Why don't they drain out the lake of the Lochness Monster?

  • 112 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#1 Posted by LiftedHeadshot (2460 posts) -

Seems quite sensible to me.

#2 Posted by EMOEVOLUTION (8997 posts) -

no place to displace the water too.. its a big lake.

#3 Posted by WeedleLad (403 posts) -

Evaporate it then.

#4 Posted by MasterBolt360 (5293 posts) -

Because even if they did, it would kill the Lochness Monster, leaving it uneligible for "live" testing with scientists. (To study its actions and such)

#5 Posted by turbotoby95 (895 posts) -
because its not re- you know what, imma just stay outta this one
#6 Posted by Anarchy4hire82 (828 posts) -

Sounds like a perfectly tangable idea to me, might as well burn down the forests in the pacific northwest to find bigfoot

#7 Posted by LiftedHeadshot (2460 posts) -

Sounds like a perfectly tangable idea to me, might as well burn down the forests in the pacific northwest to find bigfoot

Anarchy4hire82
I was actually considering that...
#8 Posted by Brainkiller05 (28954 posts) -
if it existed then the lake would have been drained.
#9 Posted by awssk8er716 (8485 posts) -

If it's not there, then it would be no fun. It's like when you thought Santa was real, but now:

[spoiler] ALL YOUR HOPES AND DREAMS ARE CRUSHED!!!!!!! HAHAHA!!! [/spoiler]

Also, it would kill a lot of fish I would think.

#10 Posted by Mkavanaugh77 (20733 posts) -
Why dont they chop down every tree and bush to look for the BIGFOOT?
#11 Posted by hamstergeddon (7188 posts) -
Lol that's the equivilant of melting the North Pole to find Santa. And we'd never do that. Oh wait...
#12 Posted by gotenks123321 (512 posts) -

Lol that's the equivilant of melting the North Pole to find Santa. And we'd never do that. Oh wait...hamstergeddon


Now im going to support global warming!
I WANT SANTA!!!

#14 Posted by gotenks123321 (512 posts) -

[QUOTE="LiftedHeadshot"]

Seems quite sensible to me.

Arab-man666

Your the dumb bloke who made all those posts about womens breasts and almost got banned a few minutes ago. Well, your idea sucks.



I thought he was talking about chicken breasts...

and I have to agree with the draining the lake plan is stupid

#15 Posted by FPSunionOWNS (2030 posts) -

that is terrible for the environment. i would never go swimming in loch ness lake that would be so scary.

#16 Posted by dackchaar (3668 posts) -

Not only would it kill everything in the lake, it would be a huge cost and really almost impossible.

#18 Posted by Arctic_Grillz (2749 posts) -
??wow some people dont use their common sense sometimes.
#19 Posted by Commander-Gree (4929 posts) -
LOL! I hope you're not serious. What about all of the other creatures living in Loch Ness?
#20 Posted by silky_smooth8 (3657 posts) -
leave it alone. let it be a monster in peace
#21 Posted by dercoo (12555 posts) -

This reminds me of a old Simpson episode where Burns did that.

#22 Posted by ProtestTheJOEL (1015 posts) -
Reminds me of that Simpsons episode
#23 Posted by ProtestTheJOEL (1015 posts) -

This reminds me of a old Simpson episode where Burns did that.

dercoo
oh man didnt see that
#24 Posted by ps3wizard45 (12905 posts) -

Right after we melt the north pole to find santa! :x

#25 Posted by Anti-Venom (5646 posts) -
it doesnt exist...
#26 Posted by LZ71 (10273 posts) -

it doesnt exist...Anti-Venom

Teh proof! :o

Loch Ness

#27 Posted by LiftedHeadshot (2460 posts) -

[QUOTE="Arab-man666"][QUOTE="LiftedHeadshot"]

Seems quite sensible to me.

gotenks123321

Your the dumb bloke who made all those posts about womens breasts and almost got banned a few minutes ago. Well, your idea sucks.



I thought he was talking about chicken breasts...

and I have to agree with the draining the lake plan is stupid

i was talking about chicken breasts but i was penalized for doing so

#28 Posted by Arctic_Grillz (2749 posts) -

[QUOTE="gotenks123321"]

[QUOTE="Arab-man666"] Your the dumb bloke who made all those posts about womens breasts and almost got banned a few minutes ago. Well, your idea sucks.LiftedHeadshot



I thought he was talking about chicken breasts...

and I have to agree with the draining the lake plan is stupid

i was talking about chicken breasts but i was penalized for doing so

but why did you made a thread talking about fake/silicone breast?

#29 Posted by MocktheDead (451 posts) -

Whats the point? The Lochness Monster is a fairytale.

#30 Posted by ice_radon (70341 posts) -
Prolly cause it is not there. I mean people have done a lot more useless things with their time, and this by all means does not top the long list of them, but I imagine there are a lot of people who probably wouldn't let this fly.
#31 Posted by 789shadow (20195 posts) -

Simply because it isn't physically or financially feasable.

#32 Posted by muller39 (14944 posts) -

To keep the legend going, who really would go there if they knew the lochness monster was not true. Say goodbye to tourist attraction.

#33 Posted by MrLions (9898 posts) -

To keep the legend going, who really would go there if they knew the lochness monster was not true. Say goodbye to tourist attraction.

muller39
What if it was true? They kill the animal and mount it in a museum! Hello new tourist attraction.
#34 Posted by LZ71 (10273 posts) -
[QUOTE="MrLions"][QUOTE="muller39"]

To keep the legend going, who really would go there if they knew the lochness monster was not true. Say goodbye to tourist attraction.

What if it was true? They kill the animal and mount it in a museum! Hello new tourist attraction.

I know that you're joking, but look at it this way. Right now, it's already a tourist attraction, and they get money off of it. If they drain it, they have a 50/50 shot of it staying a tourist attraction (finding it or not.) Why take the risk?
#35 Posted by MasterBolt360 (5293 posts) -

[QUOTE="Anti-Venom"]it doesnt exist...LZ71

Teh proof! :o

Loch Ness

Elephant lifting up its trunk?

elephant

#36 Posted by Blin220 (603 posts) -

I thought they already found big foot? or maybe i'm just too gullible about articles I read.

#37 Posted by spoofnutz (673 posts) -

Draining the lake would be an environmental catastrophe for the sake of some cryptozoologist clowns and television network profits. Not worth it on either count.

#38 Posted by BIOSHOCKER98 (451 posts) -

cuz all the fishys will die.. :(

#39 Posted by Bloodaxe726 (7903 posts) -

[QUOTE="LZ71"]

[QUOTE="Anti-Venom"]it doesnt exist...MasterBolt360

Teh proof! :o

Loch Ness

Elephant lifting up its trunk?

elephant

That just shows there's an elephant in Scotland or a monster, either way we have a mystery!

#40 Posted by LZ71 (10273 posts) -
[QUOTE="Bloodaxe726"]

[QUOTE="MasterBolt360"]

[QUOTE="LZ71"]

Teh proof! :o

Loch Ness

Elephant lifting up its trunk?

elephant

That just shows there's an elephant in Scotland or a monster, either way we have a mystery!

Teh conspiracy continues! :o
#41 Posted by Desulated (30952 posts) -

[QUOTE="Anti-Venom"]it doesnt exist...LZ71

Teh proof! :o

Loch Ness

It's a submarine piloted by Martians!

#42 Posted by antiredcap (1757 posts) -

Because Nessy died from old age and the other lttle fish have already eaten him... :cry:

#43 Posted by Evil_Saluki (4878 posts) -

Sounds like a perfectly tangable idea to me, might as well burn down the forests in the pacific northwest to find bigfoot

Anarchy4hire82
Brillient :P
#44 Posted by MrGeezer (56132 posts) -

Seems quite sensible to me.

LiftedHeadshot

For starters, because the time loss and money loss and environmental damage that would result from this sort of thing would be absolutely stupid.

WHY would anyone try to drain this entire huge ****ing lake, just to satisfy a handful of nutbags who think there's a monster living in it? Do you even realize how ridiculous this is?

#45 Posted by MrGeezer (56132 posts) -

[QUOTE="LZ71"]

[QUOTE="Anti-Venom"]it doesnt exist...MasterBolt360

Teh proof! :o

Loch Ness

Elephant lifting up its trunk?

elephant

Elephants don't live in Scotland.

That photo is a hoax. A guy put a fake monster on a wooden pole, put it in the water so that the head was sticking out, and then took a picture.

#46 Posted by muller39 (14944 posts) -
[QUOTE="MrLions"][QUOTE="muller39"]

To keep the legend going, who really would go there if they knew the lochness monster was not true. Say goodbye to tourist attraction.

What if it was true? They kill the animal and mount it in a museum! Hello new tourist attraction.

Its a big risk though.
#47 Posted by metallica_fan42 (21143 posts) -
I'm going to go out on a limb and say it would be a waste of time.
#48 Posted by PimpiNbananas (1911 posts) -

why dont they just burn every forest to Flush out Big Foot?

Oh cos they dont exist

#49 Posted by jJaAmMeEsS2184 (887 posts) -

how bout you go get it started...grab your sand bucket you bring to the beach with you, and start bucketing out the water...I'll be right behind you with mine........ZZZzzzZZZzzzz....

#50 Posted by 29121994 (1166 posts) -

where do you expect them to put all the water? and what would the point of it be anyway, they'd spend heaps of money on doing it and they wouldn't even find anything because the lochness monster is just a myth!