Too many choices - for now I'll stick with reversing the Supreme Court decision to allow unlimited political contributions from corporations. Total insanity.
"By Constitution Ali is the ultimate president of this country. He is not to be questioned, rather he is to be followed blindly as he is going to lead us straight to prosperous and world control, not to mention heaven too".
"By Constitution Ali is the ultimate president of this country. He is not to be questioned, rather he is to be followed blindly as he is going to lead us straight to prosperous and world control, not to mention heaven too". GazaAli
So I'm guessing you would turn us all into a president's minions? To do whatever he says...?
[QUOTE="GazaAli"]"By Constitution Ali is the ultimate president of this country. He is not to be questioned, rather he is to be followed blindly as he is going to lead us straight to prosperous and world control, not to mention heaven too". 3eyedrazorback
So I'm guessing you would turn us all into a president's minions? To do whatever he says...? exactly. you are a smart person.
[QUOTE="3eyedrazorback"][QUOTE="GazaAli"]"By Constitution Ali is the ultimate president of this country. He is not to be questioned, rather he is to be followed blindly as he is going to lead us straight to prosperous and world control, not to mention heaven too". GazaAli
So I'm guessing you would turn us all into a president's minions? To do whatever he says...? exactly. you are a smart person. Zombie movie! I can see it now!
"By Constitution Ali is the ultimate president of this country. He is not to be questioned, rather he is to be followed blindly as he is going to lead us straight to prosperous and world control, not to mention heaven too". GazaAli
Wouldn't that be just the creation of a religion? Just kidding. I would established a law that severely limits the contributions of firms to political campaigns, and attempt to reduce the affect of lobbying when it comes to the government.
Ban Vancouver Canucks fans. **** are they annoying -- to call them bandwagoners or fair-weather fans would be an insult to your average bandwagoner/fair-weather fan.
[QUOTE="JC346"] Because they kill people...svenus97
So does unhealty food, are you going to ban that too????
Some people smoke to relax after a long day at work and people like you want to take that away from them . . .
Both unhealty food and cigarettes are unhealthy, but wou,ld you rather allow both, or allow one and ban the other.I would rather let people choose what lifestyle choices they wish to make . . . and not arrogantly making decisions for them.
[QUOTE="svenus97"][QUOTE="hedden93"]So does unhealty food, are you going to ban that too????
Some people smoke to relax after a long day at work and people like you want to take that away from them . . .
hedden93
Both unhealty food and cigarettes are unhealthy, but wou,ld you rather allow both, or allow one and ban the other.I would rather let people choose what lifestyle choices they wish to make . . . and not arrogantly making decisions for them. Eating unhealty won't damage the person next to you, smoking, however will, no one said you couldn't smoke in your house, but smoking next to 20 next smokers is just bad.
So does unhealty food, are you going to ban that too????
Some people smoke to relax after a long day at work and people like you want to take that away from them . . .
Well when I choose not to smoke a cigarette, and I'm still endangered by someone who smokes them, it's a problem. Or you could just move 10ft away from them
[QUOTE="hedden93"]So does unhealty food, are you going to ban that too????
Some people smoke to relax after a long day at work and people like you want to take that away from them . . .
Wolls
Well when I choose not to smoke a cigarette, and I'm still endangered by someone who smokes them, it's a problem. Or you could just move 10ft away from them Or I could save the person smoking them by banning them.
I would put term limits on all Senators and Representatives, and include a pay limit as well as retirement restrictions to be voted on by the American People.
Serving in Congressis not meant to be a form of employment but a public service.
[QUOTE="Wolls"][QUOTE="JC346"] Well when I choose not to smoke a cigarette, and I'm still endangered by someone who smokes them, it's a problem.
JC346
Or you could just move 10ft away from them Or I could save the person smoking them by banning them.
Im just saying you actually should have problem with people smoking cause its not hard to avoid, and its not as if they dont know the risks to smoking and yet they chose to smoke anyway. If you would like to think you know better then thats all good for you but its a bit arrogant dont you think?
[QUOTE="Wolls"][QUOTE="JC346"] Well when I choose not to smoke a cigarette, and I'm still endangered by someone who smokes them, it's a problem.
JC346
Or you could just move 10ft away from them Or I could save the person smoking them by banning them.Yes, banning something many people enjoy doing is saving them. You do realize smokers realize that smoking is bad for their health but they do it anyway because its something they enjoy. Not all smokers are trapped by the evil tabaco companies that are brainwashing them.:roll:
Log in to comment