This topic is locked from further discussion.
yea, it's called nostalgia. Rich3232Not necessarily. Many fans of classic rock weren't even alive when it was being released.
The post is meant to have ideas and views on this particular issue exchanged....you know like a in a forum. And what I think of The Beatles isn't the point of this thread.Um, okay. Nice blog.
And you might not like the Beatles, but that doesn't mean they are a bad band.
jimkabrhel
[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]The post is meant to have ideas and views on this particular issue exchanged....you know like a in a forum. And what I think of The Beatles isn't the point of this thread.Um, okay. Nice blog.
And you might not like the Beatles, but that doesn't mean they are a bad band.
Reed_Bowie
When you put your opinion of something as the first sentence of you post, it becomes part of the thread.Â
Your opinion of musicians isn't the be-all-end-all of the world. There's not overt pressure to like older music. There are stations, on-air and on the internet that provide lots of variety.Â
Listen to what you want, but don't expect everyone to agree with your ideas about it.
The post is meant to have ideas and views on this particular issue exchanged....you know like a in a forum. And what I think of The Beatles isn't the point of this thread.[QUOTE="Reed_Bowie"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]
Um, okay. Nice blog.
And you might not like the Beatles, but that doesn't mean they are a bad band.
jimkabrhel
When you put your opinion of something as the first sentence of you post, it becomes part of the thread.Â
Your opinion of musicians isn't the be-all-end-all of the world. There's not overt pressure to like older music. There are stations, on-air and on the internet that provide lots of variety.Â
Listen to what you want, but don't expect everyone to agree with your ideas about it.
If you actually read more into it, you'd see that my first statement isn't my opinion. It was just an example. I actually had to put an edit at the end of my post because of people like you who didn't read into the post.[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"][QUOTE="Reed_Bowie"] The post is meant to have ideas and views on this particular issue exchanged....you know like a in a forum. And what I think of The Beatles isn't the point of this thread.Reed_Bowie
When you put your opinion of something as the first sentence of you post, it becomes part of the thread.Â
Your opinion of musicians isn't the be-all-end-all of the world. There's not overt pressure to like older music. There are stations, on-air and on the internet that provide lots of variety.Â
Listen to what you want, but don't expect everyone to agree with your ideas about it.
If you actually read more into it, you'd see that my first statement isn't my opinion. It was just an example. I actually had to put an edit at the end of my post because of people like you who didn't read into the post.It all comes down to an idea based on your opinions. You post a video that you say is a bd song, but obviously a lot of other people like. Yes, many people will try to convince you that certain groups or artists are good, but you have obviously gone your own way. Good for you, you aren't a lemming.
The post is meant to have ideas and views on this particular issue exchanged....you know like a in a forum. And what I think of The Beatles isn't the point of this thread.[QUOTE="Reed_Bowie"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]
Um, okay. Nice blog.
And you might not like the Beatles, but that doesn't mean they are a bad band.
jimkabrhel
When you put your opinion of something as the first sentence of you post, it becomes part of the thread.Â
Your opinion of musicians isn't the be-all-end-all of the world. There's not overt pressure to like older music. There are stations, on-air and on the internet that provide lots of variety.Â
Listen to what you want, but don't expect everyone to agree with your ideas about it.
And if a scientist used "Is the moon made of cheese" as an opening statement of a research paper on the moon, would you respond to that statement?[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"][QUOTE="Reed_Bowie"] The post is meant to have ideas and views on this particular issue exchanged....you know like a in a forum. And what I think of The Beatles isn't the point of this thread.Reed_Bowie
When you put your opinion of something as the first sentence of you post, it becomes part of the thread.Â
Your opinion of musicians isn't the be-all-end-all of the world. There's not overt pressure to like older music. There are stations, on-air and on the internet that provide lots of variety.Â
Listen to what you want, but don't expect everyone to agree with your ideas about it.
And if a scientist used "Is the moon made of cheese" as an opening statement of a research paper on the moon, would you respond to that statement?As a scientist, I would question if the one who wrote the paper was being serious, and my analysis of the article as written would be very different. If you really want to have a serious discussion, you have to learn how to write a thesis statement.
And if a scientist used "Is the moon made of cheese" as an opening statement of a research paper on the moon, would you respond to that statement?[QUOTE="Reed_Bowie"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]
When you put your opinion of something as the first sentence of you post, it becomes part of the thread.Â
Your opinion of musicians isn't the be-all-end-all of the world. There's not overt pressure to like older music. There are stations, on-air and on the internet that provide lots of variety.Â
Listen to what you want, but don't expect everyone to agree with your ideas about it.
jimkabrhel
As a scientist, I would question if the one who wrote the paper was being serious, and my analysis of the article as written would be very different. If you really want to have a serious discussion, you have to learn how to write a thesis statement.
When I say "respond" I mean: Would you actually debate that the moon is not made of cheese, or would you read the rest of the paper? And I find it incredible how you made it to be a scientist yet you still don't know to read the entirety of something before responding to it. There's also a clear thesis in my post as to what I'm arguing. Just because it's not clearly stated in the first sentence doesn't mean it's not there.It's all a matter of personal taste. Why don't you list the music you like out here and let everyone scrutinize it? You're going to get diverse viewpoints from each person based on their own music tastes.
I have my own tastes and some here would think my taste in music is either derivative or crap. Personally, I couldn't care less what they think. The only thing that matters is I like it.
Â
Pretty much this.Society may expose us to certain music early on that we'll find we have a preference toward later on, but eventually we learn we have the option to explore as much as we want, and from there we can choose what we like and dislike.Â
InEMplease
Everyone has their own tastes yes. With the second thing you said, you're almost giving people an excuse to listen to commercialized crap. I don't care if 13 year olds like Justin Bieber, his music is still garbage.It's all a matter of personal taste. Why don't you list the music you like out here and let everyone scrutinize it? You're going to get diverse viewpoints from each person based on their own music tastes.
I have my own tastes and some here would think my taste in music is either derivative or crap. Personally, I couldn't care less what they think. The only thing that matters is I like it.
Â
jun_aka_pekto
[QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]Everyone has their own tastes yes. With the second thing you said, you're almost giving people an excuse to listen to commercialized crap. I don't care if 13 year olds like Justin Bieber, his music is still garbage.It's all a matter of personal taste. Why don't you list the music you like out here and let everyone scrutinize it? You're going to get diverse viewpoints from each person based on their own music tastes.
I have my own tastes and some here would think my taste in music is either derivative or crap. Personally, I couldn't care less what they think. The only thing that matters is I like it.
Â
lonewolf604
Nobody needs an excuse to listen to anything.
[QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]Everyone has their own tastes yes. With the second thing you said, you're almost giving people an excuse to listen to commercialized crap. I don't care if 13 year olds like Justin Bieber, his music is still garbage.It's all a matter of personal taste. Why don't you list the music you like out here and let everyone scrutinize it? You're going to get diverse viewpoints from each person based on their own music tastes.
I have my own tastes and some here would think my taste in music is either derivative or crap. Personally, I couldn't care less what they think. The only thing that matters is I like it.
Â
lonewolf604
People need an excuse to like stuff you don't like?
Everyone has their own tastes yes. With the second thing you said, you're almost giving people an excuse to listen to commercialized crap. I don't care if 13 year olds like Justin Bieber, his music is still garbage.[QUOTE="lonewolf604"][QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]
It's all a matter of personal taste. Why don't you list the music you like out here and let everyone scrutinize it? You're going to get diverse viewpoints from each person based on their own music tastes.
I have my own tastes and some here would think my taste in music is either derivative or crap. Personally, I couldn't care less what they think. The only thing that matters is I like it.
Â
worlock77
People need an excuse to like stuff you don't like?
They themselves don't need an excuse, I didn't mean it literally. What i'm trying to get as is, if you just say "well let them listen to it", you're saying its okay for crappy music to come out. I'm glad Rebecca Black came out with that Friday song, tons of people hated it, but the funny thing is, its an accurate parody of actual pop music.They themselves don't need an excuse, I didn't mean it literally. What i'm trying to get as is, if you just say "well let them listen to it", you're saying its okay for crappy music to come out. I'm glad Rebecca Black came out with that Friday song, tons of people hated it, but the funny thing is, its an accurate parody of actual pop music. lonewolf604
But it *is* okay for crappy music to come out.
I think it can be akin to comparing junk food to a finely crafted gourmet dessert. A dessert is meant to be savored with each bite, enjoying it composition and complexities. A bag of chips is meant to be eaten one after another until you hit the bottom of a bag. And some times, i just want mindless junk food that i eat while watching a TV show.
Theres room for both. And room to enjoy both.
Even though it's 2013, hit songs from the 60's and 70's are still mainly what i hear on the radio, as well as in movie trailers. I guess it's nostalgia.Â
[QUOTE="jimkabrhel"][QUOTE="Reed_Bowie"] And if a scientist used "Is the moon made of cheese" as an opening statement of a research paper on the moon, would you respond to that statement?Reed_Bowie
As a scientist, I would question if the one who wrote the paper was being serious, and my analysis of the article as written would be very different. If you really want to have a serious discussion, you have to learn how to write a thesis statement.
When I say "respond" I mean: Would you actually debate that the moon is not made of cheese, or would you read the rest of the paper? And I find it incredible how you made it to be a scientist yet you still don't know to read the entirety of something before responding to it. There's also a clear thesis in my post as to what I'm arguing. Just because it's not clearly stated in the first sentence doesn't mean it's not there.I did read your post, and I took away from it something different than you intended, based on the order you put you information. Writing something with a logical order will get you better responses.Â
I would, and do, give low marks to a student who does not describe the topic adequately right up front.
A better analogy that "the moon is made of cheese" is "This lab sucked a**" as a first sentence, and then the lab experiment and results were described. Would you read that paper?
Let's see...
Â
Beatles: decent.
AC/DC: Garbage
Led Zeppelin: 9.5/10
Lynyrd Skynyrd: 9/10
Guns & Roses: Average
Slayer: 100000000/10
I agree with this like 40% Some of the Beatles albums do suck, most are pretty good, and Rubber Soul is a masterpiece IMO. Revolver is very close. Guns and Roses sucks ass. AC/DC is pretty bad too. Pink Floyd, Yes, Rush and all that good "old" progressive rock still matches up with good progressive rock and metal of Today.YoshiYogurt
I prefer Revolver (which is easily one of my favorites albums of all time), but Rubber Soul/Revolver is indeed The Beatles' best period.
I'd rank them like this: Revolver>Rubber Soul>The White Album>Abbey Road>Sgt. Pepper>everything else. Let It Be had the potential to be one of the great Beatles albums (Let It Be and Across The Universe are easily some of their most beautiful songs), but there's too much half-backed crap on that record.
[QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]Everyone has their own tastes yes. With the second thing you said, you're almost giving people an excuse to listen to commercialized crap. I don't care if 13 year olds like Justin Bieber, his music is still garbage.It's all a matter of personal taste. Why don't you list the music you like out here and let everyone scrutinize it? You're going to get diverse viewpoints from each person based on their own music tastes.
I have my own tastes and some here would think my taste in music is either derivative or crap. Personally, I couldn't care less what they think. The only thing that matters is I like it.
Â
lonewolf604
Is there any reason why 13-year olds can't listen to music they like? We were all 13-years old once.
Everyone has their own tastes yes. With the second thing you said, you're almost giving people an excuse to listen to commercialized crap. I don't care if 13 year olds like Justin Bieber, his music is still garbage.[QUOTE="lonewolf604"][QUOTE="jun_aka_pekto"]
It's all a matter of personal taste. Why don't you list the music you like out here and let everyone scrutinize it? You're going to get diverse viewpoints from each person based on their own music tastes.
I have my own tastes and some here would think my taste in music is either derivative or crap. Personally, I couldn't care less what they think. The only thing that matters is I like it.
Â
jun_aka_pekto
Is there any reason why 13-year olds can't listen to music they like? We were all 13-years old once.
Oh no, they can listen to it. I still hate the fact that Bieber is commercialized crap. I'm trying to be more tolerant. Talk to me 3 years ago I hated anybody that listen to extremely commercialized music.When I say "respond" I mean: Would you actually debate that the moon is not made of cheese, or would you read the rest of the paper? And I find it incredible how you made it to be a scientist yet you still don't know to read the entirety of something before responding to it. There's also a clear thesis in my post as to what I'm arguing. Just because it's not clearly stated in the first sentence doesn't mean it's not there.[QUOTE="Reed_Bowie"][QUOTE="jimkabrhel"]
As a scientist, I would question if the one who wrote the paper was being serious, and my analysis of the article as written would be very different. If you really want to have a serious discussion, you have to learn how to write a thesis statement.
jimkabrhel
I did read your post, and I took away from it something different than you intended, based on the order you put you information. Writing something with a logical order will get you better responses.Â
I would, and do, give low marks to a student who does not describe the topic adequately right up front.
A better analogy that "the moon is made of cheese" is "This lab sucked a**" as a first sentence, and then the lab experiment and results were described. Would you read that paper?
Honestly, if you're that bad at reading then you shouldn't be instructing anyone. My thesis is clearly stated in the sentence: " Now, I think the reasoning behind this is that we're all conditioned to believe that the classic rock bands from the 60's-70's are the best and can't be beat." Hell, if you're that poor at reading, it's even the topic of the thread. Just because I may encounter people who are this bad at reading doesn't mean that I'm going to make my opening sentence: "THE TOPIC OF THIS ESSAY IS HOW SOCIETY CONDITIONS PEOPLE TO LIKE OLDER MUSIC" because, to me, that sounds blunt and stupid. I started with a rhetorical statement as a persuasive technique. And even after that, I like to introduce the topic so people have a better understanding of what I'm talking about.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment