My Predictions for the 2015 Box Office & Ratings

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for sythushd
SythusHD

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#1 SythusHD
Member since 2013 • 52 Posts

This is my prediction of what each movie will make in the box office and how they will be rated

Star Wars Episode VII - 1.7 Billion - 90%

Jurassic World - 1.2 Billion - 89%

Bond 24 - 1.3 Billion - 91%

The Hunger Games Mockingjay Part 2 - 1.3 Billion - 94%

Avengers Age of Ultron - 1.4 Billion - 88%

The Fantastic Four - 580 Million - 84%

Fast & Furious 7 - 860 Million - 80%

Ted 2 - 620 Million - 72%

Terminator Genesis - 630 Million - 78%

Minions - 510 Million - 82%

Ant-Man - 480 Million - 88%

Frankenstein - 400 Million - 77%

The Jungle Book - 420 Million - 80%

Peanuts - 400 Million - 95%

Alvin & The Chipmunks 4 - 500 Million - 60%

Kung Fu Panda 3 - 740 Million - 89%

Mission Impossible 5 - 790 Million - 86%

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#2 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20510 Posts

This thread stinks. Ratings of what? RT? You need specify. And how did you came up with your predictions? I'm sure it was pretty scientific.

Avatar image for sythushd
SythusHD

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#3  Edited By SythusHD
Member since 2013 • 52 Posts

@Master_Live: yeah it was rotten tomatoes, am pretty sure they're the only review website that uses percentages, plus which movies do you think are going to be the highest grossing?

Avatar image for DNA-Hole
DNA-Hole

49

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 DNA-Hole
Member since 2013 • 49 Posts

Jurassic world - 1.2 billion...On a franchise whose last installment was 13 years ago, and only made $368 million worldwide on the last installment--and speilberg's not even directing the damn thing. Yeah...good luck with that

The forth chipmunks film making half a billion dollars. Hey, TC...you DO realize that the third film's take was shit compared to the second? An $86 million difference in the US, and about a $100 million less total.

Where the hell are you getting these numbers from? I'm surprised you're able to pull them from out of your ass with your head all the way up it.

Avatar image for hippiesanta
hippiesanta

10301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 hippiesanta
Member since 2005 • 10301 Posts

@Master_Live said:

This thread stinks.

Exactly

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20510

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#7  Edited By Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20510 Posts

Plus Jurassic World? We get it, dinosaurs are awesome, we got it the first 3 times. Unless they go with built up models instead of crappy CGI, I'm not touching that movie.

Avatar image for hallenbeck77
Hallenbeck77

16878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By Hallenbeck77  Moderator
Member since 2005 • 16878 Posts

@Master_Live said:

Plus Jurassic World? We get it, dinosaurs are awesome, we got it the first 3 times. Unless they go with built up models instead of crappy CGI, I'm not touching that movie.

Or at the very least, a mixture of both. I think it'll be more CG heavy than the other films because it seem like it's cheaper to go that route than traditional practical effects. Hell, I wonder what the budget for this thing is gonna be.

Avatar image for ferrari2001
ferrari2001

17772

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By ferrari2001
Member since 2008 • 17772 Posts

I was walking around my neighborhood earlier today, and low and behold in the neighbors yard was a steaming pile of dog crap. This piece of dog crap was one of the largest most disgusting pieces of dog crap that I'd ever beholden in my entire life. I almost wanted to stop and admire how this steaming pile of crap could come out of an animal as small as a dog. Not to mention a pile of crap as rotten and disgusting as this pile of crap. I thought nothing could be as crappy as this pile of dung. Then the TC made a topic about movie predictions/ratings. Now that steaming pile of worthless dog crap does not look so crappy.

Avatar image for sythushd
SythusHD

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#10 SythusHD
Member since 2013 • 52 Posts

Jurassic World can easily make 1.2 Billion, it might be bad, but you'r still going to see it

Avatar image for DNA-Hole
DNA-Hole

49

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11  Edited By DNA-Hole
Member since 2013 • 49 Posts

@sythushd said:

Jurassic World can easily make 1.2 Billion, it might be bad, but you'r still going to see it

Like you really know what movies i like to watch, ball lick. You really think that it'll make 1.2 billion--or even break it. Just because people shit their pants every once in awhile doesn't mean its an everyday occurance.

And I'm waiting for a response to your chipmunks prediction. How can you predict a half billion dollar take when the take for the third film was LESS than the second one?! You can make predictions, then predict what kind of insults are waiting for you the longer to decide to post here.

Avatar image for GamingGod999
GamingGod999

3135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12  Edited By GamingGod999
Member since 2011 • 3135 Posts

Very optimistic.

Avatar image for clarinetguy097
clarinetguy097

83

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13  Edited By clarinetguy097
Member since 2009 • 83 Posts

These numbers look pretty accurate to me.

Avatar image for hallenbeck77
Hallenbeck77

16878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Hallenbeck77  Moderator
Member since 2005 • 16878 Posts

Let's leave these old threads dead and buried. Thanks!