Yes I think it can rival them but its not exactly open world like those games are. RDR and GTA put you in a sandbox and tell you to go play. MGS is more like different sandboxes. You have a mission in Afghanistan so you fly to Afghanistan and you're dropped in an "open world" (so a small portion of Afghanistan, say a military base or something) and you're told you have X and Y missions to complete and along the way there's a bunch of side stuff you can do. Then you move on to Iraq or Zimbabwe or whatever. I think MGS can compete on quality because the games have proven that much already but it wont necessarily be a direct comparison. It'll be more like RDR was awesome. MGS was awesome.
Im I the only one who thinks that, in spite of RDR was a great game, that open world felt totally empty? Envioronment and animlas where cool but not too much to do anyway..
O yeah. Surely is going to be better. It will surely beat Read Dead or GTA. This open world gameplay can be seen from Metal Gear Solid: Peace Walker and then to
Metal Gear Solid: Ground Zeroes and Ground Zeroes is not the full complete game.
Log in to comment