Texas dad beats his daughter's child molester to death. He won't be charged.

http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/texas-dad-beats-his-daughters-child-molester-to-death-he-wont-be-charged/

Glad he isn't being charged.

That is EPIC. Yeah, I'm glad he isn't being charged too, what a boss.

Good. No jury in the world would have convicted him anyway. No fvcks given for the molester.

nice!

Good. No jury in the world would have convicted him anyway. No fvcks given for the molester.

Aljosa23

lol, he beat jesus to death.

Before I clicked the article, I was thinking "WTF?" but then I saw that he beat the sh!t out of the molester while he was in the process of molesting his daughter. Good for him.

F*ck a fair trial, psyche evaluation, all that nonsense. Let's just beat people to death.

The father should be charged. Nobody has the right to take a life, and last I checked vigilantism is still as illegal as child molestation and murder.

InEMplease

F*ck a fair trial, psyche evaluation, all that nonsense.  Let's just beat people to death.

The father should be charged.  Nobody has the right to take a life, and last I checked vigilantism is still as illegal as child molestation and murder.

InEMplease

The father didn't beat the molester afterwards. He basically stopped the molestation as it was happening by beating the sh!t out of the molester, which Texas allows. Going from the article, he didn't even mean for the guy to die.

F*ck a fair trial, psyche evaluation, all that nonsense.  Let's just beat people to death.

The father should be charged.  Nobody has the right to take a life, and last I checked vigilantism is still as illegal as child molestation and murder.

InEMplease

those dudes hate molesters.

[QUOTE="InEMplease"]

F*ck a fair trial, psyche evaluation, all that nonsense. Let's just beat people to death.

The father should be charged. Nobody has the right to take a life, and last I checked vigilantism is still as illegal as child molestation and murder.

Person0

[QUOTE="InEMplease"]

F*ck a fair trial, psyche evaluation, all that nonsense.  Let's just beat people to death.

The father should be charged.  Nobody has the right to take a life, and last I checked vigilantism is still as illegal as child molestation and murder.

GreySeal9

The father didn't beat the molester afterwards. He basically stopped the molestation as it was happening by beating the sh!t out of the molester, which Texas allows. Going from the article, he didn't even mean for the guy to die.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="InEMplease"]

F*ck a fair trial, psyche evaluation, all that nonsense.  Let's just beat people to death.

The father should be charged.  Nobody has the right to take a life, and last I checked vigilantism is still as illegal as child molestation and murder.

HoolaHoopMan

The father didn't beat the molester afterwards. He basically stopped the molestation as it was happening by beating the sh!t out of the molester, which Texas allows. Going from the article, he didn't even mean for the guy to die.

[QUOTE="Person0"]

[QUOTE="InEMplease"]

F*ck a fair trial, psyche evaluation, all that nonsense. Let's just beat people to death.

The father should be charged. Nobody has the right to take a life, and last I checked vigilantism is still as illegal as child molestation and murder.

comp_atkins

laws or no laws a jury would find a way to get a molester killer off 95% of the time.

a defense lawyer would probably plead temporary insanity for his client and a jury would go along with it.

here is a guy that flat out shot a molester in the airport after the guy was flown in for trial and he never served any time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oi3Hyxuf5AE

Justice was served and the tax money was saved what a great story. I feel bad for the little girl that got molested damn but at least one scum is gone.

That is EPIC. Yeah, I'm glad he isn't being charged too, what a boss.

destinhpark

[QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="Person0"] Dem self defense laws say otherwise

Riverwolf007

laws or no laws a jury would find a way to get a molester killer off 95% of the time.

a defense lawyer would probably plead temporary insanity for his client and a jury would go along with it.

here is a guy that flat out shot a molester in the airport after the guy was flown in for trial and he never served any time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oi3Hyxuf5AE

[QUOTE="comp_atkins"][QUOTE="Person0"] Dem self defense laws say otherwise

Riverwolf007

laws or no laws a jury would find a way to get a molester killer off 95% of the time.

a defense lawyer would probably plead temporary insanity for his client and a jury would go along with it.

here is a guy that flat out shot a molester in the airport after the guy was flown in for trial and he never served any time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oi3Hyxuf5AE

Got no problem with that video it was a clean kill IMO. The father had his child kidnapped and sexually molested. What father would not seek justice for hs son after that.

I'd probably do something similar if I found someone molesting my child.

F*ck a fair trial, psyche evaluation, all that nonsense.  Let's just beat people to death.

The father should be charged.  Nobody has the right to take a life, and last I checked vigilantism is still as illegal as child molestation and murder.

InEMplease

No he shouldn't be charged with anything. In many cases, our legal system perpetuates crime just as much as it stands to slow it down. The molester got what was coming to him, one way or another, and that is what matters in the end.

holy shit. a goddam 5 year old. what the **** is wrong with people

good on the father

[QUOTE="InEMplease"]

F*ck a fair trial, psyche evaluation, all that nonsense.  Let's just beat people to death.

The father should be charged.  Nobody has the right to take a life, and last I checked vigilantism is still as illegal as child molestation and murder.

Blueresident87

No he shouldn't be charged with anything. In many cases, our legal system perpetuates crime just as much as it stands to slow it down. The molester got what was coming to him, one way or another, and that is what matters in the end.

[QUOTE="Blueresident87"]

[QUOTE="InEMplease"]

F*ck a fair trial, psyche evaluation, all that nonsense.  Let's just beat people to death.

The father should be charged.  Nobody has the right to take a life, and last I checked vigilantism is still as illegal as child molestation and murder.

Nibroc420

No he shouldn't be charged with anything. In many cases, our legal system perpetuates crime just as much as it stands to slow it down. The molester got what was coming to him, one way or another, and that is what matters in the end.

Just Texas being Texas.

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="Blueresident87"]

No he shouldn't be charged with anything. In many cases, our legal system perpetuates crime just as much as it stands to slow it down. The molester got what was coming to him, one way or another, and that is what matters in the end.

SaltyMeatballs

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"][QUOTE="Nibroc420"] Child molesters do not get life in prison. There are laws against Vigilante justice. It's sad to see a murderer get away.Nibroc420

He was defending his 5 year old daughter from a grown man raping her. If you can't see that then GOD help you and your brain cells. Justice was served and he even called 911 and tried to get help after he beat the rapist scum. Not sure what rubbish trolling your on but maybe if you were in the 5 year old place you would have a much different outlook.

He also saved tax money that would have been wasted on the child molester. Where I come from that is a win-win.

Ah, he caught the guy in the act. That explains it

 

Glad he isn't being charged.

AmazonTreeBoa

Hope it sets a precident.

[QUOTE="Person0"][QUOTE="Nibroc420"] No, he just killed a man out of hate and anger.InEMplease

This is why I don't like this ruling.  It would give everyone an excuse to go around killing people committing a crime, just because deadly force is allowed to stop the crime.  At what point is deadly force excessive?  If after the crime has been stopped, and deadly force is still used, is that not excessive?

[QUOTE="Person0"][QUOTE="Nibroc420"] No, he just killed a man out of hate and anger.InEMplease

This is why I don't like this ruling.  It would give everyone an excuse to go around killing people committing a crime, just because deadly force is allowed to stop the crime.  At what point is deadly force excessive?  If the crime has been stopped, and deadly force is still used, is that not excessive?

F*ck a fair trial, psyche evaluation, all that nonsense.  Let's just beat people to death.

The father should be charged.  Nobody has the right to take a life, and last I checked vigilantism is still as illegal as child molestation and murder.

InEMplease

[QUOTE="InEMplease"]

[QUOTE="Person0"] Killed someone out of defense of his daughter. So not a murderer!Person0

This is why I don't like this ruling.  It would give everyone an excuse to go around killing people committing a crime, just because deadly force is allowed to stop the crime.  At what point is deadly force excessive?  If after the crime has been stopped, and deadly force is still used, is that not excessive?

It has been verified that a little girl was sexually assualted

The law says you can use up to deadly force to stop a sexual assualt

The father calls 911 after giving the rapist some act right but the scum died after.

I don't see the problem here GOD only know how many other kids got molested and what would have happened if the father was not there. Personally the rapist should have been brought back to life and killed again slowly over 48 hours. That was a FIVE YEAR OLD in case you missed that part.

Ah, he caught the guy in the act. That explains it

lostrib

[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"][QUOTE="Nibroc420"] Child molesters do not get life in prison. There are laws against Vigilante justice. It's sad to see a murderer get away.Nibroc420

How would you expect a father to react in that situation? I can't imagine a scenerio where a man would react with poise, it's just the degree to which they flip their sh*t.

[QUOTE="Person0"][QUOTE="Nibroc420"] No, he just killed a man out of hate and anger.InEMplease

This is why I don't like this ruling.  It would give everyone an excuse to go around killing people committing a crime, just because deadly force is allowed to stop the crime.  At what point is deadly force excessive?  If the crime has been stopped, and deadly force is still used, is that not excessive?

So Nibroc thinks that a father using accidentally lethal force in defending his daughter from a child molester is wrong, but when Christopher Dorner flat-out murders two people in a car, that's okay? Huh?

If you're gonna take a hard-line stance against killing people, then hey, that's wonderful, but consistency please?

So Nibroc thinks that a father using accidentally lethal force in defending his daughter from a child molester is wrong, but when Christopher Dorner flat-out murders two people in a car, that's okay? Huh?PannicAtack