@rmpumper said:
@KungfuKitten said:
I don't think it's karma because nature itself is a cruel mistress. When we talk about the beauty of nature I think we mean very select handpicked parts of nature that are beautiful. The rest of it is corpses, shitting, pain and cruelty.
Cruelty is deliberate, so unless you think that animals and/or the planet itself have the intention to cause pain and suffering for their own amusement, then cruelty is exclusive to humanity.
That's what make us the worst species on Earth - we can do better, but chose not to with some being as shitty as possible on purpose.
Hm maybe. I don't think humans have much to choose. I don't necessarily believe in a free will. Only insomuch that it's a free choice that may as well have already been made. A person sees certain options and 'picks' the one he/she deems best for as much as he/she is in control. It's very deterministic of us, for having a free will and all. Maybe our awareness is different than that of animals, but I don't see much of a difference in choice in human beings. Maybe humans have more options in their mind and in practice, and maybe the decisions are less pre-programmed and more of an on the spot analysis, but I don't know about an actual ability to choose. As such, I think differently than most people about intentions or deliberate action. To me all humans have the right intentions deep inside. We all want the same in the end. Any differences in our idea of a paradise seem inconsequential. I consider the differences in our actions to be a result of our inability to understand each other and this world, and a lack of control over our situation and ourselves. When I talk cruelty I don't think about deliberateness. I just compare it to alternative ways of being and think the natural way of being is cruel.
(I think the reason I picked the word cruelty may be exposing a little religious side of me. If there is a deliberateness in cruelty I may have been suggesting subconsciously that whoever is in control of this world, it seems they have a world that leaves some room for improvement. You know, I would be delighted to work with them on that and see if we can make this world a little nicer.)
It's interesting to me how people can look at nature and think it's beautiful. We even sell products that say 'all natural.' I wonder, do they know that cyanide is all natural? If you look at it from a sideline there's so much nasty stuff going on. Terrible illnesses, parasites, venom, traps, rape, wars. I guess it's the same thing we do with pirates. Fantasy pirates are pretty cool compared to the real deal. Let's just say the moment I came across a frog swimming in a bowl of water in my yard with half a face missing because it was being eaten alive by parasites, it made me stop in my tracks and look differently at humans having pets. Before that I always thought it was irresponsible of people to keep pets because we don't know for sure what they want and we do keep them imprisoned in ways. But after that I realised that such a life can be quite an improvement over what nature had in store for them.
So for me, saving the environment wouldn't be returning the environment to a state as if humans aren't there. Because nature scares me. So no, I don't think that animals returning to the cities are necessarily a good sign. I don't know what to think of that. For me, saving the environment would mean to reshape nature in ways that it can cause less pain and suffering. That's why I feel positive about the air pollution diminishing.
Omg I'm sorry I typed way too much again.
Log in to comment