Is "Inception" as good as "2001: A Space Odyssey"?

  • 57 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for TheFlush
TheFlush

5965

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#51 TheFlush
Member since 2002 • 5965 Posts

I can't imagine 2001 being topped by another sci-fi movie in the near future. I hope that there will be another masterpiece of such proportions though, that would be amazing!!

Plus I'm still hoping for the other 2 books (2061 and 3001) to be made into movies. Have you guys seen the sequel? 2010 is also a great film.

Arthur C. Clarke has written so many amazing books, there's lots of material there for other movies. I wish they'd make movies out of his Rama books, about an incredibly giant and weird alien spaceship that enters our solar system. Clarke is so brilliant when writing these really alien, fantastical, otherworldly stories. I love them!

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53  Edited By Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

lol. hey look, it's the battle of the of the mediocre pretentious sci fi movies.

anyway, 2001 is passable, inception is flat out garbage.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#54 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts

@Riverwolf007 said:

lol. hey look it's the battle of the of the mediocre pretentious sci fi movies.

So what do you consider a good sci-fi film?

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

@toast_burner said:

@Riverwolf007 said:

lol. hey look it's the battle of the of the mediocre pretentious sci fi movies.

So what do you consider a good sci-fi film?

idk, i tend to like low budget movies where they have to rely on the writing to carry it through over the visuals.

maybe a boy and his dog or dark star, moon was pretty good and came out recently.

2001 is crazy overrated and i have no clue why inception was popular at all.

Avatar image for sammyjenkis898
sammyjenkis898

28392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 sammyjenkis898
Member since 2007 • 28392 Posts

The genre should rely on its visuals. Relying on dialogue - like Inception, which you hated - is not a positive.

Avatar image for purplelabel
PurpleLabel

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#57  Edited By PurpleLabel
Member since 2014 • 314 Posts

@xdude85 said:

Inception is a bland, overrated piece of trash.

Agreed, 2001 was a masterpiece.

Avatar image for PsychoLemons
PsychoLemons

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 PsychoLemons
Member since 2011 • 3183 Posts

No, and Inception, like most of Nolan's films, have too much exposition and dialogue to the point that it becomes pretentious. Oh and his female characters are bad.

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

@Riverwolf007 said:

@toast_burner said:

@Riverwolf007 said:

lol. hey look it's the battle of the of the mediocre pretentious sci fi movies.

So what do you consider a good sci-fi film?

idk, i tend to like low budget movies where they have to rely on the writing to carry it through over the visuals.

maybe a boy and his dog or dark star, moon was pretty good and came out recently.

2001 is crazy overrated and i have no clue why inception was popular at all.

That's a pretty weird criticism seeing how stories can and often are told visually. What it seems like you're saying is that you prefer dialogue over visual communication. Which is fine, but it's not a logical slam against 2001 since the dialogue in 2001 worked and the visuals in 2001 also worked. But hey, never mind 2001. Movies are a VISUAL MEDIUM, and visual literacy matters a whole fucking lot. 2001 might not have been heavy on dialogue or plot exposition, but it was an epic story told largely through the strength of its visuals, and on those grounds it is a monumental achievement. Many portions of that movie didn't NEED dialogue, because everything that needed to be said could be better conveyed by showing rather than telling.