Roman Centurion Vs. Rajput was complete BS.

all that fancy dancing around with those weapons was cool and everything, but a roman centurion would've cut open those little rajputs in half before they even got a chance to flail their arms around. i love deadliest warrior, but the show is becoming more and more BS.

really?

I thought it was getting better because of the matchups

That show's only value comes from entertainment. Put no stock in its actual assessments.

I think you are having trouble facing the facts.

I bet you said the same with about the Spetznaz vs. Green Beret too, huh?

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about because what you consider fancy dancing around was a way of combat for them. They were taught to fight to the death and never give up. They allowed nothing to stop them, and did everything possible to out maneuver their opponents which is where the "fancy dancing around" comes in. Their type of combat style, and weapons were also much more dominant then the Centurions, as the Rajputs had much more training in one on one combat. Please look something up before you decide to just call something you have no understanding of "BS".

Are you a butthurt Italian or something? Those rajput guys had awesome weapons.wstfld

You clearly have no idea what you are talking about because what you consider "fancy dancing around" was a way of combat for them. They were taught to fight to the death and never give up. They allowed nothing to stop them, and did everything possible to out maneuver their opponents which is where the "fancy dancing around" comes in. Please look something up before you decide to just call something you have no understand of "BS"KidCudi37

My main gripe is the Centurian is wearing the wrong armour for the era they took it from (at least from what i recall).

if you have a problem, try fighting a rajput.auron_16

[QUOTE="auron_16"]if you have a problem, try fighting a rajput.positivebalance

[QUOTE="positivebalance"]

[QUOTE="auron_16"]if you have a problem, try fighting a rajput.auron_16

That episode was one of the only ones they got right this season. The Centurion would of won if it was an army vs. army matchup. But in single combat the Rajput had the advantages. Without his army the Centurion, is pretty weak.

That episode was one of the only ones they got right this season. The Centurion would of won if it was an army vs. army matchup. But in single combat the Rajput had the advantages. Without his army the Centurion, is pretty weak.

Blu_Falcon37

That show relies heavily on pseudo-science. I put no stock in it.

That show relies heavily on pseudo-science. I put no stock in it.

sonicare

http://www.gamespot.com/search.html?qs=Slitherine+Strategies

I don't put any stock into the results either.

if you haven't noticed... that show has no science behind it...

rajput's FTW

I couldn't believe that shaved metal whip thing they had. Probably the most dissapointing weapon ever on the show.

I think it got 1 (maybe 0) kills in the simulation. To compare: The IRA's slingshot had more kills. And the slingshot isn't even designed to kill.

Even though I doubt the truth behind the results, I think the Roman would have lost.

Roman soldiers were trained to fight well in legions, not by themselves like the Rajput.

So on a one on one fight the Roman would be at a disadvantage.

I thought they got it right. The Roman Centurion fighting style was built mostly around group tactics, so I'm not sure they would have faired so well in a one-on-one. No complaints from me.

I don't take the show seriously...

I don't take the show seriously...

coolbeans90

nor should you really...

The Rajput won because they used weapons that were efficent one on one and they were very skilled at them where the Romans used weapons that where ment to fight as a group and were trained to fight in a group and avoid one on one. In my opinion they didn't match them up properly because one fights alone, the other in a group and then when they fight they do it 1 vs 1. So Don't take the show to seriously