This topic is locked from further discussion.
Good for him. I don't have the highest opinion of him in the world because of a lot of his executive decisions relating to Star Wars, but that seems kinda petty when you see something like this.
Any and all flaws in the prequel trilogy are irrelevant compared to what he did to the originals in 1997. I don't know why he decided there needed to be singing puppets in Jabba's palace, but I distinctly remember mass suicides taking place at the drive in theater where I saw the whole Special Edition trilogy back in the day.Still doesn't make up for Jar-Jar.
THE_DRUGGIE
[QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]Any and all flaws in the prequel trilogy are irrelevant compared to what he did to the originals in 1997. I don't know why he decided there needed to be singing puppets in Jabba's palace, but I distinctly remember mass suicides taking place at the drive in theater where I saw the whole Special Edition trilogy back in the day.Still doesn't make up for Jar-Jar.
famicommander
There were singing puppets at Jabba's Palace in the original release of ROTJ. The 1997 rerelease replaced them with CGI.
Any and all flaws in the prequel trilogy are irrelevant compared to what he did to the originals in 1997. I don't know why he decided there needed to be singing puppets in Jabba's palace, but I distinctly remember mass suicides taking place at the drive in theater where I saw the whole Special Edition trilogy back in the day.[QUOTE="famicommander"][QUOTE="THE_DRUGGIE"]
Still doesn't make up for Jar-Jar.
m0zart
There were singing puppets at Jabba's Palace in the original release of ROTJ. The 1997 rerelease replaced them with CGI.
Yeah, but the scene's tone was completely changed in the re-release. It wen from looking like a dingy hell hole to being a cartoony, wacky song that totally derails the movie. To this day I have to skip that scene.Yeah, but the scene's tone was completely changed in the re-release. It wen from looking like a dingy hell hole to being a cartoony, wacky song that totally derails the movie. To this day I have to skip that scene.jim_shortsAs someone who mostly was indifferent to the changes (even the whole "Greedo shoots first" travesty), I've gotta agree. That song and dance sequence in Jabba's palace was godawful, by far the worst change he made.
Not all of them, the 80% of the rest are just plain greedy. Good for Lucas.Celebrities that are just plain nice are the best kind.
sune_Gem
[QUOTE="m0zart"][QUOTE="famicommander"] Any and all flaws in the prequel trilogy are irrelevant compared to what he did to the originals in 1997. I don't know why he decided there needed to be singing puppets in Jabba's palace, but I distinctly remember mass suicides taking place at the drive in theater where I saw the whole Special Edition trilogy back in the day.jim_shorts
There were singing puppets at Jabba's Palace in the original release of ROTJ. The 1997 rerelease replaced them with CGI.
Yeah, but the scene's tone was completely changed in the re-release. It wen from looking like a dingy hell hole to being a cartoony, wacky song that totally derails the movie. To this day I have to skip that scene.i always skip that part tooBut I thought the 1% was supposed to be greedy and evil?
Jacobistheman
Oh you mean charity donation which every rich person can afford to easily do is somehow making up for slave labor, mistreatment of workers, and abuse of illegal immigrants. Woah wait a second, they also get tax cuts when donating to nonprofit organizations? Well who woulda thought? And they get good reputation while doing it? Tell me about it.
WEAK. Try again buddy oh
He already has a shìtrillion dollars that he made with all the movies, merchandise, extended media, etc, so he figured he didn't needed this, probably.
Still, Good for him and the kids. He may have no directing ability whatsoever but he's not a heartless a-hole.
Well, he's still sitting on about 1.5 billion in cash so could easily donate all of it. It was intention to give away his stuff at death anyway.Well, he got 4.02 billion
Even if he gave half of it, he still has 2.01 billion.
supa_badman
Lucasfilm seemed grossly undervalued quite frankly (Disney will make back their money before the trilogy is even finished) so the sale seems to be Lucas simply losing interest in the business and making sure he stays immortalized with the best option - Disney.
Yeah, but the scene's tone was completely changed in the re-release. It wen from looking like a dingy hell hole to being a cartoony, wacky song that totally derails the movie. To this day I have to skip that scene.i always skip that part too[QUOTE="jim_shorts"][QUOTE="m0zart"]
There were singing puppets at Jabba's Palace in the original release of ROTJ. The 1997 rerelease replaced them with CGI.
iwilson1296
that's why I only ever watch the unaltered originals. i don't give half a sh!t about the picture and sound quality. VHS was good enough in the 90s, and it's good enough now. Plus, I also have digital copies that look as good as you could expect them to look.
i always skip that part too[QUOTE="iwilson1296"]
[QUOTE="jim_shorts"]Yeah, but the scene's tone was completely changed in the re-release. It wen from looking like a dingy hell hole to being a cartoony, wacky song that totally derails the movie. To this day I have to skip that scene.chunkowookie
that's why I only ever watch the unaltered originals. i don't give half a sh!t about the picture and sound quality. VHS was good enough in the 90s, and it's good enough now. Plus, I also have digital copies that look as good as you could expect them to look.
Are you referring to the "desaturized" versions? ...the only real concrete positive out of the Disney deal is that we will eventually get the originals restored properly. I'd say probably the holiday before the summer of episode7, or maybe even sooner.[QUOTE="chunkowookie"][QUOTE="iwilson1296"]i always skip that part too
Heirren
that's why I only ever watch the unaltered originals. i don't give half a sh!t about the picture and sound quality. VHS was good enough in the 90s, and it's good enough now. Plus, I also have digital copies that look as good as you could expect them to look.
Are you referring to the "desaturized" versions? ...the only real concrete positive out of the Disney deal is that we will eventually get the originals restored properly. I'd say probably the holiday before the summer of episode7, or maybe even sooner.Man i hope soSpoken like a true termite of society.He is still a stupid, ugly, fat, evil, gross, gay piece of fvcking sh!!te.
coolbeans90
[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]Spoken like a true termite of society.no uHe is still a stupid, ugly, fat, evil, gross, gay piece of fvcking sh!!te.
Heirren
Good for him. He may have dropped the ball with a few of his movies, but that doesn't make him any less a great person.
He is still a stupid, ugly, fat, evil, gross, gay piece of fvcking sh!!te.
coolbeans90
2/10
I find it interesting that none of his kids, (he has two boys and two girls), wanted to, or expressed an interest in possibly taking over one of his companies? He could have kept one and sold the rest. Even if the kid had to eventually go to business school, get an MBA or whatever, it seems like it would be interesting to try at least. Who wouldnt want to take a shot at running Lucasfilm, or ILM? AllicrombiePerhaps they want to try and make their own unique mark on the world. It's not a selfish thought--and it's not like they'll ever run out of money to try different things.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment