My Predictions for the 2015 Box Office & Ratings

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#1 Posted by SythusHD (38 posts) -

This is my prediction of what each movie will make in the box office and how they will be rated

Star Wars Episode VII - 1.7 Billion - 90%

Jurassic World - 1.2 Billion - 89%

Bond 24 - 1.3 Billion - 91%

The Hunger Games Mockingjay Part 2 - 1.3 Billion - 94%

Avengers Age of Ultron - 1.4 Billion - 88%

The Fantastic Four - 580 Million - 84%

Fast & Furious 7 - 860 Million - 80%

Ted 2 - 620 Million - 72%

Terminator Genesis - 630 Million - 78%

Minions - 510 Million - 82%

Ant-Man - 480 Million - 88%

Frankenstein - 400 Million - 77%

The Jungle Book - 420 Million - 80%

Peanuts - 400 Million - 95%

Alvin & The Chipmunks 4 - 500 Million - 60%

Kung Fu Panda 3 - 740 Million - 89%

Mission Impossible 5 - 790 Million - 86%

#2 Posted by Master_Live (14162 posts) -

This thread stinks. Ratings of what? RT? You need specify. And how did you came up with your predictions? I'm sure it was pretty scientific.

#3 Edited by SythusHD (38 posts) -

@Master_Live: yeah it was rotten tomatoes, am pretty sure they're the only review website that uses percentages, plus which movies do you think are going to be the highest grossing?

#4 Posted by thegerg (14826 posts) -

Ok

#5 Posted by DNA-Hole (40 posts) -

Jurassic world - 1.2 billion...On a franchise whose last installment was 13 years ago, and only made $368 million worldwide on the last installment--and speilberg's not even directing the damn thing. Yeah...good luck with that

The forth chipmunks film making half a billion dollars. Hey, TC...you DO realize that the third film's take was shit compared to the second? An $86 million difference in the US, and about a $100 million less total.

Where the hell are you getting these numbers from? I'm surprised you're able to pull them from out of your ass with your head all the way up it.

#6 Posted by hippiesanta (9793 posts) -
#7 Edited by Master_Live (14162 posts) -

Plus Jurassic World? We get it, dinosaurs are awesome, we got it the first 3 times. Unless they go with built up models instead of crappy CGI, I'm not touching that movie.

#8 Edited by Hallenbeck77 (14394 posts) -

Plus Jurassic World? We get it, dinosaurs are awesome, we got it the first 3 times. Unless they go with built up models instead of crappy CGI, I'm not touching that movie.

Or at the very least, a mixture of both. I think it'll be more CG heavy than the other films because it seem like it's cheaper to go that route than traditional practical effects. Hell, I wonder what the budget for this thing is gonna be.

#9 Edited by ferrari2001 (16808 posts) -

I was walking around my neighborhood earlier today, and low and behold in the neighbors yard was a steaming pile of dog crap. This piece of dog crap was one of the largest most disgusting pieces of dog crap that I'd ever beholden in my entire life. I almost wanted to stop and admire how this steaming pile of crap could come out of an animal as small as a dog. Not to mention a pile of crap as rotten and disgusting as this pile of crap. I thought nothing could be as crappy as this pile of dung. Then the TC made a topic about movie predictions/ratings. Now that steaming pile of worthless dog crap does not look so crappy.

#10 Posted by SythusHD (38 posts) -

Jurassic World can easily make 1.2 Billion, it might be bad, but you'r still going to see it

#11 Edited by DNA-Hole (40 posts) -

@sythushd said:

Jurassic World can easily make 1.2 Billion, it might be bad, but you'r still going to see it

Like you really know what movies i like to watch, ball lick. You really think that it'll make 1.2 billion--or even break it. Just because people shit their pants every once in awhile doesn't mean its an everyday occurance.

And I'm waiting for a response to your chipmunks prediction. How can you predict a half billion dollar take when the take for the third film was LESS than the second one?! You can make predictions, then predict what kind of insults are waiting for you the longer to decide to post here.

#12 Edited by GamingGod999 (2952 posts) -

Very optimistic.

#13 Edited by clarinetguy097 (82 posts) -

These numbers look pretty accurate to me.

#14 Posted by Hallenbeck77 (14394 posts) -

Let's leave these old threads dead and buried. Thanks!