i found the solution to global warming

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

history has shown me the way to fix global warming

Avatar image for iAtrocious
iAtrocious

1567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 iAtrocious
Member since 2010 • 1567 Posts

I agree with you. I think we should nuke all the population dense locales in the world, such as some cities in the USA, Japan, Europe, India and China. Brazil would need to be spared, though, due to its exuberant forests.

Win/win.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="iAtrocious"]

I agree with you. I think we should nuke all the population dense locales in the world, such as some cities in the USA, Japan, Europe, India and China. Brazil would need to be spared, though, due to its exuberant forests.

Win/win.

brazil would need to be nuked to stop the deforesting going on now
Avatar image for iAtrocious
iAtrocious

1567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 iAtrocious
Member since 2010 • 1567 Posts

[QUOTE="iAtrocious"]

I agree with you. I think we should nuke all the population dense locales in the world, such as some cities in the USA, Japan, Europe, India and China. Brazil would need to be spared, though, due to its exuberant forests.

Win/win.

surrealnumber5

brazil would need to be nuked to stop the deforesting going on now

So.. you're going to stop the deforestation by nuking the people who are deforesting, who are in these forests?

Avatar image for Ratchet_Fan8
Ratchet_Fan8

5574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 Ratchet_Fan8
Member since 2008 • 5574 Posts
wipe out the human race let the animals leave peacefully alone,after all.They were the R.E.A.L rulers of the earth ! :D
Avatar image for walkingdream
walkingdream

4883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 walkingdream
Member since 2009 • 4883 Posts
I thought futurama had the best idea....just get a big block of ice from Titan
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="iAtrocious"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="iAtrocious"]

I agree with you. I think we should nuke all the population dense locales in the world, such as some cities in the USA, Japan, Europe, India and China. Brazil would need to be spared, though, due to its exuberant forests.

Win/win.

brazil would need to be nuked to stop the deforesting going on now

So.. you're going to stop the deforestation by nuking the people who are deforesting, who are in these forests?

the trees will grow back in time, we must end this plight now!
Avatar image for GazaAli
GazaAli

25216

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 GazaAli
Member since 2007 • 25216 Posts
I'm sorry I want to be open minded and all, but what exactly does this study accomplish?
Avatar image for nickz_fpk
nickz_fpk

1458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 nickz_fpk
Member since 2010 • 1458 Posts

I thought futurama had the best idea....just get a big block of ice from Titan walkingdream

I think we should go with this.

Avatar image for MagnumPI
MagnumPI

9617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 MagnumPI
Member since 2002 • 9617 Posts

[QUOTE="iAtrocious"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] brazil would need to be nuked to stop the deforesting going on nowsurrealnumber5

So.. you're going to stop the deforestation by nuking the people who are deforesting, who are in these forests?

the trees will grow back in time, we must end this plight now!

No, you don't even need to worry about the trees catching fire, they are jungle trees which means theyare flame as well as radiationretardant, because I claim so.

Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts

*rubs head*I get a headache averytime when someone referances Ghengis Khan they take pics from the movie Mongol, particulary the ones with Ghengis holding a sword. See, The Mongols wouldn't use swords as it was a taboo to spill blood (ironic eh?), so they used bows mostly instead (there are a few who used swords, but even then).

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#12 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

If every liberal would stop driving their car, using computers and power in their houses, and imbibing in other excesses. our carbon levels would drop. I put the responsibility on them.

Avatar image for Atmanix
Atmanix

6927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Atmanix
Member since 2009 • 6927 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="iAtrocious"]

So.. you're going to stop the deforestation by nuking the people who are deforesting, who are in these forests?

MagnumPI

the trees will grow back in time, we must end this plight now!

No, you don't even need to worry about the trees catching fire, they are jungle trees which means theyare flame as well as radiationretardant, because I claim so.

Nukes are tree friendly as well!

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="Atmanix"]

[QUOTE="MagnumPI"]

the trees will grow back in time, we must end this plight now!surrealnumber5

No, you don't even need to worry about the trees catching fire, they are jungle trees which means theyare flame as well as radiationretardant, because I claim so.

Nukes are tree friendly as well!

you can hug trees with nuclear arms
Avatar image for Miroku32
Miroku32

8666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 43

User Lists: 0

#15 Miroku32
Member since 2006 • 8666 Posts
[QUOTE="Ratchet_Fan8"]wipe out the human race let the animals leave peacefully alone,after all.They were the R.E.A.L rulers of the earth ! :D

This is the real answer for the solution to Global Warming.
Avatar image for GalaxySpectre
GalaxySpectre

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 GalaxySpectre
Member since 2011 • 26 Posts
Wow what a beautiful idea! Wipe out the human race except for a few people such as myself and several other people I know, and then boom! Problem solved!
Avatar image for Overlord93
Overlord93

12602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Overlord93
Member since 2007 • 12602 Posts

[QUOTE="MagnumPI"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] the trees will grow back in time, we must end this plight now!Atmanix

No, you don't even need to worry about the trees catching fire, they are jungle trees which means theyare flame as well as radiationretardant, because I claim so.

Nukes are tree friendly as well!

They certainly are, then we'll have giant forests of mutant super trees which will reverse all the CO2 we have released back into O2
Avatar image for chaplainDMK
chaplainDMK

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 chaplainDMK
Member since 2008 • 7004 Posts
Wait, he killed 40 million people? I don't belive that...
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
Wow what a beautiful idea! Wipe out the human race except for a few people such as myself and several other people I know, and then boom! Problem solved!GalaxySpectre
well it would get much colder over the years, and depending on where you live your now farmable land might become tundra
Avatar image for Atmanix
Atmanix

6927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Atmanix
Member since 2009 • 6927 Posts

[QUOTE="Atmanix"]

[QUOTE="MagnumPI"]

No, you don't even need to worry about the trees catching fire, they are jungle trees which means theyare flame as well as radiationretardant, because I claim so.

Overlord93

Nukes are tree friendly as well!

They certainly are, then we'll have giant forests of mutant super trees which will reverse all the CO2 we have released back into O2

Or they can just help wipe out the rest of the human race.

Avatar image for Overlord93
Overlord93

12602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Overlord93
Member since 2007 • 12602 Posts
Atmanix
Fixes global warming either way....
Avatar image for EndSociety
EndSociety

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 EndSociety
Member since 2011 • 47 Posts
The best solution would be to reduce food production on a global scale. This would reduce population levels without having to kill people. Each year we would produce less and less food, until we're only producing enough food for a certain quantity of people. Less people would reduce economic demands on resource production and this would in effect create a stable ecosystem. And then we wouldn't have to worry about creating programs or initiatives to cover up the problems we're creating. and there still would be many wealthy, happy, people, with everything they could desire. Just not so many of them.
Avatar image for deactivated-5c37d3adcd094
deactivated-5c37d3adcd094

8362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 deactivated-5c37d3adcd094
Member since 2006 • 8362 Posts
Wait, he killed 40 million people? I don't belive that... chaplainDMK
Some estimates suggest it was that high. He did conquer the majority of Asia.
Avatar image for XileLord
XileLord

3776

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#24 XileLord
Member since 2007 • 3776 Posts

Better solution instead of just killing innocent people


Limit the amount of children two people can have together to only 1. This woul decrease the population significantly within 100 years and global warming will no longer become a issue.

Avatar image for TheColbert
TheColbert

3846

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 TheColbert
Member since 2008 • 3846 Posts
Eh its not that big of a deal. Soon we will have a hyperspace engine and we can just start dropping people off at another world and our trash some where else too.
Avatar image for worlock77
worlock77

22552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 worlock77
Member since 2009 • 22552 Posts

[QUOTE="iAtrocious"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] brazil would need to be nuked to stop the deforesting going on nowsurrealnumber5

So.. you're going to stop the deforestation by nuking the people who are deforesting, who are in these forests?

the trees will grow back in time, we must end this plight now!

So will humans, who will return to those forests to deforest them. Doesn't sound like you've really thought this plan out very well.

Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts

What if the sun decides to get spottier and hotter, if climate 'change' is weather and it'll just fluctuate, if humans aren't even the biggest producer of 'greenhouse gasses', 'cause we aren't. Then killing, or stopping humans from living won't really help...

@deforestation, trees look nice, we should plant more, hell, there's a ton of wasted space where I live, like 2 trees per yard, that could easily be like.. 10, then you wouldn't have to see ugly people/houses!

Avatar image for Baconbits2004
Baconbits2004

12602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 Baconbits2004
Member since 2009 • 12602 Posts
I think I follow you... we go back in time and kill him before he killed all those people, thus making our problem much more apparent today so we actually do something about it?
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="iAtrocious"]

So.. you're going to stop the deforestation by nuking the people who are deforesting, who are in these forests?

the trees will grow back in time, we must end this plight now!

So will humans, who will return to those forests to deforest them. Doesn't sound like you've really thought this plan out very well.

what dont you get, KILL ALL HUMANS, it is the only green solution. if we kill all non-flora then we can bring the earths temp down to the point of the last great extinction, that is our goal.
Avatar image for chaplainDMK
chaplainDMK

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 chaplainDMK
Member since 2008 • 7004 Posts
[QUOTE="chaplainDMK"]Wait, he killed 40 million people? I don't belive that... kamikaze_pigmy
Some estimates suggest it was that high. He did conquer the majority of Asia.

Dude, 40 million, that was about the population of Europe at the time... Unless he wen't around China and killed evreyone in each town I realy don't see how he could have killed that many people. And remember, this was the mid middle ages, you didn't have industrial killing centres that the Nazis had during WW2.
Avatar image for dunl12496
dunl12496

5710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#31 dunl12496
Member since 2009 • 5710 Posts

Oh goodness... so now murder is good? They suggest killing when they have no proof it will help?! Those people need to be put in jail. They're basically suggesting mass murder for something that doesn't even exist. Ridiculous.

Avatar image for dunl12496
dunl12496

5710

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#32 dunl12496
Member since 2009 • 5710 Posts

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] the trees will grow back in time, we must end this plight now!surrealnumber5

So will humans, who will return to those forests to deforest them. Doesn't sound like you've really thought this plan out very well.

what dont you get, KILL ALL HUMANS, it is the only green solution. if we kill all non-flora then we can bring the earths temp down to the point of the last great extinction, that is our goal.

Trees grow back. :roll: Why doesn't anyone get that SIMPLE fact?

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="dunl12496"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

So will humans, who will return to those forests to deforest them. Doesn't sound like you've really thought this plan out very well.

what dont you get, KILL ALL HUMANS, it is the only green solution. if we kill all non-flora then we can bring the earths temp down to the point of the last great extinction, that is our goal.

Trees grow back. :roll: Why doesn't anyone get that SIMPLE fact?

not if evil fauna is destroying it, why dont you get this simple fact, a destroyed plant can not grow as it is gone.
Avatar image for Baconbits2004
Baconbits2004

12602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 Baconbits2004
Member since 2009 • 12602 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

So will humans, who will return to those forests to deforest them. Doesn't sound like you've really thought this plan out very well.

dunl12496

what dont you get, KILL ALL HUMANS, it is the only green solution. if we kill all non-flora then we can bring the earths temp down to the point of the last great extinction, that is our goal.

Trees grow back. :roll: Why doesn't anyone get that SIMPLE fact?


You're..... joking, right? 0.o

Avatar image for inoperativeRS
inoperativeRS

8844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#36 inoperativeRS
Member since 2004 • 8844 Posts

I agree with you. I think we should nuke all the population dense locales in the world, such as some cities in the USA, Japan, Europe, India and China. Brazil would need to be spared, though, due to its exuberant forests.

Win/win.

iAtrocious
 Also, this.
Avatar image for Antitheist-
Antitheist-

228

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Antitheist-
Member since 2010 • 228 Posts

Or you could just take the advice of Abbath..

Avatar image for TaoJeetKuneDo
TaoJeetKuneDo

512

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#38 TaoJeetKuneDo
Member since 2010 • 512 Posts

Fix'd !