"We want the old site back!!" petition, sign here.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#1 Edited by TheKingIAm (985 posts) -

The new site absolutely sucks. If you want the old site back, or something similar, post a comment. Each comment equals a sign. There are no limits to your comment. If you dont want change, dont post

#2 Posted by Bhemont (1679 posts) -

At the moment, this site is so slow.

#3 Posted by Dudersaper (32949 posts) -

Talk about over-reacting.

Seriously, the site isn't as bad as you guys are making it seem (I actually really like it), and it was just released, they'll get the bugs down in no time.

#4 Edited by TheKingIAm (985 posts) -

@Dudersaper: Will they bring back the missing forums and change the ui in no time?

#5 Posted by always_explicit (2932 posts) -

Its already become so much smoother since the beta access its clearly being worked on. Everybody moans when a website changes...see facebook for an example. Now ask a group of people what the old facebook was like and its unlikely they could recall the first thing about it. The forums are the worst part at the moment partly because people dont have avatars yet and it lacks colour but its just a matter of time.

Dont like it there are other forums.

#6 Posted by thegerg (15422 posts) -

Stop complaining.

#7 Posted by LJS9502_basic (151391 posts) -

That isn't going to happen.....

#8 Edited by ZEYAAM898 (1921 posts) -

It's just a website man.

#9 Posted by Celldrax (14629 posts) -

It is a bit slow at the moment. But suck it up, you'll get used to the new design.

#10 Posted by undeadgoon (604 posts) -

Na thing have to change.. i like new stuff.... altho abit upset that i lost my profile pic ( as i cant remb where to get it from again , but what ever)

#11 Posted by seanmcloughlin (38216 posts) -

There are some changes I really don't like. like how the post history is done now, the old one was MUCH better. Old sigs were better too and the site is a bit too slow right now

But overall you're completely over reacting. it's not THAT bad

#12 Edited by capaho (1253 posts) -

Amateur hour at GS. This site should never gone online like this. The new forums are a disaster. If it isn't broken, break it.

#13 Posted by killerfist (19823 posts) -

This place takes some getting used to. There are some things I don't like.

I don't like how my posting history is displayed now. I rather have a list of topics instead of posts. And I also don't like the layout in topics themselves. The posts should be centered instead of aligned to the left. And why did they get rid of emoticons?

I do like the text editor, it's much improved.

Overall it's not as bad as I thought it would be, but there is definitely room for improvement.

#14 Posted by The-Apostle (12190 posts) -

I'll sign but only because I miss the Sports board. >_>

#15 Edited by Arthas045 (5247 posts) -

@ZEYAAM898 said:

It's just a website man.

nice lol

#16 Posted by johnd13 (8214 posts) -

No

#17 Edited by Aljosa23 (25113 posts) -

I like the new site better. No annoying gif sigs.

#18 Edited by SKaREO (3161 posts) -

I don't have anything positive to say about this interface. It's bad in just about every way I can think of. 100's of game ratings I had have gone completely missing. My profile seems to have been completely gutted. I don't know what to say but it just feels so amateur for a business to erase their customers records and go on about business as usual afterward. Meh, I probably won't come back to this site very often, I'm really disappointed.

#19 Posted by thegerg (15422 posts) -

@Aljosa23 said:

I like the new site better. No annoying gif sigs.

This. Who needs to look at or post the same pic or gif with every post?

#20 Posted by Elk (473 posts) -

Did someone say Gif?

#21 Edited by Dogswithguns (10781 posts) -

This new site doesn't give me much reason to stopping by, for now anyway.. old site was much better.

#22 Posted by Serraph105 (28144 posts) -

You know that these sort of petitions basically never work correct?

#23 Edited by Lonelynight (30041 posts) -

How do I quote people

#24 Posted by Randolph (10542 posts) -

Because internet petitions are so effective. :)

#25 Edited by Blu3V3nom07 (30 posts) -

@Lonelynight said:

How do I quote people

If you're serious, you hover over to the far-right part of the message you want. There's Reply, Quote, and flag.

#26 Posted by Shottayouth13- (6806 posts) -

Yeah, I might complain about it but it's really not that serious.

Stop being an entitled brat.

#27 Posted by konvikt_17 (22248 posts) -

The first couple petitions we had before the site change didnt work.

what makes you think this will work?

#28 Posted by hlmcpherson (50 posts) -

I really don't see any improvement with the new site structure. This new site does not provide the same ease of use as I enjoyed from the old site. Most of the things I cared about were one click away on the old site. Now I don't even know if the features I once used are even available. I am confused as to why they did this.

#29 Edited by Falcon084 (8757 posts) -

I just want the Unions back! I could find my friends easily because the unions is where they would be.

#30 Edited by dave123321 (34130 posts) -

This is better

#31 Edited by thegerg (15422 posts) -

@Shottayouth13- said:

Yeah, I might complain about it but it's really not that serious.

Stop being an entitled brat.

He's NOT entitled, hence he has to put up with a site he doesn't want.

#32 Edited by iampenguin (223 posts) -

lol

#33 Edited by tealmantis793 (53 posts) -

@capaho said:

Amateur hour at GS. This site should never gone online like this. The new forums are a disaster. If it isn't broken, break it.

The engineers have followed a Lean Startup cycle and delivered a fine minimum viable product. With the new architecture it will be more easy to add in new boards and features that are currently missing than updating the previous architecture which was 17 years old.

#34 Posted by Elk (473 posts) -

@tealmantis793 said:

The engineers have followed a Lean Startup cycle and delivered a fine minimum viable product. With the new architecture it will be more easy to add in new boards and features that are currently missing than updating the previous architecture which was 17 years old.

I couldn't have said it better!

#35 Edited by LexLas (4265 posts) -

What a bunch of pansies, its only been a day or two, lol .. Give it time to sink in dang !

pansies

#36 Posted by stoxos (101 posts) -

the old site was great... this one is reason for me not to get in again...

#37 Posted by wis3boi (31459 posts) -

#38 Posted by R4gn4r0k (16619 posts) -

I don't want the old site back. I want them to fix this new site and bring back functions from the old site that are missing.

#39 Posted by Hallenbeck77 (14449 posts) -

I know there's a decent amount of people who miss the old site, but I say just give this a fair chance to get the kinks all worked out. As far as petitioning to return to the original site, I hate to be the one to say this and I'm not trying to be rude, but I'm afraid it's simply not going to happen. Just give it some time--that's all we ask.