@gamerguru100 said:
Damn it, Geezer. Why is your logic always so addicting? :P
Don't get me wrong...I'm sure that the 21st century sucks for some people in some places. But that'd probably be more along the lines of "some corrupt regime started genocide against my people in the 21st century" and less along the lines of "art sucks today."
For starters, if my rant about how the 21st century sucks is almost entirely revolved around art, then things are pretty fucking good. It wasn't that long ago that sanitation, painkillers, vaccines, running water, and indoor heating/cooling were either nonexistent or only available to the wealthy. Most countries have MOSTLY eliminated things like genocide and slavery. Violent crime is down and civil rights are at an all time high. THAT should be enough to make this the best damn time to be alive without even bringing art into the equation. Don't get me wrong, I love art. But I am MORE in love with people not starving or getting slaughtered for their race/religion/etc. Great music is awesome, but what's even MORE awesome is not dying horribly from easily preventable diseases.
And secondly, art today is fucking awesome. Do you know why? Because more people have the capability to make art. The internet is one of the absolute greatest things to happen to art, if for no other reason than that now it gives artists a voice. Before, you could make your art and chances are that no one within a mile of you is ever gonna see or hear it. By contrast, someone in the USA today can post their art on the internet and within 24 hours have people from Germany and Brazil and Japan looking at that shit. That is amazing as all ****. And yet some people gripe about that. And it boggles my fucking mind, man. I mean, HOW is that a bad thing? The only thing that seems to make sense is that it comes from a place of elitism. As in, "I like what I like, and the entire art community should cater to MY likes. It is beneath me to see someone making BAD art, so art should remain accessible to the few and privileged so that we don't have the dirty common man having his say." And I say "**** that" to that kind of snooty hoity toity nonsense. **** that sense of entitlement that art is only for the talented and not for the common man. That attitude actually PREVENTS great art from being made. The same accessibilty to art that allows bad art to be popular is the same accessability to art that lets good artists have a chance when in any other time period they wouldn't have had the opportunity to set their foot within the door. A shitload of talented artists today never would have had a fucking chance if not having had the luck of living right now, and their talents would have gone wasted. If the increased opportunity to have access to the creation of art results in some shitty art, that's a VERY small price to pay for all of the talented artists who otherwise never would have gotten a chance. Art today is fucking awesome if for no other reason than that nearly EVERYONE now has the means to be an artist if they want to be one.
Log in to comment