor, created by someone who hates whoever they are bashing (and on the internet, hate is eternal), and sometimes just outright lies. Getting your reasons for hating politicians off that site is just as good as getting it from quickmeme.

WiiCubeM1

Click the links and read them. Most of it is bills he's introduced, stuff he's blogged, and wikipedia.

I did, but I'd still say only about half of that is actually valid.

which half?

Oh no, people have different opinions than you do!

Isn't the president determined by who spends the most on their campaign?

Isn't the president determined by who spends the most on their campaign?

Fandangle

most of the time the winner raises the most money.

3rd parties are not electable because a president's ideas are worthless without congress behind him. Seeing as though congress is pretty much a 2 party entity it will never happen. We need reform to cap the 2 parties numbers so we can get a third a chance. I would be 100% for Libertarians.

Because they dissagree with him?

Because his economic policies are ridiculous to anyone who knows anything about economics. Getting rid of the federal reserve is a very bad idea.Mochyc

Actually getting rid of it is a good thing as the dollar was worth alot more before the federal reserve was founded

This country is ****

Orayus

Then my country would seem like hell lol

why i dont vote at all cause i dont want to help get a power hungery criminal to office?

Obama can do no wrong.

Just to say, its pretty hard being President probably. They don't have the power people think they do.

Just to say, its pretty hard being President probably. They don't have the power people think they do.

Ilovegames1992

[QUOTE="Ilovegames1992"]

Just to say, its pretty hard being President probably. They don't have the power people think they do.

topsemag55

Our monarchs haven't had total power for a long long time.

Our monarchs haven't had total power for a long long time.

Ilovegames1992

[QUOTE="Ilovegames1992"]

Our monarchs haven't had total power for a long long time.

topsemag55

I dunno man, at least stuff got done back then.

And seeing as we never really had a proper revolution as opposed to say France, i guess having a monarch isn't that bad.

I dunno man, at least stuff got done back then.

And seeing as we never really had a proper revolution as opposed to say France, i guess having a monarch isn't that bad.

Ilovegames1992

To Ron Paul supporters: in all seriousness, exactly what do you expect he would accomplish if he did somehow actually win the White House?

To Ron Paul supporters: in all seriousness, exactly what do you expect he would accomplish if he did somehow actually win the White House?

worlock77

Couldn't you say that on behalf of all the candidates?

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

To Ron Paul supporters: in all seriousness, exactly what do you expect he would accomplish if he did somehow actually win the White House?

sexyweapons

Couldn't you say that on behalf of all the candidates?

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

To Ron Paul supporters: in all seriousness, exactly what do you expect he would accomplish if he did somehow actually win the White House?

sexyweapons

Couldn't you say that on behalf of all the candidates?

Not necessarily. Most candidates have one of the two main parties behind them, which gives them a plausable chance of getting their agenda across. Paul has the support of neither party, and would have little to no support for his agenda. At best he'd be a lame duck.

No he is a hypocrite.. He is firmly against federal government but fully supports states to pass and enforce even more extreme laws than the Federal government ever has.. sSubZerOo

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]No he is a hypocrite.. He is firmly against federal government but fully supports states to pass and enforce even more extreme laws than the Federal government ever has.. topsemag55

I don't get it honestly it seems like half the Ron Paul supporters don't even know about some of the things he wouldn't mind or support even for states to pass...sSubZerOo