Loreal cuts ties with AxelleDespiegelaere(WorldCup girl)

The hawtness had signed less than a week ago a contract to model for the L'oreal brand, today, L'oreal decided to cut ties with the girl, after pictures of her during a hunting trip surfaced in the internet.

L'oreal spokesman said that L'oreal doesn't do animal testing anymore, anywhere in the world, and that it will not tolerate the killing of animals.

Link

What do you guys think? This is the girl btw,

Shame, would have loved to see more of her, wouldn't have been long for her to join Victoria's Secret or do some minimal clothing photoshoot :p

who fvcking cares abt these broads or what happens to them or after in FIFA WORLD CUP , everyone is more interested in watching the matches and favourite players.

Who the **** cares if she went hunting? >_>

L'oreal

Damn liberals

It's none of their damn business what she does in her spare time. >_>

L'oreal, as a private employer, is free to associate with whoever it deems fit. And that is that.

But we eat meat:-\

Public image

Agree with master live here

How does someone hunting hurt anyone's public image? Only an idiot would be offended by her hunting.

This is one of those times where I feel like the animal rights people get a bit carried away.

Sure she hunts and I too dislike hunting if a person isn't going to actually use the animal for food and such, but I would not cost someone a job just because they hunt...

It doesn't matter if anyone is actually offended, that's still not the image that Loreal wants to present.

There's a difference between killing to eat, and killing for sport.

Then they need to get over themselves because it's such a minor thing to get upset over.

@The-Apostle They are still well within their rights to cut ties with her.

In what way?

Companies have the right to protect themselves from any sort of financial loss due to their employees actions. This is the second thread in like a week in which someone doesn't seem to get that. Pretty simple. Unless the contract she had with them said otherwise, they are free to release her from it is they deem her a risk to their public image.

I just don't see why it would hurt their image. It's not like she killed a person.

Killing cows, pigs, chickens, and fish is ok. Killing Bambi is not.

...unless you live under a rock, how can you not know that hunting, especially in Africa (and esp. more recently) is viewed negatively by a lot of people? Also, if you read the article, you'd know the company already had problems with animal rights activists in the past due to testing on animals which they have been trying to fix; making the hiring and supporting of someone who is so public about her hunting all the more damaging to them. I am honestly not even sure why this is a thread. The article only assumes the images of her hunting was the reason they cut ties with her, but no one knows if that is in fact true. Plus...why does anyone care about some random beauty product companies association with some random woman from the World Cup?

yup, and she didn't hunt anything illegal or endangered

Apparently killing animals for food, rather than going to the grocery store instead, is wrong.

LOL daily mail.

Gonna need another source before I have an opinion on this.

@Ackad said:

There's a little more to this.

That's not gonna stop the dipshit comments! :D

First Kendall Jones, then Steven Spielberg and now this girl I'm supposed to have heard about? The horror...

It is if she represents them and brings negative attention to them.

This. I'm going out on a limb and guessing she didn't dine on Gazelle that evening. There's something wrong with people that go out to kill animals for fun.

Yeah, lol. A cosmetic company doing that.

I was going to mention that she typed in the post she was ready to hunt Americans and that may have been the straw that broke the camel's back but it looks like somebody already posted the Twitter screenshot.

Obviously she was referring to beating the US in the games and not literally killing Americans but the company probably didn't want to take the chance of losing business over her. She is probably famous enough that she will find work elsewhere over this.

I completely disagree. If she were whoring herself out, sleeping with 10 different men per day or getting into crazy orgies or something like that, I'd say that it's her problem (and I dont mean it in a "approve sex stuff 'cause she is hot" way, merely giving a example of questionable behavior) but this girl is HUNTING FOR SPORT, which is fucking despicable, I don't care if you think its something "conservative". But when you go to a foreign country to sneak on some unsuspecting animal who has not wronged you in any way and you put a bullet in its head and just let the carcass there to rot or you take it to turn it into a trophy...then there is something seriously wrong with you. Especially since the girl went out of her way to claim that "Hunting is more than a matter of life and death", **** you girl, it's death for the animal and thats it. I completely understand hunting for food or culling animal population that threatens the human population (without the humans invading the animal's habitats first). But there are no valuable arguments to defend the killing of animals for fun.

And it baffles me how most people who do crap like that are fucking spoiled rich brats who think they own the world, like this girl.

I ate a ribeye steak today for pleasure. And I'm already overweight and I eat too much meat. That's essentially "killing for fun". My actions result in the needless deaths of animals, and my motivation is pleasure rather than necessity. Now, if you really put the spotlight onto yourself, think about the last time you ate chicken or beef. Did you really NEED that hsmburger or chicken sandwich, or was the act of eating it simply about the ENJOYMENT of eating a tasty piece of meat?

Sure, SOMETIMES people kill out of necessity. Usually people kill just because they CAN, and it's somehow convenient or beneficial to them.

@lightleggy said:

The hawtness had signed less than a week ago a contract to model for the L'oreal brand, today, L'oreal decided to cut ties with the girl, after pictures of her during a hunting trip surfaced in the internet.

L'oreal spokesman said that L'oreal doesn't do animal testing anymore, anywhere in the world, and that it will not tolerate the killing of animals.

Link

What do you guys think? This is the girl btw,

Shame, would have loved to see more of her, wouldn't have been long for her to join Victoria's Secret or do some minimal clothing photoshoot :p

I find she is cute.I don't care if she goes hunting,I would care about the product,not the fact she likes to go hunting.

Have you ever watched any liberal media news stations? They see hunting as the spawn of satan incarnate. Plenty of people watch those stations and agree with every word they say.

Looks a bit like Amanda Nox. Better keep British students away from her.

Hmmmm. So is loreal planning on firing everyone on their staff who isn't vegetarian?

If not then that's pretty hypocritical.

Private company can associate with who they want even if their reasons are dumb.