@Riverwolf007 said:
I'm not really into the mary sue accusation since to some extent every fictional character is a mary sue but for real every new charater in that movie is a mary sue. Rey is the greatest jedi evar and knows more about the falcon than han. Finn is the 2nd greatest jedi evar who can take a saber hit and keep on truckin plus a better jar jar when he needs to be the comic relief. New chick yoda (or choda if you will) is kinder wiser and yoda-y-er than yoda. Game of thrones stormtrooper is best trooper ever (not counting gary). Darth solo was instantly relatable. Bridge crews are now even more british and super Cool new rebel pilot can now snipe individual ground troopers who present the most danger to heros on the ground. Even the death star gets in on the action by being the coolest new death star. Its a fun movie and all but it feels like cranking everyone to 11 and breaking off the knob may not have been the best storytelling choice to make.
And shit, they even do that sort of meta-humor, where they make fun of themselves for being lame and then act as if that excuses them for being lame.
Like, that scene where the Resistance is discussing how to defeat Starkiller Base. They describe the whole thing, and someone is like, "so basically it's another Death Star." Then another dude is like, "no, this is the Death Star. THIS is Starkiller base." And Han Solo is like, "yeah, I get it, it's big. We can still blow it up." And then they proceed to blow it up EXACTLY the same as last time: they just fly inside and start shooting shit.
But seriously, I'm starting to HATE that kind of crap. That whole exchange of dialogue can't have happened without one of the writers realizing "yes, this is just another Death Star and we're going to destroy it just the same as last time. Fans will certainly notice that, so let's make fun of the concept before they do." And then when people point out that that's exactly what happened last time, that whole part of the movie can be dismissed as a deliberate homage since the fact that the characters made fun of it makes it an intentional artistic decision.
And like...NO. That's a stupid thing to have in the movie, the characters flat out acknowledge that. Being cute and self-deprecating doesn't make that better, that makes it WORSE. The writers knew what they were doing well enough to have the actual characters make a joke about what the writers were doing, and yet the writers still did it. If you know that something sucks to such a degree that you have to defend yourrself by proactively having the characters comment on it in order to make it seem like the writers are in on the joke, then there's a very good chance that they should have just come up with a better idea. Even the CHARACTERS in this movie are pointing out how derivative this movie is, and that's supposed to make it okay?
Log in to comment