And yes, I am a baby, but that doesn't mean much when everything in the universe is relative.
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
How to move faster than the speed of light, and designing a space ship that could do that.
Approximately a 100,000KG "space ship"
The speed of C (speed of light-- 299,792,458 m / s)
The amount of energy needed to do so.
2. Relevant equations
How does E=MC 2 factor into this?
What does it mean? It means that the more massive an object that you try to move, the more energy it takes, and to go even faster, you need exponentially higher amounts of energy from your environment as you get closer to the speed of light. Naturally, it will eventually become impossible, as you will have had to consume the entire universe in the process of feeding your own movement through space time.
3. The attempt at a solution
If at first you try to exceed the speed of light, you will fail.
So go in the opposite direction of C, go in the opposite direction of light flow, to move through space and times itself.
We can all see light, yet we know that there is also gravity and magnetism, which are invisible.
Because the sun is actually the most massive object near us, it also possesses the most gravity. But what is producing that gravity? Having a lot of mass? Why does mass have gravity? Because it just does? Absolutely not.
Don't think of visible light flowing away from the sun, think of it as light flowing INTO the sun, and leaving as gravity.
That gravity will now escape our solar system and try to find even more massive objects than our sun. This is why the universe appears to be expanding.
If you observe the donut shape seen from some black holes, you will see it as a wheel spinning in space, ejecting matter in and out of it in opposite directions; we can deduce that some of that matter is being sent back into the past, and some of it into the future (lower and higher energy states).
We can also deduce that our sun is exactly the same, except we are so much closer to it, we can actually see it;
I'm saying that our sun is actually a black hole, and we are living within it's event horizon (and are therefore invisible to everyone outside our solar system).
Because black holes will shoot energy in opposite directions, we can deduce that as the sun grows larger and and more red, we are simply getting closer to it, and because this represents the flow of time into and out of our blackhole (our sun), then we will see Venus as our current destination if we do not stop burning fossil fuels, and Mercury as our final destination; a lifeless planet, and MARS as simply a reboot of our past, and the first place we must go after revisiting the moon.
Eventually, as time passes, we will have developed the technology to take a spaceship, and enter the gravitational rift that our sun is projecting randomly off into space, when we learn how to predict it.
Enter Quantum physics;
The Schrodinger cat concept;
if you place a cat in a box with one meal that is poison, and another meal that is safe to eat, and then close the box; you will not know when the cat will die, so until then, it is not inaccurate to say that the cat is both dead and alive.
This represents the continuum between 0 and 1, and everything in between.
Now observe the water molecule.
Two hydrogen atoms, and one oxygen atom.
The two hydrogen atoms are bonded to it, because they want it to become a lower state of matter.
The oxygen atom perceives itself as 16, and the two hydrogen elements as 0, and 1.
Yet it cannot see that it is all that stands between them. The oxygen in water molecules represents the quantum continuum, and only the two hydrogen atoms below it, can see that. In theory, if we can break the bond between oxygen and hydrogen found in water, we can use that raw electrical charge to create enough thrust for hyper efficient space travel.
Conclusion:
If we can develop an engine that releases pure oxygen when it's fed only pure water, we can use the third byproduct, Ionic thrust, as a means for rapid space travel, and will eventually need only solar power to fuel the process.
The excess hydrogen will need to be burned out the back, but it will become only water vapor, and completely harmless.
I have a lot of writings that contain even more "gibberish" should you so desire.
The main point of this was just to get people thinking and questioning. Label it as naive and pretentious ramblings if you must.
Log in to comment