Teaser quote, it wets the appetite to read on --
After Page outlined his vision for the future of Google, Lessin added that "privately, executives were quick to call the company a 'bully' and to plot ways to counter Google's growing power."
Tizen. It's something we've talked about here, and something that most scoffed at. Tizen is an operating system that would be largely controlled by Samsung in the way Apple controls iOS. (Samsung has flattered Apple on so many occasions it's become quite the embarrassment for any educated observer)
Think about Samsung's mission with Tizen. What a ridiculous notion, that a company with wealth, power, privilege, and resources like Samsung would attempt to differentiate their products from those of their competition. Samsung understands that android is no longer special. So why not employ some of those resources to make something different?
Google does not approve of Samsung using android as an open platform. (The breakdown of this pay to view article -- for those of who you do not pay -- is shared by AppleInsider)
Reports of contention between Google and Samsung are not new, but increasing hostility between the two companies were clearly evident at the recent Allen & Co. meeting of tech and media industry luminaries recently held in Sun Valley, according to a report by The Information written by Jessica Lessin.
In particular, the report described a "tense private meeting" at the event between Google's chief executive Larry Page and Samsung vice chairman Jay Y. Lee. The meeting involved Samsung's smartwatch strategy, which is currently focused primarily on Tizen and a heavily customized Android fork, rather than Google's official Android Wear.
"Right before Samsung launched its first Gear watch last fall," Lessin wrote, "Google objected to how it planned to brand the device, since it was running a very heavily modified version of Android, according to people familiar with the matter. Google had wanted Samsung to wait to release the Gear until its new version of Android for wearables, Android Wear, was ready. But Samsung pushed ahead."Credit AppleInsider
This is nothing new. But now it's uglier than before, and Google is doing quite a bit more bullying than before, and Samsung is less cooperative than ever. Want to know why?
At the beginning of this year, Google's head of Android Sundar Pichai demanded Samsung drop its new "Magazine UX" tablet interface, with The Information later reporting that Pichai was "prepared to forbid" Samsung from using Google's ostensibly open Android operating system unless Samsung surrendered more control to Google.
There's more in that AppleInsider article that most people either have never read and understood or have chosen to ignore. It's damning stuff.
I don't know what Google is expecting companies to do. They failed spectacularly to produce compelling android hardware of their own (to the tune of multiple BILLIONS of dollars) and are now expecting everyone else, regardless of who is making it, to bow to their whim so that they have a snowball's chance in hell of creating an android ecosystem that holds even the slightest party light candle to that of Apple's magnanimous, increasingly succinct ecosystem.
Google's Apple flattering attempt to create an advertising portal through which they can make money off of people willing to purchase devices powered by that very software is in trouble, and I'm certain they know it.
Log in to comment