@ANIMEguy10034 said:
@MirkoS77 said:
Even if Iwata puts out a plan that makes complete sense as to where the market is and where it's going, planning for it and being able to take action to change are two completely different things. Iwata is admitting to things and says change is coming, that's great. He also has been saying each gen since the GCN how Nintendo failed to maintain momentum due to software droughts, apologized, that they've learnt their lesson, and that each new gen wouldn't suffer from exactly the same issue again and again.......and yet, they continue to happen after his "promises".....again and again. On what basis do people hold faith that this same man that has been unable to rectify this problem for generations now can recover Nintendo from the position it's currently in?
Iwata has a proven track record that he is either a) lying, or b) is incapable of doing what he says he will. Frankly, I don't want a CEO that does either.
On a more important note, I also want a CEO who is aggressive. Who doesn't hold such defeatist views as "we aren't good at competing", "we aim to be everyone's second console choice", and "no one wants online". It's like every word that comes out of his mouth is either some excuse, apology, or an observation of an area that Nintendo lacks in, yet nothing is ever seemingly done about it. Iwata does not have that aggressive, go-get 'em drive to lead Nintendo in this day and age. He's passive, there's no feeling of drive behind the company at all. Look no further than Steve Jobs to see how much attitude matters. That guy was apparently a serious asshole as CEO, but he was a hard-ass visionary. After he bought his way back into Apple and became CEO again, he took no time in cleaning up that company and saving it when it was mere months away from filing for bankruptcy and turned it into one of the most profitable companies on the planet. And it wasn't done by being a nice guy....
And that's Iwata's problem. He's too nice. And nice guys make terrible CEOs.
The thing is, Nintendo would have been screwed regardless. Hiroshi Yamauchi, former Nintendo CEO, picked Iwata because Iwata was the best man they had for the job. The best man for the job was not a business man, he was a video game developer, chosen by the CEO who made Nintendo a huge hit during the NES days. Let that sink in.
I admit that he's not the best CEO in the world. I also admit that he really doesn't know how to handle console launches, but I still give him credit for turning the tides and making the DS, Wii and 3DS into a success. Especially the 3DS considering how rough its first year was. We really have to wonder where Nintendo would be right now if Yamauchi chose the second best in the company. If Iwata were to drop his position, who will they choose as next CEO? Can they find an "ideal" CEO who's aggressive but gets stuff done? Would a new CEO be a repeat of Iwata?
Yamauchi was mistaken. The best man for the job was not a game developer, that much is painfully obvious now. I've never quite understood how people automatically equate being a great game developer into being a great CEO. Just because someone directs amazing films for 20th Century Fox does not automatically give them all the necessary business acumen to preside over a multi-billion dollar corporation. You ever see that show Restaurant Impossible? These fucking idiots begin business because they've come to believe that being able to cook a decent home meal suddenly gives them the necessary foundation to run a business, and then they are all completely bewildered when it starts crumbling around them. Business schools exists for a reason. In fact, the business and creative minded are oftentimes in HUGE conflict with one another.
And again, that does not even take into account attitude which I find hugely important to be successful in such a competitive environment. You just can't hold attitudes like, "we're not good at competing" and "we aim to be 2nd place" when you're a CEO. FFS, could you imagine Yamauchi ever saying such things? Is it any wonder Nintendo is in the place it's in with such outlooks?
Tbh, I really don't give much credit to Iwata for the handhelds (and I'm now 100% convinced the Wii was a fluke). That's been a market they've held a monopoly on long before Iwata came to power, much of their 3rd party relations have already been well established (and are there because many don't have a choice as there's really been no competition). And sure, Iwata turned the 3DS around. Who was the one that fumbled the launch in the first place? Oh, that's right......Iwata. And to get it back on track, he pulled all developmental resources off of Wii U games and allowed it to sit dead in the water for months and months and months, until here we sit a year later when Nintendo has to cut its forecasts by seventy percent and posted a loss of 200+ million along with a third year of consecutive losses. That's what sinks in to me. You cannot take the 3DS's recovery into account without also taking the hugely detrimental impact it had on the Wii U, and Nintendo as a whole, into account as well.
This is not to mention that, while the 3DS is now performing decent on its own (but still much worse than the DS), it is on the downswing. Mobile is encroaching further and further into this market, Iwata has done nothing to address this, simply taking a "wait and see" approach when he should have had the foresight years ago to see the threat this market would present and take actions. Now handhelds, one of Nintendo's guaranteed fallbacks, is on unsure ground and only is it just now that steps may be taken.
I'm sorry, but Iwata has to go and the management needs a MASSIVE shake-up and infusion of fresh blood. I don't know who would replace him, but just because I can't name someone doesn't mean someone doesn't exist and that it'd be wrong to give them a shot. I really feel each day Iwata remains as CEO he is damaging Nintendo further. I just hope something is done before it's too late.
Log in to comment