Self righteous people. People who believe they are better then you just because they choose not to eat meat or partake in the occasional drink or good smoke. Straight edge, pacifism, and people who try to be different for the sake of being different.
I think most of the things that really get on my nerves really boil down to being closed minded to the point of being illogical. Things like creationism and simultaneously advocating for small government and socially conservative policies are such examples.
Self righteous people. People who believe they are better then you just because they choose not to eat meat or partake in the occasional drink or good smoke. Straight edge, pacifism, and people who try to be different for the sake of being different.MgamerBD
:lol: What a hypocrite. This coming from a guy who was insulting people who choose to believe in pacifism. Kid, you were doing the same thing.
[QUOTE="MgamerBD"]Self righteous people. People who believe they are better then you just because they choose not to eat meat or partake in the occasional drink or good smoke. Straight edge, pacifism, and people who try to be different for the sake of being different.TheWalkingGhost
:lol: What a hypocrite. This coming from a guy who was insulting people who choose to believe in pacifism. Kid, you were doing the same thing. Your not even a real pacifist. You believe in violence :lol:
[QUOTE="TheWalkingGhost"][QUOTE="MgamerBD"]Self righteous people. People who believe they are better then you just because they choose not to eat meat or partake in the occasional drink or good smoke. Straight edge, pacifism, and people who try to be different for the sake of being different.MgamerBD
:lol: What a hypocrite. This coming from a guy who was insulting people who choose to believe in pacifism. Kid, you were doing the same thing. Your not even a real pacifist. You believe in violence :lol:How many times to you need to be called a moron to get the hint? Still funny you clearly have no idea what pacifism is......
Conformists. They just want to be part of the insiders. It's impossible to have an intelligent conversation with them because their entire concepts of true/false is based on what is trendy within a particular group. All they do is group up and heckle anyone who disagrees with them on anything and then talk about how brilliant they are for agreeing with each other.
[QUOTE="MgamerBD"][QUOTE="TheWalkingGhost"]:lol: What a hypocrite. This coming from a guy who was insulting people who choose to believe in pacifism. Kid, you were doing the same thing. TheWalkingGhost
Your not even a real pacifist. You believe in violence :lol:How many times to you need to be called a moron to get the hint? Still funny you clearly have no idea what pacifism is...... Pacifist promote non violence. What is there to understand? No backbone, pretty much most of the pacifist I know wouldn't even stand up for their own mother. Too busy being "passive".
Pacifist promote non violence. What is there to understand? No backbone, pretty much most of the pacifist I know wouldn't even stand up for their own mother. Too busy being "passive". MgamerBD
Those "no backbone" who "wouldn't stand up for their own mother" liberated a country that contains twice as much people as the USA do from Britain's imperial grip. Derp?
[QUOTE="MgamerBD"][QUOTE="TheWalkingGhost"][QUOTE="MgamerBD"] Your not even a real pacifist. You believe in violence :lol:How many times to you need to be called a moron to get the hint? Still funny you clearly have no idea what pacifism is...... Pacifist promote non violence. What is there to understand? No backbone, pretty much most of the pacifist I know wouldn't even stand up for their own mother. Too busy being "passive". Let me try again, you are a moron and a liar. Pacifism is the belief in non-violence not the belief in letting people walk all over you. Standing up for yourself doesn't automatically mean resorting to violence, you use that as a last resort for self-defense reasons. Dwight D. Esienhower backed pacifism, but was a military man.
Geez these pacifists are mean with words. Too bad not with their fists. I guess when you won't fight with your hands. All the bullying makes you sharp with your tongue.
[QUOTE="MgamerBD"][QUOTE="TheWalkingGhost"]How many times to you need to be called a moron to get the hint? Still funny you clearly have no idea what pacifism is......TheWalkingGhost
Pacifist promote non violence. What is there to understand? No backbone, pretty much most of the pacifist I know wouldn't even stand up for their own mother. Too busy being "passive". Let me try again, you are a moron and a liar. Pacifism is the belief in non-violence not the belief in letting people walk all over you. Standing up for yourself doesn't automatically mean resorting to violence, you use that as a last resort for self-defense reasons. Dwight D. Esienhower backed pacifism, but was a military man. I'm pretty sure in war the last thing he was singing or his soldiers were singing were kum by yah.
Geez these pacifists are mean with words. Too bad not with their fists. I guess when you won't fight with your hands. All the bullying makes you sharp with your tongue. MgamerBD
You got some serious issues kid. But I guess sarcasm is all you got when getting your butt handed to you.
I'm pretty sure in war the last thing he was singing or his soldiers were singing were kum by yah.MgamerBD
Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and not clothed. This world in arms is no spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers. The genius of its scientists, and the hopes of its children.
No pacifism on his part, obviously. :roll: I know you are just trolling because you are bored, but at least do a better job of it.
Sadly, I'm not the one with serious issues. Just because I know violence is an alternative to problems that makes me wrong? Just because I believe that some things have to be settled with fights? And pacifists are basically hippies with a slightly better education I am wrong? LOL I suggest you look in the mirror.
Welfare and the generations of entitled people it creates.Nibroc420
Some people don't make enough to feed their families. I guess they just starve? hmm, it's ok for millionaires to sit on their money, but poor people that a little bit and it's "NO STOP you can't LIVE" Not everyone can dick around on the computer that their mommy bought them. Anyway things that bother me: *Unorganized people - this doesn't "bother'' me, but I will sometimes feel tempted to organize people's things (movies/game/books) and house in general. *Attention wh0res - Attention is something I generally don't want. *People that try to be cool - similar to above *Stubborn people/ not open minded people - People that WILL not try new things *Apathetic and uncaring people Silly and stupid stuff: Poor people exempt: *People that have 300 songs on their Ipod <--- Do you even LIKE music? I have 6000 songs I feel like I don't listen to enough. *People that own ONE console. *People with Garbage computers. AND: *conservatives (SORRY lol)
[QUOTE="MgamerBD"]Sadly, I'm not the one with serious issues. Just because I know violence is an alternative to problems that makes me wrong? Just because I believe that some things have to be settled with fights? And pacifists are basically hippies with a slightly better education I am wrong? LOL I suggest you look in the mirror. Yeah, you are just trolling. It is obvious you don't mean a word you say, because nobody can be this unintentionally stupid.
*People that have 300 songs on their Ipod <--- Do you even LIKE music? I have 6000 songs I feel like I don't listen to enough. *People that own ONE console. *People with Garbage computers.YoshiYogurt
[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]Welfare and the generations of entitled people it creates.YoshiYogurt
Some people don't make enough to feed their families. I guess they just starve? hmm, it's ok for millionaires to sit on their money, but poor people that a little bit and it's "NO STOP you can't LIVE" Not everyone can dick around on the computer that their mommy bought them. Anyway things that bother me: *Unorganized people - this doesn't "bother'' me, but I will sometimes feel tempted to organize people's things (movies/game/books) and house in general. *Attention wh0res - Attention is something I generally don't want. *People that try to be cool - similar to above *Stubborn people/ not open minded people - People that WILL not try new things *Apathetic and uncaring people Silly and stupid stuff: Poor people exempt: *People that have 300 songs on their Ipod <--- Do you even LIKE music? I have 6000 songs I feel like I don't listen to enough. *People that own ONE console. *People with Garbage computers. AND: *conservatives (SORRY lol) Ignore statements like that; the biggest welfare rats are on wall street which include Goldman Sachs.
[QUOTE="Nibroc420"]Welfare and the generations of entitled people it creates.YoshiYogurt
Some people don't make enough to feed their families. I guess they just starve? hmm, it's ok for millionaires to sit on their money, but poor people that a little bit and it's "NO STOP you can't LIVE" Not everyone can dick around on the computer that their mommy bought them. If you want to help someone financially then you should, but that doesn't mean someone else should be forced to also. Public welfare is just an excuse used by looters and moochers to attempt to justify statism.
There are so many common things people point out regarding current issues with the government and society on the internet, but we're all either too lazy, too cynical or too wimpy to form any movement that would make a change.
Sadly, I'm not the one with serious issues. Just because I know violence is an alternative to problems that makes me wrong? Just because I believe that some things have to be settled with fights? And pacifists are basically hippies with a slightly better education I am wrong? LOL I suggest you look in the mirror.MgamerBD
Si vis pacem para bellum.
It is correct to say sometimes violence is simply the most efficient solution, more often than what the average person would want at least. However the meaningless violence you're advocading is the lowest form of interaction I can think of.
And get your sh1thead out of your ass, pacifism is something to strive for, not a set of absolute bonds a person imposes himself.
Maybe you're the one who should look in the mirror.
[QUOTE="MgamerBD"]Sadly, I'm not the one with serious issues. Just because I know violence is an alternative to problems that makes me wrong? Just because I believe that some things have to be settled with fights? And pacifists are basically hippies with a slightly better education I am wrong? LOL I suggest you look in the mirror.N30F3N1X
Si vis pacem para bellum.
It is correct to say sometimes violence is simply the most efficient solution, more often than what the average person would want at least. However the meaningless violence you're advocading is the lowest form of interaction I can think of.
And get your sh1thead out of your ass, pacifism is something to strive for, not a set of absolute bonds a person imposes himself.
Maybe you're the one who should look in the mirror.
Don't waste your time. Even a pacifist would fight in self defense, not roll over and die, like he seems to think. A pacifist would never take part in meaningless violence and strives to find more peaceful solutions before violence is ever used. Pacifism is a goal, something we should all strive for, but as you said...It doesn't bind anyone. Why would anybody want to resort to violence when you don't need to? How can you get a peaceful solution if you don't look for one? Believe me, if violence is all you look for, that is all you will get.
[QUOTE="TheWalkingGhost"][QUOTE="MgamerBD"]Sadly, I'm not the one with serious issues. Just because I know violence is an alternative to problems that makes me wrong? Just because I believe that some things have to be settled with fights? And pacifists are basically hippies with a slightly better education I am wrong? LOL I suggest you look in the mirror. Yeah, you are just trolling. It is obvious you don't mean a word you say, because nobody can be this unintentionally stupid. >I actually put up a meaningful argument >You insult me lol pacifists..
[QUOTE="MgamerBD"]Sadly, I'm not the one with serious issues. Just because I know violence is an alternative to problems that makes me wrong? Just because I believe that some things have to be settled with fights? And pacifists are basically hippies with a slightly better education I am wrong? LOL I suggest you look in the mirror.N30F3N1X
Si vis pacem para bellum.
It is correct to say sometimes violence is simply the most efficient solution, more often than what the average person would want at least. However the meaningless violence you're advocading is the lowest form of interaction I can think of.
And get your sh1thead out of your ass, pacifism is something to strive for, not a set of absolute bonds a person imposes himself.
Maybe you're the one who should look in the mirror.
Sadly, believe it or not. Not everyone wants a pacifist world. Meaningless violence...lol. Don't put words in my posts bro.
Politics and religion, talking about either is about as productive as humping a doorknob, sure it may make you feel better but in the end it rarely gets you anywhere, although sometimes it will open the door.
Sure, let's make this an anarchy and let everyone run lose. I live in a free country I have the right to say what I like and what I don't, if that troubles you, I suggest you to ignore me (as you suggested by minding your own damn business).
Ricardomz
LOL you think you have rights.
And I do, just check the article 19 of the Declaration of the Human Rights.
it changes all the time. But for the last 2 years or so, Â what continues to bother me is the mentality that government has the duty to perform state sanctioned first degree premeditated murder on citizens. Obviously this mentality has existed for as long as we had civilization, but to think now in 2013 a majority of people in the world still thinks that way, is disheartening.Â
People that have the "shoot first, ask questions later" mentality.
If all of the above were to die off, the world would be a bajillion steps closer to being perfect, and I'd be slightly less annoyed. And now that I think of it, violence in our societies would decrease by a very, very large amount...
Dishonesty. People are stealing other people stuff for capital gain or they feel entitled. What if people stopped breaking in and stealing cars? What if all our cars had no locks and to turn them on was to flip on a switch like they do in Nascar? Of course when police do a sting they pretty much do the same thing, they leave the doors unlock with the key inside. Chances are good someone would step inside and take the car.
Extreme political correctness, people refusing to accept responsibility and instead blaming it on scapegoats such as music, movies, video games, etc. EatShanna
-Smartphones- Look up for a minute people. Life is right ahead of you.
-Mean people- Life is short.....be nice.
- Females not asking a man out for a date. I'm right here and I would be flaterd if you asked me on a date.
- Guns- If people loved people like they do their guns we would not have killings.
Log in to comment