@Serraph105 said:
I think some people were under the impression that Bernie would hold strong and not do this, but I would make the argument that good politicians compromise with each other. Hillary has adopted many of Bernie's plans, and because of this he gave her his endorsement and support. In my view this is a sign that both Bernie and Hillary are good public servants. What's your view on this OT community?
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/bernie-sanders-finally-endorse-hillary-clinton-n607591
I agree with your assessment, for the most part. I actually watched Bernie's speech in its entirety, and he made it very clear that the two campaigns had been working together and had established a good middle-ground - this obviously involves Clinton officially adopting numerous of Sanders' policy positions.
So, what we are left with - and I think this is important - is not only a unified message that can tackle Trump, but also we're left with a party platform that has been heavily influenced by Sanders and is actually going to satisfy the largest number of Democratic voters (whether they know it or not).
It's hard to argue against that. All I see now is a lot of personal attacks and misinformation flying around about both Clinton and Sanders as individual people. This is unhelpful at best.
One thing I really can't understand, though, is a Bernie supporter who will now not vote at all because they have a "Bernie or bust" mentality. That makes zero sense to me, especially if you are about evidence-based policy rather than individual personalities (I suspect few people really subscribe to this, despite what they say).
At this point, every sane person should be pushing hard for a Democratic win, because the alternative is Trump. So it's not even about "who is the best candidate" now, it's quite literally about keeping an insane despot from the White House.
Log in to comment