Can Someone Truly Be Straight After Doing a Gay Sex Scene?

  • 110 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

#1 Posted by BluRayHiDef (10839 posts) -

I'm watching "Kill Your Darlings," starring Daniel Radcliffe and Dane DeHaan. The film is about two Columbia college students and their literary and sexual adventures, as well as the surrounding drama. This film includes a sex scene between Daniel's character and another male character (not DeHaan). After seeing this scene - that is, after seeing Daniel's legs spread wide and pressed up backwards as another man enters him, - I can't think of Daniel as a straight man. How can someone be straight after doing such a graphic, homosexual scene?

#2 Edited by jasean79 (2375 posts) -

If the money is right..

#3 Edited by toast_burner (22022 posts) -

It's called acting.

#4 Edited by thegerg (15655 posts) -

Yes. A person's job (in this case, acting) has no bearing on their sexuality.

#5 Edited by jasean79 (2375 posts) -

@thegerg said:

Yes. A person'd job (in this case, acting) has no bearing on their sexuality.

*person's

#6 Edited by Ariabed (1190 posts) -

Did you see him get penetrated, was his little willy hard, if not then he was just acting. Funny that

#7 Edited by indzman (18948 posts) -

@toast_burner said:

It's called acting.

#8 Posted by Korvus (4751 posts) -

@toast_burner said:

It's called acting.

Nothing to add.

#9 Edited by always_explicit (2973 posts) -

I guess its just like asking someone if they are a vegetarian after that beef burger you saw them chow down at work.

Yes they are still a vegetarian...but there was always that one time you saw them choke on that meaty treat.

In all seriousness though...there is no topic here. He is an actor. Acting. It has no baring on his sexual preference. Although it may have a negative impact on the way other people are attracted to him.

#10 Posted by BluRayHiDef (10839 posts) -

@always_explicit said:

I guess its just like asking someone if they are a vegetarian after that beef burger you saw them chow down at work.

Yes they are still a vegetarian...but there was always that one time you saw them choke on that meaty treat.

In all seriousness though...there is no topic here. He is an actor. Acting. It has no baring on his sexual preference. Although it may have a negative impact on the way other people are attracted to him.

I can't look at him the same anymore.

#11 Edited by jasean79 (2375 posts) -

@BluRayHiDef said:

@always_explicit said:

I guess its just like asking someone if they are a vegetarian after that beef burger you saw them chow down at work.

Yes they are still a vegetarian...but there was always that one time you saw them choke on that meaty treat.

In all seriousness though...there is no topic here. He is an actor. Acting. It has no baring on his sexual preference. Although it may have a negative impact on the way other people are attracted to him.

I can't look at him the same anymore.

But you knew what the movie was about before watching...right? So, on some level you had to expect a scene of this nature.

#12 Posted by BluRayHiDef (10839 posts) -

@jasean79 said:

@BluRayHiDef said:

@always_explicit said:

I guess its just like asking someone if they are a vegetarian after that beef burger you saw them chow down at work.

Yes they are still a vegetarian...but there was always that one time you saw them choke on that meaty treat.

In all seriousness though...there is no topic here. He is an actor. Acting. It has no baring on his sexual preference. Although it may have a negative impact on the way other people are attracted to him.

I can't look at him the same anymore.

But you knew what the movie was about before watching...right? So, on some level you had to expect a scene of this nature.

No. I did not know about the sexual aspect prior to watching the film.

#13 Edited by Korvus (4751 posts) -

@BluRayHiDef said:

I can't look at him the same anymore.

And how exactly did you look at him?

Do you now think he's gay? And if so, does it matter to you if he is?

#14 Posted by BluRayHiDef (10839 posts) -

@korvus said:

@BluRayHiDef said:

I can't look at him the same anymore.

And how exactly did you look at him?

Do you now think he's gay? And if so, does it matter to you if he is?

It's not just the sexual aspect of the scene, but the look of vulnerability in his eyes as he was being FUCKED. He was so feminine.

#15 Posted by Korvus (4751 posts) -

@BluRayHiDef: And what's the problem with that?

#16 Posted by thegerg (15655 posts) -

@BluRayHiDef said:

@korvus said:

@BluRayHiDef said:

I can't look at him the same anymore.

And how exactly did you look at him?

Do you now think he's gay? And if so, does it matter to you if he is?

It's not just the sexual aspect of the scene, but the look of vulnerability in his eyes as he was being FUCKED. He was so feminine.

New question: Can BluRay really be straight if he's so intrigued by looking into another man's eyes as he's being FUCKED?

#17 Posted by jasean79 (2375 posts) -

@BluRayHiDef said:

@korvus said:

@BluRayHiDef said:

I can't look at him the same anymore.

And how exactly did you look at him?

Do you now think he's gay? And if so, does it matter to you if he is?

It's not just the sexual aspect of the scene, but the look of vulnerability in his eyes as he was being FUCKED. He was so feminine.

So he acted the part really well then? I'm not seeing the issue here.

#18 Edited by BluRayHiDef (10839 posts) -

@thegerg said:

@BluRayHiDef said:

@korvus said:

@BluRayHiDef said:

I can't look at him the same anymore.

And how exactly did you look at him?

Do you now think he's gay? And if so, does it matter to you if he is?

It's not just the sexual aspect of the scene, but the look of vulnerability in his eyes as he was being FUCKED. He was so feminine.

New question: Can BluRay really be straight if he's so intrigued by looking into another man's eyes as he's being FUCKED?

Oh, stop it, Greg. Anyhow, you guys, I just found the scene to be weird/ awkward.

#19 Posted by Korvus (4751 posts) -

@BluRayHiDef: We understand that. I think we're just trying to understand why the sight of an actor playing a vulnerable gay character changes the way you look at the actor.

#20 Posted by jasean79 (2375 posts) -

@BluRayHiDef:

How about the reverse? Like, if a gay guy/girl does a hetero sex scene...is it still hard for you to believe that they're gay?

#21 Posted by Korvus (4751 posts) -

@jasean79 said:

@BluRayHiDef:

How about the reverse? Like, if a gay guy/girl does a hetero sex scene...is it still hard for you to believe that they're gay?

I like that question too. Well done =)

#22 Posted by thegerg (15655 posts) -

@BluRayHiDef said:

@thegerg said:

@BluRayHiDef said:

@korvus said:

@BluRayHiDef said:

I can't look at him the same anymore.

And how exactly did you look at him?

Do you now think he's gay? And if so, does it matter to you if he is?

It's not just the sexual aspect of the scene, but the look of vulnerability in his eyes as he was being FUCKED. He was so feminine.

New question: Can BluRay really be straight if he's so intrigued by looking into another man's eyes as he's being FUCKED?

Oh, stop it, Greg. Anyhow, you guys, I just found the scene to be weird/ awkward.

I'm just saying, you seem to be looking into the whole thing in a strangely deep manner. It's as if you don't understand what sexuality is, or you can't separate fiction from reality.

#23 Edited by Master_Live (15116 posts) -
  1. Use the spoiler feature.
  2. After such an emotional and psychological draining scene his true self was exposed and he will slowly accept it eventually. He is gay now.
#24 Posted by magicalclick (23034 posts) -

I didn't cared to watch the film until you promoted the gay sex scene in such erotic details. Good job.

#25 Posted by Korvus (4751 posts) -

@Master_Live said:
  1. Use the spoiler feature.
  2. After such a emotional and psychological draining scene his true self was exposed and he will slowly accept it eventually. He is gay now.

Now I understand why nobody in Hollywood is monogamous anymore!

#26 Edited by BluRayHiDef (10839 posts) -

@magicalclick said:

I didn't cared to watch the film until you promoted the gay sex scene in such erotic details. Good job.

LMAO.

#27 Edited by jasean79 (2375 posts) -

@Master_Live said:

After such a emotional and psychological draining scene his true self was exposed and he will slowly accept it eventually. He is gay now.

#28 Edited by BluRayHiDef (10839 posts) -

@Master_Live said:
  1. Use the spoiler feature.
  2. After such a emotional and psychological draining scene his true self was exposed and he will slowly accept it eventually. He is gay now.

Are you joking or are you serious?

#29 Posted by Wilfred_Owen (20895 posts) -

The thrusts, quick or slow?

#30 Edited by Senor_Kami (8437 posts) -

It depends on how graphic it is. If it's just some essentially PG-13 stuff with cutaways and just kissing, I could buy that. The scene you described seems pretty extreme though. Male-Female ones aren't usually that graphic outside of pornography. You could still be straight I guess. I'm not buying it, but it's not impossible.

#31 Posted by Korvus (4751 posts) -

@Senor_Kami: I just Youtube'd the scene. It's not graphical at all.

#32 Edited by GazaAli (23279 posts) -

The moneymaker has no associations or affiliations of any sort. He goes where the money instructs him to go. Today he is a Christian and tomorrow he is an atheist. He is heterosexual, homosexual and bisexual all at the same time. He is an all-in-one socialist, capitalist and communist. So if I were you TC I really wouldn't give this much thought.

#33 Posted by BluRayHiDef (10839 posts) -

@GazaAli said:

The moneymaker has no associations or affiliations of any sort. He goes where the money instructs him to go. Today he is a Christian and tomorrow he is an atheist. He is heterosexual, homosexual and bisexual all at the same time. He is an all-in-one socialist, capitalist and communist. So if I were you TC I really wouldn't give this much thought.

Are you saying that he's just a whore?

#34 Edited by comp_atkins (31608 posts) -

@BluRayHiDef said:

@always_explicit said:

I guess its just like asking someone if they are a vegetarian after that beef burger you saw them chow down at work.

Yes they are still a vegetarian...but there was always that one time you saw them choke on that meaty treat.

In all seriousness though...there is no topic here. He is an actor. Acting. It has no baring on his sexual preference. Although it may have a negative impact on the way other people are attracted to him.

I can't look at him the same anymore.

that sounds like your issue, not the actor's

#35 Edited by VaguelyTagged (10258 posts) -

the only question i got is that how in the freakin' hell could someone fuck Daniel Radcliffe? he's fugly. no wonder there has been something in his eyes the moment he was being done, it's been an once in a lifetime experience for him.

#36 Edited by BluRayHiDef (10839 posts) -

@comp_atkins said:

@BluRayHiDef said:

@always_explicit said:

I guess its just like asking someone if they are a vegetarian after that beef burger you saw them chow down at work.

Yes they are still a vegetarian...but there was always that one time you saw them choke on that meaty treat.

In all seriousness though...there is no topic here. He is an actor. Acting. It has no baring on his sexual preference. Although it may have a negative impact on the way other people are attracted to him.

I can't look at him the same anymore.

that sounds like your issue, not the actor's

Oh, please. Take your political correctness and be gone. Are you even a real Human being?

#37 Edited by sammyjenkis898 (28155 posts) -

#38 Edited by BluRayHiDef (10839 posts) -

@sammyjenkis898 said:

This is acceptable because they're female.

#39 Edited by Korvus (4751 posts) -

@BluRayHiDef: I'm still trying to figure out if you are against gay people, against supposedly straight guys playing gay roles or neither.

#40 Edited by sammyjenkis898 (28155 posts) -

@BluRayHiDef said:

@sammyjenkis898 said:

This is acceptable because they're female.

What?

#41 Posted by comp_atkins (31608 posts) -

@BluRayHiDef said:

@comp_atkins said:

@BluRayHiDef said:

@always_explicit said:

I guess its just like asking someone if they are a vegetarian after that beef burger you saw them chow down at work.

Yes they are still a vegetarian...but there was always that one time you saw them choke on that meaty treat.

In all seriousness though...there is no topic here. He is an actor. Acting. It has no baring on his sexual preference. Although it may have a negative impact on the way other people are attracted to him.

I can't look at him the same anymore.

that sounds like your issue, not the actor's

Oh, please. Take your political correctness and be gone. Are you even a real Human being?

i'm 60% human

#42 Edited by alim298 (1699 posts) -

Yes because apparently your sexual orientation unlike 99 percent of your other mental traits is "unchangeable." You're stuck with it "forever."

#43 Posted by wis3boi (31592 posts) -

@BluRayHiDef said:

@thegerg said:

@BluRayHiDef said:

@korvus said:

@BluRayHiDef said:

I can't look at him the same anymore.

And how exactly did you look at him?

Do you now think he's gay? And if so, does it matter to you if he is?

It's not just the sexual aspect of the scene, but the look of vulnerability in his eyes as he was being FUCKED. He was so feminine.

New question: Can BluRay really be straight if he's so intrigued by looking into another man's eyes as he's being FUCKED?

Oh, stop it, Greg. Anyhow, you guys, I just found the scene to be weird/ awkward.

I read this post with a stereotypical gay lisp. The thread is now complete.

#44 Posted by Korvus (4751 posts) -

@wis3boi: We can all go home now.

#45 Posted by BluRayHiDef (10839 posts) -

@korvus said:

@BluRayHiDef: I'm still trying to figure out if you are against gay people, against supposedly straight guys playing gay roles or neither.

I think that it's okay for people to engage in whatever behavior they want to so as long as it has no negative affects on those not involved. Hence, I think it's okay for people to engage in homosexual behavior. However, I still think homosexuality is weird/ strange, particularly among men. The sight of homosexual behavior between males makes me cringe. I can understand if you're offended and/ or puzzled by my opinion, but I can't help how I feel.

#46 Posted by GazaAli (23279 posts) -

@BluRayHiDef said:

@GazaAli said:

The moneymaker has no associations or affiliations of any sort. He goes where the money instructs him to go. Today he is a Christian and tomorrow he is an atheist. He is heterosexual, homosexual and bisexual all at the same time. He is an all-in-one socialist, capitalist and communist. So if I were you TC I really wouldn't give this much thought.

Are you saying that he's just a whore?

I'm saying that he's most likely a money whore yes.

#47 Posted by LordQuorthon (5360 posts) -

Stop making threads. Even the Internet, dumb as it is, deserves better than this.

#48 Posted by Korvus (4751 posts) -

@BluRayHiDef said:

@korvus said:

@BluRayHiDef: I'm still trying to figure out if you are against gay people, against supposedly straight guys playing gay roles or neither.

I think that it's okay for people to engage in whatever behavior they want to so as long as it has no negative affects on those not involved. Hence, I think it's okay for people to engage in homosexual behavior. However, I still think homosexuality is weird/ strange, particularly among men. The sight of homosexual behavior between males makes me cringe. I can understand if you're offended and/ or puzzled by my opinion, but I can't help how I feel.

I'm not offended at all, I'm delighted. The same person who keeps saying "Everybody discriminates against me based on the way I look" (probably the person who complains about discrimination the most on these forums) is saying he cringes at the sight of homosexual behaviour. It is the sweet irony I came to expect from this place.

#49 Edited by BluRayHiDef (10839 posts) -

@korvus said:

@BluRayHiDef said:

@korvus said:

@BluRayHiDef: I'm still trying to figure out if you are against gay people, against supposedly straight guys playing gay roles or neither.

I think that it's okay for people to engage in whatever behavior they want to so as long as it has no negative affects on those not involved. Hence, I think it's okay for people to engage in homosexual behavior. However, I still think homosexuality is weird/ strange, particularly among men. The sight of homosexual behavior between males makes me cringe. I can understand if you're offended and/ or puzzled by my opinion, but I can't help how I feel.

I'm not offended at all, I'm delighted. The same person who keeps saying "Everybody discriminates against me based on the way I look" (probably the person who complains about discrimination the most on these forums) is saying he cringes at the sight of homosexual behavior. It is the sweet irony I came to expect from this place.

I was being hyperbolic; I don't literally cringe when I see homosexuality among men, but I am "weirded out" by it. However, I don't emote in anyway that would suggest how I feel.

#50 Posted by Korvus (4751 posts) -

@BluRayHiDef: So your complaint was not that people are prejudiced against you, but that they don't bother hiding it? Guess I misunderstood.